“They don’t have a name for what he is”

The strategic de-characterization of Hannibal Lecter


DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.336301
Keywords: Hannibal Lecter, psychonarratology, characterization, phenomenology, unknowability, realism.


This essay challenges the myth of Hannibal Lecter, in Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs, as an enigmatic and unclassifiable character. Lecter’s enigma is generated through a largely unexplored process of de-characterization, i.e. by recurrently presenting him through the speech of other characters who describe him as unknowable. After considering Lecter’s case against the background of well-known literary unknowabilities, a deductive phenomenological exploration of Lecter’s de-characterization is carried out with the assistance of tools from the disciplines of personality and social psychology, and supported by empirical evidence from those fields. The demystifying of Lecter’s unreadability does not entail a debasement of the film or the character. On the contrary, Lecter’s de-characterization, albeit a form of narrative manipulation, is viewed as responsible for much of the film’s impact and success. It produces sensitivity-boosting effects; it mediates the indirect characterization of the other characters; and it engages the spectators’ self-image thus contributing importantly to the enjoyment and appreciation of the film.


Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Enrique Cámara-Arenas, Universidad de Valladolid

Profesor Contratado Doctor Dpto. de Filología Inglesa Universidad de Valladolid


Abbott, H. P. (2013). Real Mysteries. Narrative & the Unknowable. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

Baelo-Allué, S. (2002). The aesthetics of serial killing: Working against ethics in The Silence of the Lambs (1988) and American Psycho (1991). Atlantis, 24 (2), 7–24.

Bal, M. (2009). Narratology. Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8(5A), 279–86.

Brewer, W. F. & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6 (5–6), 473–86.

Cámara-Arenas, E. (2010). Causal attribution and the analysis of literary characters: A. C. Bradley's study of Iago and Othello. Journal of Literary Semantics, 39, 43–66.

---. (2011). Villains in our mind: A psychological approach to literary and filmic villainy. In A. Fahraeus & D. Yakali Çamoglu (Eds.), Villains and Villainy. Embodiments of evil in literature, popular culure and media (pp. 3–27). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

---. (2018).Refining affective disposition theory: Towards a theory of narrative equilibrium. Metha: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy, X(1), 160–187.

Carroll, A. (2015). 'We’re just alike': Will Graham, Hannibal Lecter, and the monstrous-human. Studies in Popular Culture, 38(1), 41–63.

Cenciarelli, C. (2012). Dr. Lecter’s taste for ‘Golberg’, or: The horror of Bach in the Hannibal franchise. Journal of the Royal Musical Association, 137 (1), 107–134.

Chester, D. (2016). The Fantasy Fiction Formula. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Costa, P T & McCrae R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources.

Crisp, R. J. & Turner, R. N. (2010). Essential Social Psychology. London: SAGE.

Culpeper, J. (2001). Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts. Textual Explorations. Longman.

Cuse, C., Ehrin, K. & Cipriano, A. (2013). Bates Hotel. United States: A&E.

Darabont, F. (2010). The Walking Dead. United States: AMC.

Delbanco, A. (2005). Melville: His World and Work. New York, NY: Knopf.

DeLisi, M., Vaughn, M. G., Beaver, K. M. & Wright, J. P. (2010). The Hannibal Lecter myth: Psychopathy and verbal intelligence in the MacArthur violence risk assessment study. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 32, 169–177.

Demme, J. (1991). The Silence of the Lambs. United States: Metro Goldwyn Meyer/ Orion Pictures.

Donald, A. (1992). Working for oneself: Labor and love in The Silence of the Lambs. Michigan Quarterly Review, 31(3), 347–360.

Dyer, R. (1997). Kill and kill again. Sight and Sound, 7(9), 14–17.

Ebert, R. (2006). The Shining (1980),Chicago Sun-Times. Retrieved November 21, 2018.

Fincher, D. (1995). Seven. United States: New Line Cinema.

Forster, E. M. (1927). Aspects of the Novel. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Friedkin, W. (1973). The Exorcist. United States: Warner Bros.

Friend, T. (1999). Acquired tastes: A killer’s consuming passions. New Yorker 5 July 1999, 81–84.

Fuller, B. (2013). Hannibal. United States: NBC.

Fuller, S. M. (2005). Deposing an American cultural totem: Clarice Starling and postmodern heroism in Thomas Harris’s Red Dragon, The Silence of the Lambs, and Hannibal. The Journal of Popular Culture, 38(5), 819–833.

Gregory, B. (2002). Hannibal Lecter. The honey in the lion’s mouth. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 56(1), 100–114.

Grixti, J. (1995). Consuming cannibals: Psychopathic killers as archetypes and cultural icons. Journal of American Culture, 18(1), 87.

Halberstam, J. (1995). Skinflick: Posthuman gender in Jonathan Demme’s The Silence of the Lambs. In J. Halberstam (Ed.), Skin Shows: Gothic Horror and the Technology of Monsters (pp. 161-177). Durham: Duke University Press.

Hanscomb, S. (2010). Existentialims and art-horror. Sartre Studies International, 16(1), 1–23.

Hantke, S. (1998). The kingdom of the unimaginable. The construction of social space and the fanstasy of privacy in serial killer narratives. Literature/Film Quarterly, 26(3), 178–195.

Harris, T. (1982). Red Dragon. London: Bodley Head.

---. (1988). The Silence of the Lambs. London: Heinemann.

Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–28.

Kendrick, M. G. (2016). Villainy in Western Culture: Historical Archetypes of Danger, Disorder and Death. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company.

Krakowiak, K. M. & Oliver, M. B. (2012). When good characters do bad things: Examining the effect of moral ambiguity on enjoyment. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 117–35.

Kubrick, S. (1977). The Shining. United States: Warner Bros.

Litman, J. A. (2005). Curiosity and the pleasures of learning: Wanting and liking new information. Cognition and Emotion, 19(6), 793–814.

Mann, M. (1986). Manhunter. United States: De Laurentiis Entertaining Group.

Manos, J. (2006). Dexter. United States: CBS.

Margolin, U. (1986). The doer and the deed. Action as basis for characterization in narrative. Poetics Today, 7(2), 205–225.

Messent, P. (2000). American gothic: Liminality in Thomas Harris’s Hannibal Lecter novels. Journal of American and Comparative Cultures, 23(4), 23–35.

Metcalf, G. (1995). The soul in the meat suit: Ivan Albright, Hannibal Lecter and the body grotesque. In M. J. Meyer (Ed.), Literature and the Grotesque (pp. 23-25). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

Nikolajeva, M. (2014). Reading for Learning: Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Nodelman, P. (1992). The Pleasures of Children’s Literature. New York, NY: Longman.

Palmer, Alan. (2004). Fictional Minds. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Penhall, J. (2017). Episode 1. Mindhunter. United States: Netflix.

Persaud, R. (1991). Doctors to the slaughter? British Medical Journal, 302 (6791), 1545.

Pfister, M. (1988). The Theory and Analysis of Drama. Cambridge: CUP.

Phelan, J. (1996). Narrative as Rhetoric. Technique, Audiences, Ethics, Ideology. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press.

Plantinga, C. (2011). Folk psychology for film critics and scholars. Projections, 5(2), 26–50.

Platt, L. (2003). The Hannibal Lecter novels: Modern/postmodern fables,Americana: The Journal of American Popular Culture, 1900 to Present, 2(2). np.

Prince, G. (1982). Narratology. The Form and Function of Narrative. The Hague: Mouton.

Rauthmann, J. F. (2011). Acquisitive or protective self-presentation of dark personalities? Associations among the dark triad and self-monitoring. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 502–8.

Rimmon-Kenan, S. (1983). Narrative Fiction. Contemporary Poetics. London: Routledge.

Robbins, B. (1996). Murder and mentorship: Advancement in The Silence of the Lambs. Boundary 2, 23(1), 71–90.

Schmid, D. (2007). The kindest cut of all: Adapting Thomas Harris’s Hannibal. Literature/Film Quarterly, 35(1), 389–395.

Senior, W. A. (2003). Where have all the monsters gone? Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts, 14, 2(54), 214–216.

Shafer, D. M. & Raney, A. A. (2012). Exploring how we enjoy antihero narratives. Journal of Communication, 62(6),1028–46.

Smith, J. (2015). Filmmakers as folk psychologists: How filmmakers exploit cognitive biases as an aspect of characterization, narration, and spectatorship. In L. Zunshine (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Approaches to Literature (pp. 483–501). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

Sperber, D. & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Communication & Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Stewart, S. (1982). The epistemology of the horror story. The Journal of American Folklore, 95(375), 33–50.

Taylor, B. (1994). The violence of the event: Hannibal Lecter in the Lyotardian sublime. In S. Earnshaw (Ed.), Postmodern Surroundings (pp. 215-230). Atlanta, GA: Rodopi.

Todorov, T. (1977). The Poetics of Prose. Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univeristy Press.

Veselka, L., Schermer J. A. & Vernon, P. A. (2012). The dark triad and an expanded framework of personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 417–25.

Weinstein, P. (2005). Unknowing. The Work of Modernist Fiction. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Williamson, K. (2013). The Following. United States: Fox.

How to Cite
Cámara-Arenas, E. (2019). “They don’t have a name for what he is”: The strategic de-characterization of Hannibal Lecter. International Journal of English Studies, 19(1), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.336301