Una revisión de la investigación de Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) con informes de sostenibilidad: conjunto de datos 1999-2020
A Review of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Research with Sustainability Reporting: 1999-2020 dataset
Resumen
Este trabajo tiene como objetivo identificar las principales áreas de estudio en la investigación de Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). Mediante un análisis bibliométrico, este estudio evaluó 955 documentos publicados recuperados de la base de datos Scopus para encontrar una estructura de revisión de la investigación sobre GRI con temas de sostenibilidad desde 1999 hasta 2020 utilizando el paquete bibliométrico de VOSviewer y Publish or Perish de Harzing. Este trabajo examinó las revistas, autores, países, instituciones, área temática, palabras clave, citación, coautoría, co-citación, acoplamiento bibliográfico y redes de co-ocurrencias más eficaces. Asimismo, este trabajo demostró la estructura intelectual de la investigación y los obstáculos percibidos para el crecimiento de la bibliografía. Los resultados muestran que en los últimos 20 años la tendencia de las publicaciones ha ido en aumento. Este estudio ofrece una comprensión global y la publicación de las tendencias de los estudios anteriores y sugiere que habrá un número mucho mayor de artículos en este campo durante la próxima década.
Descargas
Citas
Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2019). Conceptual structure and perspectives on Entrepreneurship education research: a bibliometric review.European Research on Management and Business Economics, 25(3), 105-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2019.04.003
Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis.Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
Ashrafi, M., Magnan, G. M., Adams, M., & Walker, T. R. (2020), Understanding the conceptual evolutionary path and theoretical underpinnings of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability.Sustainability, 12(3), 760. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030760
Azapagic, A. (2004). Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry.Journal of Cleaner Production, 12(6), 639-662. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-6526(03)00075-1
Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies.Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Baker, H. K., Pandey, N., Kumar, S., & Haldar, A. (2020). A bibliometric analysis of board diversity: Current status, development, and future research directions.Journal of Business Research, 108, 232-246.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.025
Ballou, B., Chen, P. C., Grenier, J. H., & Heitger, D. L. (2018). Corporate social responsibility assurance and reporting quality: Evidence from restatements.Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 37(2), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019
Bamel, U.K., Pandey, R., & Gupta, A. (2020). Safety climate: systematic literature network analysis of 38 years (1980-2018) of research.Accident Analysis and Prevention, 135, 105387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.105387
Boiral, O. (2013). Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports.Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-04-2012-00998
Boiral, O., & Henri, J. F. (2017). Is sustainability performance comparable? A study of GRI reports of mining organizations.Business & Society, 56(2), 283-317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315576134
Boto-Álvarez, A., & García-Fernández, R. (2020). Implementation of the 2030 Agenda Sustainable Development Goals in Spain. Sustainability, 12(6), 2546. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12062546
Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009). Building institutions based on information disclosure: lessons from GRI's sustainability reporting.Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571-580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.12.009
Callon, M., Courtial, J. P., Turner, W. A., & Bauin, S. (1983). From translations to problematic networks: An introduction to co-word analysis.Information (International Social Science Council), 22(2), 191-235. https://doi.org/10.1177/053901883022002003
Castriotta, M., Loi, M., Marku, E., & Naitana, L. (2019). What's in a name? Exploring the conceptual structure of emerging organizations. Scientometrics, 118(2), 407-437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2977-2
Carolina Rezende de Carvalho Ferreira, M., Amorim Sobreiro, V., Kimura, H., & Luiz de Moraes Barboza, F. (2016). A systematic review of literature about finance and sustainability.Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 6(2), 112-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2016.1177438
Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany.Journal of Business Ethics, 87(1), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9794-0
Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis.Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(4-5), 303-327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2007.05.003
Clarkson, P. M., Overell, M. B., & Chapple, L. (2011). Environmental reporting and its relation to corporate environmental performance.Abacus, 47(1), 27-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6281.2011.00330.x
Comerio, N., & Strozzi, F. (2019). Tourism and its economic impact: A literature review using bibliometric tools.Tourism Economics, 25(1), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354816618793762
Danisch, C. (2021). The Relationship of CSR Performance and Voluntary CSR Disclosure Extent in the German DAX Indices.Sustainability, 13(9), 4904. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094904
Dawkins, J. (2004). Corporate responsibility: The communication challenge.Journal of Communication Management, 9(2), 108-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/13632540510621362
De Klerk, M., De Villiers, C., & Van Staden, C. (2015). The influence of corporate social responsibility disclosure on share prices: Evidence from the United Kingdom.Pacific Accounting Review, 27(2), 208-228. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-05-2013-0047
Di Vaio, A., Syriopoulos, T., Alvino, F., & Palladino, R. (2020). "Integrated thinking and reporting" towards sustainable business models: a concise bibliometric analysis.Meditari Accountancy Research. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-12-2019-0641
Dos Santos, R. A., Méxas, M. P., & Meiriño, M. J. (2017). Sustainability and hotel business: criteria for holistic, integrated and participative development.Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 217-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.098
Durieux, V., & Gevenois, P. A. (2010). Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication.Radiology, 255(2), 342-351. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.09090626
Eccles, N. S., & Viviers, S. (2011). The origins and meanings of names describing investment practices that integrate a consideration of ESG issues in the academic literature.Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389-402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0917-7
E-Vahdati, S., Zulkifli, N., & Zakaria, Z. (2019). Corporate governance integration with sustainability: a systematic literature review.Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society. https://doi.org/10.1108/CG-03-2018-0111
E-Vahdati, S., Zulkifli, N., Zakaria, Z. (2018). A Moderated Mediation Model for Board Diversity and Corporate Performance in ASEAN Countries.Sustainability, 10(2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020556
Eccles, R. G., Serafeim, G., & Krzus, M. P. (2011). Market interest in nonfinancial information.Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 23(4), 113-127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2011.00357.x
Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting.Organization Science, 21(5), 1092-1107. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0494
Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Nieto, M. (2018). Independent directors' background and CSR disclosure.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 991-1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1515
Fuente, J. A., García-Sanchez, I. M., & Lozano, M. B. (2017). The role of the board of directors in the adoption of GRI guidelines for the disclosure of CSR information.Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 737-750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.155
Gamerschlag, R., Möller, K., & Verbeeten, F. (2011). Determinants of voluntary CSR disclosure: empirical evidence from Germany.Review of Managerial Science, 5(2-3), 233-262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0052-3
Garcia, A. S., Mendes-Da-Silva, W., & Orsato, R. J. (2017). Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets.Journal of Cleaner Production, 150, 135-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.180
García-Lillo, F., Claver-Cortés, E., Marco-Lajara, B., & Úbeda-García, M. (2019). Identifying the 'knowledge base'or 'intellectual structure'of research on international business, 2000-2015: A citation/co-citation analysis of JIBS.International Business Review, 28(4), 713-726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.02.001
García-Sánchez, I. M., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., Aibar-Guzmán, B., & Aibar-Guzmán, C. (2020). Do institutional investors drive corporate transparency regarding business contribution to the sustainable development goals?. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(5), 2019-2036. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2485
Harzing, A. (1997). Publish or perish. Tarma Software Research Pty Limited.
Hedberg, C. J., & Von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies.Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3), 153-164. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.38
Initiative, G.R. (2016). Consolidated set of GRI sustainability reporting standards 2016. Glob. Report. Initiat. Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Initiative, G.R. (2012). Global reporting initiative. Online https://www.Glob.org/Pages/default.aspx [20 Dec 2012].
Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers.American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
Koseoglu, M. A. (2016). Growth and structure of authorship and co-authorship network in the strategic management realm: Evidence from the Strategic Management Journal.Business Research Quarterly, 19(3), 153-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2016.02.001
Kostrzewa, K., & Piasecki, R. (2009). Approaches to Sustainable Development in Poland. L'Europe en Formation, (2), 181-196.
Knebel, S., & Seele, P. (2015). Quo vadis GRI? A (critical) assessment of GRI 3.1 A+ non-financial reports and implications for credibility and standardization.Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(2), 196-212. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-11-2013-0101
KPMG, A.G. (2017). Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft (KPMG)(2017) Global Automotive Executive Survey 2017.
Krajnc, D., & Glavič, P. (2005). A model for integrated assessment of sustainable development. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 43(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.06.002
Kulevicz, R. A., Porfirio, G. E. D. O., De Oliveira, O. S., Zavala Zavala, A. A., Silva, B. A. D., & Constantino, M. (2020). Influence of sustainability reports on social and environmental issues: bibliometric analysis and the word cloud approach. Environmental Reviews, (999), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2019-0075
Li, H., An, H., Wang, Y., Huang, J., & Gao, X. (2016). Evolutionary features of academic articles co-keyword network and keywords co-occurrence network: Based on two-mode affiliation network. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 450, 657-669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2016.01.017
Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability, 10(1), 166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166
Lim, A., & Tsutsui, K. (2012). Globalization and commitment in corporate social responsibility: Cross-national analyses of institutional and political-economy effects. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 69-98. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122411432701
López-Arceiz, F. J., Santamaría, R., & del Río, C. (2020). Sustainability for European investors: Evidence from a sustainable ranking.Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 23(2), 148-166. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.369331
Lozano, R. (2006). A tool for a Graphical Assessment of Sustainability in Universities (GASU).Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9-11), 963-972. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.11.041
Lozano, R., & Huisingh, D. (2011). Inter-linking issues and dimensions in sustainability reporting.Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(2-3), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2010.01.004
Martínez-López, F.J., Merigó, J.M., Valenzuela-Fernández, L., & Nicolás, C. (2018). Fifty years of the European Journal of Marketing: a bibliometric analysis.European Journal of Marketing, 52 (1/2), 439-468. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-11-2017-0853
Michelon, G., Pilonato, S., & Ricceri, F. (2015). CSR reporting practices and the quality of disclosure: An empirical analysis.Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 33, 59-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.10.003
Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W (h) ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1543-8
Nguyen, T. T. D. (2020). An Empirical Study on the Impact of Sustainability Reporting on Firm Value.Journal of Competitiveness, 12(3), 119-135. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.03.07
Niemann, L., Hoppe, T., & Coenen, F. (2017). On the benefits of using process indicators in local sustainability monitoring: Lessons from a Dutch municipal ranking (1999-2014).Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(1), 28-44. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1733
O'Dwyer, B., & Owen, D. L. (2005). Assurance statement practice in environmental, social and sustainability reporting: a critical evaluation.The British Accounting Review, 37(2), 205-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2005.01.005
Palacios-Callender, M., & Roberts, S. A. (2018). Scientific collaboration of Cuban researchers working in Europe: understanding relations between origin and destination countries.Scientometrics, 117(2), 745-769. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2888-2
Pang, R., & Zhang, X. (2019). Achieving environmental sustainability in manufacture: A 28-year bibliometric cartography of green manufacturing research.Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 84-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.303
Paun, D. (2018). Corporate sustainability reporting: An innovative tool for the greater good of all.Business Horizons, 61(6), 925-935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2018.07.012
Persson, O., Danell, R., Schneider, J.W. (2009). How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis. Celebr. Sch. Commun. Stud. A Festschrift Olle Persson his 60th Birthd. 5, 9-24.
Petera, P., & Wagner, J. (2015). Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) and its Reflections in the Literature.European Financial and Accounting Journal, 10(2), 13-32. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.efaj.139
Rasche, A. (2009). "A necessary supplement" what the United Nations Global Compact is and is not.Business & Society, 48(4), 511-537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650309332378
Rehn, C., Kronman, U., & Wadskog, D. (2007). Bibliometric indicators-definitions and usage at Karolinska Institutet. kib.ki.se. 13, 2012.
Reynolds, M., & Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting.Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1-2), 47-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9316-x
Roca, L. C., & Searcy, C. (2012). An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports.Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 103-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.08.002
Ronda-Pupo, G. A. (2017). The effect of document types and sizes on the scaling relationship between citations and co-authorship patterns in management journals.Scientometrics, 110(3), 1191-1207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2231-8
Rossetto, D. E., Bernardes, R. C., Borini, F. M., & Gattaz, C. C. (2018). Structure and evolution of innovation research in the last 60 years: Review and future trends in the field of business through the citations and co-citations analysis.Scientometrics, 115(3), 1329-1363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2709-7
Prado-Lorenzo, J. M., Rodríguez-Domínguez, L., Gallego-Álvarez, I., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2009). Factors influencing the disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions in companies world-wide. Management Decision. 47(7), 1133-1157. https://doi.org/10.1108/00251740910978340
Şahin, Z., & Çankaya, F. (2020). The importance of sustainability and sustainability reporting. In NewApproaches to CSR, Sustainability and Accountability, Volume I (pp. 45-59). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9588-9_4
Sikacz, H. (2017). CSR reporting as an object of bibliometric analysis of scientific publications. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu, (474), 160-172.
Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., & Dikshit, A. K. (2007). Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry.Ecological Indicators, 7(3), 565-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.06.004
Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
Su, H. N., & Lee, P. C. (2010). Mapping knowledge structure by keyword co-occurrence: a first look at journal papers in Technology Foresight.Scientometrics, 85(1), 65-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0259-8
Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources.Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 463-490. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.820
Tahamtan, I., Afshar, A. S., & Ahamdzadeh, K. (2016). Factors affecting number of citations: a comprehensive review of the literature.Scientometrics, 107(3), 1195-1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1889-2
Tsay, M. Y. (2009). Citation analysis of Ted Nelson's works and his influence on hypertext concept.Scientometrics, 79(3), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-008-1641-7
United Nations (2020a). Sustainable Development Goals. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/?menu=1300. Accessed 13 February 2020.
United Nations (2020b). SDG Indicators, Available at: https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/indicators/indicators-list/ Accessed 13 February 2020.
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2014). Visualizing bibliometric networks. In Measuring scholarly impact (pp. 285-320). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8_1
Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2017). Citation-based clustering of publications using CitNetExplorer and VOSviewer.Scientometrics, 111(2), 1053-1070. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2300-7
Veronica, S., Alexeis, G. P., Valentina, C., & Elisa, G. (2019). Do stakeholder capabilities promote sustainable business innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises? Evidence from Italy.Journal of Business Research, 119, 131-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.06.025
Vogel, R. (2012). The visible colleges of management and organization studies: a bibliometric analysis of academic journals.Organization Studies, 33(8), 1015-1043. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840612448028
Wan-Hussin, W.N., Qasem, A., Aripin, N., Ariffin, M.S.M. (2021). Corporate Responsibility Disclosure, Information Environment and Analysts' Recommendations: Evidence from Malaysia.Sustainability, 13(6), 3568. https:// doi.org/10.3390/su13063568
Weber, J.L. (2018). Corporate social responsibility disclosure level, external assurance and cost of equity capital.Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 16(4), 694-724. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFRA-12-2017-0112
White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972-1995.Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327-355. url{https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(19980401)49:4<327::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-4}
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
