Nursing diagnosis proposal: risk of vaccination refusal
Abstract
Introduction: Vaccination is, nowadays, the best tool for the prevention of diseases in public health, avoiding, thanks to it, around 2 to 3 million deaths annually. However, anti-vaccine movements and their growth put public health at risk, being Nursing one of the most important pieces in the fight against these groups and misinformation.
Objective: To elaborate a diagnosis proposal that registers the susceptibility to the appearance of vaccination refusal.
Methodology: A bibliographic search was carried out in different databases (LILACS, ScienceDirect, PubMed, Cochrane and Scopus) to support the creation of the diagnosis on the most recent scientific evidence and with the highest level of quality.
Results: We propose the creation of the diagnosis "Risk of refusal of vaccination", whose definition is "susceptible to refuse immunization against communicable and/or fatal diseases, putting the user's health and public health at risk".
Discussion: within Taxonomy II, is included in Domain 11, safety/protection, and in class 5, defensive processes.
Conclusions: In the absence of a Nursing diagnosis related to vaccination, a process in which nurses play an active role, and in the face of the threat posed by anti-vaccine movements, the diagnosis Risk of refusal of vaccination represents an important advance in the body of nursing knowledge.
Downloads
References
Forcada Segura JA. Generalidades de las vacunas. Asociación Española de Vacunología [Internet]. 2019 [consultado el 29 de mayo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.vacunas.org/generalidades/
León Gómez VE, Rebollo García L, Rincón Elvira EE, García Murciego MEG. Reticencia vacunal y sus repercusiones: revisión bibliográfica. SANUM [Internet]. 2020 [consultado el 30 de mayo de 2022];4(2):14–27. Disponible en: https://revistacientificasanum.com/pdf/sanum_v4_n2_a3.pdf
Valenzuela MT. Importancia de las vacunas en salud pública: hitos y nuevos desafíos. Revista Médica Clínica Las Condes [Internet]. 2020 [consultado el 30 de mayo de 2022];31(3):233–239. Disponible en: https://www.elsevier.es/es-revista-revista-medica-clinica-las-condes-202-pdf-S0716864020300407
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Ten threats to global health in 2019. Organización Mundial de la Salud [Internet]. 2019 [consultado el 30 de mayo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/news-room/spotlight/ten-threats-to-global-health-in-2019
Jašarević T. Reticencia a la vacunación: Un desafío creciente para los programas de inmunización. Organización Mundial de la Salud [Internet]. 2015 [consultado el 28 de mayo de 2022] Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news/item/18-08-2015-vaccine-hesitancy-a-growing-challenge-for-immunization-programmes
Aparicio Rodrigo M. Antivacunas: un reto para el pediatra. Rev Pediatr Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2015 [consultado el 30 de mayo de 2022];17:107–17. Disponible en: https://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/pap/v17n66/01_editorial.pdf
Fernández P, Jaramillo Carolina. Movimiento anti-vacunas: vacunar o no a nuestros hijos. Revista OACTIVA UC Cuenca [Internet]. 2019 [consultado el 28 de mayo de 2022];4(Especial):47–54. Disponible en: https://oactiva.ucacue.edu.ec/index.php/oactiva/article/view/406/552
Organización Mundial de la Salud. Un nuevo informe muestra que los casos de sarampión aumentan a nivel mundial debido a una cobertura vacunal insuficiente. Organización Mundial de la Salud [Internet]. 2018 [consultado el 30 de mayo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news/item/29-11-2018-measles-cases-spike-globally-due-to-gaps-in-vaccination-coverage
Organización Mundial de la Salud. COVID-19 and mandatory vaccination: Ethical considerations and caveats. Organización Mundial de la Salud [Internet] 2021 [consultado el 30 de mayo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/340841/WHO-2019-nCoV-Policy-brief-Mandatory-vaccination-2021.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Consejo Internacional de Enfermeras. Declaración del Consejo Internacional de Enfermeras sobre la vacunación contra la COVID-19. Consejo Internacional de Enfermeras [Internet]. 2022 [consultado el 30 de mayo de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.icn.ch/system/files/documents/2022-02/ICN%20Statement%20COVID-19%20Vaccination%20%E2%80%93%20Nurses%20lead%20the%20way_SP_1.0.pd
NANDA International. Diagnósticos enfermeros. Definiciones y clasificación 2018-2020. ELSEVIER. 11º edición. 2019 [consultado el 11 de junio de 2022]. p. 77, 104, 191.
Cadeddu C, Castagna C, Sapienza M, Lanza TE, Messina R, Chiavarini M, et al. Understanding the determinants of vaccine hesitancy and vaccine confidence among adolescents: a systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother [Internet]. 2021 [Consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];17(11):4470–86. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34473589/
Truong J, Bakshi S, Wasim A, Ahmad M, Majid U. What factors promote vaccine hesitancy or acceptance during pandemics? A systematic review and thematic analysis. Health Promotion International [Internet]. 2022 [consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];37(1). Disponible en: https://academic.oup.com/heapro/article/37/1/daab105/6318107
Roy DN, Biswas M, Islam E, Azam MS. Potential factors influencing COVID-19 vaccine acceptance and hesitancy: A systematic review. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2022 [consultado el 10 de junio de 2022];17(3). Disponible en: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0265496
Adeyanju GC, Engel E, Koch L, Banzinger T, Shahid IBM, Head MG, et al. Determinants of Influenza vaccine hesitancy among pregnant women in Europe: a systematic review. Eur J Med Res [Internet]. 2021 [consultado el 10 de junio de 2022];26:116. Disponible en: https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s40001-021-00584-w.pdf
Wake AD. The Willingness to receive COVID-19 vaccine and its associated factors: “vaccination refusal could prolong the war of this pandemic” – a systematic review. Risk Manag Healthc Policy [Internet]. 2021 [consultado el 26 de junio de 2022];14:2609-2623. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34188572/
Shakeel CS, Mujeeb AA, Mirza MS, Chaudhry B, Khan SJ. Global COVID-19 vaccine acceptance: A systematic review of associated social and behavioral factors. Vaccines [Internet]. 2022 [consultado el 26 de junio de 2022];10(1):110. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/10/1/110
Yasmin F, Najeeb H, Moeed A, Naeem U, Asghar MS, Chughtai NU, et al. COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in the United States: A Systematic Review. Front. Public Health [Internet]. 2021 [consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];9. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8650625/pdf/fpubh-09-770985.pdf
Wang Y, Liu Y. Multilevel determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy in the United States: A rapid systematic review. Prev Med Rep [Internet]. 2022 [consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];25. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34934611/
Nehal KR, Steendam LM, Campos Ponce M, van der Hoeven M, Smit GSA. Worldwide Vaccination Willingness for COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Vaccines [Internet]. 2021 [consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];9:1071. Disponible en: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-393X/9/10/1071
Nolte F, Pacchiotti A, Castellano V, Lamy P, Gentile Á. Reticencia a la vacunación: abordaje de su complejidad. Rev Hosp Niños [Internet]. 2016 [consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];60(268):16-22. Disponible en: https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/pt/biblio-1103478
Galanis P, Vraka I, Siskou O, Konstantakopoulou O, Katsiroumpa A, Kaitelidou D. Willingness, refusal and influential factors of parents to vaccinate their children against the COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine [Internet]. 2022 [consultado el 10 de junio de 2022];157(1). Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0091743522000421?pes=vor
Sheldenkar A, Lim F, Yung CF, Lwim MO. Acceptance and uptake of influenza vaccines in Asia: A systematic review. Vaccine [Internet]. 2019 [consultado el 26 de junio de 2022];37(35):4896-4905. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31301918/
Larson HJ, Clarke RM, Jarrett C, Eckersberger E, Levine Z, Schulz WS, et al. Measuring trust in vaccination: A systematic review. Hum Vaccin Immunother [Internet]. 2018 [consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];14(7):1599–609. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29617183/
Díaz Seoane M, Berbel Hernández C, Allué Tango M, García Rodriguez C, Sanz López P, Pérez Martín MI, et al. Factors related to parents’ decision not to vaccinate their children. Vacunas [Internet]. 2020 [consultado el 31 de mayo de 2022];21(1):4–10. Disponible en: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2445146020300054
Moorhead S, Johnson M, Maas ML, Swanson E. Clasificación de Resultados de Enfermería (NOC). Medición de Resultados en Salud. ELSEVIER. 5ª edición. 2013 [consultado el 18 de junio de 2022]. p. 3.
NNNConsult. Herramienta online para la consulta y diseño de Planes de Cuidados de Enfermería. ELSEVIER [Internet]. 2021 [consultado el 18 de junio de 2022]. Disponible en: https://www.nnnconsult.com/
Butcher HK, Bulechek GM, McCloskey J, Wagner CM. Clasificación de Intervenciones de Enfermería (NIC). Elsevier. 7ª edición. 2018 [consultado el 18 de junio de 2022]. p. 3.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the copyright of the published works, and encourages and allows the reuse of the works under the license for use stated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011 (© Publications Service, University of Murcia, 2011)
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España(texto legal) “ a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Spain license (legal text)”. They can be copied, used, broadcasted, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and original source of their publication (journal, publisher and URL) are cited; (ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license is mentioned.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (pre-reviewed ) and / or post-print (reviewed and accepted for publication) versions of their works prior to publication, as it ensures a wider circulation and dissemination which may lead to a possible increase in its mention and a higher scope among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.