Consecuencias de las prácticas de sostenibilidad en el coste de capital y en la reputación corporativa
Effect of sustainable practices on capital costs and corporate reputation
Resumen
El objetivo de esta investigación es clarificar el efecto que las prácticas sostenibles generan en el coste de capital y en la reputación corporativa, al ser prácticas percibidas por los inversores y el mercado y que generan un impacto a nivel económico y financiero. Las hipótesis son testadas para una muestra compuesta por 1.757 empresas internacionales, cotizadas y no financieras. Dicha muestra está constituida por un total de 8.785 observaciones pertenecientes a 25 países y una región administrativa especial de la República Popular China (Hong Kong) para el periodo 2006-2010.Los resultados tras aplicar una metodología para datos de panel confirman cómo las prácticas de sostenibilidad son valoradas positivamente por los inversores y otros stakeholders, generando un efecto positivo en la reputación empresarial y un menor coste de capital.
Descargas
Citas
[Adams, 2002] C.A. Adams. Internal organisational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorising. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (2002), pp. 223-250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12226
[Adams y Zutshi, 2004] C. Adams, A. Zutshi. Corporate social responsibility: Why business should act responsibly and be accountable. Australian Accounting Review, 14 (2004), pp. 31-39
[Archel et al., 2009] P. Archel, J. Husillos, C. Larrinaga, C. Spence. Social disclosure, legitimacy theory and the role of the state. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 22 (2009), pp. 1284-1307
[Arellano y Bond, 1991] M. Arellano, S. Bond. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58 (1991), pp. 277-297
[Asher et al., 2005] C. Asher, J.M. Mahoney, J.T. Mahoney. Towards a property rights foundation for a stakeholder theory of the firm. Journal of Management and Governance, 9 (2005), pp. 5-32
[Basu y Palazzo, 2008] K. Basu, G. Palazzo. Corporate social responsibility: A process model of sense making. Academy of Management Review, 33 (2008), pp. 122-136
[Berman et al., 2005] S.L. Berman, S.A. Phillips, A.C. Wicks. Resource dependence, managerial discretion and stakeholder performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1 (2005), pp. B1-B6
[Blanco et al., 2009] B. Blanco, J.M. García, J.A. Tribó. The complementary between segment disclosure and earnings quality, and its effect on cost of capital. 32nd Annual Congress of the European Accounting Association,
[Boatright, 1994] J.R. Boatright. Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or whats so special about shareholders?. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4 (1994), pp. 393-407
[Botosan, 2006] C.A. Botosan. Disclosure and the cost of capital: what do we know?. Accounting and Business Research, International Accounting Policy Forum, (2006), pp. 31-40
[Botosan y Plumlee, 2005] C.A. Botosan, M.A. Plumlee. Assessing alternative proxies for the expected risk premium. The Accounting Review, 80 (2005), pp. 21-53
[Brammer y Pavelin, 2004] S. Brammer, S. Pavelin. Building a good reputation. European Management Journal, 22 (2004), pp. 704-713
[Branco y Rodrigues, 2006] M.C. Branco, L.L. Rodrigues. Corporate social responsibility and resource based perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 69 (2006), pp. 111-132
[Carroll, 1979] A.B. Carroll. A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4 (1979), pp. 497-505
[Chen et al., 2009] K. Chen, Z. Chen, K. Wei. Agency costs of free cash flow and the effect of shareholder rights on the implied cost of equity capital. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46 (2009), pp. 171-207
[Choi y Wang, 2009] J. Choi, H. Wang. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30 (2009), pp. 895-907
[Cormier et al., 2005] D. Cormier, M. Magnan, B. van Velthoven. Environmental disclosure quality in large German companies: Economic incentives, public pressures or institutional conditions. European Accounting Review, 14 (2005), pp. 111-122
[de Miguel et al., 2005] A. De Miguel, J. Pindado, C. de la Torre. How do entrenchment and expropriation phenomena affect control mechanisms?. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13 (2005), pp. 505-516
[Deegan, 2000] C. Deegan. Financial accounting theory. Irwin McGraw-Hill, (2000)
[Deegan, 2002] C. Deegan. The legitimising effect of social and environmental disclosures–A theoretical foundation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15 (2002), pp. 282-311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12226
[Dhaliwal et al., 2011] D. Dhaliwal, O. Li, A. Tsang, Y. Yang. Voluntary non-financial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86 (2011), pp. 59-100
[Donaldson y Preston, 1995] T. Donaldson, L.E. Preston. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1995), pp. 65-91
[Dowling, 2004] G.R. Dowling. Corporate reputations: Should you compete on yours. California Management Review, 46 (2004), pp. 19-36
[Easton, 2004] P.D. Easton. PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. The Accounting Review, 79 (2004), pp. 73-95
[El Ghoul et al., 2011] S. El Ghoul, O. Guedhami, C.C.Y. Kwok, D. Mishra. Does corporate social responsibility affect the cost of capital?. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35 (2011), pp. 2388-24060
[Fama y French, 1992] E.F. Fama, K.R. French. The cross-section of expected stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), pp. 427-465
[Fombrun, 1996] C. Fombrun. Reputation: Realising value from the corporate image. Harvard Business School Press, (1996)
[Fombrun et al., 2000] C.J. Fombrun, N.A. Gardberg, M.L. Barnett. Opportunity platforms and safety nets: Corporate citizenship and reputational risk. Business and Society Review, 105 (2000), pp. 85-106
[Fombrun y Shanley, 1990] C. Fombrun, M. Shanley. What’ in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (1990), pp. 233-258
[Freeman, 1984] R.E. Freeman. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing Inc, (1984)
[Friedman, 1970] M. Friedman. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, (1970), pp. 13-33
[Garrigues Walker y Trullenque-San Juan, 2008] A. Garrigues Walker, F. Trullenque-San Juan. Responsabilidad social corporativa: ¿papel mojado o necesidad estratégica?. Harvard Deusto Business Review, 164 (2008), pp. 18-36
[Godfrey y Hatch, 2007] P.C. Godfrey, N.W. Hatch. Researching corporate social responsibility: An agenda for the 21st Century. Journal of Business Ethics, 70 (2007), pp. 87-98
[González-Esteban, 2007] E. González-Esteban. La teoría de los stakeholders: un puente para el desarrollo práctico de la ética empresarial y de la responsabilidad social corporativa. VERITAS, 2 (2007), pp. 205-224
[Gray et al., 1995] R.H. Gray, R. Kouhy, S. Lavers. Methodological themes: constructing a research database of social and environmental reporting by UK companies. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 8 (1995), pp. 78-101
[Gray et al., 1996] R.H. Gray, D. Owen, C. Adams. Accounting and accountability: Changes and challenges in corporate social and environmental reporting. Prentice Hall, (1996)
[Gregory et al., 2011] A. Gregory, R. Tharyan, J. Whittaker. Corporate social responsibility and the valuation of firms. Xfi Centre for Finance and Investment, (2011)
[Guenster et al., 2011] N. Guenster, R. Bauer, J. Derwall, K. Koedijk. The economic value of corporate ecoefficiency. European Financial Management, 17 (2011), pp. 679-704
[Guthrie y Parker, 1990] J. Guthrie, L.D. Parker. Corporate social reporting: A rebuttal of legitimacy theory. Accounting and Business Research, 19 (1989), pp. 343-352
[Hail y Leuz, 2006] L. Hail, C. Leuz. International differences in cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulations matter?. Journal of Accounting Research, 44 (2006), pp. 485-531
[Heard y Bolce, 1981] J. Heard, W. Bolce. The political significance of corporate social reporting in the United States of America. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6 (1981), pp. 247-254
[Hillman y Keim, 2001] A.J. Hillman, G.D. Keim. Shareholder value stakeholder management, and social issues: What’ the bottom line?. Strategic Management Journal, 22 (2001), pp. 125-139
[Hong y Andersen, 2011] Y. Hong, M.L. Andersen. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and earnings management: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Ethics, 104 (2011), pp. 461-471
[Jo y Harjoto, 2011] H. Jo, M. Harjoto. Corporate governance and firm value: The impact of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103 (2011), pp. 351-383
[Jones, 1995] T.M. Jones. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1995), pp. 404-437
[Jones y Wicks, 1999] T. Jones, A. Wicks. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24 (1999), pp. 206-222
[Kasznik, 1999] R. Kasznik. On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 37 (1999), pp. 57-81
[Knox y Maklan, 2004] S. Knox, S. Maklan. Corporate social responsibility: Moving beyond investment towards measuring outcomes. European Management Journal, 22 (2004), pp. 508-516
[Lai et al., 2010] C. Lai, C. Chiu, C. Yang, D. Pai. The effects of corporate social responsibility on brand performance: The mediating effect of industrial brand equity and corporate reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 95 (2010), pp. 457-469
[Larrán y García-Meca, 2004] M. Larrán, E. García-Meca. Costes, beneficios y factores ligados a la política de divulgación de información financiera. Revista de Contabilidad, 7 (2004), pp. 75-111
[Lindblom, 1993] C.K. Lindblom. The implications of organizational legitimacy for corporate social performance and disclosure. Paper presented at the Critical Perspective on Accounting Conference, New York, NY. (1993)
[Lourenço et al., 2012] I.C. Lourenço, M. Castelo, J. Curto, T. Eugénio. How does the market value corporate sustainability performance?. Journal of Business Ethics, 108 (2012), pp. 417-428
[Mahoney et al., 2008] L. Mahoney, W. LaGore, J.A. Scazzero. Corporate Sscial performance financial performance for firms that restate earnings. Issues in Social and Environmental Accounting, 2 (2008), pp. 104-130
[McWilliams y Siegel, 2001] A. McWilliams, D.S. Siegel. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firma perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26 (2001), pp. 117-127
[McWilliams et al., 2006] A. McWilliams, D.S. Siegel, P.M. Wright. Corporate social responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43 (2006), pp. 1-18
[Meek y Gray, 1989] G. Meek, S.J. Gray. Globalization of stock markets and foreign listing requirements: Voluntary disclosures by continental European companies listed on the London Stock Exchange. Journal of International Business Studies, 20 (1989), pp. 315-316
[Melo y Garrido-Morgado, 2012] T. Melo, A. Garrido-Morgado. Corporate reputation: A combination of social responsibility and industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environment Management, 19 (2012), pp. 11-31
[Mitchell et al., 1997] R.K. Mitchell, B.R. Agle, D.J. Wood. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22 (1997), pp. 853-886
[Nieto y Fernández, 2004] M. Nieto, R. Fernández. Responsabilidad social corporativa: la última innovación en management. Universia Business Review, Madrid, (2004),
[Ohlson y Juettner-Nauroth, 2005] J.A. Ohlson, B.E. Juettner-Nauroth. Expected EPS and EPS growth as determinants of value. Review of Accounting Studies, 10 (2005), pp. 349-365
[Orlitzky et al., 2003] M. Orlitzky, F.L. Schmidt, S.L. Rynes. Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24 (2003), pp. 403-441
[Parlamento Europeo, 2013] Parlamento Europeo. Informe sobre responsabilidad social de las empresas: comportamiento responsable y transparente de las empresas y crecimiento sostenible (2012/2098(INI)). Comisión de Asuntos Jurídicos, Ponente, (2013)
[Peloza, 2005] J. Peloza. Corporate social responsibility as reputation insurance. Paper presented at the 2nd Annual Corporate Social Performance Conference. Haas School of Business, University of California, (2005, April)
[Pérez Ruiz y Rodríguez del Bosque Rodríguez, 2012] A. Pérez Ruiz, I. Rodríguez del Bosque Rodríguez. La imagen de responsabilidad social corporativa en un contexto de crisis económica: El caso del sector financiero en España. Universia Business Review, 33 (2012), pp. 14-29
[Porter y Kramer, 2006] M.E. Porter, M.R. Kramer. The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 85 (2006), pp. 78-92
[Post et al., 2002] J.E. Post, L. Preston, S. Sachs. Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45 (2002), pp. 6-29
[Prior et al., 2008] D. Prior, J. Surroca, J.A. Tribó. Are socially responsible managers really ethical? Exploring the relationship between earnings management and corporate social responsibility. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (2008), pp. 160-177
[Robinson et al., 2008] M. Robinson, A. Kleffner, S. Bertels, C. Street. The value of a reputation for corporate social responsibility: Empirical evidence. Working Paper, University of Michigan, (2008),
[Scholtens y Kang, 2012] B. Scholtens, F.C. Kang. Corporate social responsibility and earnings management: Evidence from Asian economies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, (2012),
[Selvi et al., 2010] Y. Selvi, E. Wagner, A. Turiel. Corporate social responsibility in the time of financial crisis: Evidence from Turkey. Annales Universitatis Apulensis Series Oeconomica, 12 (2010), pp. 281-290
[Sen y Bhattacharya, 2001] S. Sen, C.B. Bhattacharya. Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (2001), pp. 25-243
[Sen et al., 2006] S. Sen, C.B. Bhattacharya, D. Korschun. The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: A field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34 (2006), pp. 158-166
[Spagnolo, 2005] G. Spagnolo. Managerial incentives and collusive behavior. European Economic Review, 49 (2005), pp. 1501-1523
[Starks, 2009] L.T. Starks. Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility: What do investors care about? What should investors care about?. The Financial Review, 44 (2009), pp. 461-468
[Surroca et al., 2010] J. Surroca, J.A. Tribó, S. Waddock. Corporate responsibility and financial performance: The role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 31 (2010), pp. 463-490
[Torres et al., 2012] A. Torres, T. Bujmolt, J. Tribó, P. Verhoel. Generating global brand equity through corporate social responsibility to key stakeholders. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29 (2012), pp. 13-24
[Ullman, 1985] A.H. Ullman. Data in research of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of US firms. Academy of Management Review, 10 (1985), pp. 250-279
[Waddock, 2003] S. Waddock. Stakeholder performance implications of corporate responsibility. International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5 (2003), pp. 114-124
[Williams y Barrett, 2000] R.J. Williams, J.D. Barrett. Corporate philanthropy, criminal activity, and firm reputation: Is there a link. Journal of Business Ethics, 26 (2000), pp. 341-350
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
