Niveles de tolerancia a la ambigüedad en estudiantes españoles de contabilidad: un estudio comparativo
Ambiguity tolerance levels in spanish accounting students: a comparative study
Resumen
La ambigüedad es la percepción de la inadecuación de la información que resulta de determinadas características de un escenario. En situaciones de toma de decisiones, la percepción de ambigüedad puede percibirse como una amenaza y supone un reto cognitivo. En esta línea la literatura ha tratado la incidencia de los niveles de tolerancia a la ambigüedad (AT) en la toma de decisiones en contextos empresariales y financieros.
Este trabajo trata de estudiar los niveles de AT en una muestra de estudiantes de contabilidad comparándolos con los niveles de otros estudiantes de otras carreras de ciencias sociales.
El instrumento usado es la versión española del MSTAT-II (McLain, 2008) y la muestra está compuesta por estudiantes de distintas carreras de ciencias sociales de la Universidad de Huelva.
Los resultados indican un alto nivel de consistencia interna del instrumento con esta muestra. Los estudiantes de contabilidad presentan niveles de tolerancia a la ambigüedad más bajos que el resto de sus compañeros en otras carreras. Por último, se debaten las implicaciones educativas para las universidades de estos resultados.
Descargas
Citas
[Accounting, 1990] Accounting Education Change Commission. (AECC). Objectives of Education for Accountants: Position Statement No. 1. Issues in Accounting Education, 5 (1990), pp. 307-312
[American Institute, 2009] American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (2009). Mapping of the Core Competency Framework to the Skills Tested on the CPA Exam. Available online at http://ceae.aicpa.org/Resources/Education+and+Curriculum+Development
[Amernic and Beechy, 1984] J.H. Amernic, T. Beechy. Accounting students’ performance and cognitive complexity: some empirical evidence. The Accounting Review, 59 (April 1984), pp. 300-313
[Amernic et al., 1979] J. Amernic, N. Aranya, J. Polluck. Is there a generally accepted standard accountant?. CA Magazine, (October 1979), pp. 34-42
[Arquero Montaño, 2000] J.L. Arquero Montaño. Capacidades no técnicas en el perfil profesional en contabilidad: las opiniones de docentes y profesionales. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, XXIX (2000), pp. 149-172
[Arquero et al., 2009] J.L. Arquero, J.A. Donoso, S.M. Jiménez, J.M. González. Análisis exploratorio del perfil demandado para administración y dirección de empresas: implicaciones para el área contable. (Exploratory analysis of the educational profile for BA: implications for accounting). Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review, 12 (2009),
[Arthur Andersen, 1989] Arthur Andersen & Co., (1989). Perspectives on Education: Capabilities for Success in the Accounting Profession. New York.
[Banning, 2003] K.C. Banning. The Effect of the Case Method on Tolerance for Ambiguity. Journal of Management Education, 27 (2003), pp. 556-567
[Benjamin et al., 1996] A.J. Benjamin, R.E. Riggio, B.T. Mayes. Reliability and Factor Structure of Budner's Tolerance for Ambiguity Scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 11 (1996), pp. 625-632
[Bhushan and Amal, 1986] L.I. Bhushan, S.B. Amal. A situational test of intolerance of ambiguity. Psychologia, 29 (1986), pp. 254-261
[Budner, 1962] J. Budner. Tolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. Journal of Personality, 30 (1962), pp. 29-40
[Common Content Project, 2006] Common Content Project (2006). The skills framework. Available online at: www.commoncontent.com.
[Deppe et al., 1991] L.A. Deppe, E.O. Sonderegger, J.D. Stice, D.C. Clark, G.F. Streugling. Emerging competencies for the practice of accountancy. Journal of Accounting Education, 9 (1991), pp. 257-290
[Dermer, 1973] J.D. Dermer. Cognitive Characteristics and the Perceived Importance of Information. The Accounting Review, 48 (1973), pp. 511-519
[DeRoma et al., 2003] V.M. DeRoma, K.M. Martin, M.L. Kessler. The relationship between tolerance for ambiguity and need for course structure. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30 (June 2003), pp. 104-109
[Ebeling and Spear, 1980] K.S. Ebeling, P. Spear. Preference and performance on two tasks of varying ambiguity as a function of ambiguity tolerance. Australian Journal of Psychology, 32 (2 August 1980), pp. 127-133
[Elias, 1999] Z.E. Elias. An Examination of Nontraditional Accounting Students’ Communication Apprehension and Ambiguity Tolerance. Journal of Education for Business, 75 (1999), pp. 38-41
[Ellsberg, 1961] D. Ellsberg. Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 75 ((November) 1961), pp. 643-669
[Frenkel-Brunswik, 1948] E. Frenkel-Brunswik. Tolerance of ambiguity as a personality variable. American Psychologist, 3 (1948), pp. 268
[Frenkel-Brunswik, 1949] E. Frenkel-Brunswik. Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. Journal of Personality, 18 (1949), pp. 108-143
[Frenkel-Brunswik, 1951] E. Frenkel-Brunswik. Personality theory and perception. Perception: An approach to personality,
[Furnham, 1994] A. Furnham. A content, correlational and factor analytic study of four tolerance of ambiguity questionnaires. Personality and Individual Differences, 16 (1994), pp. 403-410
[Furnham and Ribchester, 1995] A. Furnham, T. Ribchester. Tolerance of ambiguity: A review of the concept, its measurement and applications. Current Psychology, 14 (1995), pp. 179-199
[Ghosh and Ray, 1997] D. Ghosh, M.R. Ray. Risk Ambiguity, and Decision Choice: Some Additional Evidence. Decision Sciences, 28 (1997), pp. 81-104
[Ghosh, 1994] D. Ghosh. Tolerance for Ambiguity Risk Preference, and Negotiator Effectiveness. Decision Sciences, 25 (1994), pp. 263-280
[Gul, 1986] F.A. Gul. Tolerance for ambiguity, auditors’ opinions and their effects on decision making. Accounting and Business Research, 16 (1986), pp. 99-105
[Gul and Tsui, 1994] F.A. Gul, J.S.L. Tsui. Perceptions of Auditor Independence: The Moderating Role of Personality. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 2 (1994), pp. 203-209
[Harding and Ren, 2007] N. Harding, M. Ren. The importance in accounting of ambiguity tolerance at the national level Evidence from Australia and China. Asian Review of Accounting, 15 (2007), pp. 6-24
[Hartmann, 2005] F. Hartmann. The effects of tolerance for ambiguity and uncertainty on the appropriateness of accounting performance measures. Abacus, Vol. 41 (2005), pp. 241-264
[Hassall et al., 2003] T. Hassall, J. Joyce, J.L. Arquero, J.A. Donoso. The Vocational Skills Gap For Management Accountants: The Stakeholders Perspectives. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 40-1 (2003), pp. 78-88
[Hogarth, 1989] R. Hogarth. Ambiguity in competitive decision-making: Some implications and tests. pp. 31-50
[Holland, 1973] J.L. Holland. Making vocational choices. A theory of careers. Prentice Hall, (1973)
[Huber and n., 2003] n. Huber. An Experiential Leadership Approach for Teaching Tolerance for Ambiguity. Journal of Education for Business;, 79 (2003), pp. 52-55 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2015.1024833
[International, 1996] International Federation of Accountants. Education Committee. (1996). IEG 9 Prequalification Education, Assessment of professional competence and experience requirements of professional accountants. N.Y., IFAC.
[International, 2008] International Federation of Accountants. International Accounting Education Standards Board. (2008). IES 3 Professional Skills. In International Education Standards 1-8. N.Y., IFAC.
[Jones and Davidson, 2007] S.H. Jones, R.A. Davidson. Measuring the Problem-Solving Abilities of Accounting and Other Business Students: A Comparison and Evaluation of Three Methods. Accounting Education, 16 (2007), pp. 65-79
[Judge et al., 1999] T.A. Judge, C.J. Thoreson, V. Pucik, T.M. Welbourne. Managerial coping with organizational change: a dispositional perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84 (1999), pp. 107-122
[Kirton, 1981] M.J. Kirton. A reanalysis of two scales of tolerance of ambiguity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 45 (1981), pp. 405-414
[Kischkel, 1984] K.-H. Kischkel. A scale for the measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Diagnostica, 30 (1984), pp. 144-154
[Lamberton et al., 2005] B. Lamberton, J. Fedorowicz, S.J. Roohani. Tolerance for Ambiguity and IT Competency among Accountants. Journal of Information Systems, 19 (2005), pp. 75-95
[Liedtka et al., 2008] S.L. Liedtka, B.K. Church, M.R. Ray. Performance Variability Ambiguity Intolerance, and Balanced Scorecard-Based Performance Assessments. Behavioral Research In Accounting, 20 (2008), pp. 73-88
[Lowe and Reckers, 1997] D.J. Lowe, P.M.J. Reckers. The influence of outcome effects, decision aids usage, and intolerance of ambiguity on evaluations of professional audit judgment. International Journal of Auditing, 1 (1997), pp. 43-59
[MacDonald, 1970] A.P. MacDonald. Revised scale for ambiguity tolerance: Reliability and validity. Psychological Reports, 26 (1970), pp. 791-798
[May et al., 1995] G.S. May, F.W. Windal, J. Sylvestre. The need for change in accounting education: an educator survey. Journal of Accounting Education, 13 (1995), pp. 21-43
[McLain, 1993] D.L. McLain. The MSTAT-I: A new measure of an individual's tolerance for ambiguity. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53 (1993), pp. 183-189
[McLain, 2008] D.L. McLain. Evidence of the Properties of an Ambiguity Tolerance Measure (MSTATII) Psychological Reports. Article currently under review, (2008),
[Norton., 1975] R. Norton. Measurement of ambiguity tolerance. Journal of Personality Assessment, 39 (1975), pp. 607-619 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa3906_11
[Pich et al., 2002] M.T. Pich, C.H. Loch, A. DeMeyer. On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science, 48 (2002), pp. 1008-1023
[Pincus, 1990] K.V. Pincus. Auditor individual differences and fairness of presentation judgments. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 9 (1990), pp. 150-166
[Poesio, 1996] M. Poesio. Semantic ambiguity and perceived ambiguity. Semantic ambiguity and underspecification, pp. 159-201
[Pratt, 1980] J. Pratt. The effects of personality on a subject's information processing: a comment. The Accounting Review, 55 (1980), pp. 501-506
[Rydell and Rosen, 1966] S.T. Rydell, E. Rosen. Measurement and some correlates of need-cognition. Psychological Reports, 19 (1966), pp. 139-165 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.139
[Sherrill, 2001] W.W. Sherrill. Tolerance of Ambiguity among MD/MBA Students: Implications for Management Potential. The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 21 (2001), pp. 117-122 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chp.1340210209
[Smith, 1999] M. Smith. Personality issues and their impact on accounting and auditing. Managerial Auditing Journal, 14 (1999), pp. 453-460
[Tsui, 1993] J. Tsui. Tolerance for ambiguity, uncertainty audit qualifications and banker's perceptions. Psychological reports, 72 (1993), pp. 915-919
[Viscusi and Chesson, 1999] W.K. Viscusi, H. Chesson. Hopes and fears: The conflicting effects of risk ambiguity. Theory and Decision, 47 (1999), pp. 153-178
[Walker et al., 2007] H.K. Walker, A.A. Armenakis, J.B. Bernerth. Factors influencing organizational change efforts. An integrative investigation of change content, context, process and individual differences. Journal of organizational Change Management, 20 (2007), pp. 761-773
[Wang and Chan, 1995] P. Wang, P.S. Chan. Top management perception of strategic information processing in a turbulent environment. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16 (1995), pp. 33-43 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006620
[Westerberg et al., 1997] M. Westerberg, J. Singh, E. Hackner. Does the CEO matter? An empirical study of small Swedish firms operating in turbulent environments. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13 (1997), pp. 251-270
[Wharton et al., 1999] R.R. Wharton, L.E. Parry, G. Buntzman. Success or bankruptcy: the relationship between personal and goal orientation and simulation performance.
[Wright and Davidson, 2000] M.E. Wright, R.A. Davidson. The Effect of Auditor Attestation and Tolerance for Ambiguity on Commercial Lending Decisions. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 19 (2000), pp. 67-81
[Yurtsever, 2001] G. Yurtsever. Tolerance of ambiguity, information, and negotiation. Psychological reports, 89 (2001), pp. 57-64 http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.2001.89.1.57
[Zebda, 1991] A. Zebda. The problem of ambiguity and vagueness in accounting. Behavioural Research in Accounting, 3 (1991), pp. 117-145
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
