Impact of female genital mutilation on childbirth and sexuality. A systematic review.

Authors

  • María Calderón Fernández Midwife. Centro Universitario Cruz Roja de Enfermería de Sevilla (Universidad de Sevilla) https://orcid.org/0009-0009-0868-3743
  • Antonio Luis Partida Márquez Midwife. Centro Universitario Cruz Roja de Enfermería de Sevilla (Universidad de Sevilla)
  • Miguel Garrido Bueno Master's Degree in New Healthcare and Research Trends. Centro Universitario Cruz Roja de Enfermería de Sevilla (Universidad de Sevilla) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4695-2264
  • Tamara Moya Ruiz Nursing Graduate. Centro Universitario de Enfermería San Juan de Dios (Universidad de Sevilla) https://orcid.org/0009-0007-8351-5753
  • Manuel Pabón Carrasco PhD in Health Sciences. Department of Nursing. Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy, and Podiatry, University of Seville. Seville, Spain. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9011-3695
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.649281
Keywords: Reproductive Health, Genital Mutilation Female, Parturition, Anthropology Cultural

Abstract

Introduction: Female genital mutilation is a practice with deep cultural roots in some African and Asian countries, justified as a rite of passage into adulthood. Various international organizations consider it a form of violence against women, with negative repercussions on their physical, psychological, reproductive, and sexual health.

Material and Methos: To understand its repercussions on reproductive health, a systematic review of recent scientific literature was conducted, selecting six articles. The search was conducted between November 2023 and September 2024 in databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL. DeCS and MeSH descriptors were used in combination with Boolean operators. Study selection followed the PRISMA 2020 and Cochrane guidelines, applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Two researchers independently assessed the relevance of the studies, with a third resolving discrepancies. The methodological quality and risk of bias of the articles were assessed using the SIGN scale and JBI items.

Results: Six scientific articles published between 2018 and 2024 in various scientific journals were analyzed. All six articles included samples from different African countries.

Conclusion: The literature reviewed establishes a relationship between female genital mutilation and longer labor duration, a higher rate of cesarean sections, more perineal tears, a greater need for episiotomy, and a higher risk of postpartum hemorrhage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    387
  • ESP_PDF (Español (España))
    213
  • ENG_PDF
    102
  • XML (Español (España))
    0

References

Auvert B, Taljaard D, Lagarde E, Sobngwi-Tambekou J, Sitta R, Puren A. Randomized, controlled intervention trial of male circumcision for reduction of HIV infection risk: the ANRS 1265 Trial. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(11): e298.

Hellsten SK. Rationalising circumcision: from tradition to fashion, from public health to individual freedom-critical notes on cultural persistence of the practice of genital mutilation. J Med Ethics. 2004; 30(OMS, 1988): 248-53.

World Health Organization. Report on the Regional Seminar on Traditional Practices Affecting the Health of Women and Children in Africa, 6-10 April 1987, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 1988.

Gudeta TA, Regassa TM, Gamtessa LC. Female genital mutilation: prevalence, associated factors and health consequences among reproductive age group women in Keffa Zone, Southwest, Ethiopia. Reprod Health. 2022; 19(1): 1-9.

León-Larios F, Casado-Mejía RM. Conocimientos, actitudes y experiencias profesionales de las matronas de atención primaria de salud de Sevilla sobre mutilación genital femenina. Matronas Profesión. 2014; 15(2): 56-61.

World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on the management of health complications from female genital mutilation. 2016. Available from: https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/206437/?sequence=1

Gallego MA, López MI. Mutilación genital femenina: Revisión y aspectos de interés médico legal. Cuad Med Forense. 2010; 16(3): 145-51

Jiménez-Ruiz I. Enfermería y Cultura: las fronteras del androcentrismo en la Ablación/Mutilación Genital Femenina. Proyecto de investigación (Tesis doctoral). 2015. Universidad de Murcia.

Lucas B. Aproximación antropológica a la práctica de la ablación o mutilación genital femenina. Cuadernos electrónicos de filosofía del derecho. 2008; 17:4.

Nzinga AM, De Andrade Castanheira S, Hermann J, Feipel V, Kipula AJ, Bertuit J. Consequences of Female Genital Mutilation on Women’s Sexual Health–Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2021; 18(4): 750-760.

Biglu MH, Farnam A, Abotalebi P, Biglu S, Ghavami M. Effect of female genital mutilation/cutting on sexual functions. Sexual Reprod Healthc. 2016; 10:3-8.

Ezeoke GG, Adeniran AS, Adesina KT, Fawole AA, Ijaiya MA, Olarinoye AO. Female adolescents and the future of female genital mutilation/cutting: a report from an endemic area. Afr Health Sci. 2021; 21(4): 1808-16.

Smolak A. The association of female circumcision with HIV status and sexual behavior in Mali: a multilevel analysis. JAIDS Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2014; 65(5): 597-602.

González-Timoneda A, Ruiz Ros V, González-Timoneda M, Cano Sánchez A. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of primary healthcare professionals to female genital mutilation in Valencia, Spain: are we ready for this challenge? BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18(1):1-13.

Kaplan A, Torán Monserrat P, Bedoya Muriel MH, Bermúdez Anderson K, Moreno Navarro J, Bolíbar Ribas B. Las mutilaciones genitales femeninas: reflexiones para una intervención desde la atención primaria. Atención Primaria. 2006; 38(2): 122-6.

Jiménez-Ruiz I, Martínez PA, Bravo MMP, Roche FP. Aproximación a la Ablación/Mutilación Genital Femenina (A/MGF) desde la Enfermería Transcultural. Una revisión bibliográfica. Enfermería Global. 2012; 11(4).

Ávila FP, Mas MM, Moreno JB, Giner AR, Ferrandis EF. Mutilación genital femenina. Educare21. 2009;54.

Ackley BJ, Ladwig GB, Makic MBF, Martinez-Kratz MR, Zanotti M. Nursing diagnosis handbook, revised reprint with 2021-2023 NANDA-I® updates - e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2021.

Jiménez-Ruiz I, Martínez PA, Carpenito LJ. Proposal for Nursing Diagnosis: Post Female Genital Mutilation Syndrome. Enfermería Global. 2017;16(1):51-68.

Joanna Briggs Institute. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. 2020. Adelaide: Joanna Briggs Institute; 2020.

Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne JA. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. p. 243-96. Available from: handbook.cochrane.org.

*Akpak, YK, Yilmaz, I. The impact of female genital mutilation/cutting on obstetric outcomes and its management. J Mater Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022; 35(5): 927-932.

*Kulaksiz D, Abdi Nor I, Erin R, Baki Erin K, Toprak T. A prospective cohort study of the relationship of female genital mutilation with birth outcomes in Somalia. BMC Womens Health. 2022; 22(1): 202.

*Rabiepour S, Ahmadi Z. The effect of female circumcision on maternal and neonatal outcomes after childbirth: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023;23(1):46.

*Anikwe CC, Ejikeme BN, Obiechina NJ, Okorochukwu BC, Obuna JA, Onu FA, et al. Female genital mutilation and obstetric outcome: a cross-sectional comparative study in a tertiary hospital in Abakaliki, South East Nigeria. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X. 2019;1:100005.

*Yosef Y, Borsamo A, Abeje S. Assessment of complications associated with female genital cutting among postnatal women in Chuko Primary Hospital, Sidama region, Southern Ethiopia. SAGE Open Medicine. 2023;11:20503121221144243.

*Gebremicheal K, Alemseged F, Ewunetu H, Tolossa D, Ma'alin A, Yewondwessen M, et al. Sequela of female genital mutilation on birth outcomes in Jijiga town, Ethiopian Somali region: a prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2018; 18(1): 305.

Published
21-04-2025
How to Cite
[1]
Calderón Fernández, M. et al. 2025. Impact of female genital mutilation on childbirth and sexuality. A systematic review. Global Nursing. 24, 1 (Apr. 2025). DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.649281.
Issue
Vol. 24 No. 1 (2025): #75 January-April
Section
REVIEWS

Copyright (c) 2025 Global Nursing

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:

1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the copyright of the published works, and encourages and allows the reuse of the works under the license for use stated in point 2.

© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011  (© Publications Service, University of Murcia, 2011)

2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España(texto legal) “ a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Spain license (legal text)”. They can be copied, used, broadcasted, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and original source of their publication (journal, publisher and URL) are cited; (ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license is mentioned.

Licencia Creative Commons

3. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (pre-reviewed ) and / or post-print (reviewed and accepted for publication) versions of their works prior to publication, as it ensures a wider circulation and dissemination which may lead to a possible increase in its mention and a higher scope among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.