Analysis of the programs for the presence of family members in the extrahospital cardiorrespiratory stop in adult patient
Abstract
Objective: Explore programs aimed at the participation of family members in situations of CRP in adults in the out-of-hospital setting.
Method: Narrative review of the scientific literature, in primary databases (Scielo, PubMed, Cuiden and Cochrane Plus and CINAHL), using DeCS and MeSH structured language, from 2005 to 2020, in Spanish and English. 23 studies are obtained.
Results: Studies show that mourning for family members of a cardiorespiratory arrest in the out-of-hospital setting is less traumatic if they are allowed to be present. Staying with the victim must be ensured unless the professional considers that it is harmful. The advantages of the presence of family members are as much for the family member as for the healthcare team. Despite the existence of a social and ethical need in accordance with the principle of patient autonomy for the implementation of these programs, they hardly exist and this is usually due to the resistance generated by the professionals or managers themselves.
Conclusions: In the case of cardiorespiratory arrest in adults in the out-of-hospital setting, the main international scientific societies recommend the implementation of programs for the presence of family members, which makes it a necessity. The scientific literature demonstrates more advantages than disadvantages, fundamentally in terms of better grief in family members and greater satisfaction and less possibility of legal claims in health professionals, promoting the humanization of care that would translate into lower healthcare costs in the prevalence of grief pathological.
Downloads
References
Neumar RW, Shuster M, Callaway CW, Gent LM, Atkins DL, Bhanji F, et al. Part 1: Executive summary: 2015 American Heart Association guidelines update for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation. 2015 Oct 20;132(18): S315–67.
Monsieurs KG, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Recomendaciones para la Resucitación 2015 del Consejo Europeo de Resucitación (ERC) Sección 1: Resumen Ejecutivo[Internet]. [cited 2020 Apr 27]. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.038
Noureddine S, Avedissian T, Isma'eel H, El Sayed MJ. Assessment of cardiopulmonary resuscitation practices in emergency departments for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest victims in Lebanon. J Emerg Trauma Shock [Internet]. 2016 Jul-Sep [cited 2020 May 5];9(3):115-21. DOI: 10.4103/0974-2700.185275
Kim H, Kim H‐J, Suh EE. The e_ectiveness of patient-centered education for family caregivers of patients with cardiovascular diseases Presence of relatives during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Perspectives of health professionals, patients and family in the Basque Country. Journal of cardiop rehabi and prevent [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 May 6]; 37(6), 459‐ DOI: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000309
Yamashita A, Maeda T, Myojo Y, Wato Y, Ohta K, Inaba H. Temporal variations in dispatcher-assisted and bystander-initiated resuscitation efforts. Am J Emerg Med [Internet]. 2018 [cited 2020 May 6];36(12):2203-2210. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.03.080
Shuvy M, Koh M, Qiu F, Brooks SC, Chan TCY, Cheskes S, Dorian P, Geri G, Lin S, Scales DC, Ko DT. Health care utilization prior to out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A population-based study. Resuscitation [Internet]. 2019 Aug [cited 2020 May 7]; 141:158-165. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.04.033
Oczkowski SJW, Mazzetti I, Cupido C, Fox-Robichaud AE. Family presence during resuscitation: A Canadian Critical Care Society position paper. Can Respir J [Internte]. 2015 Jul 1 [cited 2020 May 3];22(4):201–5. DOI: 10.1155/2015/532721
De Stefano C, Normand D, Jabre P, Azoulay E, Kentish-Barnes N, Lapostolle F, et al. Family presence during resuscitation: A qualitative analysis from a national multicenter randomized clinical trial. PLoS One [Internet]. 2016 Jun 1 [cited 2020 Apr 30];11(6). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156100
Guzzetta C. Family presence during resuscitation and invasive procedures. Crit Care Nurse [Internet]. 2016 Feb 1 [cited 2020 May 3];36(1):11–4. DOI: 10.4037/ccn2016980
Ferrara G, Ramponi D, Cline TW. Evaluation of physicians’ and nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and compliance with family presence during resuscitation in an emergency department setting after an educational intervention. Adv Emerg Nurs J [Internet]. 2016 Jan 28 [cited 2020 May 4];38(1):32–42. DOI: 10.1097 / TME.0000000000000086
Barreto MS, Peruzzo HE, Garcia-Vivar C, Marcon SS. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and invasive procedures: a meta-synthesis. Rev Esc Enferm USP [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 May 7];53: e03435. DOI: 10.1590/S1980-220X2018001303435
Administración General del Estado. Ley 41/2002, de 14 de noviembre, Básica reguladora de la autonomía del paciente y de derechos y obligaciones en materia de información y documentación clínica. Boletín Oficial del estado (BOE) [Internet]. 2002 [Citado 1 May 2020]; 274: 40126-32. Disponible en: https://boe.es/boe/dias/2002/11/15/pdfs/A40126-40132.pdf
Giles T, de Lacey S, Muir-Cochrane E. Factors influencing decision-making around family presence during resuscitation: a grounded theory study. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2016 Nov [cited 2020 Apr 30];72(11):2706–17. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jan.13046
Mawer C. How Can We Make Out-of-Hospital CPR More Family Centered? AMA J Ethics [Internet]. 2019 May 1 [cited 2020 May 5];21(5): E461-469. DOI: 10.1001/amajethics.2019.461
Buick JE, Ray JG, Kiss A, Morrison LJ. The association between neighborhood effects and out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes. Resuscitation [Internet]. 2016 Jun [cited 2020 May 4]; 103:14-19. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2016.03.008
Brasel K, Entwistle J, Sade R. Should family presence be allowed during cardiopulmonary resuscitation? An Thorac Surg Ìnternet]. 2016 [cited 2020 May 5];102(5):1438-1443. DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.02.011
Cariou G, Pelaccia T. Are they trained? Prevalence, motivations and barriers to CPR training among cohabitants of patients with a coronary disease. Intern Emerg Med [Internet]. 2017 Sep [cited 2020 May 4];12(6):845-852. DOI: 10.1007/s11739-016-1493-8
Stassart C, Stipulante S, Zandona R, Gillet A, Ghuysen A. Psychological impact of out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on the witness engaged in gestures of survival. Rev Med Liege [Internet]. 2017 May [cited 2020 May 6];72(5):236-240. PMID: 28520322
Enriquez D, Mastandueno R, Flichtentrei D, Szyld E. Relatives’ Presence During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Glob Heart [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 mayo 2;12(4):335-340. DOI: 10.1016/j.gheart.2016.01.007
Tíscar-González V, Gastaldo D, Moreno-Casbas MT, Peter E, Rodriguez-Molinuevo A, Gea-Sánchez M. Presence of relatives during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Perspectives of health professionals, patients and family in the Basque Country. Aten Primaria [Internet]. 2018 May 1 [cited 2020 May 1];51(5):269–77. DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2017.12.002
Whitehead L, Tierney S, Biggerstaff D, Perkins GD, Haywood KL. Trapped in a disrupted normality: Survivors' and partners' experiences of life after a sudden cardiac arrest. Resuscitation [Internet]. 2020 Feb 1 [cited 2020 May 6]; 147:81-87. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.12.017
Ghasemi Y, Molavynejad S, Jouzi M, Hemmatipour A. Evaluating the awareness of ordinary people about relief operations and cardiopulmonary resuscitation when facing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. J Family Med Prim Care [Internet]. 2019 Jul [cited 2020 May 6];8(7):2318-2321. DOI: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_408_19
Sato N, Matsuyama T, Kitamura T, Hirose Y. Disparities in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation performed by a family member and a non-family member. J Epidemio [Internet]. 2020 Apr 18 [cited 2020 May 7]. DOI: 10.2188/jea.JE20200068
Fernández-Aed I, Pérez-Urdiales I, Unanue-Arza S, García-Azpiazu Z, Ballesteros-Peña S. Estudio cualitativo sobre las experiencias y emociones de los técnicos y enfermeras de emergencias extrahospitalarias tras la realización de maniobras de reanimación cardiopulmonar con resultado de muerte. Enfermer Intens [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2020 May 7]; 28(2): 57-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.enfi.2016.10.003
Colbert JA, Adler JN. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation - Polling results. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(26): 38.
Jabre P, Belpomme V, Azoulay E, et al. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. N Engl J Med [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2020 May 8]; 368:1008-18. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203366
Leung NY, Chow SK. Attitudes of healthcare staff and patients’ family members towards family presence during resuscitation in adult critical care units. J Clin Nurs [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2020 May 5]; 21:2083-93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2011.04013.x
Lederman Z, Garasic M, Piperberg M. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Who should decide? J Med Ethics [Internet] 2014 [cited 2020 May 6]; 40:315-9. DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100715
Hung MS, Pang SM. Family presence preference when patients are receiving resuscitation in an accident and emergency department. J Adv Nurs [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2020 May 6]; 67:56-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2010.05441.x
Kosowan S, Jensen L. Family presence during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Cardiac health care professionals’ perspectives. Can J Cardiovasc Nurs [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2020 May 7]; 21:23-9. PMID: 21848046
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the copyright of the published works, and encourages and allows the reuse of the works under the license for use stated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011 (© Publications Service, University of Murcia, 2011)
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España(texto legal) “ a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Spain license (legal text)”. They can be copied, used, broadcasted, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and original source of their publication (journal, publisher and URL) are cited; (ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license is mentioned.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (pre-reviewed ) and / or post-print (reviewed and accepted for publication) versions of their works prior to publication, as it ensures a wider circulation and dissemination which may lead to a possible increase in its mention and a higher scope among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.
