Efecto del locus de control en la relación entre participación presupuestaria y rendimiento: un estudio experimental
The effect of locus of control in the relationship between budgetary participation and performance: An experimental study
Resumen
Cada vez más organizaciones involucran a su personal en los procesos presupuestarios bajo la premisa de que una mayor participación mejorará la consecución de las metas presupuestarias. Sin embargo, la participación no siempre conduce a mejoras en el rendimiento, ya que las características de personalidad hacen que los individuos reaccionen de forma diferente ante situaciones presupuestarias similares. En este trabajo se estudia el papel de la característica de personalidad locus de control en la relación participación presupuestaria-rendimiento mediante un experimento de laboratorio con 115 estudiantes de grado. Los resultados confirman que el locus de control influye en los efectos de la participación presupuestaria sobre la eficiencia de los individuos. Nuestros resultados revelan, también, que individuos con locus de control externo alcanzan menores rendimientos que los sujetos con locus de control interno en entornos participativos, pero no obtienen rendimientos diferentes en función del entorno. Además, nuestros resultados muestran que solo para niveles bajos del locus de control (internos) una mayor participación se traduce en mayores rendimientos.
Descargas
Citas
Argyris, 1952: The impact of budgets on people Controllership Foundation, (1952)
Brownell, 1980: Brownell, P. (1980). Participation in budgeting, locus of control and organizational effectiveness. Working paper (Sloan School of Management) (pp. 1104-1180). Cambridge, Mass: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Brownell, 1981: Participation in budgeting, locus of control and organizational effectiveness The Accounting Review, 56 (1981), pp. 844-860
Brownell, 1982: A field study examination of budgetary participation and locus of control The Accounting Review, 57 (1982), pp. 766-777
Brownell, 1983: The motivational impact of management-by-exception in a budgetary context Journal of Accounting Research, 21 (1983), pp. 456-472
Byrne y Damon, 2008: To participate or not to participate? Voice and explanation effects on performance in a multi-period budget setting The British Accounting Review, 40 (2008), pp. 207-227
Calveras y Solá, 2002: La economía experimental y el análisis de la gestión de los recursos humanos Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 12 (2002), pp. 405-419
Chhabra, 2013: Locus of control as a moderator in the relationship between job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A study of Indian IT professionals Organizations and Markets in Emerging Economies, 4 (2013), pp. 25-41
Chenhall, 1986: Authoritarianism and participative budgeting: A dyadic analysis The Accounting Review, 61 (1986), pp. 263-272
Chong, 2002: A note on testing a model of cognitive budgetary participation processes using a structural equation modeling approach Advanced in Accounting, 19 (2002), pp. 27-51
Chong y Chong, 2002: Budget goal commitment and informational effects of budget participation on performance: A structural equation modeling approach Behavioral Research in Accounting, 14 (2002), pp. 65-86
Chong y Eggleton, 2003: The decision-facilitating role of management accounting systems on managerial performance: The influence of locus of control and task uncertainty Advances in Accounting, 20 (2003), pp. 165-197
Chong et al., 2005: The impact of market competition and budgetary participation on performance and job satisfaction: A research note The British Accounting Review, 37 (2005), pp. 115-133
Chong et al., 2006: The multiple roles of participative budgeting on job performance Advances in Accounting, 22 (2006), pp. 67-95
Chow, 1983: The effects of job standard tightness and compensation scheme on performance: An exploration of linkages The Accounting Review, 58 (1983), pp. 667-685
Coletti et al., 2005: The effect of control systems on trust and cooperation in collaborative environments The Accounting Review, 80 (2005), pp. 477-500
Cromwell et al., 1961: Reaction time, locus of control, choice behavior, and descriptions of parental behavior in schizophrenic and normal subjects Journal of Personality, 29 (1961), pp. 363-379
Dakhli, 2010: Budgetary participation in a non-western country Journal of Business in Developing Nations, 12 (2010), pp. 1-31
De Baerdemaekera y Bruggeman, 2015: The impact of participation in strategic planning on managers’ creation of budgetary slack: The mediating role of autonomous motivation and affective organizational commitment Management Accounting Research, 29 (2015), pp. 1-12
Dos Santos et al., 2014: The relationship between cost management knowledge and budgetary participation with managers’ performance Revista Brasileira de Gestão de Negócios, 16 (2014), pp. 124-142
Dunk, 1989: Budget emphasis, budgetary participation and managerial performance: A note Accounting, Organizations and Society, 14 (1989), pp. 321-324
Fernández Fernández, 2004: La criptografía clásica Sigma: Revista de matemáticas, 24 (2004), pp. 119-141
Frucot y Shearon, 1991: Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction The Accounting Review, 66 (1991), pp. 80-99
Furnham, 1986: Economic locus of control Human Relations, 39 (1986), pp. 29-43
Gómez Ruiz y Naranjo Gil, 2016: El uso interactivo de la información de control y las respuestas emocionales de los empleados Revista de Contabilidad, 19 (2016), pp. 102-110
Hashim et al., 2014: Roles of budgetary participation on leader's performance: A study case in ternate Asian Social Science, 10 (2014), pp. 35
Hayes y Matthes, 2009: Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations Behavior Research Methods, 41 (2009), pp. 924-936 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.3.924
Heinle et al., 2013: A theory of participative budgeting The Accounting Review, 88 (2013), pp. 1025-1050
Hoffi-Hofstetter y Mannheim, 1999: Managers’ coping resources, perceived organizational patterns, and responses during organizational recovery from decline Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20 (1999), pp. 665-685
Hope y Fraser, 2003: Beyond budgeting: How managers can break free from the annual performance trap Boston, (2003)
Hyatt y Prawitt, 2001: Does congruence between audit structure and auditors’ locus of control affect job performance? The Accounting Review, 76 (2001), pp. 263-274
Johnson y Neyman, 1936: Tests of certain lineal hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems Statistical Research Memoirs, 1 (1936), pp. 57-93
Joyce et al., 1982: Person-situation interaction: Competing models of fit Journal of Occupational Behavior, 3 (1982), pp. 265-280
Judge y Bono, 2001: Relationship of core self-evaluations traits–self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability–with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis Journal of Applied Psychology, 86 (2001), pp. 80-92
Kren, 1992: Budgetary participation and managerial performance: The impact of information and environmental volatility The Accounting Review, 67 (1992), pp. 511-526
Leach-López et al., 2008: An update on budgetary participation, locus of control, and the effects on Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction The Journal of Applied Business Research, 24 (2008), pp. 121-134
Libby, 1999: The influence of voice and explanation on performance in a participative budgeting setting Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24 (1999), pp. 125-137
Licata et al., 1986: A note on participation in budgeting and locus of control The Accounting Review, 61 (1986), pp. 112-117
Locke y Latham, 1990: A theory of goal setting and taskperformance Prentice Hall, (1990)
Luft y Shields, 2009: Psychology models of management accounting Foundations and Trends in Accounting, 4 (2009), pp. 199-345
Mah’d et al., 2013: The impact of budgetary participation on managerial performance: Evidence from Jordanian university executives Journal of Applied Finance y Banking, 3 (2013), pp. 133-156
Marrone, 2007: Apariencia y realidad en la escritura Escritura e imagen, 3 (2007), pp. 5-20
Mia, 1988: Managerial attitude, motivation and the effectiveness of budget participation Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13 (1988), pp. 465-475
Milani, 1975: The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study The Accounting Review, 50 (1975), pp. 274-284
Nouri y Parker, 1998: The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23 (1998), pp. 467-483
O’Connor, 1995: The influence of organizational culture on the usefulness of budget participation by Singaporean-Chinese managers Accounting, Organizations and Society, 20 (1995), pp. 383-403
Parker y Kyj, 2006: Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process Accounting, Organizations and Society, 31 (2006), pp. 27-45
Pérez García, 1984: Dimensionalidad del constructo locus of control Revista de Psicología General y Aplicada: Revista de la Federación Española de Asociaciones de Psicología, 39 (1984), pp. 471-488
Prümmer et al., 2011: Participative budgeting: A review of empirical research and practical implications International Journal of Business Innovation and Research, 5 (2011), pp. 559-598
Rothmann y Coetzer, 2003: The big five personality dimensions and job performance SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 29 (2003), pp. 68-74
Rockness, 1977: Expectancy theory in a budgetary setting: An experimental examination The Accounting Review, 52 (1977), pp. 893-903
Rotter, 1966: Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement Psychological monographs: General and applied, 80 (1966), pp. 1-28
Rotter, 1990: Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable American Psychologist, 45 (1990), pp. 489-493
Shastri y Stout, 2008: Budgeting: Perspectives from the real world Management Accounting Quarterly, 10 (2008), pp. 18-25
Shields y Shields, 1998: Antecedents of participative budgeting Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23 (1998), pp. 49-76
Spector, 1982: Behavior in organizations as a function of employee's locus of control Psychological Bulletin, 91 (1982), pp. 482-497
Thomas et al., 2006: Locus of control at work: A meta-analysis Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27 (2006), pp. 1057-1087
Tiller, 1983: The dissonance model of participative budgeting: An empirical exploration Journal of Accounting Research, 21 (1983), pp. 581-595
Tong y Wang, 2006: Validation of locus of control scale in Chinese organizations Personality and Individual Differences, 41 (2006), pp. 941-950
Vroom, 1964: Work and motivation Willey, (1964)
Webb, 2002: The impact of reputation and variance investigations on the creation of budget slack Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27 (2002), pp. 361-378
Wong-On-Wing et al., 2010: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and participation in budgeting: Antecedents and consequences Behavioral Research in Accounting, 22 (2010), pp. 133-153
Ziemkiewicz et al., 2011: How locus of control influences compatibility with visualization style IEEE Visual Analytics Science and Technology, (2011), pp. 81-90
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) y ASEPUC conservan los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 4.0 Internacional. Permite copiar, distribuir e incluir el artículo en un trabajo colectivo (por ejemplo, una antología), siempre y cuando no exista una finalidad comercial, no se altere ni modifique el artículo y se cite apropiadamente el trabajo original. Esta revista no tiene tarifa por la publicación Open Access. ASEPUC y EDITUM financian los costes de producción y publicación de los manuscritos.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente la versión publicada de sus obras, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
