Obstetric practices developed in two maternities for low risk mothers
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the quality of care provided to women and children during cases of natural childbirth in municipal public maternity wards of the city of Natal/RN, Brazilian Northeast.
Method: A cross-sectional study, quantitative in two public hospitals with 314 puerperal women attending the period between April and July 2014.
Results: The differences between the maternity wards were identified with regard to the provision of liquids orally (p=0.018), stimulus for non-supine position (p=0.002), existence of partograph (p=0.001), support or welcoming by health professionals (p=0.047) intravenous infusion (p<0.001), supine position (p<0.001), use of oxytocin (p<0.001), food and liquid restriction (p=0.002), and the fact that the touch is performed by more than one examiner (p=0.011). Assistance during the process of labor and birth showed better results in general for motherhood A.
Conclusions: They become necessary to implement improvements and realignment of current obstetric model.
Downloads
References
Silveira SC, Camargo BV, Crepaldi MA. Assistência ao parto na maternidade: representações sociais de mulheres assistidas e profissionais de saúde. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2010; 23(1): 1-10.
Bessa LF, Mamede MV. Ação educativa: uma perspectiva para humanização do parto? Rev Baiana Enferm. 2010; 24(1,2,3): 11-22.
Busanello J, Kerber NPC, Fernandes GFM, Zacarias CC, Cappellaro J, Silva ME. Humanização do parto e a formação dos profissionais da Saúde. Ciênc Cuid Saúde. 2011; 10(1): 169-75.
Gonçalves R; Aguiar CA, Merighi MAB, Jesus MCP. Experiencing care in the birthing center context: the users' perspective. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2011; 45(1): 62-70.
World Health Organization. Care in normal birth: a pratical guide. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1996.
Carvalho IS, Costa Júnior PB da, Macedo JBPO, Brito RS. Epidemiologic characterization of parturitions and births: an ecological study based on an information system. J Nurs UFPE on line. 2014; 8(3): 616-23.
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology. STROBE Statement: checklist of items that should be included in reports of cross-sectional studies. 2007. Available from: <http://www.strobe-statement.org/fileadmin/Strobe/uploads/checklists/STROBE_checklist_v4_cross-sectional.pdf>. Cited 2013 Aug. 10.
Natal. Anuário Natal 2013. Natal: Secretaria Municipal de Meio Ambiente; 2013.
Silva FMB, Paixão TCR, Oliveira SMJV, Leite JS, Riesco MLG, Osava RH. Care in a birth center according to the recommendations of the World Health Organization. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013; 47(5): 1031-8.
Singata M, Tranmer J, Gyte GML. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (8): CD003930.
Figueiredo MS, Oliveira DKMA, Vieira NRS, Davim RMB, Silva RAR. Possíveis indicadores da assistência obstétrica a parturiente em uma maternidade escola. Cogitare Enferm. 2013; 18(4): 722-8.
d'Orsi E, Brüggemann OM, Diniz CS, Aguiar JM, Gusman CR, Torres JA, et al. Social inequalities and women's satisfaction with childbirth care in Brazil: a national hospital-based survey. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014; 30(sup.1): S1-15.
Diniz CSG, d’Orsi E, Domingues RMSM, Torres JA, Dias MABD, Schneck CA, et al. Implementation of the presence of companions during hospital admission for childbirth: data from the Birth in Brazil national survey. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014; 30(sup.1): S1-14.
Hodnett ED, Gates S, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Weston J. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (7): CD003766.
Stancato K, Vergílio MSTG, Bosco CS. Avaliação da estrutura e assistência em sala de pré-parto, parto e pós-parto imediato-PPP de um hospital universitário. Ciênc Cuid Saúde. 2011; 10(3): 541-8.
Jones L, Othman M, Dowswell T, Alfirevic Z, Gates S, Newburn M, et al. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (3): CD009234.
Giglio MRP, França E, Lamounier JA. Avaliação da qualidade da assistência ao parto normal. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2011; 33(10): 297-304.
Lawrence A, Lewis L, Hofmeyr GJ, Styles C. Maternal positions and mobility during first stage labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (10): CD003934.
Barros LA, Veríssimo RCSS. Uso do partograma em maternidades escola de Alagoas. Rev RENE. 2011; 12(3): 555-60.
Lavender T, Hart A, Smyth RMD. Effect of partogram use on outcomes for women in spontaneous labour at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (7): CD005461.
Moreira MEL, Gama SGN, Pereira APE, Silva AAM, Lansky S, Pinheiro RS, Gonçalves AC, et al. Clinical practices in the hospital care of healthy newborn infant in Brazil. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014; 30(sup.1): S1-12.
Ministério da Saúde. Iniciativa Hospital Amigo da Criança: revista, atualizada e ampliada para o cuidado integrado: módulo 1: histórico e implementação. Fundo das Nações Unidas para a Infância. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2008.
Moore ER, Anderson GC, Bergman N, Dowswell T. Early skin-to-skin contact for mothers and their healthy newborn infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; (5): CD003519.
Ministério da Saúde. Manual de acolhimento e classificação de risco em obstetrícia. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Departamento de Ações Programáticas Estratégicas. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2014.
Ministério da Saúde. Lei nº 11.634, de 27 de dezembro de 2007. Dispõe sobre o direito da gestante ao conhecimento e a vinculação à maternidade onde receberá assistência no âmbito do Sistema Único de Saúde. Diário Oficial da União 2007; 28 dez.
d’Orsi E, Chor D, Giffin K, Angulo-Tuesta A, Barbosa GP, Gama AS, et al. Qualidade da atenção ao parto em maternidades do Rio de Janeiro. Rev Saúde Pública. 2005; 39(4): 646-54.
Chalmers B, Kaczorowski J, Levitt C, Dzakpasu S, O'Brien B, Lee L, et al. Use of routine interventions in vaginal labor and birth: findings from the maternity experiences survey. Birth. 2009; 36(1): 13-25.
Reveiz L, Gaitán HG, Cuervo LG. Enemas during labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (7): CD000330.
Basevi V, Lavender T. Routine perineal shaving on admission in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000; (1): CD001236.
Leal MC, Pereira APE, Domingues RMSM, Theme Filha MM, Dias MAB, Nakamura-Pereira M, et al. Obstetric interventions during labor and childbirth in Brazilian low-risk women. Cad Saúde Pública. 2014; 30(sup.1): s1-31.
Dawood F, Dowswell T, Quenby S. Intravenous fluids for reducing the duration of labour in low risk nulliparous women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (6): CD007715.
Bugg GJ, Siddiqui F, Thornton JG. Oxytocin versus no treatment or delayed treatment for slow progress in the first stage of spontaneous labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (6): CD007123.
Sartore A, Seta F, Maso G, Ricci G, Alberico S, Borelli M, et al. The effects of uterine fundal pressure (Kristeller maneuver) on pelvic floor function after vaginal delivery. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012; 286(5): 135-9.
Verheijen EC, Raven JH, Hofmeyr GJ. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (4): CD006067.
Pádua KS, Osis MJD, Faúndes A, Barbosa AH, Moraes Filho OB. Factors associated with cesarean sections in Brazilian hospitals. Rev Saúde Pública. 2010; 44(1): 70-9.
Anim-Somuah M, Smyth RMD, Jones L. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (12): CD0000031.
Shepherd A, Cheyne H. The frequency and reasons for vaginal examinations
in labour. Women Birth. 2013; 26(1): 49-54.
Downe S, Gyte GM, Dahlen HG, Singata M. Routine vaginal examinations for assessing progress of labour to improve outcomes for women and babies at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013; (7): CD010088.
Borders N, Lawton R, Martin SR. A clinical audit of the number of vaginal examinations in Labor: a NOVEL idea. J Midwifery Womens Health. 2012; 57(2): 139-44.
Carroli G, Mignini L. Episiotomy for vaginal birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (1): CD000081.
Pereira ALF, Nagipe SFSA, Lima GPVL, Nascimento SD, Gouveia MSF. Care and outcomes of relaxation room assistance at a public maternity hospital, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Texto contexto - enferm. 2012; 21(3): 566-73.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the copyright of the published works, and encourages and allows the reuse of the works under the license for use stated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011 (© Publications Service, University of Murcia, 2011)
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España(texto legal) “ a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Spain license (legal text)”. They can be copied, used, broadcasted, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and original source of their publication (journal, publisher and URL) are cited; (ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license is mentioned.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (pre-reviewed ) and / or post-print (reviewed and accepted for publication) versions of their works prior to publication, as it ensures a wider circulation and dissemination which may lead to a possible increase in its mention and a higher scope among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.
