Institutional capacity in the accounting reform process in Spanish local governments
Capacidad institucional en el proceso de reforma contable de los ayuntamientos españoles
Abstract
In 2015, Spanish local governments began to apply a new accounting standard. The success achieved in its implementation is related with stimuli from outside the organization and with the institutional capacity – administrative and political – developed by it. Through an electronic questionnaire and several interviews carried out with municipal chief financial officers it has been shown that few actions to build the necessary institutional capacity were undertaken in the period prior to its implementation. The results show that the LGs did not attain the necessary institutional capacity and will have to continue allocating resources and time to improve it.
Downloads
-
Abstract434
-
PDF275
References
Alonso, 2007: Capacidades estatales, instituciones y política social Prometeo Libros Editorial, (2007)
Anessi-Pessina et al., 2008: Accounting reforms: Determinants of local governments’ choices Financial Accountability and Management, 24 (2008), pp. 231-242
Bergmann and Labaronne, 2013: La armonización contable internacional: El papel del IPSASB y el estado actual de su proceso de reformas Revista Española de Control Externo, XV (2013), pp. 19-29
Brown, 2015: Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research 2nd ed., The Guilford Press, (2015)
Brusca and Gómez, 2013: Hacia la armonización del a contabilidad pública en Europa: las normas europeas de contabilidad pública Revista Española de Control Externo, XV (2013), pp. 91-111
Brusca and Martinez, 2016: Adopting International Public Sector Accounting Standards: A challenge for modernizing and harmonizing public sector accounting International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82 (2016), pp. 724-744
Brusca and Montesinos, 2012: La reforma del sector público y las normas internacionales de contabilidad: El caso de España Contaduría. Universidad de Antioquía, 60 (2012), pp. 179-207
Brusca et al., 2013: Legitimating International Public Sector Accounting Standards (IPSAS): The case of Spain Public Money & Management, 33 (2013), pp. 437-444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-018-2219-x
Burns, 2005: Government capacity and the Hong Kong civil service Oxford University Press, (2005)
Burns and Scapens, 2000: Conceptualizing management accounting change: An institutionalization framework Management Accounting Research, 11 (2000), pp. 3-25
Carpenter and Feroz, 2001: Institutional theory and accounting rule choice: An analysis of four US state governments’ decision to adopt generally accepted accounting principles Accounting Organization and Society, 26 (2001), pp. 565-596
Chávez and Rayas, 2006: Fortalecer la capacidad institucional. La plataforma para un gobierno exitoso Portal de desarrollo, (2006) http://www.portaldeldesarrollo.org/gobierno/recursos.php?idseccion=272idcontenido=292
Christianses and Van Peteghem, 2007: Governmental accounting reform: Evolution of the implementation in Flemish municipalities Financial Accountability and Management, 23 (2007), pp. 375-399
Covaleski and Dirsmith, 1988: An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation and fall of a university budget category Administrative Science Quarterly, 33 (1988), pp. 562-587
Duque, 2012: Análisis de los factores de capacidad institucional en municipios pequeños de los departamentos de Boyacá y Cundinamarca Cuadernos de Administración, 28 (2012), pp. 11-24
European Commission, 2013: Towards implementing harmonized public sector accounting standards in Member States. The suitability of IPSAS for the Member States European Commission, (2013)
Evans, 1996: El Estado como problema y como solución Desarrollo Económico, Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 35 (1996), pp. 529-562
Forss and Venson, 2002: An evaluation of the capacity building efforts of United Nations operational activities in Zimbabwe: 1980–1985 (2002) http://www.un.org/esa/coordination/Chpt8.pdf
Grindle and Hilderbrand, 1995: Building sustainable capacity in the public sector: What can be done? Public Administration and Development, 15 (1995), pp. 441-463
Harun and Kamase, 2012: Accounting change and institutional capacity: The case of a provincial government in Indonesia Australasian Accounting Business and Finance Journal, 6 (2012), pp. 35-43
Nelissen, 2002: The administrative capacity of new types of governance Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 2 (2002), pp. 5-22
Oslak, 2004: Transformación estatal y gobernabilidad en el contexto de la globalización: un análisis comparativo de Argentina, Brasil, Chile y Uruguay: el caso Argentino, propuesta de investigación presentada por el equipo de consultores del Centro de Desarrollo y Asistencia Técnica en Tecnología para la Organización Pública A.Rosas. Una ruta metodológica para evaluar la capacidad institucional, Fall (2004), pp. 119-134
Oslak and Orellana, 2001: El análisis de la capacidad institucional: aplicación del a metodología SADCI Mimeo, (2001)
Pérez, 2007: Proyectos y logros de la Contabilidad Pública en España Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 46 (2007), pp. 95-107
Pérez, 2011: El nuevo Plan General de Contabilidad Pública y la normativa de desarrollo contable aplicable a las entidades integradas en el sector público administrativo estatal Presupuesto y Gasto Público, 63 (2011), pp. 121-133
Pollitt and Bouckaert, 2011: Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New public management, governance and the Neo-Weberian State 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, (2011)
Powell and DiMaggio, 1991: The new institutionalism in organizational analysis The University of Chicago Press, (1991)
Pozzoli and Ranucci, 2013: The process of implementing the accounting harmonisation in the Italian Local Governments: The case of Prato International Journal of Business Research and Development, 2 (2013), pp. 1-18
PwC, 2014: Collection of information related to the potential impact, including costs, of implementing accruals accounting in the public sector and technical analysis of the suitability of individual IPSAS standards. Report for the European Commission I.BruscaJ.C.Martinez. Adopting International Public Sector Accounting Standards: A challenge for modernizing and harmonizing public sector accounting, 82 (2014), pp. 724-744
Reginato et al., 2010: Italian municipalities’ NPFM reforms: An institutional theory perspective Pecunia, 11 (2010), pp. 153-175
Repetto, 2007: Capacidad estatal institucionalidad social y políticas públicas o la búsqueda del “tesoro perdido” Capacidades estatales, instituciones y política social, pp. 41-83
Rosas, 2008: Una ruta metodológica para evaluar la capacidad institucional Política y Cultura, Fall (2008), pp. 119-134
Rosas and Gil, 2013: La capacidad institucional de gobiernos locales en la atención del cambio climático. Un modelo de análisis Revista Mexicana de Análisis Político y Administración Pública, II (2013), pp. 113-138
Salvatore and Del Gesso, 2013: Accrual accounting in Italian local governments in the context of public sector managerial changes Proceedings of 8th Annual London Business Research Conference,
Savitch, 1998: Global challenge and institutional capacity: Or, how we can refit local administration for the next century Administration & Society, 30 (1998), pp. 248-273 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfy189 |
Ter Bogt and Van Helden, 2000: Accounting change in Dutch government: Exploring the gap between expectations and realizations Management Accounting Research, 11 (2000), pp. 263-279
Tobelem, 1992: Institutional Capacity Analysis and development System (ICADS). Operational Manual World Bank, (1992)
Willems and Baumer, 2003: Institutional capacity and climate actions. Environment Directorate International Energy Agency, n° 5 OECD, (2003) www.oecd.org./env/cc/
The publications in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. Ediciones de la Universidad de Murcia (EDITUM) and ASEPUC conserve the patrimonial rights (copyright) of the published manuscripts, and favour and allow their reuse under the licence of use indicated in point 2.
2. The manuscripts are published in the electronic edition of the journal under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence. It allows to copy, distribute and include the article in a collective work (for example, an anthology), as long as there is no commercial purpose, the article is not altered or modified and the original work is properly cited. This journal is free of charge for the Open Access publication. ASEPUC and EDITUM finance the productiona and publication costs of the manuscripts.
3. Conditions for self-archiving. Authors are permitted and encouraged to electronically disseminate the published version of their works, as it favors their circulation and dissemination and thus a possible increase in their citation and reach among the academic community.

