Pruebas basadas en encuestas sobre las sinergias positivas entre la cultura adaptativa y el cuadro de mando integral
Survey-based Evidence on Positive Synergies between Adaptive Culture and a Balanced Scorecard
Agencias de apoyo
- Comunidad de Madrid y Fondo Social Europeo (S2015/HUM-34)
Resumen
Las investigaciones anteriores sobre contabilidad de gestión han abordado cómo la cultura organizativa puede sustituir o complementar el uso de la toma de decisiones y el control de los sistemas de contabilidad de gestión (SCG). Sin embargo, este artículo sostiene que no todas las culturas organizativas y los SCG son iguales. Su compatibilidad determina si su uso conjunto crea sinergias positivas o negativas. Este trabajo sigue una metodología basada en una encuesta realizada en 2017 a 102 directivos de diferentes nacionalidades. Las respuestas recogidas indican el papel que desempeña la cultura en el uso del cuadro de mando integral (CMI) y su conciencia sobre los indicadores clave de rendimiento (ICR). De forma notable, nuestra encuesta a los directivos revela que las culturas adaptativas crean sinergias positivas con el CMI y, en consecuencia, juicios positivos en la escala de los ICR.
Descargas
Citas
Abernethy, M. A., & Vagnoni, E. (2004). Power, organization design and managerial behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29 (3-4), 207-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(03)00049-7
Alsharari, N., Dixon, R., & Youssef, M. (2015). Management accounting change: Critical review and a new contextual framework. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 11 (4), 476-502. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAOC-05-2014-0030
Armstrong, M. (2006). Human Resource Management Practice. London: Kogan Page limited.
Başar, E., & Düzgün, A. (2016). Links of consciousness, perception, and memory by means of delta oscillations of brain. Frontiers in Psychology, 7 (article 217). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00275
Bisbe, J., Batista-Foguet, J.M., & Chenhall, R. (2007). Defining management accounting constructs: A methodological note on the risks of conceptual misspecification. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(7-8), 789-820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.09.010
Bove, L., Pervan, S., Beatty, S., & Shiu, E. (2009). Service worker role in encouraging customer organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Research, 62 (7), 698-705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2008.07.003
Cameron, K. S., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Carter, M., Armenakis, A., Feild, H., & Mossholder, K. (2013). Transformational leadership, relationship quality, and employee performance during continuous incremental organizational change. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34 (7), 942-958. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1824
Chapman, C.S., & Kihn, L.A. (2009). Information system integration, enabling control and performance. Accounting Organizations and Society, 34, 151-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.07.003
Chenhall, R. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: findings from contingency-based research and directions. Accounting Organizations and Society, 28 (2-3), 127-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00027-7
Collins, J. C. (2001). Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap... and Others Don't. London: Random House.
Cooke, R. A., & Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Organizational Culture Inventory. Plymouth: Human Synergistics.
Costa-Oliveira, H., Lima-Rodrigues, L., & Craig, R. (2019). The presence of bureaucracy in the balanced scorecard. Revista de Contabilidad, 22(2), 218-224. https://doi.org/10.6018/rcsar.382271
Costanza, D., Nikki, M., Severt, M., & De Costanza, R. (2016). The effect of adaptive organizational culture on long-term survival. Journal of Business and Psychology, 31 (3), 361-381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-015-9420-y
Cox, R., Issa, R., Ahrens, D. (2003). Management's perception of key performance indicators for construction. Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, 129 (2), 142-151. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2003)129:2(142)
Da Silva, A., Fernández-Feijoo, B., & Gago, S. (2020). Accounting information tools in managerial clinical service decision-making processes: Evidence from Portuguese public hospitals. International Public Management Journal, 23 (4), 535-563. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1495136
Davis, S., & Albright, T. (2004). An investigation of the effect of balanced scorecard implementation on financial performance. Management Accounting Research, 15 (2), 135-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2003.11.001
Deem, J.W., Barnes, B., Segal, S., & Preziosi, R. (2010). The relationship of organizational culture to balanced scorecard effectiveness, SAM Advanced Management Journal, 75 (4), 31-39.
Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate Culture and Organizational Effectiveness. New York: Willey.
Dent, J. (1990). Strategy, organization and control: Some possibilities for accounting research. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15 (1/2), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(90)90010-R
Doran, J., & Ryan, G. (2017). The role of stimulating employees' creativity and idea generation in encouraging innovation behaviour in Irish firms. Irish Journal of Management, 36 (1), 32-48. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijm-2017-0005
Dossi, A., & Patelli, L. (2010). You learn from what you measure: Financial and non-financial performance Measures in multinational companies. Long Range Planning, 43(4), 498-526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2010.01.002
Erciyes, E. (2018). The fusion of national culture and organizational culture in international settings. METU Studies in Development, 45 (April), 1-23. Available at https://hdl.handle.net/11511/93222
Farooq, A., & Hussain, Z. (2011). Balanced scorecard perspective on change and performance: A study of selected Indian companies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24 (C), 754-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.043
Flamholtz, E. (2001). Corporate culture and the bottom line. European Management Journal, 19 (3), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(01)00023-8
Flamholtz, E., & Randle, Y. (2012). Corporate culture, business models, competitive advantage, strategic assets and the bottom line. Journal of Human Resource Costing & Accounting, 16 (2), 76-94. https://doi.org/10.1108/14013381211284227
Gago, S., & Purdy, D. E. (2015). The effects of budgetary knowledge and extrinsic motivation on the importance that managers attribute to their budgets. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 44 (1), 47-71. https://doi.org/10.1080/02102412.2014.987446
Gibbons, R., & Kaplan, R. S. (2015). Formal measures in informal management: Can a balanced scorecard change a culture? The American Economic Review, 105(5), 447-451. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.p20151073
Gupta, G., & Salter, S. (2018). The balanced scorecard beyond adoption. Journal of International Accounting Research, 17 (3), 115-134. https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-52093
Hall, M. (2016). Realising the richness of psychology theory in contingency-based management accounting research. Management Accounting Research, 31, 63-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2015.11.002
Han, H. (2012). The relationship among corporate culture, strategic orientation, and financial performance. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 53 (3), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965512443505
Heinicke, A., Guenther, T., & Widener, S. (2016). An examination of the relationship between the extent of a flexible culture and the levers of control system: The key role of beliefs control. Management Accounting Research, 33, 25-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.03.005
Henri, J. (2006). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31 (1), 77-103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2004.10.003
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
Ittner, C., Larcker, D., & Meyer, M. (2003). Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review, 78 (3), 725-58. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2003.78.3.725
Kaplan, R. S. (2006a). The Competitive advantage of management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 18(1), 127-135. https://doi.org/10.2308/JMAR.2006.18.1.127
Kaplan, R. S. (2006b). How to implement a new strategy without disrupting your organization. Strategic Direction, 22(8), 100-109. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2006.05622had.002
Kaplan, R. S. (2012). The balanced scorecard: comments on balanced scorecard commentaries. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 8(4), 539-545. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325911211273527
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February, 71-79. Available at https://hbr.org/1992/01/the-balanced-scorecard-measures-that-drive-performance-2
Kaplan, R. S, & Norton, D. P. (2000) Having trouble with your strategy? Then map it. Harvard Business Review 78, no. 5 (September-October 2000): 167-176. Available at https://hbr.org/2000/09/having-trouble-with-your-strategy-then-map-it
Kaplan, R. S, & Norton, D. P. (2001,a). The strategy-focused organization. Strategy & Leadership, 29 (3), 41-42. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396637
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001,b). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part II. Accounting Horizons, 15(2), 147-160. http://dx.doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.1.87
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P (2004). The strategy map: guide to aligning intangible assets. Strategy & Leadership, 32(5), 10-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10878570410699825
Kaplan, R.S, & Norton, D.P. (2006). Response to S. Voelpel et al., "The tyranny of the balanced scorecard in the innovation economy," Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2006, pp. 43-60. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(3), 421-428. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930610681492
Kotter, J. P., & Heskett, J. L. (1992). Corporate Culture and Performance. New York: Maxwell Macmillan International.
Krajcsák, Z. (2018). Successes of quality management systems through self-evaluation and commitment in different organizational cultures. Management Decision, 56(7), 1,467-1,484. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2017-0870
Kristof-Brown, A., Zimmerman, R. D., & John, E. C. (2005). Consequences of individuals' fit at work: A meta-analysis of person-job, person-organization, person-group, and person-supervisor fit. Personnel Psychology, 58 (2), 281-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00672.x
Levy, M., & Powell, P. (2000). Information systems strategy for small and medium sized enterprises: An organisational perspective. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 9 (1), 63-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00028-7
Libby, T., Salterio, A., & Webb, A. (2004). The balanced scorecard: The effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review, 79 (4), 1,075-1,094 https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2004.79.4.1075
Lipe, M., & Salterio, S. (2000). The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review, 75 (3), 283-298. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2000.75.3.283
Malmi, T. (2001). Balanced scorecards in Finnish companies: A research note. Management Accounting Research, Vol 12 (2), 207-220. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.2000.0154
Malmi, T., & Brown, D. A. (2008). Power, organization design and managerial behavior. Management Accounting Research, 29 (4), 287-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.09.003
Malmi, T., Bedford, D., Brühl, R., Dergård, J., Hoozée, S., Janschek, O., Willert, J., Ax, C., Bednarek, P., Gosselin, M., Hanzlick, M., Israelsen, P., Johanson, D., Johanson, T., Madsen, D. Ø., Rohde, C., Sandelin, M., Strömsten, T., & Toldbod, T. (2020). Culture and management control interdependence: An analysis of control choices that complement the delegation of authority in Western cultural regions. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2020.101116
Malgwi, A., & Dahiru, H. (2014). Balanced scorecard financial measurement of organizational performance: A review. IOSR Journal of Economics and Finance (IOSR-JEF), 4 (6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.9790/5933-0460110
Malina, M., & Selto, F. (2001). Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 13, 47-90. https://doi.org/10.2308/jmar.2001.13.1.47
Marginson, D. (2009). Value systems as a mechanism for organizational change. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 5 (1), 7-34. https://doi.org/10.1108/18325910910932197
Mikes, A. (2009). Risk management and calculative cultures. Management Accounting Research, 20 (1), 18-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2008.10.005
Mohamed, S. (2003). Adaptation of the balanced scorecard to measure organizational safety culture. Journal of Construction Research, 4(1), 45-57. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1609945103000285
Nørreklit, H. (2000), The balance on the balanced scorecard - a critical analysis of some of its assumptions. Management Accounting Research, 11(1), 65-88. https://doi.org/10.1006/mare.1999.0121
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw Hill.
Otley, D. (2016). The contingency theory of management accounting and control: 1980-2014. Management Accounting Research, 31, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2016.02.001
Ouchi, W. (1979). A conceptual framework for the design of organizational control mechanisms. Management Science, 25 (9), 833-848. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-7138-8_4
Park, H., Ribière, V., & Schulte Jr, W. D. (2004). Critical attributes of organizational culture that promote knowledge management technology implementation success. Journal of Knowledge Management, 8 (3), 106-117. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673270410541079.
Pérez Granero, L., Guillén, M., & Banón-Gomis, A. (2017). Influencia de los factores de contingencia en el desarrollo del cuadro de mando integral y su asociación con un rendimiento mejor. El caso de las empresas españolas. Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review 20, 82-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2016.07.002
Pérez-López, M.C., Gómez-Miranda, M. E., Argente-Linares, E., & López-Sánchez, L. (2018). The internationalisation of Spanish family firms through business groups: Factors affecting the profitability, and the moderating effect of the family nature of the Spanish business. Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, 21 (1), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.09.002
Pitkänen, H., & Lukka, K. (2011). Three dimensions of formal and informal feedback in management accounting. Management Accounting Research, 22 (2), 125-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2010.10.004
Rautiainen, A., Urquía-Grande, E., & Muñoz-Colomina, C. (2017). Institutional logics in police performance indicator development: A comparative case study of Spain and Finland, European Accounting Review, 26 (2), 165-191. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638180.2015.1120412
Roi, R. C. (2006). Leadership, Corporate Culture and Financial Performance. San Francisco: The Faculty of the School of Education.
Schein, E. (1988). La Cultura Empresarial y el Liderazgo. Una Visión dinámica. Barcelona: Plaza & Janes Editores S.A
Sebastián, M. (2016). Consciousness and theory of mind: a common theory? Theoria, 31(1), 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1387/theoria.14091
Shields, M. D., & Young, S. M. (1994). Managing innovation costs: A study of cost conscious behavior by R&D professionals. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 6 (Fall), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8350-5471-4_38
Simons, R., (2000). Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Prentice Hall.
Stede, W A., Van der, Chow, C. W, & Lin, T. W. (2006). Strategy, choice of performance measures, and performance. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 18(1), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.2308/bria.2006.18.1.185
Swieringa, R. J., & Moncur, R. H. (1972). The relationship between managers' budget related behavior and selected attitude, position, size and performance measures. Journal of Accounting Review, 10 (Supplement), pp. 194-209. https://doi.org/10.2307/2489874
Tsang, A., Jardine, A., & Kolodny, H. (1999). Measuring maintenance performance: a holistic approach. International. Journal of Operations & Production Management, 19 (7), 691-715. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910271674
Tseng, S. (2010). The correlation between organizational culture and knowledge conversion on corporate performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 14 (2), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271011032409
Urquía-Grande, E.; Lorain, M.A., Rautiainen, A., & Cano-Montero, E. (2021). Balance with logic-measuring the performance and sustainable development efforts of an NPO in rural Ethiopia. Evaluation and Program Planning, 87, 101944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2021.101944
Velasquez, S., Suomala, P., & Järvenpää, M. (2015). Cost consciousness: Conceptual development from a management accounting perspective. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 12 (1), 55-86. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-07-2013-0029
Verdu-Jover, A., Alos-Simo, L., & Gomez-Gras. J. (2018). Adaptive culture and product/service innovation outcomes. European Management Journal, 36 (3), 330-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2017.07.004
Vieira, R., O'Dwyer, B., & Schneider, R. (2017). Aligning strategy and performance management system: the case of wind-farm industry. Organization and Environment, 30 (1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026615623058
Voelpel, S., Leibold, M., Eckhoff, R. & Davenport, T. (2006). The tyranny of the balanced scorecard in the innovation economy. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 7(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930610639769
Wiersma, E. (2009). For which purposes do managers use balanced scorecards?: An empirical study. Management Accounting Research, 20 (4), 239-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2009.06.001
Wong-On-Wing, B., Guo, L., Li, W., & Yang, D. (2007). Reducing conflict in balanced scorecard evaluations. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32 (4), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2006.05.001
Yates, J., & De Oliveira, S. (2016). Culture and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.003
Yesil, S., & Kaya, A. (2013). The effect of organizational culture on firm financial performance: Evidence from a developing country. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 81 (C). pp. 428-437. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.455
Zheng, W., Yang, B., & Mclean, G. (2010). Linking organizational culture, structure, strategy, and organizational effectiveness: Mediating role of knowledge management. Journal of Business Research, 63 (7), 763-771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.06.005
Zimmerman, J. L. (2011). Accounting for Decision Making and Control. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Derechos de autor 2023 Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
