Gobierno Corporativo y Rendición de Cuentas: ¿Existe Algún Efecto Sobre la Performance Empresarial?
Corporate Governance and Accountability: Any Effect on Business Performance?
Resumen
El artículo analiza el efecto que la estructura de los consejos de administración y la divulgación de información de responsabilidad social corporativa ejercen sobre la performance empresarial. A partir de un modelo dinámico estimado mediante el método generalizado de momentos (MGM), y utilizando una muestra de 171 sociedades españolas cotizadas en el periodo 2004-2008, se constata que no existe ningún efecto de la estructura de gobierno corporativo y la rendición de cuentas sobre la performance de la organización, tras controlar por la performance previa. El artículo pone de manifiesto la importancia de considerar la endogeneidad dinámica en la relación existente entre gobierno corporativo/responsabilidad social corporativa y performance.
Descargas
Citas
[Abbott and Monsen, 1979] W. Abbott, R. Monsen. On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: selfreported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement. Academy of Management Journal, 22 (1979), pp. 501-515
[Adams et al., 1995] C. Adams, W. Hill, C. Roberts. Environmental employee and ethical reporting in Europe. ACCA Research Report 41, Chartered Association of Certified Accountants. London, (1995),
[Adams et al., 1998] C. Adams, W. Hill, C. Roberts. Corporate social reporting practices in Western Europe: Legitimating corporate behaviour?. British Accounting Review, 30 (1998), pp. 1-21
[Adams and Mehran, 2005] R. Adams, H. Mehran. Corporate performance, board structure and its determinants in the banking industry. Working Paper, Federal Reserve Bank of New York., (2005),
[Allouche and Laroche, 2005] J. Allouche, P. Laroche. A Meta-Analytical Investigation of the Relationship between Coporate Social and Financial Performance. Revue de Gestion des Resources Humaines, 57 (2005), pp. 18-41
[Anderson and Frankle, 1980] J.C. Anderson, A.W. Frankle. Voluntary social reporting: An iso-beta portfolio analysis. Accounting Review, 55 (1980), pp. 467-479
[Angla and Seto, 2009] J. Angla, D. Seto. Responsabilidad social corporativa y resultado financiero: un análisis empírico. Administrando en entornos inciertos, coord. por Francisco José Cossío Silva, (2009),
[Aras et al., 2010] G. Aras, A. Aybars, O. Kutlu. Managing corporate performance Investigating the relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in emerging markets. International Journal of productivity and Performance management, 59 (2010), pp. 229-254
[Archel, 2003] P. Archel. La divulgación de la información social y medioambiental en la gran empresa española en el periodo 1994-1998: Situación actual y perspectivas. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 32 (2003), pp. 571-601
[Archel and Lizarraga, 2001] P. Archel, F. Lizarraga. Algunos determinantes de la información medioambiental divulgada por las empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista de Contabilidad, 4 (2001), pp. 129-153
[Arellano and Bond, 1991] M. Arellano, S. Bond. Some Tests of Specification for Panel Data: Monte Carlo Evidence and an Application to Employment Equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58 (1991), pp. 277-297
[Arellano and Bover, 1995] M. Arellano, O. Bover. Another Look at the Instrumental Variable Estimation of Error-Component Models. Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1995), pp. 29-51
[Aupperle et al., 1985] K. Aupperle, A. Carroll, J. Hatfield. An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28 (1985), pp. 446-463
[Baglioni and Colombo, 2009] A. Baglioni, L. Colombo. The Efficiency View of Corporate Boards: Evidence from Italian Listed Firms. Working Paper., (2009),
[Barnett and Salomon, 2006] M. Barnett, R. Salomon. Beyond dichotomy: The Curvilinear Relationship between Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 27 (2006), pp. 1101-1122
[Bathala et al., 1995] Ch. Bathala, R. Rao. The Determinants of Board Composition: An Agency Theory Perspective. Managerial and Decision Economics, 16 (1995), pp. 59-69
[Bauer et al., 2006] R. Bauer, R. Otten, A. Rad. Ethical investing in Australia: Is there a financial penalti?. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 14 (2006), pp. 33-48
[Baysinger and Butler, 1985] B. Baysinger, H. Butler. Corporate governance and the board of directors: performance effects of changes in board composition. Journal of Law Economics and Organization, 1 (1985), pp. 101-124
[Beiner et al., 2004] S. Beiner, W. Drobetz, F. Schmid, H. Zimmermann. Is board size an independent corporate governance mechanism?. Kylos, 57 (2004), pp. 327-356
[Beiner et al., 2006] S. Beiner, W. Drobetz, M. Schmid, H. Zimmermann. An integrated framework of corporate governance and firm valuation. European Financial Management, 12 (2006), pp. 249-283
[Belkaoui and Karpik, 1989] A. Belkaoui, P. Karpik. Determinants of the corporate decision to disclose social information. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 2 (1989), pp. 36-51
[Bello, 2005] Z. Bello. Socially responsible investing and portfolio diversification. The Journal of Financial Research, 28 (2005), pp. 41-57
[Bennedsen et al., 2008] M. Bennedsen, H. Kongsted, Ch.K. Meisner. The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms. Journal of banking and finance, 32 (2008), pp. 1098-1109
[Benson et al., 2006] K. Benson, T. Brailsford, J. Humphrey. Do socially responsible fund managers really invest differently?. Journal of Business Ethics, 65 (2006), pp. 337-357
[Bhagat and Black, 2001] S. Bhagat, B. Black. The non-correlation between board independence and long term firm performance. Journal of Corporation Law, 27 (2001), pp. 231-274
[Bhagat and Bolton, 2008] S. Bhagat, B. Bolton. Corporate Governance and Firm Performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14 (2008), pp. 257-273
[Blacconiere and Northcut, 1997] W.G. Blacconiere, W.D. Northcut. Environmental information and market reactions to environmental legislation. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance, 12 (1997), pp. 149-178
[Blacconiere and Patten, 1994] W.G. Blacconiere, D.M. Patten. Environmental disclosures, regulatory costs, and changes in firm value. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 18 (1994), pp. 357-377
[Blundell and Bond, 1998] R. Blundell, S. Bond. Initial Conditions and Moment Restrictions in Dynamic Panel Data Models. Journal of Econometrics, 87 (1998), pp. 115-143
[Boone, Field, Karpoff, Raheja, Ch., 2007] A.L. Boone, L.C. Field, J.M. Karpoff, Ch.G. Raheja. The Determinants of Corporate Board Size and Independence: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics., 85 (2007), pp. 66-101
[Boutin and Savaria, 2004] F. Boutin, P. Savaria. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Risk. Journal of Investing, 13 (2004), pp. 57-67
[Bowman, 1978] E. Bowman. Strategy, annual reports and alchemy. California Management Review, Spring, (1978)pp. 64-71
[Bowman and Haire, 1975] E. Bowman, M. Haire. A strategic posture toward corporate social responsibility. California Management Review, 18 (1975), pp. 49-58
[Bragdon and Marlin, 1972] J. Bragdon, J. Marlin. Is pollution profitable?. Risk Management, 19 (1972), pp. 9-18
[Brine et al., 2006] M. Brine, R. Brown, G. Hackett. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance in the Australian context. Australian Treasury., (2006),
[Cabeza et al., 2010] L. Cabeza, A. Martínez, F. Marbella. Corporate social responsibility and business performance: the case of social work at Spanish savings banks. Revista Innovar, 20 (2010), pp. 33-46
[Callado and Utrero, 2005] F. Callado, N. Utrero. El impacto de la Responsabilidad Social Corporativa en el valor de mercado de la empresa: un análisis para el mercado español. Working Paper., (2005),
[Carmona and Carrasco, 1988] S. Carmona, F. Carrasco. Información de contenido social y estados contables: Una aproximación empírica y algunas consideraciones teóricas. Actualidad Financiera, noviembre, (1988), pp. 2175-2192
[Chand and Fraser, 2006] M. Chand, S. Fraser. The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance: Industry Type as a Boundary Condition. The Business Review, 5 (2006), pp. 240-245
[Cheung and Mak, 2010] P. Cheung, W. Mak. The Relation between Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure and Financial Performance: Evidence from de Commercial Banking Industry. Working Paper. Simon Fraser University., (2010),
[Chong et al., 2006] J. Chong, M. Her, G. Phillips. To sin or not to sin?. Now thats the question, Journal of Asset Management, 6 (2006), pp. 406-417
[Christmann, 2000] P. Christmann. Effects of “Best Practices” of Environmental Management on Cost Advantage: The Role of Complementary Assets. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (2000), pp. 663-680
[Coles et al., 2008] J.L. Coles, N.D. Daniel, L. Naveen. Boards: does one fit all?. Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2008), pp. 329-356
[Conyon and Peck, 1998] M. Conyon, S. Peck. Board size and corporate performance: evidence from European countries. The European Journal of Finance, 4 (1998), pp. 291-304
[Core et al., 2006] J. Core, W. Guay, T. Rusticus. Does weak governance cause weak stock returns?. An examination of firm operating performance and investors’ expectations, Journal of Finance, 56 (2006), pp. 655-687
[Cormier and Magnan, 2007] D. Cormier, M. Magnan. The revisited contribution of environmental reporting to investors’ valuation of a firms earnings: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 62 (2007), pp. 613-626
[Cowen et al., 1987] S. Cowen, L. Ferreri, J. Parker. The impact of corporate characteristics on social responsibility disclosure: A typology and frequency-based analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 12 (1987), pp. 111-122
[De Andrés and Rodríguez, 2009] P. De Andrés, Rodríguez. Friendly or Controlling Boards?. Documento de Trabajo N° 438/2009. Fundación de las Cajas de Ahorros., (2009),
[Deegan and Gordon, 1996] C. Deegan, B. Gordon. A study of the environmental disclosure practices of Australian corporation. Accounting and Business Research, 26 (1996), pp. 187-199
[Deegan and Rankin, 1996] C. Deegan, M. Rankin. Do Australian companies report environmental news objectively? An analysis of environmental disclosures by firms prosecuted successfully by the Environmental Protection Authority. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9 (1996), pp. 50-67
[Derwall et al., 2005] J. Derwall, N. Guenster, R. Bauer, K. Koedijk. The ecoefficiency premium puzzle. Financial Analysts Journal, 61 (2005), pp. 51-63
[Dhaliwal et al., 2011] D. Dhaliwal, O. Li, A. Tsang, Y. Yang. Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86 (2011), pp. 59-100
[Dowell et al., 2000] G. Dowell, S. Hart, B. Yeung. Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?. Management Science, 46 (2000), pp. 1059-1074
[Fernández et al., 1998] A.I. Fernández, S. Gómez-Ansón, C. Fernández-Méndez. El papel supervisor del Consejo de Administración sobre la actuación gerencial. Evidencia para el caso español. Investigaciones Económicas, 22 (1998), pp. 501-516
[Fernández and Luna, 2010] J.L. Fernández, L. Luna. Mayor transparencia y credibilidad para hacer frente a la crisis de confianza de la RSE. En Morata. La Responsabilidad Social de las Empresas a debate: lecciones de la crisis, pp. 58-68
[Fiori et al., 2007] G. Fiori, F. Donato, M.F. Izzo. Corporate social responsibility and firms performance: and analysis on Italian listed companies. SSRN Working Paper Series., (2007),
[Fombrun et al., 1990] Ch. Fombrun, M. Shanley. Whats in a name?. Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (1990), pp. 233-258
[Freedman and Jaggi, 1988] M. Freedman, B. Jaggi. An analysis of the association between pollution disclosure and economic performance. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 1 (1988), pp. 43-58
[Friedman, 1970] M. Friedman. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, (13 septiembre 1970)pp. 122-126
[García Ayuso and Larrinaga, 2003] M. García Ayuso, C. Larrinaga. Environmental disclosure in Spain: Corporate characteristics and media exposure. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting, 115 (2003), pp. 184-214
[García and Gil de Albornoz, 2005] B. García, B. Gil de Albornoz. El Gobierno Corporativo y las Prácticas de Earnings Management: Evidencia empírica en España. Working Paper, WP-EC 2005-11. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, (2005),
[Geczy et al., 2005] C. Geczy, R. Stambaugh, D. Levin. Investing in socially responsible mutual funds. Working Paper, Wharton University., (2005),
[Gómez, 2008] F. Gómez. Responsabilidad social corporativa y performance financiero: treinta y cinco años de investigación empírica en busca de un consenso. Principios, 11 (2008), pp. 5-22
[Gray et al., 2001] R. Gray, M. Javad, D. Power, C. Sinclair. Social and environmental disclosures and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 28 (3 y 4), (2001), pp. 327-356
[Gray et al., 1995] R. Gray, R. Kouhy, S. Lavers. Methodological themes: constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8 (1995), pp. 78-101
[Gray et al., 1987] R. Gray, D. Owen, K. Maunders. Corporate social reporting: Accounting and Accountability. Prentice-Hall, (1987)
[Guest, 2008] P. Guest. The determinants of board size and composition: Evidence from the UK. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14 (2008), pp. 51-72
[Guest, 2009] P. Guest. The impact of board size on firm performance: evidence from the UK. The European Journal of Finance, 15 (2009), pp. 385-404
[Guthrie and Parker, 1989] J. Guthrie, L. Parker. Corporate social reporting, a rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19 (1989), pp. 343-352
[Hackston and Milne, 1996] D. Hackston, M. Milne. Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 9 (1996), pp. 77-108
[Haubrich, 1998] J.G. Haubrich. Bank diversification: Laws and fallacies of large numbers. Economic Review, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Q2, (1998), pp. 2-9
[Heinze, 1976] D. Heinze. Financial correlates of a social involvement measure. Akron Business and Economic Review, 7 (1976), pp. 48-51
[Hogner, 1982] R. Hogner. Corporate social reporting: eight decades of development at US Steel. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 4 (1982), pp. 45-55
[Holtz-Eakin et al., 1988] D. Holtz-Eakin, W. Newey, H. Rosen. Estimating Vector Autoregressions with Panel Data. Econometrica, 56 (1988), pp. 1371-1395
[Hong and Kacperczyk, 2009] H. Hong, M. Kacperczyk. The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93 (2009), pp. 15-36
[Husillos, 2007] F. Husillos. Una aproximación desde la teoría de la legitimidad a la información medioambiental revelada por las empresas españolas cotizadas. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 36 (2007), pp. 97-122
[Jensen, 2002] M. Jensen. Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12 (2002), pp. 235-256
[Jones and Murrell, 2001] R. Jones, A. Murrell. Signalling Positive Corporate Social Performance. Business and Society, 40 (2001), pp. 59-78
[Kelly, 1981] G. Kelly. Australian social responsibility disclosure: some insights into contemporary measurement. Accounting and Finance, 21 (1981), pp. 97-104
[Lehn et al., 2008] K. Lehn, S. Patro, M. Zhao. Determinants of the Size and Structure of Corporate Boards: 1935-2000. Working Paper. Center for Economic Institutions Working Paper Series, (2008),
[Linck et al., 2008] J.S. Linck, J.M. Netter, T. Yang. The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 87 (2008), pp. 308-328
[Mak and Li, 2001] Y.T. Mak, Y. Li. Determinants of corporate ownership and board structure: evidence from Singapore. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7 (2001), pp. 235-256
[Margolis and Walsh, 2003] J. Margolis, J. Walsh. Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48 (2003), pp. 268-305
[Marom, 2006] I. Marom. Toward a Unified Theory of the CSP-CFP Link. Journal of Business Ethics, 67 (2006), pp. 191-200
[McWilliams and Siegel, 1997] A. McWilliams, D. Siegel. The role of money managers in assessing corporate social responsibility research. Journal of Investing, 6 (1997), pp. 98-107
[McWilliams and Siegel, 2001] A. McWilliams, D. Siegel. Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance: Correlation or Misspecification?. Strategic Management Journal, 21 (2001), pp. 603-609
[Mínguez and Martín, 2003] A. Mínguez, F. Martín. El Consejo de Administración como mecanismo de control: Evidencia para el mercado español. Working Paper, WP-EC 2003-02. Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, (2003),
[Miras et al., 2011] M.M. Miras, A. Carrasco, B. Escobar. Una revisión de los meta-análisis sobre Responsabilidad Social Corporativa y Rendimiento Financiero. Revista de Estudios Empresariales. Segunda época, 1 (2011), pp. 118-132
[Moneva, 2007] J.M. Moneva. El marco de la información sobre responsabilidad social de las organizaciones. Ekonomiaz, 65 (2007), pp. 284-317
[Moneva and Llena, 1996] J.M. Moneva, F. Llena. Análisis de la información sobre responsabilidad social en las empresas industriales que cotizan en Bolsa. Revista Española de Financiación y Contabilidad, 25 (1996), pp. 361-401
[Moneva and Llena, 2000] J.M. Moneva, F. Llena. Environmental disclosures in the annual reports of large companies in Spain. The European Accounting Review, 9 (2000), pp. 7-29
[Moneva and Ortas, 2007] J.M. Moneva, E. Ortas. Información de sostenibilidad y performance financiera en el mercado español: especial referencia al sector financiero. Ekonomiaz, 66 (2007), pp. 246-265
[Moneva and Ortas, 2009] J.M. Moneva, E. Ortas. Desarrollo sostenible e información corporativa. Evolución y situación actual. Economía Industrial, 371 (2009), pp. 139-154
[Moneva et al., 2007] J.M. Moneva, J.M. Rivera, M.J. Muñoz. The corporate stakeholder commitment and social and financial performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 107 (2007), pp. 84-102
[Moore, 2001] G. Moore. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: An Investigation in the U.K. Supermarket Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 34 (2001), pp. 299-315
[Moussavi and Evans, 1986] F. Moussavi, D. Evans. An attributional approach to measuring corporate social performance. Working Paper. Presentado en Academy of Management meetings, San Diego, (1986),
[Ochoa and Aranguren, 2005] E. Ochoa, N. Aranguren. Divulgación de información social y medioambiental. Un estudio empírico de las empresas del IBEX 35. Comunicación presentada al XIII Congreso AECA, Oviedo, (2005),
[Orlitzky et al., 2003] M. Orlitzky, F. Schmidt, S. Rynes. Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (2003), pp. 403-411
[Patten, 1990] D. Patten. The market reaction to social responsibility disclosures: The case of the Sullivan Principles signings. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 15 (1990), pp. 575-587
[Patten, 1991] D. Patten. Exposure, legitimacy and social disclosure. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 10 (1991), pp. 297-308
[Patten, 1992] D. Patten. Intra-industry environmental disclosures in response to the Alaskan oil spill: a note on legitimacy theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17 (1992), pp. 471-475
[Peasnell et al., 2003] K. Peasnell, P. Pope, S. Young. Managerial Equity Ownership and the Demand for Outside Directors. European Financial Management, 9 (2003), pp. 231-250
[Peloza, 2006] J. Peloza. Using Corporate Social Responsibility as Insurance for Financial Performance. California Management Review, 48 (2006), pp. 51-72
[Post, 1991] J. Post. . CT: JAI Press, (1991)
[Prado et al., 2009] J. Prado, I. García, I. Gallego. Características del consejo de administración e información en materia de responsabilidad social corporativa. Revista española de financiación y contabilidad, 141 (2009), pp. 107-135
[Preston, 1978] L. Preston. Analyzing corporate social performance: Methods and results. Journal of Contemporary Business, 7 (1978), pp. 135-150
[Preston and O’Bannon, 1997] L. Preston, D. O’Bannon. The Corporate Social-Financial Performance Relationship. A Typology and Analysis. Business and Society, 36 (1997), pp. 419-429
[Rediker and Seth, 1995] K. Rediker, A. Seth. Boards of directors and substitution effects of alternative governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 16 (1995), pp. 85-99
[Roberts, 1992] R. Roberts. Determinants of corporate social responsibility disclosure: an application of stakeholder theory. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17 (1992), pp. 595-612
[Roodman, 2009] D. Roodman. A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71 (2009), pp. 135-158
[Salama, 2005] A. Salama. A Note on the Impact of Environmental Performance on Financial Performance. Structural Change and Economics Dynamics, 16 (2005), pp. 413-421
[Schultz et al., 2010] E. Schultz, D. Tan, K. Walsh. Endogeneity and the corporate governance-performance relation. Australian Journal of Management, 35 (2010), pp. 145-163
[Shank et al., 2005] T. Shank, D. Manullang, R. Hill. Is it better to be naughty or nice?. Journal of Investing, 14 (2005), pp. 82-87
[Small and Graff Zivins, 2002] A. Small, J. Graff Zivins. A Modigliani-Miller Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility. Working Paper. Columbia University, (2002),
[Stanwick and Stanwick, 1998] P. Stanwick, S. Stanwick. The Relationship between Corporate Social Performance and Organization size, financial Performance and Environmental Performance: An Empirical Examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (1998), pp. 195-204
[Statman, 2006] M. Statman. Socially responsible indexes: Composition, performance and tracking error. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 32 (2006), pp. 100-109
[Sturdivant and Ginter, 1977] F. Sturdivant, J. Ginter. Corporate Social Responsiveness: Management Attitudes and Economic Performance. California Management Review, 19 (1977), pp. 30-39
[Suntraruk and Ph., 2009] Ph. Suntraruk. Boards of Directors, Ownership and Firms Performance: A study of SET100 Firms in Thailand. Working Paper, (2009),
[Trotman and Bradley, 1981] K. Trotman, G. Bradley. Associations between social responsibility disclosure and characteristics of companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6 (1981), pp. 355-362
[Ullmann, 1985] A. Ullmann. Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure and economic performance. Academy of Management Review, 10 (1985), pp. 540-577
[Vance, 1975] S. Vance. Are socially responsible firms good investment risks?. Management Review, 64 (1975), pp. 18-24
[Van de Velde et al., 2005] E. Van de Velde, W. Vermeir, F. Corten. Corporate social responsibility and financial performance. Corporate Governance, 5 (2005), pp. 129-138
[Waddock and Graves, 1997] S.A. Waddock, S.B. Graves. The corporate social performance: financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18 (1997), pp. 303-319
[Wintoki et al., 2008] M.B. Wintoki, J.S. Linck, J.M. Netter. Endogeneity and the Dynamics of Corporate Governance. 4th Annual Conference on Empirical Legal Studies Paper,
[Wu, 2006] M. Wu. Corporate Social Performance, Corporate Financial Performance and Firm Size: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of American Academy of Business, 8 (2006), pp. 163-171
[Yermack, 1996] D. Yermack. Higher Market Valuation of Companies with a Small Board of Directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40 (1996), pp. 185-212
[Zeghal and Ahmed, 1990] D. Zeghal, A. Ahmed. Comparison of social responsibility information disclosure media used by Canadian firms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 3 (1990), pp. 38-53
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
