The internationalisation of Spanish family firms through business groups: Factors affecting the profitability, and the moderating effect of the family nature of the Spanish business
La internacionalización de las empresas familiares españolas a través de grupos empresariales: factores que afectan a la rentabilidad y el efecto moderador de la naturaleza familiar del negocio
Abstract
Spanish family businesses have undertaken a major process of internationalisation, creating business groups with companies in emerging countries, such as Morocco. Morocco is the principal destination for Spanish investment in Africa. This paper analyses the impact of factors related to ownership, management and organisational culture on the performance of business groups created by Spanish and Moroccan companies. Therefore we also examine the possible moderating effect of the family nature of the Spanish company. In total, 252 business groups are analysed, of which 124 were created by Spanish family firms and 128 by Spanish non-family firms. The information was obtained through a survey conducted in 2013.
The results, obtained by linear regression, show that performance, measured by profitability, is enhanced when there is a higher proportion of ownership by the Spanish family business, when there is a larger number of Moroccan managers, when the management approach is results-oriented and when decision taking is centralised. Moreover, the family nature of the Spanish company has a moderating effect on the relationship between business group profitability and two of the variables analysed, namely the percentage of ownership and the centralisation of decision taking.
The results of this study could help to clarify an issue of some significance in professional and academic circles. Both owners and managers of family businesses can use these research findings to better understand how certain characteristics of business group management could affect their performance and the success of the internationalisation process.
Downloads
-
Abstract650
-
PDF408
References
Alas et al., 2009: Manufacturing strategies and choices in culture contexts” Journal of Business Economics and Management, 10 (2009), pp. 279-289
Amor-Tapia and Tascón-Fernández, 2014: Estimation of future levels and changes in profitability: The effect of the relative position of the firm in its industry and the operating-financing disaggregation Revista de Contabilidad, 17 (2014), pp. 30-46
Anglin et al., 2017: An archival approach to measuring family influence: An organizational identity perspective Family Business Review, 30 (2017), pp. 19-36
Arregle et al., 2012: Internationalization of family-controlled firms: A study of the effects of external involvement in governance Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36 (2012), pp. 1115-1143
Banalieva and Eddleston, 2011: Home-region focus and performance of family firms: The role of family vs. non-family leaders Journal of International Business Studies, 42 (2011), pp. 1060-1072
Barbera and Moores, 2013: Firm ownership and productivity: A study of family and non-family SMEs Small Business Economics, 40 (2013), pp. 953-976
Basco, 2013: The family's effect on family firm performance: A model testing the demographic and essence approaches Journal of Family Business Strategy, 4 (2013), pp. 42-66
Basco, 2014: Exploring the influence of the family upon firm performance: Does strategic behaviour matter? International Small Business Journal, 32 (2014), pp. 967-995
Berrone et al., 2012: Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research Family Business Review, 25 (2012), pp. 258-279
Bertrand and Schoar, 2006: The role of family in family firms Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20 (2006), pp. 73-96
Bhaumik et al., 2010: Does ownership structure of emerging-market firms affect their outward FDI? The case of the Indian automotive and pharmaceutical sectors Journal of International Business Studies, 41 (2010), pp. 437-450
Binacci et al., 2016: Are all non-family managers (NFMs) equal? The impact of NFM characteristics and diversity on family firm performance Corporate Governance: An International Review, 24 (2016), pp. 569-583
Bona Sánchez et al., 2007: Control familiar y calidad del resultado Revista de Contabilidad, 10 (2007), pp. 11-32
Botero et al., 2015: Family business research in the european context, with commentary from Mr Jesús Casado, Secretary General of European Family Businesses, with a practice-based view on the topic European Journal International Management, 9 (2015), pp. 139-159
Carney, 2005: Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (2005), pp. 249-265
Chen et al., 2006: Corporate control, corporate governance and firm performance in New Zealand International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 3 (2006), pp. 263-276
Chen et al., 2009: Parent contribution and organizational control in international joint ventures Strategic Management Journal, 30 (2009), pp. 1133-1156
Chen et al., 2008: Do family firms provide more or less voluntary disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research, 46 (2008), pp. 499-536
Cheung et al., 2014: Board structure and intragroup propping: Evidence from family business groups in Hong Kong Financial Management, 43 (2014), pp. 569-601
Choi and Beamish, 2004: Split management control and international joint venture performance Journal of International Business Studies, 35 (2004), pp. 201-215
Choi et al., 2015: Family ownership and R&D investment: The role of growth opportunities and business groups membership Journal of Business Research, 68 (2015), pp. 1053-1161
Chrisman et al., 2012: Family involvement, family influence, and family centered non-economic goals in small firms Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36 (2012), pp. 267-293
Chrisman et al., 2005: Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29 (2005), pp. 555-576
Chrisman et al., 2013: The influence of family goals, governance, and resources on firm outcomes Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (2013), pp. 1249-1261
Chua et al., 1999: Defining the family business by behaviour Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23 (1999), pp. 19-39
Chua et al., 2003: Succession and nonsuccession concerns of family firms and agency relationships with nonfamily managers Family Business Review, 16 (2003), pp. 89-107
Cox et al., 2005: Defining human resource development in Morocco: An exploratory inquiry Human Resource Development International, 8 (2005), pp. 435-447
Damanpour et al., 2012: Organizational culture and partner interaction in the management of international joint ventures in India Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 29 (2012), pp. 453-478
De Miguel et al., 2004: Ownership structure and firm value: New evidence from Spain Strategic Management Journal, 25 (2004), pp. 1199-1207
Del Giudice, 2017: Understanding family-owned business groups Springer International Publishing, (2017)
Delios and Beamish, 1999: Ownership strategy of Japanese firms: Transactional, institutional, and experience influences Strategic Management Journal, 20 (1999), pp. 915-933
Della Piana et al., 2012: Towards a better understanding of family business groups and their key dimensions Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3 (2012), pp. 174-192
Dodd and Dyck, 2015: Agency, stewardship, and the universal-family firm: A qualitative historical analysis Family Business Review, 28 (2015), pp. 312-331
Economic, 2010: Inversión española en el Magreb (2010)
consulted 5 Oct 2014:. Available in http://wwwoficinascomercialeses/icex/cma/contentTypes/common/records/mostrarDocumento/?doc=481270
Eddleston and Kellermanns, 2007: Destructive and productive family relationships: A stewardship theory perspective Journal of Business Venturing, 22 (2007), pp. 545-565
European Family and Business, 2012: Family business statistics (2012)
consulted 12 Feb 2015:. Available in http://wwweuropeanfamilybusinesseseu/uploads/Modules/Publications/family-business-statisticspdf
Fekete and Böcskei, 2011: Cultural waves in company performance Research Journal of Economics, Business and ICT, 3 (2011), pp. 38-42
Fernández and Nieto, 2006: Impact of ownership on the international involvement of SMEs Journal of International Business Studies, 37 (2006), pp. 340-351
Filatotchev et al., 2007: FDI by firms from newly industrialised economies in emerging markets: Corporate governance, entry mode and location Journal of International Business Studies, 38 (2007), pp. 556-572
Forster and Fenwick, 2015: The influence of islamic values on management practice in Morocco European Management Journal, 33 (2015), pp. 143-156
Fuentes et al., 2007: Factores a tener en cuenta en la expansión internacional de la empresa familiar Investigaciones Europeas de Dirección y Economía de la Empresa, 13 (2007), pp. 75-96
George and Mallery, 2003: SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference Ally and Bacon, (2003)
Geringer and Hebert, 1989: Control and performance of international joint ventures Journal of International Business Studies, 20 (1989), pp. 235-254
Geringer and Hebert, 1991: Measuring performance of international joint ventures Journal of International Business Studies, 22 (1991), pp. 249-264
Ghobadian and O??Regan, 2006: The impact of ownership on small firm behaviour and performance International Small Business Journal, 24 (2006), pp. 555-586
Gómez-Mejía et al., 2007: Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills Administrative Science Quarterly, 52 (2007), pp. 106-137
Gómez-Mejia et al., 2010: Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms Journal of Management Studies, 47 (2010), pp. 223-252
Hair et al., 2006: Multivariate data analysis Prentice Hall, (2006)
Hoffmann et al., 2016: Understanding the performance consequences of family involvement in the top management team: The role of long-term orientation International Small Business Journal, 34 (2016), pp. 345-368
Hofstede, 2001: Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations Sage, (2001)
Hofstede et al., 1990: Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative and quantitative study across twenty cases Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1990), pp. 286-316
Holt et al., 2017: Family firm(s) outcomes model: Structuring financial and nonfinancial outcomes across the family and firm Family Business Review, 30 (2017), pp. 182-202
House et al., 2004: Culture, leadership and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies Sage Publications, (2004)
International Accounting Standards Board, 2011: IFRS 10 consolidated financial statements (2011)
consulted 2 Sep 2015:. Available in http://wwwiaspluscom/en/standards/ifrs/ifrs10
Jaskiewicz and Dyer, 2017: Addressing the elephant in the room: Disentangling family heterogeneity to advance family business research’ Family Business Review, 30 (2017), pp. 111-118
Jensen and Meckling, 1976: Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure Journal of Financial Economics, 3 (1976), pp. 305-360
Kammerlander et al., 2015: Value creation in family firms: A model of fit Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6 (2015), pp. 63-72
Kandula, 2006: Performance management Prentice Hall of India Private Limited, (2006)
Kotlar and De Massis, 2013: Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (2013), pp. 1263-1288
Kraus et al., 2016: Family firm internationalization: A configurational approach Journal of Business Research, 69 (2016), pp. 5473-5478
Kuo et al., 2012: The influence of international experience on entry mode choice: Difference between family and non-family firms European Management Journal, 30 (2012), pp. 248-263
Laforet, 2016: Effects of organisational culture on organisational innovation performance in family firms Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23 (2016), pp. 379-407
La Porta et al., 1999: Corporate ownership around the world Journal of Finance, 54 (1999), pp. 471-517
Le Breton-Miller and Miller, 2013: Socioemotional wealth across the family firm life-cycle: A commentary on “family business survival and the role of boards” Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37 (2013), pp. 1391-1397
Lien et al., 2016: Institutional reforms and the effects of family control on corporate governance Family Business Review, 29 (2016), pp. 174-188
Madison et al., 2016: Viewing family firm behavior and governance through the lens of agency and stewardship theories Family Business Review, 29 (2016), pp. 65-93
Mazzi, 2011: Family business and financial performance: Current state of knowledge and future research challenges Journal of Family Business Strategy, 2 (2011), pp. 166-181
Miller and Le Breton-Miller, 2006: Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities Family Business Review, 19 (2006), pp. 73-87
Miller and Le Breton-Miller, 2007: Kicking the habit: Broadening our horizons by studying family businesses Journal of Management Inquiry, 16 (2007), pp. 27-30
Minichilli et al., 2010: Top management team in family-controlled companies: “Familiness,” “faultlines,” and their impact on financial performance” Journal of Management Studies, 47 (2010), pp. 205-222
Mitter et al., 2014: Internationalization of family firms: The effect of ownership and governance Review of Managerial Science, 8 (2014), pp. 1-28
Mohedano-Suanes and Benavides-Espinosa, 2012: Ownership and control in international joint ventures: A case study between a Spanish multinational and a public chinese company Universia Business Review, 33 (2012), pp. 122-143
Morck et al., 2005: The rise and fall of the widely held firm: A history of corporate ownership in Canada A history of corporate governance around the world: Family business groups to professional managers, pp. 65-140
Moroccan, 2010: Moroccan guide (2010)
consulted 10 Jun 2013:. Available in http://wwwoficinascomercialeses/icex/cma/contentTypes/common/records/viewDocument/0,,00bin?doc=4108544
Neubaum et al., 2017: Stewardship climate scale: An assessment of reliability and validity Family Business Review, 30 (2017), pp. 37-60
O’Reilly and Chatman, 1996: Culture as social control: Corporations, cults and commitment pp. 287-365
Perrini et al., 2008: Does ownership structure affect performance? Evidence from the Italian market Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16 (2008), pp. 312-325
Pindado and Requejo, 2015: Family business performance from a governance perspective: A review of empirical research International Journal of Management Reviews, 17 (2015), pp. 279-311
Podsakoff et al., 2012: Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it Annual Review of Psychology, 63 (2012), pp. 539-569 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Pothukuchi et al., 2002: National and organizational culture differences and international joint venture performance Journal of International Business Studies, 33 (2002), pp. 243-265
Poza, 2007: Family business Thomson South-Western, (2007)
Poza et al., 1997: Stakeholder perceptions of culture and management practices in family and family firms: A preliminary report Family Business Review, 10 (1997), pp. 135-155
Rahman and Korn, 2010: Alliance structuring behavior: Relative influence of alliance type and specific alliance experience Management Decision, 48 (2010), pp. 809-825
Saffold, 1988: Culture traits, strength and organizational performance: Moving beyond strong culture Academy of Management Review, 13 (1988), pp. 546-558
Salvato and Melin, 2008: Creating value across generations in family-controlled businesses: The role of family social capital Family Business Review, 21 (2008), pp. 259-276
Sánchez-Ballesta and García-Meca, 2007: A meta-analytic vision of the effect of ownership structure on firm performance Corporate Governance: An International Review, 15 (2007), pp. 879-892
Scarlata et al., 2016: The effect of founder experience on the performance of philanthropic venture capital firms International Small Business Journal, 34 (2016), pp. 618-636
Schein, 1985: Organisational culture and leadership – A dynamic view Jossey-Bass, (1985)
Schulze et al., 2001: Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence Organization Science, 12 (2001), pp. 99-116
Sciascia and Mazzola, 2008: Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance Family Business Review, 21 (2008), pp. 331-345
Sciascia et al., 2013: Family involvement in the board of directors: Effects on sales internationalization Journal of Small Business Management, 51 (2013), pp. 83-99
Sharma et al., 2012: 25 years of family business review: Reflections on the past and perspectives for the future Family Business Review, 25 (2012), pp. 5-15
Shenkar and Zeira, 1992: Role conflict and role ambiguity of chief executives officers in international joint venture Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1992), pp. 55-75
Short et al., 2016: Oh, the places we’ll go! Reviewing past, present, and future possibilities in family business research Family Business Review, 29 (2016), pp. 11-16
Sitthipongpanich and Polsiri, 2015: Do CEO and board characteristics matter? A study of that family firms Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6 (2015), pp. 119-129
Stewart and Hitt, 2012: Why can’t a family business be more like a nonfamily business? Modes of professionalization in family firms Family Business Review, 25 (2012), pp. 58-86
Sund et al., 2015: Intergenerational ownership succession. Shifting the focus from outcome measurements to preparatory requirements Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6 (2015), pp. 166-177
Teng and Das, 2008: Governance structure choice in strategic alliances: The roles of alliance objectives, alliance management experience, and international partners Management Decision, 46 (2008), pp. 725-742
Thomsen et al., 2006: Blockholder ownership: Effects on firm value in market and control based governance systems Journal of Corporate Finance, 12 (2006), pp. 246-269
Tsang, 2002: Learning from overseas venturing experience: The case of Chinese family businesses Journal of Business Venturing, 17 (2002), pp. 21-40
Vallejo, 2011: A model to study the organizational culture of the family firm Small Business Economics, 36 (2011), pp. 47-64
Villalonga and Amit, 2006: How do family ownership, control, and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80 (2006), pp. 385-417
Wagner et al., 2015: A meta-analysis of the financial performance of family firms: Another attempt Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6 (2015), pp. 3-13
Wang and Shailer, 2015: Ownership concentration and firm performance in emerging markets: A meta-analysis Journal of Economic Surveys, 29 (2015), pp. 199-229
Wang and Shailer, 2017: Family ownership and financial performance relations in emerging markets International Review of Economics and Finance, 51 (2017), pp. 82-98
Woods et al., 2012: Escalation of commitment in private family businesses: The influence of outside board members Journal of Family Business Strategy, 3 (2012), pp. 18-27
Yabushita and Suehiro, 2014: Family business groups in Thailand: Coping with management critical points Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31 (2014), pp. 997-1018
Yu et al., 2012: The landscape of family business outcomes: A summary and numerical taxonomy of dependent variables Family Business Review, 25 (2012), pp. 33-57
The publications in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) and ASEPUC conserve the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published manuscripts, and favour and allow their reuse under the licence of use indicated in point 2.
2. The manuscripts are published in the electronic edition of the journal under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. It allows to copy, distribute and include the article in a collective work (for example, an anthology), as long as there is no commercial purpose, the article is not altered or modified and the original work is properly cited. This journal is free of charge for the Open Access publication. ASEPUC and EDITUM finance the productiona and publication costs of the manuscripts.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are permitted and encouraged to electronically disseminate the published version of their works, as it favors their circulation and dissemination and thus a possible increase in their citation and reach among the academic community.
