Workload, Motivation, and Nursesing Compliance with Electronic Documentation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia

Authors

  • Eli Amaliyah Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, and Health Sciences, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0057-8825
  • Diva Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, and Health Sciences, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia.
  • Tomy Suganda Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine, and Health Sciences, Universitas Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa, Banten, Indonesia. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1177-3696
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.700101
Keywords: Electronic Health Records, Nursing Documentation, Workload, Work Motivation, Nursing Informatics, Patient Safety, Indonesia

Abstract

Background: The global adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs) has transformed nursing documentation and is expected to improve patient safety, quality of care, and clinical efficiency. Nevertheless, nurses’ compliance with electronic nursing documentation remains problematic, particularly in low- and middle-income countries such as Indonesia. Workload and work motivation are frequently suggested as determinants of documentation compliance, yet empirical evidence from Indonesian hospitals is still limited. Objective: To examine the relationship between workload and work motivation with nurses’ compliance in electronic nursing documentation in inpatient units of a provincial teaching hospital in Indonesia. Methods: A quantitative cross-sectional study was conducted among 90 inpatient nurses selected by simple random sampling. Workload was measured using the NASA Task Load Index, motivation was assessed with a structured questionnaire based on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs, and documentation compliance was evaluated through a retrospective audit of electronic records based on national standards. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and binary logistic regression (p < 0.05). Results: Most nurses experienced high to very high workload levels. Workload was significantly associated with documentation compliance (p < 0.05) and remained a significant predictor in logistic regression (OR = 0.040). Motivation showed no significant independent effect (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Nurses’ compliance with electronic nursing documentation was primarily influenced by workload rather than individual motivation. Improving workload management and aligning EMR design with nursing workflows are essential to enhance documentation quality and support sustainable digital transformation in Indonesian nursing practice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    16
  • ESP_PDF (Español (España))
    7
  • ENG_PDF
    7
  • XML (Español (España))
    0

References

1. Saraswasta IWG, Hariyati RrTS. A systematic review of the implementation of electronic nursing documentation toward patient safety. Enferm Clin. 2021 Apr;31:S205–9.

2. Montoya-Garrido MJ, Rodríguez-Suárez CA, Mateos-López N, Santiago-Díaz YT, González-de la Torre H. Shift-to-Shift Information Transfer: Phenomenological Study of Nurses’ Experiences. JMIR Nurs. 2025 Nov 28;8:e81703–e81703.

3. McCarthy B, Fitzgerald S, O’Shea M, Condon C, Hartnett-Collins G, Clancy M, et al. Electronic nursing documentation interventions to promote or improve patient safety and quality care: A systematic review. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Apr;27(3):491–501.

4. Bail K, Merrick E, Bridge C, Redley B. Documenting patient risk and nursing interventions: record audit. Australian Journal of Advanced Nursing. 2021 Feb 4;38(1).

5. Suganda T, Hariyati RTS. Perbandingan kualitas dokumentasi keperawatan berbasis elektronik dan berbasis kertas: Study literature. Holistik Jurnal Kesehatan. 2020 Apr 22;14(1):17–28.

6. Mykkänen Minna, Miettinen Merja, Saranto Kaija. Standardized Nursing Documentation Supports Evidence-Based Nursing Management. In 2016.

7. Instefjord MH, Aasekjær K, Espehaug B, Graverholt B. Assessment of quality in psychiatric nursing documentation – a clinical audit. BMC Nurs. 2014 Dec 17;13(1):32.

8. Strudwick G, Tajirian T, Kemp J, Coombe N, Haider U, Kaur S, et al. Utilizing an Informatics Engagement Strategy as an Approach to Sustain and Retain the Nursing Workforce. Can J Nurs Leadersh. 2023 Jan 31;35(4):42–54.

9. Suganda T, Handiyani H, Rachmi SF, Masyati E, Rahman LOA. An Analysis of Head Nurses’ Nursing Informatics Competencies and Nurses’ Attitudes towards Patient Safety in Hospitals. Dunia keperawatan: Jurnal Keperawatan dan Kesehatan. 2023 Mar 30;11(2):213–26.

10. Taneva DI, Gyurova-Kancheva VT, Kirkova-Bogdanova AG, Paskaleva DA, Zlatanova YT. Electronic Nursing Records: Importance for Nursing and Benefits of Implementation in Health Information Systems—A Scoping Review. Nurs Rep. 2024 Nov 18;14(4):3585–605.

11. De Groot K, Sneep EB, Paans W, Francke AL. Patient participation in electronic nursing documentation: an interview study among community nurses. BMC Nurs. 2021 Dec 1;20(1):72.

12. Buchner VK, Ewers A. Erfahrungen von diplomierten Pflegekräften mit der elektronischen Sturzdokumentation: Eine qualitative Studie. Prävention und Gesundheitsförderung. 2025 Jul 25;

13. Whalen K, Grella P, Snydeman C, Dwyer AM, Yager P. Nursing Attitudes and Practices in Code Documentation Employing a New Electronic Health Record. Appl Clin Inform. 2021 May 23;12(03):589–96.

14. Stemmer R, Bassi E, Ezra S, Harvey C, Jojo N, Meyer G, et al. A systematic review: Unfinished nursing care and the impact on the nurse outcomes of job satisfaction, burnout, intention‐to‐leave and turnover. J Adv Nurs. 2022 Aug 9;78(8):2290–303.

15. Kazmi W, Ushna Khan Durrani, Zara Rathod, Aya Abdelhamid Elshalakany. Enhancing The Quality of Emergency Admission Clerking in Neurosurgery: A Comparative Study of Traditional Methods Versus A Surgical Clerking Proforma. Journal of Ayub Medical College Abbottabad. 2024 Nov 25;36(4).

16. Jones NT, Seckman C. Facilitating Adoption of an Electronic Documentation System. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2018 May;36(5):225–31.

17. Meißner A, Schnepp W. Staff experiences within the implementation of computer-based nursing records in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative research. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Dec 20;14(1):54.

18. Falk A. Nurse staffing levels in critical care: The impact of patient characteristics. Nurs Crit Care. 2023 Mar 27;28(2):281–7.

19. Chen YC, Wu HC, Ho JJ, Cheng NY, Guo YL, Shiao JSC. Exploring the Association Between Patient–Nurse Ratio and Nurses’ Occupational Stressors: A Cross‐Sectional Study. J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jan 24;2025(1).

20. Lee RY, Thate J, Withall J, Yen PY, Cato K, Rossetti SC. Relationship between Additional Required Nursing Documentation and Patient Outcomes: A Scoping Review. Appl Clin Inform. 2025 May 19;16(03):628–39.

21. Hendy, Ginting CN, Nasution SW. Analysis of the relationship between characteristics and workload of nurses with documentation of nursing care at the inpatient installation of Royal Prima Hospital. In 2023. p. 040009.

22. Mulyana H, Poddar S, Hassan HC. The Relationship Between Nurses Work Motivation and Compliance in Conducting Documentation of Observations According to the EWS Escalation at the Awal Bros Hospital. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2021;27–30.

23. Nyarmi, Wahyuni ED, Ni’mah L. The Affecting Factors of Nurses’ Compliance in Nursing Documentation. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation. 2020 Feb 13;24(02):4098–105.

24. Zeng D, Takada N, Hara Y, Sugiyama S, Ito Y, Nihei Y, et al. Impact of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation on Work Engagement: A Cross-Sectional Study of Nurses Working in Long-Term Care Facilities. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 24;19(3):1284.

25. Swakowska K, Olejniczak D, Poniatowski ŁA, Staniszewska A. The relationship between employee motivation and professional burnout among nurses in Germany: an analytical study. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2025 Dec 17;38(6):586–95.

26. Ahlstedt C, Eriksson Lindvall C, Holmström IK, Muntlin Athlin Å. What makes registered nurses remain in work? An ethnographic study. Int J Nurs Stud. 2019 Jan;89:32–8.

27. Kantek F, Yildirim N, Kavla İ. Nurses’ perceptions of motivational factors: a case study in a Turkish university hospital. J Nurs Manag. 2015 Jul;23(5):674–81.

28. Soomro A, Ramendran SPR C, Kumar a R, Haji Mohamed lMoona. Psychological Contract Elements and Nurses’ Psychological Wellbeing in Private Hospitals, Klang Valley, Malaysia. The Malaysian Journal of Nursing. 2025;17(02):55–67.

29. Scheithauer S, Batzer B, Dangel M, Passweg J, Widmer A. Workload even affects hand hygiene in a highly trained and well-staffed setting: a prospective 365/7/24 observational study. Journal of Hospital Infection. 2017 Sep;97(1):11–6.

30. Bhadauria RS, Selvarajb BNX, Chouhan DS, Kumawat AK, Begum F, David JB. Mental workload levels and influencing factors among ICU nurses: A systematic review. Multidisciplinary Reviews. 2025 May 12;8(11):2025348.

31. Fikri Z, Bellarifanda A, Sunardi S, ‘Ibad MR, Mu’jizah K. The relationship between mental workload and nurse stress levels in hospitals. Healthc Low Resour Settings. 2023 Dec 14;

32. Lestari IB, Jingga NA, A. Wahyudiono YD. The Relationship Between Physical And Mental Workload With Fatigue On Nurses. The Indonesian Journal of Occupational Safety and Health. 2023 Mar 31;12(1):10–8.

33. Yulia Purnawati, Tri Martiana, Rachmat Hargono, Firman Suryadi Rahman. The Analysis of Workload and Safety Communication Against Burnout Syndrome in Inpatient Nurses. Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology. 2020 Jul 24;14(3):2244–8.

34. Gusar I, Lazinica A, Klarin M. Work motivation, job satisfaction, and nursing record-keeping: do they differ in surgery and internal disease departments? Central European Journal of Nursing and Midwifery. 2020 Dec 4;11(4):163–70.

35. Pindek S, Howard DJ, Krajcevska A, Spector PE. Organizational constraints and performance: an indirect effects model. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 2019 Mar 11;34(2):79–95.

36. Khalaf MA, Salem TSM. The moderating effect of structural barriers on TQM-performance relationship in Egyptian service organizations. International Journal of Quality and Service Sciences. 2018 Nov 19;10(4):349–65.

37. Halldorsdottir S, Einarsdottir EJ, Edvardsson IR. Effects of cutbacks on motivating factors among nurses in primary health care. Scand J Caring Sci. 2018 Mar 24;32(1):397–406.

38. Ramadhani M, Muis M, Thamrin Y, Naiem MF, Indar I, Wahiduddin W. Factors that Affecting Female Nurse Performance with Work Stress as an Intervening Variable in the Hospital of Dr. Tadjuddin Chalid Makassar. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2021 Sep 11;9(E):835–42.

39. Rojas CL, Seckman CA. The Informatics Nurse Specialist Role in Electronic Health Record Usability Evaluation. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing. 2014 May;32(5):214–20.

40. Hariyati RTS, Hamid AY, Eryando T, Hasibuan ZA. Usability and satisfaction of using electronic nursing documentation, lesson-learned from new system implementation at a hospital in Indonesia. Int J Healthc Manag. 2020 Jan 2;13(1):45–52.

41. Akhu-Zaheya L, Etoom M. The Relationship between Intensive Care Unit’s Nurses’ Informatics Competency and Quality of Patients’ Electronic Health Record’s Documentation. Jordan Journal of Nursing Research. 2024;3(2).

Published
27-04-2026
How to Cite
[1]
Amaliyah, E. et al. 2026. Workload, Motivation, and Nursesing Compliance with Electronic Documentation: A Cross-Sectional Study in Indonesia. Global Nursing. 25, 1 (Apr. 2026). DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.700101.
Issue
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH