Redes sociales y rendimiento dinámico de la empresa: Evidencia de la industria de semiconductores de Taiwán
Social Networks and Dynamic Firm Performance: Evidence from the Taiwanese Semiconductor Industry
Resumen
Este estudio examina la relación entre la interconexión del consejo directivo y el rendimiento de la empresa. Utilizando datos de la industria de semiconductores de Taiwán de 2013 a 2015, este estudio utiliza la centralidad, los agujeros de la estructura y el número de interconexiones entre consejos directivos como proxies de la interconexión de los consejos directivos. Este estudio también evalúa el rendimiento de la empresa a largo plazo mediante un modelo de análisis envolvente de datos dinámicos. donde se concluye que la interconexión de los directivos mejora la eficiencia dinámica. Utilizando un análisis de la red social de los directivos, también identificamos las cinco mejores empresas con mejor interconexión del consejo directivo en términos de centralidad, agujeros estructurales, y el número de directores interconectados. En general, este trabajo es novedoso en la vinculación de la interconexión de los directivos con la eficiencia dinámica. El estudio enriquece la literatura contable existente sobre el papel de los directivos para influir en el rendimiento de la empresa y evaluar éste desde una perspectiva de eficiencia multidimensional.
Descargas
Citas
Adams, R. B., & Ferreira, D. (2009). Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(2), 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.007
Andersson, L., Jackson, S. E., & Russell, S. V. (2013). Greening organizational behavior: An introduction to the special issue. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(2), 151-155. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1854
Arya, B., & Lin, Z. (2007). Understanding collaboration outcomes from an extended resource-based view perspective: The roles of organizational characteristics, partner attributes, and network structures. Journal of Management, 33(5), 697-723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305561
Assaf, A. G. (2012). Benchmarking the Asia Pacific tourism industry: A Bayesian combination of DEA and stochastic frontier. Tourism Management, 33(5), 1122-1127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2011.11.021
Badar, K., Hite, J. M., & Badir, Y. F. (2013). Examining the relationship of co-authorship network centrality and gender on academic research performance: the case of chemistry researchers in Pakistan. Scientometrics, 94(2), 755-775. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0764-z
Banker, R., Natarajan, R., & Zhang, D. (2019). Two-stage estimation of the impact of contextual variables in stochastic frontier production function models using data envelopment analysis: second stage OLS versus bootstrap approaches. European journal of operational research, 278(2), 368-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2018.10.050
Banker, R. D., & Natarajan, R. (2008). Evaluating contextual variables affecting productivity using data envelopment analysis. Operations Research, 56(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.1070.0460
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170-1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631
Bowlin, W. F. (1998). Measuring performance: An introduction to data envelopment analysis (DEA). The Journal of Cost Analysis, 15(2), 3-27. https://doi.org/10.1080/08823871.1998.10462318
Brown, A. B., Dai, J., & Zur, E. (2018). Too busy or well-connected? Evidence from a shock to multiple directorships. The Accounting Review, 94(2), 83-104. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-52165
Burt, R. S. (1993). The social structure of competition. In Explorations in Economic Sociology. 57-91. http://homepage.ntu.edu.tw/~khsu/network/reading/burt.pdf
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349-399. https://doi.org/10.1086/421787
Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital: Oxford university press. https://doi.org/10.1177/009430610603500523
Castells, M. (2000). Materials for an exploratory theory of the network society1. The British journal of sociology, 51(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00005.x
Chang, T.-Y., Hsu, T.-C., & Hong, Y.-W. P. (2009). Exploiting data-dependent transmission control and MAC timing information for distributed detection in sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 58(3), 1369-1382. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5313958
Chen, J. H., & Jan, T. S. (2005). A variety-increasing view of the development of the semiconductor industry in Taiwan. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 72(7), 850-865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2004.06.002
Chiu, Y.-h., Luo, Z., Chen, Y.-C., Wang, Z., & Tsai, M.-P. (2013). A comparison of operating performance management between Taiwan banks and foreign banks based on the Meta-Hybrid DEA model. Economic Modelling, 33, 433-439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.039
Choi, T. Y., & Kim, Y. (2008). Structural embeddedness and supplier management: a network perspective. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 44(4), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-493X.2008.00069.x
Chu, P. Y., Lin, Y. L., Hsiung, H. H., & Liu, T. Y. (2006). Intellectual capital: An empirical study of ITRI. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(7), 886-902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2005.11.001
Cross, R., & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928-937. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159632
Cross, R., Thomas, R. J., & Light, D. A. (2008). How top talent uses networks and where rising stars get trapped. Organizational dynamics, 37(2), 165-180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2008.02.001
Dong, D., Gao, X., Sun, X., & Liu, X. (2018). Factors affecting the formation of copper international trade community: Based on resource dependence and network theory. Resources Policy, 57, 167-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2018.03.002
Doyle, P., & Wong, V. (1998). Marketing and competitive performance: an empirical study. European Journal of Marketing, 32(5/6), 514-535. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090569810216145
Drago, C., Millo, F., Ricciuti, R., & Santella, P. (2015). Corporate governance reforms, interlocking directorship and company performance in Italy. International Review of Law and Economics, 41, 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2014.09.003
Ebrahim, A., & Fattah, T. A. (2015). Corporate governance and initial compliance with IFRS in emerging markets: The case of income tax accounting in Egypt. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24, 46-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2015.02.003
Ferris, S. P., Jagannathan, M., & Pritchard, A. C. (2003). Too busy to mind the business? Monitoring by directors with multiple board appointments. The Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1087-1111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00559
Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D., & Mulholland, R. R. (1979). Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social networks, 2(2), 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(79)90002-9
Gallego-Álvarez, I., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Rodríguez-Dominguez, L. (2010). The influence of gender diversity on corporate performance. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 13(1), 53-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1138-4891(10)70012-1
Gnyawali, D. R., & Madhavan, R. (2001). Cooperative networks and competitive dynamics: A structural embeddedness perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 431-445. https://www.jstor.org/stable/259186
Gulati, R., Lavie, D., & Madhavan, R. R. (2011). How do networks matter? The performance effects of interorganizational networks. Research in Organizational Behavior, 31, 207-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2011.09.005
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of management, 35(6), 1404-1427. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309343469
Hopwood, A. G. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 156-182. https://doi.org/10.2307/2489870
Horton, J., Millo, Y., & Serafeim, G. (2012). Resources or power? Implications of social networks on compensation and firm performance. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 39(3‐4), 399-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2011.02276.x
Jiraporn, P., Kim, Y. S., Davidson, W. N., & Singh, M. (2006). Corporate governance, shareholder rights and firm diversification: An empirical analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 30(3), 947-963. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2005.08.005
Kang, K. H., Lee, S., & Huh, C. (2010). Impacts of positive and negative corporate social responsibility activities on company performance in the hospitality industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 29(1), 72-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2009.05.006
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (Vol. 2). New York: Wiley.
La Porta, R., Lopez‐de‐Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (2000). Agency problems and dividend policies around the world. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00199
Larcker, D. F., So, E. C., & Wang, C. C. (2013). Boardroom centrality and firm performance. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 55(2-3), 225-250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2013.01.006
Larrán-Jorge, M., & García-Correas, Á. (2015). ¿ Influyen los modelos de financiación autonómicos en la eficiencia de las universidades públicas españolas? Revista de Contabilidad, 18(2), 162-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2014.06.001
Lin, T.-Y., & Chiu, S.-H. (2013). Using independent component analysis and network DEA to improve bank performance evaluation. Economic Modelling, 32, 608-616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.03.003
Liu, F., & Lee, H. J. (2010). Use of social network information to enhance collaborative filtering performance. Expert systems with applications, 37(7), 4772-4778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.061
Liu, J. S., & Lu, W.-M. (2010). DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance. Omega, 38(6), 453-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.12.002
Liu, Y. (2014). Outside options and CEO turnover: The network effect. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 201-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2014.03.004
López, M. C. P., Miranda, M. E. G., Argente-Linares, E., & López-Sánchez, L. (2018). The internationalisation of Spanish family firms through business groups: Factors affecting the profitability, and the moderating effect of the family nature of the Spanish business. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review, 21(1), 82-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2017.09.002
Lu, W.-M., Kweh, Q. L., Nourani, M., & Huang, F.-W. (2016). Evaluating the efficiency of dual-use technology development programs from the R&D and socio-economic perspectives. Omega, 62, 82-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.011
Ma, R., Huang, Y. C., & Shenkar, O. (2011). Social networks and opportunity recognition: A cultural comparison between Taiwan and the United States. Strategic Management Journal, 32(11), 1183-1205. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.933
Markóczy, L., Li Sun, S., Peng, M. W., & Ren, B. (2013). Social network contingency, symbolic management, and boundary stretching. Strategic Management Journal, 34(11), 1367-1387. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2072
Marsden, P. V. (2002). Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Social Networks, 24(4), 407-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00016-3
Martínez Franco, C. M., & Guzmán Raja, I. (2014). Medida de la eficiencia en entidades no lucrativas: un estudio empíricopara fundaciones asistenciales. Revista de Contabilidad-Spanish Accounting Review (RC-SAR), 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2013.08.005
Maury, B. (2006). Family ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Western European corporations. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(2), 321-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.02.002
McDonald, J. (2009). Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European journal of operational research, 197(2), 792-798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2008.07.039
Mesa, R. B., Sánchez, H. M., & Sobrino, J. N. R. (2014). Main determinants of efficiency and implications on banking concentration in the European Union. Revista de Contabilidad, 17(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcsar.2013.08.006
Metters, R. D., Frei, F. X., & Vargas, V. A. (1999). Measurement of Multiple Sites in Service Firms with Data Envelopment Analysis. Production and Operations Management, 8(3), 264-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.1999.tb00308.x
Milliken, F. J., & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21(2), 402-433. https://www.jstor.org/stable/258667
Mizruchi, M. S. (1996). What do interlocks do? An analysis, critique, and assessment of research on interlocking directorates. Annual Review of Sociology, 22(1), 271-298. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2083432
Monaghan, S., Lavelle, J., & Gunnigle, P. (2017). Mapping networks: Exploring the utility of social network analysis in management research and practice. Journal of Business Research, 76, 136-144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.03.020
Nicholson, G. J., Alexander, M., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). Defining the social capital of the board of directors: An exploratory study. Journal of Management & Organization, 10(1), 54-72. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2004.10.1.54
Nicholson, G. J., & Kiel, G. C. (2004). A framework for diagnosing board effectiveness. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 12(4), 442-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00386.x
Ødegaard, F., & Roos, P. (2014). Measuring the Contribution of Workers' Health and Psychosocial Work-Environment on Production Efficiency. Production and Operations Management, 23(12), 2191-2208. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.12242
Ouyang, H. S. (2006). Agency problem, institutions, and technology policy: Explaining Taiwan's semiconductor industry development. Research Policy, 35(9), 1314-1328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.04.013
Park, H., & Kim, Y.-K. (2014). The role of social network websites in the consumer–brand relationship. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(4), 460-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2014.03.011
Parkhe, A., Wasserman, S., & Ralston, D. A. (2006). New frontiers in network theory development. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 560-568. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.21318917
Perry, T., & Peyer, U. (2005). Board seat accumulation by executives: A shareholder's perspective. The Journal of Finance, 60(4), 2083-2123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00788.x
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The extemal control of organizations. A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York et al.: Harper & Row.
Phan, P. H., Lee, S. H., & Lau, S. C. (2003). The performance impact of interlocking directorates: The case of Singapore. Journal of Managerial Issues, 338-352. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40604436
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116-145. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393988
Renneboog, L., & Zhao, Y. (2014). Director networks and takeovers. Journal of Corporate Finance, 28, 218-234. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2327620
Richardson, A. J. (2009). Regulatory networks for accounting and auditing standards: A social network analysis of Canadian and international standard-setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(5), 571-588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.11.005
Rodan, S. (2010). Structural holes and managerial performance: Identifying the underlying mechanisms. Social networks, 32(3), 168-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2009.11.002
Sandström, A., & Carlsson, L. (2008). The performance of policy networks: the relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 497-524. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00281.x
Selvam, M., Gayathri, J., Vasanth, V., Lingaraja, K., & Marxiaoli, S. (2016). Determinants of firm performance: A Subjective Model. Int'l J. Soc. Sci. Stud., 4, 90. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v4i7.1662
Sparrowe, R. T., Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., & Kraimer, M. L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 316-325. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069458
Strandskov, J. (2006). Sources of competitive advantages and business performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 7(3), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1080/16111699.2006.9636132
Sun, L., & Stuebs, M. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and firm productivity: Evidence from the chemical industry in the United States. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(2), 251-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1579-9
Surin, E. F., & Ab Wahab, I. (2013). The effect of social network on business performance in established manufacturing small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in Malaysia. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 67, 55. http://www.ipedr.com/vol67/012-CBETM2013-N10014.pdf
Ting, I. W. K., & Lean, H. H. (2011). Capital structure of government-linked companies in Malaysia Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting & Finance, 7(2), 137-156. http://web.usm.my/journal/aamjaf/vol%207-2-2011/7-2-6.pdf
Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European journal of operational research, 130(3), 498-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00407-5
Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3), 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2009.07.003
Tsai, K.-M., & Wang, P.-J. (2001). Comparisons of neural network models on material removal rate in electrical discharge machining. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 117(1), 111-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-0136(01)01146-3
Tsai, L.-C., Zhang, R., & Zhao, C. (2019). Political connections, network centrality and firm innovation. Finance Research Letters, 28, 180-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2018.04.016
Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9(3), 471-481. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1984.4279680
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35-67. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2393808
Van Ees, H., Postma, T. J., & Sterken, E. (2003). Board characteristics and corporate performance in the Netherlands. Eastern Economic Journal, 29(1), 41-58. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40326457
Wang, C.-T., & Chiu, C.-S. (2014). Competitive strategies for Taiwan's semiconductor industry in a new world economy. Technology in Society, 36, 60-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.12.002
Wang, W.-K., Lu, W.-M., Kweh, Q. L., & Lai, H.-W. (2014). Does corporate social responsibility influence the corporate performance of the US telecommunications industry? Telecommunications Policy, 38(7), 580-591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.telpol.2014.01.004
Warren, C., & Jones, J. (2018). Corporate financial accounting: Cengage Learning.
Wong, L. H. H., Gygax, A. F., & Wang, P. (2015). Board interlocking network and the design of executive compensation packages. Social Networks, 41, 85-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.965991
Yeo, H.-J., Pochet, C., & Alcouffe, A. (2003). CEO reciprocal interlocks in French corporations. Journal of Management and Governance, 7(1), 87-108. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022442602193
Zaheer, A., & Bell, G. G. (2005). Benefiting from network position: Firm capabilities, structural holes, and performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 809-825. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.482
Derechos de autor 2021 Revista de Contabilidad - Spanish Accounting Review
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
