Exploring determining factors of web transparency in the world's top universities
Explorando los factores determinantes de la transparencia en la web de las mejores universidades del mundo
Abstract
This paper aims to analyze the online transparency of the top 100 Universities in the world and determine which factors influence the degree of online transparency achieved by these institutions. To this end, a global transparency index was developed comprising of four dimensions (“E-Information”, “E-Services”, “E-Participation” and “Navigability, Design and Accessibility”). From the analysis of the various dimensions, it is worth noting that universities are aware of the importance of having a web page with adequate “Navigability, Design and Accessibility”. In contrast, “E-information” is the least valued dimension due to universities focusing their attention on the disclosure of general information rather than on more specific issues. In addition, a multivariate regression equation was used to test the relationship between the online information disclosed and a particular set of factors. As main findings, younger universities of greater size and which are privately funded are the ones most interested in utilizing web pages.
Downloads
-
Abstract592
-
PDF374
References
Abbott and Monsen, 1979: On the measurement of corporate social responsibility: Self-reported disclosures as a method of measuring corporate social involvement The Academy of Management Journal, 22 (1979), pp. 501-515
Al-Khalifa, 2014: A framework for evaluating university mobile web pages Online Information Review, 38 (2014), pp. 166-185
Baraibar and Luna, 2012: The influence of transparency of university social responsibility in the creation of reputation Regional and Sectoral Economics Studies, 12 (2012), pp. 21-31
Berg, 2001: Qualitative research methods for the social sciences Allyn and Bacon, (2001)
Bonsón and Bednárová, 2015: CSR reporting practices of Eurozone companies Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 18 (2015), pp. 182-193
Bonsón and Flores, 2011: Social media and corporate dialogue: The response of global financial institutions Online Information Review, 35 (2011), pp. 34-49
Buenadicha et al., 2001: A new Web assessment index: Spanish universities analysis Internet Research, 11 (2001), pp. 226-234
Castiglia and Turi, 2011: The impact of voluntar accountability on the design of higher education assessment Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15 (2011), pp. 119-130
Católico, 2012: Revelación y divulgación de la información financiera y no financiera de las Universidades Públicas en Colombia Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas de la Universidad Militar Nueva Granada, 20 (2012), pp. 57-76
Ceulemans et al., 2015: Sustainability reporting in higher education: A comprehensive review of the recent literature and paths for further research Journal of Cleaner Production, 106 (2015), pp. 127-143
Crawford, 2012: A link to the future: A pilot study look at how historically black colleges and universities with journalism and mass communications units use the internet in recruiting Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 5 (2012), pp. 47-60
Cuadrado-Ballesteros et al., 2014: The role of media pressure on the disclosure of sustainability information by local governments Online Information Review, 38 (2014), pp. 114-135
Díaz-Nafría et al., 2015: Building up e-Participatory decision-making from the local to the global scale. Study case at the European Higher Education Area Computers in Human Behavior, 47 (2015), pp. 26-41
Escamilla et al., 2016: Análisis de la divulgación de la información sobre la responsabilidad social corporativa en las empresas de transporte público urbano en España Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 19 (2016), pp. 195-203
Escobar, 2016: Análisis empírico de la Responsabilidad social universitaria en Andalucía Encuentros Multidisciplinares, 18 (2016),
Evgenievich et al., 2015: Some aspects of the implementation of the principle of transparency in Russian universities: Research, experience, perspectives International Education Studies, 8 (2015), pp. 191-2014
Flórez-Parra et al., 2014: Corporate governance, analysis of the top 100 universities in the Shanghai ranking Revista de Educación, 364 (2014), pp. 170-196
Flórez-Parra et al., 2016: Transparency and its determinants at Colombian universities Higher Education Research & Development, (2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1239613
published online: 4.10.6:
Foyeke et al., 2015: (2015) Firm size and financial performance: A determinant of corporate governance disclosure practices of Nigerian companies Journal of Accounting and Auditing, (2015), pp. 1-8
Frías-Aceituno et al., 2013: Is integrated reporting determined by a country's legal system? An exploratory study Journal of Cleaner Production, 44 (2013), pp. 45-55
Fuente et al., 2017: The role of the board of directors in the adoption of GRI guidelines for the disclosure of CSR information Journal of Cleaner Production, 141 (2017), pp. 737-750
Gallego-Álvarez et al., 2011: Information disclosed online by Spanish universities: Content and explanatory factors Online Information Review, 35 (2011), pp. 360-385
Gálvez-Rodríguez et al., 2012: Determining factors in online transparency of NGOs: A Spanish case study VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23 (2012), pp. 661-683
Garde-Sánchez, 2013: Revelación online de información sobre Responsabilidad Social universitaria: Propuesta de un modelo e incentivos de divulgación Universidad de Granada, (2013) (Tesis Doctoral)
García-Sánchez et al., 2013: Determinants of corporate social disclosure in Spanish local governments Journal of Cleaner Production, 39 (2013), pp. 60-72
Garde-Sánchez et al., 2013a: Online disclosure of university social responsibility: A comparative study of public and private US universities Environmental Education Research, 19 (2013), pp. 709-746
Garde-Sánchez et al., 2013b: Divulgación Online de Información de Responsabilidad Social en las Universidades Españolas Revista de Educación, N° extraordinario (2013), pp. 177-209
Gatsi, 2016: Introduction to quantitative methods in business Xlibris Corporation, (2016)
Goodall, 2006: Should top universities be led by top researchers and are they? Journal of Documentation, 62 (2006), pp. 388-411
Gordon et al., 2002: A comparative empirical examination of extent of disclosure by private and public colleges and universities in the United States Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 21 (2002), pp. 235-275
Hazelkorn, 2012: European transparency instruments: Driving the modernisation of European higher education
Hite and Railsback, 2010: Analysis of the content and characteristics of university web pages with implications for web designers and educators The Journal of Computer Information Systems, 51 (2010), pp. 107-113
Isfandyari-Moghaddam et al., 2012: Evaluation of university web pages as communication tools: An Iranian report Advances in computer, communication, control and automation lecture, 121 (2012), pp. 121-130
Jabnoun, 2015: The influence of wealth, transparency, and democracy on the number of top ranked universities Quality Assurance in Education, 23 (2015), pp. 108-122
Khaled et al., 2015: The impact of board and audit committee characteristics on voluntary disclosure: A meta-analysis Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 24 (2015), pp. 13-28
Kim-Soon et al., 2014: E-service quality in higher education and frequency of use of the service International Education Studies, 7 (2014), pp. 1-10
Kirchner et al., 2016: An analysis of the level of transparency of federal universities’ websites in the south of Brazil Public Administration Research, 5 (2016), pp. 42-52
Kundid and Rogosic, 2012: E-transparency of Croatian banks: Determinants and disclosure contents Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 25 (2012), pp. 86-116
Larrán and Giner, 2002: The use of the internet for corporate reporting by Spanish companies The International Journal of Digital Accounting Research, 2 (2002), pp. 53-82
Larrán et al., 2012: Do Spanish public universities use corporate social responsibility as a strategic and differentiating factor? International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2 (2012), pp. 1-13
Lee et al., 2012: An exploratory examination of the implementation of online accountability: A technological innovation Perspective Journal of Information Technology Management, 23 (2012), pp. 1-11
Lu and Abeysekera, 2014: Stakeholders’ power, corporate characteristics, and social and environmental disclosure: Evidence from China Journal of Cleaner Production, 64 (2014), pp. 426-436
Mamun, 2011: Quality of private university graduates of Bangladesh: The employers’ perspective South Asian Journal of Management, 18 (2011), pp. 48-68
Marston and Polei, 2004: Corporate reporting on the Internet by German companies International Journal of Accounting Standard Committee, 5 (2004), pp. 285-311
Meyer and Rowan, 1977: Institutional organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony American Journal of Sociology, 83 (1977), pp. 340-363
Miras and Escobar, 2016: Does the institutional environment affect CSR disclosure? The role of governance Revista de Administração de Empresas, 56 (2016), pp. 641-654
Mondéjar et al., 2006: Implantación de la metodología e-learning en la docencia universitaria: Una experiencia a través del proyecto Campus Virtual Revista latinoamericana de tecnología educativa, 5 (2006), pp. 59-71
Neter et al., 1996: Applied linear regression models 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., (1996)
Ojino et al., 2013: The quality of Kenyan university web pages: A study for the re-engineering of the Masinde Muliro University web page Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 9 (2013), pp. 169-176
Panopoulou et al., 2008: A framework for evaluating web sites of public authorities Aslib Journal of Information Management, 60 (2008), pp. 517-546
Pinto et al., 2009: Information provided by Spanish university web pages on their assessment and quality processes Scientometrics, 81 (2009), pp. 265-289
Pinto et al., 2007: Metric analysis of the information visibility and diffusion about the European Higher Education Area on Spanish University web pages Scientometrics, 72 (2007), pp. 345-370
Quayes and Hasan, 2014: Financial disclosure and performance of microfinance institutions Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 10 (2014), pp. 314-337 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1006814
Ricci, 2013: What future for social reporting and accountability in academic systems. An overview of the Italian Case Review of International Comparative Management, 14 (2013), pp. 201-202
Rodríguez-Bolívar et al., 2013: Online disclosure of corporate social responsibility information in leading Anglo-American Universities Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15 (2013), pp. 515-575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000000778
Rufín and Medina, 2014: The impact of the transparency policy on university students’ trust and intention of continued use 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Science, pp. 2083-2092 http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.263
Ruiz-Lozano and Tirado-Valencia, 2016: Do industrial companies respond to the guiding principles of the Integrated Reporting framework? A preliminary study on the first companies joined to the initiative Revista de Contabilidad – Spanish Accounting Review, 19 (2016), pp. 252-260
Sáez-Martín et al., 2014: A vision of social media in the Spanish smartest cities Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 8 (2014), pp. 521-544
Skouloudis et al., 2014: Trends and determinants of corporate non-financial disclosure in Greece Journal of Cleaner Production, 68 (2014), pp. 174-188
Suchman, 1995: Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches Academy of Management Review, 20 (1995), pp. 571-610
Sulo et al., 2012: Factors affecting research productivity in public universities of Kenya: The case of Moi University, Eldoret Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences, 3 (2012), pp. 475-484
Taylor, 2001: Efficiency by performance indicators? Evidence from Australian higher education Tertiary Education and Management, 7 (2001), pp. 41-55
Vaccaro and Madsen, 2009: Corporate dynamic transparency: The new ICT-driven ethics? Ethics and Information Technology, 11 (2009), pp. 113-122
Waters, 2007: Nonprofit organizations’ use of the Internet: A content analysis of communication trends on the Internet sites of the philanthropy 400 Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 18 (2007), pp. 59-76
Wood, 2000: A cross cultural comparison of the contentes of codes of ethics: USA, Canada and Australia Journal of Business Ethics, 25 (2000), pp. 287-298
Zeng et al., 2012: Factors that drive Chinese listed companies in voluntary disclosure of environmental information Journal of Business Ethics, 109 (2012), pp. 309-321
The publications in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) and ASEPUC conserve the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published manuscripts, and favour and allow their reuse under the licence of use indicated in point 2.
2. The manuscripts are published in the electronic edition of the journal under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. It allows to copy, distribute and include the article in a collective work (for example, an anthology), as long as there is no commercial purpose, the article is not altered or modified and the original work is properly cited. This journal is free of charge for the Open Access publication. ASEPUC and EDITUM finance the productiona and publication costs of the manuscripts.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are permitted and encouraged to electronically disseminate the published version of their works, as it favors their circulation and dissemination and thus a possible increase in their citation and reach among the academic community.
