Patient perception of nursing care in the context of the COVID-19 crisis

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.479441
Keywords: humanized care, nursing staff hospital, patient satisfaction, quality of health

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has heavily altered regular procedures of healthcare systems worldwide. Daily work has become physically and emotionally exhausting for health care professionals, forced to face and adapt to new challenges and stressful situations. This situation weighs on the daily nursing practice and might have an impact on the quality of care provided and on the level of satisfaction perceived by hospitalized patients. Thus, the present study aimed to determine the patient’s perception of humanized nursing care received during their hospital stay.
Methods: A descriptive, quantitative, cross-sectional study was carried out, in which telephone interviews were conducted in 357 people >18 years of age who were admitted for more than 24 hours to the Hospital de León in order to asses patient´s perception. One instrument used was The Perception of Behaviors of Humanized Nursing Care Scale (PCHE), to evaluate in three dimensions (D): qualities of nursing practice (D1), openness to nurse–patient communication (D2), and willingness to care (D3). In addition, an institutional satisfaction survey was performed to know the opinion on the quality of customer service in hospitalization area.
Results: The percentage of patients scoring as “always” every dimension was: D1 = 91.2%; D2= 81.4%; and D3= 87.8%. Patient satisfaction obtained a mean score of 4.6 out of 5. 42.3% of population were men and 57.7% were women, most in the age range 61–75 years. The predominant marital status and educational level were married and basic–medium, respectively.
Conclusion: Despite the negative impact of COVID-19 in the health care system, patients perceived humanized nursing care received as very successful.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Monje, P.; Miranda, P.; Oyarzún, J:; Fredy Seguel, P. & Flores, E. Perception of humanized nursing care by hospitalized users. Ciencia y Enfermeria. 2018;24:1–10.

Kheokao, J.; Krirkgulthorn, T.; Umereweneza, S. & Seetangkham, S. Communication Factors in Holistic Humanized Nursing Care : Evidenced from Integrative Review. Journal of MCU Peace Studies. 2019;7(3):609–27.

Urra, M.E.; Jana, A. & García,V. Algunos Aspectos Esenciales Del Pensamiento De Jean Watson Y Su Teoría De Cuidados Transpersonales. Ciencia y enfermería. 2011;17(3):11–22.

Marriner Tomey, A. & Raile Alligood, M. Modelos y teorías en enfermería. 6a. Elsevier, editor. España; 2014.

Button, D.; Harrington, A. & Belan, I. E-learning & information communication technology (ICT) in nursing education: A review of the literature. Nurse Education Today. 2014;34(10):1311–23.

Hung, H.Y; Huang Y.F.; Tsai, J.J. & Chang, Y.J. Current state of evidence-based practice education for undergraduate nursing students in Taiwan: A questionnaire study. Nurse Education Today. 2015;35(12):1262-7.

Liu, Q.; Luo, D.; Haase, J.E:; Guo, Q.; Wang, X.; Liu, S.; Xia, L.; Liu, Z.; Yan, J. The experiences of health-care providers during the COVID-19 crisis in China: a qualitative study. Lancet Glob Health. 2020;8:e790-98.

McFarland M. Teoría de la diversidad y de la universalidad de los cuidados culturales. Modelos y teorías en enfermería 6a ed. Madrid. 2007. 472–498 p.

Busch, I.M.; Moretti, F.; Travaini, G.; Wu, A.W. & Rimondini, M. Humanization of Care: Key Elements Identified by Patients, Caregivers, and Healthcare Providers. A Systematic Review. Patient. 2019;12(5):461–74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40271-019-00370-1

Pereira A.; Souza Da Silva R.; De Camargo C.L.; Ribeiro De Oliveira R.C. Volviendo a los planteamientos de la atención sensible. Enfermería Global. 2012; 25.http://revistas.um.es/eglobal/article/view/eglobal.11.1.143161

Castro, M.; Zeitoune, R.; Tracera, G.; Moraes, K.; Batista, K. & Nogueira, M. Humanization in the work of nursing faculty. Revista brasileira de enfermagem. 2020;73(1):e20170855.

González-Hernández OJ. Validez y confiabilidad del instrumento “Percepción de comportamientos de cuidado humanizado de enfermería 3ª versión”. Aquichan. 2015;15(3):381-392. DOI: 10.5294/aqui.2015.15.3.6

Bruce, J. Implementing the user perspective. Studies in Family Planning. 1980;11(1):29–33.

Diprete E. Garantía de la Calidad de la Atención de salud en los países en desarrollo. 717th ed. Bethesda; U. R. C.; 2002.

Eugenio Rojas, K.D.; Ortiz González, M.; Triviño Bermúdez, M. &Velasco Peña, E.A. Percepción Del Cuidado Humanizado En Profesionales De Enfermería En Una Institución Prestado De Servicio De Salud En Urgencias. 2018; Available from: http://repository.ucc.edu.co/bitstream/ucc/7648/2/2018_Cuidado_Humanizado_Profesionales.pdf

Romero-Massa, E.; Contreras-Méndez, I.; Pérez-Pájaro, Y. & Jiménez-Zamora, V. Cuidado humanizado de enfermería en pacientes hospitalizados. Cartagena, Colombia. Revisata Ciencias Biomédicas. 2013;4(1):60–8.

Valdivia Cornejo, M.J. Percepción del cuidado humanizado y nivel de satisfacción en pacientes de área observación, Emergencia- Hospital Honorio Delgado. Universidad Nacional de San Agustín de Arequipa; 2019.

Ceballos Vásquez, P. Desde los ámbitos de enfermería, analizando el cuidado humanizado. Ciencia y Enfermeria. 2010;16(1):31–5.

Espinoza Medalla, L.; Huerta Barrenechea, K.; Pantoja Quiche, J.; Velásquez Carmona, W.; Cubas Cubas, D. & Ramos Valencia, A. El cuidado humanizado y la percepción del paciente en el Hospital EsSalud Huacho. Octubre de 2010. Ciencia y Desarrollo. 2011;13:53.

Acosta Revollo, A.; Mendoza Acosta, C. A.; Morales Murillo, K. & Quiñones Torres, A.M. percepción del paciente hospitalizados sobre el cuidado humanizado brindado por enfermería en una IPS de tercer nivel. Cartagena 2013. Vol. 66. Corporación Universitaria Rafael Núlez. Facultad de ciencias de la Salud; 2013.

Published
08-10-2021
How to Cite
[1]
Blanco-Nistal, M.M. et al. 2021. Patient perception of nursing care in the context of the COVID-19 crisis . Global Nursing. 20, 4 (Oct. 2021), 26–60. DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.479441.
Issue
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH