New Regulatory on Goodwill: Some Empirical Evidences

Cambios en la Normativa sobre Fondo de Comercio: Algunas Evidencias Empíricas

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Navarro García Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena
Keywords: goodwill, consequences of accounting alternatives, amortization

Abstract

Accounting for goodwill has been controversial for a-long time. As a result of a new regulation in USA, the IASE has also modified its regulation so that goodwill must be tested for impairment annually instead of being amortised.
This paper have used accounting information of 177 Spanish group companies for the period 1998-2000. In this respect, we have analysed the consequences of excluding goodwill amortization on several important ratios.
The empirical evidence presented indicated that certain ratios as debt-to-equity, return on assets and return on equity, are affected by new IFRS accounting treatment for goodwill. However, we consider that standard-setters must take into account other factors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    235
  • PDF (Español (España))
    119

References

ASSOCIATION FOR INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT AND RESEARCH (AIMR) (1993): Financial reporting in the 1990s and beyond, Charlottesville, AIMR.

ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES BOARD (APB) (1970): Intangible assets, Opinion n.º 17, Nueva York, AICPA.

ARCHEL, P.; ROBLEDA, H.; SANTAMARÍA, R. (1995): “Una aproximación empírica al estu- dio de las eliminaciones en las cuentas consolidadas”, Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, vol. XXIV, n.º 24, enero-marzo, p. 59-79.

BARRETT, M.J.; BEAVER, W.H.; COOPER, W.W.; MILBURN, J.A.; SOLOMONS, D.; TWEE- DIE, D.P. (1991): “American Accounting Association Committee on Accounting and Auditing Measurement, 1989-90”, Accounting Horizons, vol. 5, n.º 3, septiembre, p. 81-105.

BARTH, M.E.; BEAVER, W.H.; LANDSMAN, W. R. (2001): “The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: Another view”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 31, n.º 1-3, p. 77-104.

CEA GARCÍA, J.L. (2002): “En el umbral de la reforma de la regulación contable española ante la adaptación del modelo IASB. Algunas reflexiones desde la disidencia parcial pero sustancial con el libro blanco de la reforma”, Estudios Financieros n.º 236, pp. 153-198.

COLLEY, J.R.; VOLKAN, A.G. (1988): “Accounting for goodwill”, Accounting Horizons, vol. 2, n.º 1, marzo, p. 35-41.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (FASB) (1999): Exposure Draft: Business Combinations and Intangible assets, Norwalk, FASB.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (FASB) (2001a): Statement of Financial Accounting Standards n.º 141, “Business Combinations”, Norwalk, FASB.

FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS BOARD (FASB) (2001b): Statement of Financial Accounting Standards n.º 142, “Goodwill and other intangibles assets”, Norwalk, FASB.

GINER, B.; PARDO, F. (2002): “Is goodwill amortization value relevant for share prices? A European perspective”, 25th Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association, Copenhagen.

GORE, P.; TAIB, F.M.; TAYLOR, P.A. (2000): “Accounting for goodwill: An examination of factors influencing management preferences”, Accounting and Business Research, vol. 30, n.º 3, verano, p. 213-225.

HEALY, P.M.; WAHLEN, J.M. (1999): “A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting”, Accounting Horizons, vol. 13, n.º 4, diciembre, p. 365-383.

HIRST, D.E.; HOPKINS, P.E. (1998): “Comprehensive income reporting and analysts’ valuation judgments”, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 36, n.º 3, p. 47-75.

HOLTHAUSEN, R.W.; WATTS, R.L. (2001): “The relevance of the value-relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, vol. 31, n.º 1-3, p. 3-75.

HOPKINS, P.E. (1996): “The effect of financial statement classification of hybrid financial instruments on financial analysts’ stock price judgments”, Journal of Accounting Research, vol. 34, n.º 3, p. 33-50.

HOPKINS, P.E.; HOUSTON, R.W.; PETERS, M.F. (2000): “Purchase, pooling, and equity analysts’ valuation judgments”, The Accounting Review, vol. 75, n.º 3, julio, p. 257-281.

INSTITUTO DE CONTABILIDAD Y AUDITORÍA DE CUENTAS (ICAC) (2002): Informe sobre la situación actual de la Contabilidad en España y líneas básicas para abordar su reforma (Libro Blanco para la reforma de la Contabilidad en España), ICAC, Madrid.

INTERNATIONAL ACCOUNTING STANDARD BOARD (IASB) (2004): Activos intangibles, Norma Internacional de Contabilidad n.º 38, Londres, IASB.

JENNINGS, R.; ROBINSON, J.; THOMPSON, R.B.; DUVALL, L. (1996): “The relation between accounting goodwill numbers and equity values”, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 23, n.º 4, junio, p. 513-533.

JENNINGS, R.; LECLERE, M.; THOMPSON, R.B. (2001): “Goodwill amortization and the usefulness of earnings”, Financial Analyst Journal, vol. 57, n.º 5, septiembre-octubre, p. 20-28.

JOHNSON, L.T.; PETRONE, K.R. (1998): “Is goodwill an asset?”, Accounting Horizons, vol. 12, n.º 3, septiembre, p. 293-303.

LARRÁN, J.; MONTERREY, J.; MULERO, E. (2000): “Una evaluación empírica del fondo de comercio”, Revista de Contabilidad, vol. 3, n.º 5, enero-junio, p. 101-126.

MOEHRLE, S.R.; REYNOLDS-MOEHRLE, J.A; WALLACE, J.S. (2001): “How informative are earnings numbers that exclude goodwill amortization?”, Accounting Horizons, vol. 15, n.º 3, septiembre, p. 243-255.

PAYNE, J.W.; BETTMAN, J.R.; JOHNSON, E.J. (1993): The adaptive decision maker, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

XIE, H. (2001): “The mispricing of abnormal accruals”, The Accounting Review, vol. 76, n.º 3, julio, p. 357-373.

Published
01-07-2004
How to Cite
Navarro García, J. C. (2004). New Regulatory on Goodwill: Some Empirical Evidences: Cambios en la Normativa sobre Fondo de Comercio: Algunas Evidencias Empíricas. Revista De Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, 7(14), 113–133. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/rcsar/article/view/387401
Issue
Section
Articles