“Meet our group!”:

Addressing multiple audiences on the websites of Spanish research groups

Keywords: Research groups, Digital composing, Academic websites, Audience, Language choice, Multilingual practices.


Websites offer research groups a powerful tool for self-promotion and dissemination of their research to a diversified audience. The aim of this study is to explore how research groups affiliated to a research institution in a non-Anglophone country compose their websites to achieve visibility and impact and reach multiple audiences. Content analysis of the websites and semi-structured interviews were used to examine the language(s) in which the websites are written and their content. The study shows that through these websites research groups address simultaneously the international disciplinary community and various local audiences and that these audiences shape the choice of language and content. Findings from this study provide insights into new communication and representation practices engaged in by research groups to meet disciplinary goals, requirements for funding, and society’s demands.


Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Languaging when contexts collapse: Audience design in social networking. Discourse, Context & Media, 4–5, 62-73. doi :10.1016/j.dcm.2014.08.006

Barjak, F. (2006). The role of the Internet in informal scholarly communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 57(10), 1350-1367.

Bell, A. (1984). Language style as audience design. Language in Society, 13(2), 145-204.

Bondi, M. (2015). Language policy in web-mediated scientific knowledge dissemination: A case study of risk communication across genres and languages. In R. Pló & C. Pérez-Llantada (Eds.), English as a scientific and research language in Europe (pp. 85-111). Berlin: De Gruyter.

Bukvova, H. (2011). Scientists online: A framework for the analysis of internet profiles. First Monday, 16(10). doi: 10.5210/fm.v16i10.3584

Callahan, E. & Herring, S.C. (2012). Language choice on university websites: Longitudinal trends. International Journal of Communication, 6, 322-355.

Catenaccio, P. (2012). A genre-theory approach to the website: Some preliminary considerations. In S. Campagna, G. Garzone, C. Ilie, & E. Rowley-Jolivet (Eds.), Evolving genres in web mediated communication (pp. 27-52). Bern: Peter Lang.

Crowston, K. & Williams, M. (2000). Reproduced and emergent genres of communication on the World Wide Web. Information Society, 16(3), 201-215. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.1997.665482

Flowerdew, J. & Li, Y. (2009). English or Chinese? The trade-off between local and international publication among Chinese academics in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 1–6.

Han, Y. (2019). Translanguaging as transnational spaces: Chinese visiting scholars’ language practices on WeChat. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1(22). doi: 10.1080/14790718.2018.1546308

Herman, E. (2018). Scholarly reputation. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 365(18), fny200. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fny200

Herman, E. & Nicholas, D. (2019). Scholarly reputation building in the digital age: An activity-specific approach. Review article. El profesional de la información, 28(1), e280102. doi: 10.3145/epi.2019.ene.02

Hess, M. (2002). A nomad faculty: English professors negotiate self–representation in university Web space. Computers and Composition, 19(2), 171–189.

Hyland, K. (2010). Constructing proximity: Relating to readers in popular and professional science. English for Academic Purposes, 9, 116-127.

Hyland, K. (2012). Individuality or conformity? Identity in personal and university academic homepages. Computers and Composition, 29, 309-322.

Hyland, K. & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1-12.

Jiang, Z. & Fitzgerald, S.R. (2019). Promoting institutional repositories via visualizations: A change-point study. New Review of Academic Librarianship, 1-18. doi: 10.1080/13614533.2018.1547775

Kjellberg, S. & Haider, J. (2018). Researchers’ online visibility: tensions of visibility, trust and reputation. Online Information Review. doi: 10.1108/OIR-07-2017-0211

Kousha, K. & Thelwall, M. (2014). Disseminating research with Web CV hyperlinks. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 64(8), 1615-1626.

Lillis, T. & Tuck, J. (2016) Academic literacies: a critical lens on writing and reading in the academy. In K. Hyland & P. Shaw (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of English for Academic Purposes (pp. 30-43). Abingdon: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Lupton, D., Mewburn, I. & Thomson, P. (2017). The Digital Academic: Critical Perspectives on Digital Technologies in Higher Education. New York, NY: Routledge.

Luzón, M.J. (2017). Connecting genres and languages in online scholarly communication. Written Communication, 34(4), 441-471. doi: 10.1177/0741088317726298

Marwick, A.E. & Boyd, D. (2011). I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society, 13(1), 114–33.

McGrath, L. (2014). Parallel language use in academic and outreach publication: A case study of policy and practice. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 13, 5–16.

Pagliaro, M. (2019). Chemistry education fostering creativity in the digital era. Israel Journal of Chemistry, 59, 1-8.

Petersen, M. & Shaw, P. (2002). Language and disciplinary differences in a biliterate context. World Englishes, 21(3), 357–374.

Saichaie, K. & Morphew, C.C. (2014). What college and university websites reveal about the purposes of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(4), 499–530.

Seargeant, P., Tagg, C. & Ngampramuan, W. (2012). Language choice and addressivity strategies in Thai-English social network interactions. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 16(4), 510–531.

Spanish Strategy for Science and Technology and Innovation (2012). Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. Retrieved from http://www.idi.mineco.gob.es/stfls/MICINN/Investigacion/FICHEROS/Spanish_Strategy_Science_Technology.pdf. Retrieved November 23, 2018.

Thelwall, M., Li, X., Barjak, F. & Robinson, S. (2008). Assessing the international web connectivity of research groups. Aslib Proceedings, 60(1), 18-31.

Tomaskova, R. (2015). A walk through the multimodal landscape of university websites. Brno Studies in English, 41(1), 77-100.

Vabø, A., Alvsvåg, A., Kyvik, S. & Reymert, I. (2016). The establishment of formal research groups in higher education institutions. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 2-3, 33896. doi: 10.3402/nstep.v2.33896.

Wuchty, S., Jones, B. & Uzzi, B.F. (2007). The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge. Science, 316, 1036-1039. doi: 10.1126/science.1136099

Zhang, Y. Q. & O’Halloran, K. L. (2012). The gate of the gateway: A hypermodal approach to university homepages. Semiotica, 190, 87-109. doi: 10.1515/sem-2012-0041

How to Cite
Luzón, M. J. (2019). “Meet our group!”: . International Journal of English Studies, 19(2), 37-59. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.382561