Economía Circular y Sostenibilidad Social: Una aproximación transdisciplinar al sector de la automoción en el País Vasco
Circular Economy and Social Sustainability: A Transdisciplinary Approach to the Basque Country´s automotive sector
Agencias de apoyo
- Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities (Ref: PID2019-107822RB-I00)
- Basque Government (Ref: IT1679-22)
- Vice-rector of the UPV/EHU-Gipuzkoa Campus/ Provincial Government of Gipuzkoa (Ref: P7-L4)
Resumen
Este artículo contribuye al debate sobre la economía circular (EC) a través de la comprensión de cómo este concepto se construye y se vincula al triple eje de la sostenibilidad. Pretendemos observar si la forma en que el término es definido por los académicos coincide con las definiciones y el discurso que emanan de los actores implicados en nuestro análisis. Basándonos en el marco de Investigación e Innovación Responsables, mantuvimos dos reuniones con actores del sector de la automoción del País Vasco. Los resultados reflejan que no existe una única forma de entender el concepto, ni entre los agentes estudiados ni en la literatura académica, ya que, aunque existen muchas concordancias, han surgido diversas discrepancias. Sin embargo, sí se observa un patrón general, en el sentido de que el eje social de la sostenibilidad se encuentra arrinconado, mientras que el eje medioambiental y económico se sitúan en el centro del concepto de EC.
Descargas
Citas
ACEA – European Automobile Manufacturers' Association - (2020). Economic and Market Report. EU Automotive Industry Full‐year 2019. Available at https://www.acea.be/uploads/statistic_documents/Economic_and_Market_Report_full-year_2019.pdf.
Bauwens, T., Hekkert, M., & Kirchherr, J. (2020). Circular futures: What Will They Look Like? Ecological Economics, 175, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106703
Blum, N.U., Haupt, M., & Bening, C.R. (2020). Why « Circular » doesn´t always mean « Sustianble ». Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 162, 105042. https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000426900
Boiral, O. (2004). Du développement durable aux normes ISO: peut-on certifier la "bonne conduite" des entreprises?. Revue Internationale de Droit et Politique du Développement Durable, 2, 2, 91-114.
Calisto Friant, C. M., Vermeulen, W.J.V., & Salomone, R. (2020). A typology of circular economy discourses: Navigating the diverse visions of a contested paradigm. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 161, 104917. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104917
Club of Rome (2009). A New Path for World Development. Club of Rome International secretariat, Suiza. Available at http://www.clubofrome.org.
Clube, R.K.M., & Tennant, M. (2020). The Circular Economy and human needs satisfaction: Promising the radical, delivering the familiar. Ecological Economics, 177, 106772. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106772
Dai, Q., Shin, E., & Smith, C. (2018). Open and inclusive collaboration in science: A framework. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers 2018/07.
De Jesus, A., & Mendonça, S. (2018). Lost in Transition? Drivers and Barriers in the Eco-innovation Road to the Circular Economy. Ecological Economics, 145, 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001
Despeisse, M., Kishita, Y., Nakano, M., & Barwood, M. (2015). Towards a Circular Economy for End-of-Life Vehicles: A Comparative Study UK – Japan. Procedia The 22nd CIRP Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 29, 668-673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.122.
DFG_Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (2020). Plan de gestión Etorkizuna Eraikiz 2020. https://www.gipuzkoa.eus/es/web/multimedia/-/etorkizuna-eraikiz-kudeaketa-plana
DFG_Diputación Foral de Gipuzkoa (2020). Plan de gestión Etorkizuna Eraikiz 2020. https://www.gipuzkoa.eus/es/web/multimedia/-/etorkizuna-eraikiz-kudeaketa-plana.
Dzhengiz, T., Miller, E. M., Ovaska, J. and Patala, S. (2023). Un- packing the circular economy: A problematizing review. International Journal of Management Reviews. ISSN 1460-8545. Downloaded from: https://e-space.mmu.ac.uk/631342/. Published Version, Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12329.
EC -European Commission- (2013). Special Eurobarometer 401: Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI), Science and Technology. Brussels: European Commission. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/Survey/getSurveyDetail/instruments/SPECIAL/surveyKy/1096.
EC -European Commission- (2015). Closing the loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy COM (2015) 614 final. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2015/EN/1-2015-614-EN-F1-1.PDF.
EC -European Commission- (2020). A new Circular Economy Action Plan For a cleaner and more competitive Europe COM (2020) 98 final. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/transparency/documents-register/detail?ref=COM(2020)98&lang=es.
EEA –European Environmental Agency- (2019). Paving the way for a circular economy: insights on status and potentials. EEA Report No 11/2019. Available at https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/circular-economy-in-europe-insights.
Eguren, J.A., Justel, D., Iriarte, I., & Esnaola, A. (2018). Opportunities and incentives for Remanufacturing in the Basque Country. Procedia CIRP, 73, 253–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2018.04.081
EMAF –Ellen MacArthur Foundation- (2012). Towards the circular economy. Available at https://www.aquafil.com/assets/uploads/ellen-macarthur-foundation.pdf
EU -European Union- (2014). Responsible research and innovation. Europe's ability to respond to societal challenges. Available at https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/2be36f74-b490-409e-bb60-12fd438100fe
Euroscience (2014). Euroscientist special issue on RRI. Why develop a toolkit for RRI? EuroScientist, Strasbourg. Available at https://www.euroscientist.com/develop-toolkit-rri/.
EUSH -EU Science Hub- (2019). Sustainable production and consumption. The European Commission´s science and knowledge service. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/research-topic/sustainable-production-and-consumption. Accessed 02/12/2019. Last update: 13/12/2018.
Farel, R., Yannou, B., & Bertoluci, G. (2013). Finding best practices for automotive glazing recycling: a network optimization model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 52, 446-461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.02.022.
Figge, F., Thorpe, A., & Gutberlet, M. (2023). Definitions of the Circular Economy-Circularity Matters. Ecological Economics, 208, 107823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2023.107823
Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: Pittman.
Froelich, D., Haoues, N., Leroy, Y., & Renard, H. (2007). Development of a new methodology to integrate ELV treatment limits into requirements for metal automotive part design. Minerals Engineering, 20, 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2007.04.019
García, I. (2006). El método cualitativo aplicado a la investigación medioambiental: grupos de discusión y entrevistas. En L. Camarero (Coord.), Medio ambiente y sociedad. Elementos de Explicación Sociológica (173-213). Madrid, España: Thomson.
Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N., & Hultink, E.J. (2017). The Circular Economy - A New Sustainability Paradigm?, Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048.
Genovese, A. & Pansera, M. (2019). The Circular Economy at a crossroad: Technocratic Eco-Modernism or Convivial Technology for Social Revolution? Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3459180 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3459180.
Ghisellini, P., Cialani, C., & Ulgiati, S. (2016). A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems, Journal of Cleaner Production, 114, 11-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007
Gil-Lamata, M., & Latorre-Martínez, M.P. (2022). The Circular Economy and Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review, Management Letters / Cuadernos de Gestión, 22(1), 129-142. https://doi.org/10.5295/CDG.211492MG
Government of Spain (2020). Plan de impulse de la cadena de valor de la industria de la automoción. Hacia una movilidad sostenible. https://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/.
Government of the Basque Country (2022). Plan de Inversiones Estratégicas de Euskadi 2022-2024. Available at URL: https://www.bizkaia.eus/home2/Archivos/DPTO1/Noticias/PDF/514736145_202203301701028071405_22520.pdf?hash=430c9a6ccb4b3ffe054792849306533b.
Govidan, K., & Hasanagic, M. (2018). A systematic review on drivers, barriers, and practices towards circular economy: a supply chain perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 56, 1-2, 278-311. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141.
Goyal, S., Chauhan, S., & Mishra, P. (2021). Circular economy research: A bibliometric analysis (2000-2019) and future research insights. Journal of Cleaner Production, 287, 125011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125011
Hedberg, A., Sipka, S., & Bjerkem, J. (2019). Creating a digital roadmap for a circular economy. Discussion Paper, Sustainable Prosperity for Europe Programme. European Policy Centre. Available at https://wms.flexious.be/editor/plugins/imagemanager/content/2140/PDF/2019/pub_difital_roadmap_for_circular_economy.pdf.
Hill, S.F. (2015). The circular economy: from waste to resource stewardship, part I. Waste and Resource Management, 168, 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1680/warm.14.00003
Homrich, A.S., Galvao, G., Abadia, L.G., & Carvalho, M.M. (2018). The circular economy umbrella: Trends and gaps on integrating pathways. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 525-543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.064.
Iacovidou, E., Hahladakis, J.N., & Purnell, P. (2021). A systems thinking approach to understanding the challenges of achieving the circular economy. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28, 24785-24806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11725-9
Ibáñez, J. (2000). Perspectivas de la investigación social: el diseño en las tres perspectivas. En M. García Ferrando, F. R. Alvira Martín, L. E. Alonso Benito, & M. Escobar Mercado, El análisis de la realidad social. Métodos y técnicas de investigación (pp. 57-98). Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.
IHOBE -Sociedad Pública de Gestión Ambiental- (2018). Economía circular en la industria del País Vasco. Diagnóstico. Departamento de Medio Ambiente, Planificación Territorial y Vivienda. Gobierno Vasco. Available at https://www.euskadi.eus/contenidos/informacion/economia_circular/es_def/adjuntos/diagnostico.pdf.
IPCC -International Panel on Climate Change (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report. Available at URL: https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6syr/pdf/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf.
Kirchherr, J., & van Santen, R. (2019). Research on the circular economy: A critique of the field. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 151, 104480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104480.
Kirchherr, J., Piscicelli, L., Bour, R. Kostense-Smit, E., Muller, J. Huibrechtse-Truijens, A., & Hekkert, M. (2018). Barriers to the Circular Economy: Evidence From the European Union (EU). Ecological Economics, 150, 264-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028.
Korhonen, J., Honkasalo, A., & Seppälä, J. (2018a). Circular economy: The Concept and its Limitations. Ecological Economics, 143, 37-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.06.041
Korhonen, J., Nuur, C., Feldmann, A., & Birkie, S.E. (2018b). Circular economy as an essentially contested concept. Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 544-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.111
Leder, N., Kumar M., & Sanchez-Rodrigues, V. (2020). Influential factors for value creation within the Circular Economy: Framework for Waste Valorisation. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 158, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.104804.
Lewandowski, M. (2016). Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework. Sustainability, 8(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010043
Lieder, M., & Rashid, A. (2016). Towards circular economy implementation: a comprehensive review in context of manufacturing industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 115, 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042.
Llena-Macarulla, F., Moneva, J. M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Scarpellini, S. (2023). Reporting measurements or measuring for reporting? Internal measurement of the Circular Economy from an environmental accounting approach and its relationship. Spanish Accounting Review, 26(2), 200-212. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.467751
Meadows, D., Randers, J., & Meadows, D. (2006). Los límites del crecimiento 30 años después. Barcelona, España: Círculo de Lectores.
Mies, A., & Gold, S. (2021). Mapping the social dimension of the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 321, 128960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128960
Millar, N., McLaughlin, E., & Böger, T. (2019). The Circular Economy: Swings and Roundabouts? Ecological Economics, 158, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.12.012
Millet, D., Yvars, P.A., & Tonnelier, P. (2012). A method for identifying the worst recycling case: Application on a range of vehicles in the automotive sector. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 68, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2012.07.002
Moneva, J.M., Scarpellini, S., Aranda-Usón, A., & Alvarez Etxeberria, I. (2022). Sustainability reporting in view of the European sustainable finance taxonomy: Is the financial sector ready to disclose circular economy? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2423.
Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The Circular Economy: An Interdisciplinary Exploration of the Concept and Application in a Global Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2
Okorie, O., Obi, M., Russell, J., Charnley, F., & Salonitis, K. (2021). A triple bottom line examination of product cannibalization and remanufacturing: A review and research agenda. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 958-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.013
Orkestra -Instituto Vasco de Competitividad- (2017). Informe de Competitividad del País Vasco 2017 ¿Y mañana?. Fundación Deusto. Available at https://www.orkestra.deusto.es/images/investigacion/publicaciones/informes/informe-competitividad-pais-vasco/2017-orkestra-informe-competitividad.pdf
Ormazabal, M., Prieto-Sandoval, V., Puga-Leal, R., & Jaca, C. (2018). Circular economy in Spanish SMEs: challenges and opportunities, Journal of Cleaner Production, 185, 157-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.031
Padilla-Rivera, A., Russo-Garrido, S., & Merveille, N. (2020). Addressing the Social Aspects of a Circular Economy: A Systematic Literature Review. Sustainability, 12, 7912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12197912.
Ranta, V., Aarikka-Stenroos, L., Ritala, P., & Mäkinen, S.J. (2018). Exploring institutional drivers and barriers of the circular economy: A coss-regional comparison of China, the US, and Europe. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 135, 70-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.017.
Reike, D., Vermeulen, W.J.V., & Witjes, S. (2018). The circular economy: New or Refurbished as CE 3.0? –Exploring Controversies in the Conceptualization of the Circular Economy through a Focus on history and Resource Value Retention Options. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 135, 246-264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.08.027.
Reuter, M.A., van Schaik, A., Ignatenko, O., & de Haan, G.J. (2006). Fundamental limits for the recycling of end-of-life vehicles. Minerals Engineering, 19, 433-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mineng.2005.08.014
Ritzén, S., & Sandström, G.Ö. (2017). Barriers to the Circular Economy – integration of perspectives and domains. Procedia CIRP, 64, 7-12. The 9th CIRP IPSS Conference: Circular Perspectives on Product/Service-Systems. https://doi.org/10.2016/j.procir.2017.03.005.
Rizos, V., Behrens, A., Kafyeke, T., Hirschnitz-Garbers, M, & Ioannou, A. (2015). The Circular Economy: Barriers and Opportunities for SMEs. CEPS Working Document no.412. Available at https://www.greengrowthknowledge.org/sites/default/files/downloads/resource/GreenEconet_CEPS_SMEs_Circular_Economy.pdf.
Saidani, M., Yannou, B., Leroy, Y., & Cluzel, F. (2018). Heavy vehicles on the road towards the circular economy: Analysis and comparison with the automotive industry. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 135, 108-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.017
Sauvé, S., Bernard, P., & Sloan (2016). Environmental sciences: sustainable development and circular economy: alternative concepts for trans-disciplinary research. Environmental Development, 17, 48-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2015.09.002
Scarpellini, S. (2022). Social impacts of a circular business model: An approach from a sustainability accounting and reporting perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(3), 646-656. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2226
Scarpellini, S., Marín-Vinuesa, L. M., Aranda-Usón, A., & Portillo-Tarragona, P. (2020). Dynamic capabilities and environmental accounting for the circular economy in businesses. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 11(7), 1129-1158. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-04-2019-0150
Schöggl, J.P., Baumgartner, R.J., & Hofer, D. (2017). Improving sustainability performance in early phases of product design: A checklist for sustainable product development tested in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 3, 1602-1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.195
Simic, V. (2015). A two-stage interval-stochastic programming model for planning end-of-life vehicles allocation under uncertainty. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 98, 19-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.03.005
Skene, K.R. (2018). Circles, spirals, pyramids and cubes: why the circular economy cannot work. Sustainability Science, 13, 479-492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-017-0443-3
Smallman, M., Lomme, K., &. Faullimmel, N. (2015). Report on the analysis of needs and constraints of the stakeholder groups in RRI practices in Europe. Fundación Bancaria la Caixa, available at https://www.rri-tools.eu/documents/10184/107098/RRITools_D2.2-AnalysisNeeds+ConstraintsStakeholderGroupsRRI.pdf/83c55909-118c-4cad-b7e4-74d5a770c8a1.
Smol, M., Avdiushchenko, A., Kulczycka, J., & Nowaczek, A. (2018). Public awareness of circular economy in southern Poland: Case of the Malopolska region, Journal of Cleaner Production, 197, part 1, 1035-1045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.100.
Tukker, A., & Cohen, M.J. (2004). Industrial Ecology and the Automotive Transport System. Can Ford Shape the Future Again? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 8(3), 14-18. https://doi.org/10.1162/1088198042442324
Türkeli, S., Kemp, R., Huang, B., Bleischwitz, R., & McDowall, W. (2018). Circular economy scientific knowledge in the European Union and China: a bibliometric, network and survey analysis (2006–2016), Journal of Cleaner Production, 197(Part 1), 244-1261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.118
Urain, I., Eguren, J.A., & Justel, D. (2022). Development and validation of a tool for the integration of the circular economy in industrial companies: Case study of 30 companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 370, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133318
Watson, J., & Newby, R. (2012). Using focus groups in entrepreneurship research. ICSB World Conference Proceedings; Washington, 2, 1, Washington: International Council for Small Business (ICSB), 1-49.
Yi, H.C., & Park, J.W. (2015). Design and Implementation of an End-of-Life Vehicle Recycling Centre based on IoT (Internet of Things) in Korea. Procedia the 22nd CIRP conference on Life Cycle Engineering, 728-733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.007
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
