Clause Initial Null Subjects in Web-based Written Language
An Analysis of Eight Varieties of English
Supporting Agencies
- Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation
Abstract
Null subjects in English(es) are a phenomenon that has recently received much attention in the specialized literature. However, most studies are based on small datasets and samples of varieties due to the difficulty of extracting null subjects from corpora. The present paper is a first step towards the automatization of the data retrieval process of null subjects and analyzes a much larger sample of cases and varieties than previous research, namely, Australian, Canadian, Jamaican, Singaporean, Nigerian, Indian, Bangladeshi and Pakistani Englishes. By focusing on referential and non-referential third person singular clause initial null and overt subjects, a variationist examination of the data is conducted by means of mixed-effects logistic regression analyses which shows that non-referential null subjects are a much more pervasive and stable phenomenon in World Englishes than their referential counterparts. In addition, a cline of varieties emerges with respect to referential null subjects: these null subjects are more frequent the more advanced varieties are in Schneider’s Dynamic Model.
Downloads
References
Ariel, M. (1994). Interpreting anaphoric expressions: A cognitive versus a pragmatic approach. Journal of Linguistics, 30(1), 3–42. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700016170
---. (2001). Accessibility theory: An overview. In T. Sanders, J. Schliperoord & Wilbert Spooren (Eds.), Text Representation: Linguistic and Psycholinguistic Aspects (pp. 29–87). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht/Providence: Foris Publications.
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bayley, R., Cardenas, N. L., Trevino Schouten, B. & Velez Salas, C. M. (2012). Spanish dialect contact in San Antonio, Texas: An exploratory study. In K. Geeslin & M. Diaz-Campos (Eds.), Selected Proceedings of the 14th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium (pp. 48–60). Somerville, CA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S. & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow: Longman.
Biberauer, T., Holmberg, A. & Roberts, I. (Eds.). (2010). Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cole, M. D. (2009). Null subjects: A reanalysis of the data. Linguistics, 47(3), 559–587. doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/LING.2009.019
---. (2010). Thematic null subjects and accessibility. Studia Linguistica, 64(3), 271–320. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9582.2010.01172.x
Davies, Mark. (2013). Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 Billion Words from Speakers in 20 Countries (GloWbE). Retrieved 21 August, 2023 from https://corpus.byu.edu/glowbe/.
Davies, M. & Fuchs, R. (2015). Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE). English World-Wide, 36(1), 1–28. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01dav
Grafmiller, J. & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2018). Mapping out particle placement in Englishes around the world: A case study in comparative sociolinguistic analysis. Language Variation and Change, 30(3), 385–412. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954394518000170
Gries, S. Th., & Stefanowitsch, A. (2004). Extending collostructional analysis: A corpus-based perspective on ‘alternations’. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 9(1), 97–129. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.9.1.06gri
Huang, C.-T. J. (1984). On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 15(4), 531–574.
Huang, Y. (1992). Against Chomsky’s typology of empty categories. Journal of Pragmatics, 17(1), 1–29. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(92)90026-8
---. (2000). Anaphora: A cross-linguistic approach. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Huddleston, R., Pullum, G. K., Bauer, L., Birner, B., Briscoe, T., Collins, P., Denison, D., Lee, D., Mittwoch, A., Nunberg, G., Palmer, F., Payne, J., Peterson, P., Stirling, L. & Ward, L. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jaeggli, O. & Safir, K. J. (1989). The null subject parameter and parametric theory. In O. Jaeggli & K. J. Safir (Eds.), The Null Subject Parameter (pp. 1–44). Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kortmann, B., Lunkenheimer, K. & Ehret, K. (Eds.) (2020). The Electronic World Atlas of Varieties of English. Zenodo. Retrieved 21 August, 2023 from http://ewave-atlas.org.
Kuhn, M. & Johnson, K. (2013). Applied Predictive Modelling. New York: Springer-Verlag New York.
López-Couso, M. J. & Méndez-Naya, B. (2014b). From clause to pragmatic marker: A study of the development of like-parentheticals in American English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 15(1), 66-91. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/jhp.15.1.03lop
Loureiro-Porto, L. (2017). ICE vs GloWbE: Big data and corpus compilation. World Englishes, 36(3), 448–470. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12281
Nagy, N. G., Aghdasi, N., Denis, D. & Motut, A. (2011). Null subjects in heritage languages: Contact effects in a cross-linguistic context. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 17(2), 135–44.
Perlmutter, D. (1971). Deep and Surface Constraints in Generative Grammar. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, R., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. (1985). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London/New York: Longman.
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
---. (2006). Minimalist Syntax Revisited. Retrieved 21 August, 2023 from http://courses.essex.ac.uk/lg/lg514.
Schneider, E. W. (2007). Postcolonial English: Varieties around the World. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schröter, V. (2019). Null Subjects in English: A Comparison of British English and Asian Englishes. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Schröter, V. & Kortmann, B. (2016). Pronoun deletion in Hong Kong English and Colloquial Singaporean English. World Englishes, 35(2), 221–241. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12192
Serrano-Losada, M. (2017). Raising turn out in Late Modern English: The rise of a mirative predicate. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 15(2), 411–437. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.15.2.05ser
Steger, M. & Schneider, E. W. (2012). Complexity as a function of iconicity: The case of complement clause constructions in New Englishes. In B. Kortmann & B. Szmrecsanyi (Eds.), Linguistic Complexity: Second Language Acquisition, Indigenization, Contact (pp. 156–191). Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.
Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J., Heller, B. & Röthlisberger, M. (2016). Around the world in three alternations: Modeling syntactic variation in varieties of English. English World-Wide, 37(2), 109–137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.37.2.01szm
Szmrecsanyi, B., Grafmiller, J. & Rosseel, L. (2019). Variation-based distance and similarity modeling: A case study in World Englishes. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 2, 23. doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2019.00023
Tamaredo, I. (2020). Complexity, Efficiency, and Language Contact: Pronoun Omission in World Englishes. Bern: Peter Lang.
Tamaredo, I., Röthlisberger, M., Grafmiller, J. & Heller, B. (2020). Probabilistic Indigenization Effects at the Lexis–Syntax Interface. English Language and Linguistics, 24(2), 413–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674319000133
Torres Cacoullos, R. & Travis, C. E. (2014). Prosody, priming and particular constructions: The patterning of English first-person singular subject expression in conversation’. Journal of Pragmatics 63, 19–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.003
Wagner, S. (2012). Null subjects in English: Variable rules, variable language? Postdoctoral Dissertation, Chemnitz University of Technology, Germany.
---. (2018). Never Saw One – First-person null subjects in spoken English. English Language and Linguistics, 22(1), 1–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1360674316000216
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green