Postoperative pain in women undergoing caesarean section

Authors

  • Natalia Carvalho Borges Universidade Federal de Goiás http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1371-0066
  • Brunna Costa e Silva Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Charlise Fortunato Pedroso Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Thuany Cavalcante Silva Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Bruna Silva Ferreira Tatagiba Universidade Federal de Goiás
  • Lílian Varanda Pereira Universidade Federal de Goiás
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.16.4.267721
Keywords: Pain, Postoperative pain, Cesarean section

Supporting Agencies

  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the incidence, intensity and quality for pain post-cesarean section.
Methods: Cross-sectional study. A total of 1062 post-cesarean section women were interviewed in immediates pre- and post-operative. Pain intensity and quality were evaluated through the Numerical Rating Scale (0-10) and McGill Pain Questionnaire-SF. The variables were explored by descriptive measures and the incidence of postoperative pain calculated with a 95% confidence interval.
Results: The incidence of pain was 92,7% (IC 95%: 90,9 - 94,2). The average level of pain intensity at the time of worst pain was 6,6 (dp=2,2). The descriptors more frequently chosen were “aching” (91.6%) “tender” (70.0%) and “throbbing” (56.1%).
Conclusions: High-intensity postoperative pain is a reality for post-cesarean section women, showing the importance of pain assessment for implementation of curative and preventive actions to reduce losses in the recovery of women.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Natalia Carvalho Borges, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Enfermeira. Doutoranda em enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Goiás

Brunna Costa e Silva, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Graduanda em enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Goiás

Charlise Fortunato Pedroso, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Enfermeira. Mestre em enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Goiás.

Thuany Cavalcante Silva, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Enfermeira. Mestranda em enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Goiás

Bruna Silva Ferreira Tatagiba, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Enfermeira. Mestranda em Enfermagem. Universidade Federal de Goiás.

Lílian Varanda Pereira, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Enfermeira. Doutora em Enfermagem.  Professor Associado da Universidade Federal de Goiás.

References

Ward CW. Procedure-specific postoperative pain management. Medsurg Nurs. 2014;23(2):107-10.

Loos MJ, Scheltinga MR, Mulders LG, Roumen RM. The Pfannenstiel incision as a source of chronic pain. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(4):839-46.

IASP. Associação Internacional Para Estudo da Dor. Guia para o Tratamento da Dor em Contextos de Poucos Recursos [internet]. Seatle: IASP Press; 2010 [citado 2016 set 05]. Disponível em: <http://www.iasp-

pain.org/files/Content/ContentFolders/Publications2/FreeBooks/GuidetoPainManagement_Portuguese.pdf.>

VanDenKerkhof EG, Peters ML, Bruce J. Chronic pain after surgery: time for standardization? A framework to establish core risk factor and outcome domains for epidemiological studies. Clin J Pain. 2013;29(1):2-8.

Sng BL, Sia AT, Quek K, Woo D, Lim Y. Incidence and risk factors for chronic pain after caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(5):748-52.

Cançado TOB, Omaris M, Ashmawi HA, Torres MLA. Dor crônica pós-cesariana. Influência da técnica anestésico-cirúrgica e da analgesia pós-operatória. Rev Bras Anestesiol. 2012;62(6):762-774.

Beiranvand S, Noparast M, Eslamizade N, Saeedikia S. The effects of religion and spirituality on postoperative pain, hemodynamic functioning and anxiety after cesarean section. Acta Med Iran. 2014;52(12):909-15.

Pan PH, Coghill R, Houle TT, Seid MH, Lindel WM, Parker RL, et al. Multifactorial preoperative predictors for postcesarean section pain and analgesic requirement. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(3):417-25.

IASP. International Association for the Study of Pain [internet]. IASP Taxonomy. 2012 [cited 2016 jun 22]. Disponível em: http:/www.iasp-pain.org/Education/Content.aspx?ItemNumber=1698&navItemNumber=576#Sensitization>.

Gadsden J, Hart S, Santos AC. Post-cesarean delivery analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2005;101(5):62-9.

Eisenach JC, Pan P, Smiley RM, Lavand'homme P, Landau R, Houle TT. Resolution of pain after childbirth. Anesthesiology. 2013;118(1):143-51.

Sousa L, Pitangui ACR, Gomes FA, Nakano MAS, Ferreira CHJ. Mensuração e características de dor após cesárea e sua relação com limitação de atividades. Acta Paul Enferm. 2009;22(6):741-7.

Nikolajsen L, Sorensen HC, Jensen TS, Kehlet H. Chronic pain following caesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2004;48(1):111-6.

IBGE. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística [internet]. Censo Demográfico 2010: População estimada 2014. 2010 [citado 2015 mar 22]. Disponível em: <http://cidades.ibge.gov.br/xtras/perfil.php?lang=&codmun=520870>.

Sociedade Americana de Anestesiologia. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2012;116(2): 248-73.

Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 1990;17(8):1022-4.

Melzack R. The short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30(2):191-7.

Costa LCM, Mahera CG, McAuley JH, Hancock MJ, Oliveira WM, Azevedo DC, et al. The Brazilian-Portuguese versions of the McGill Pain Questionnaire were reproducible, valid, and responsive in patients with musculoskeletal pain. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2011; 64(8):903–12.

ABEP. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil [internet]. 2013 [citado 2013 jan 21]. Disponível em <http://www.abep.org/novo/Content.aspx?ContentID=835>.

Buhagiar L, Cassar OA, Brincat MP, Buttigieg GG, Inglott AS, Adami MZ, et al. Predictors of post-caesarean section pain and analgesic consumption. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2011;27(2):185-91.

Karlstrom A, Engstrom-Olofsson R, Norbergh KG, Sjoling M, Hildingsson I. Postoperative pain after cesarean birth affects breastfeeding and infant care. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2007;36(5):430-40.

Alves Neto O, Costa CMC, Siqueira JTT, Teixeira MJ. Dor: princípio e prática. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2009.

Woolf CJ. Recent advances in the pathophysiology of acute pain. Br J Anaesth. 1989;63(2):139-46.

Lovich-Sapola J, Smith CE, Brandt CP. Postoperative pain control. Surg Clin North Am. 2015;95(2):301-18.

Santos FDRP, Nunes SFL, Silva JPd, Silva RMO, Viana RP, Pereira VO, et al. Dor em pacientes no pós-operatório de cirurgias torácicas e abdominais. Rev Ciênc Ext [Internet]. 2014 [citado 2015 abril 23]; 10(3):99-107. Disponível em: <http://ojs.unesp.br/index.php/revista_proex/article/download/926/1042>.

Katz J, Poleshuck EL, Andrus CH, Hogan LA, Jung BF, Kulick DI, et al. Risk factors for acute pain and its persistence following breast cancer surgery. Pain. 2005;119:16-25.

Fortin JD, Schwartz-Barcott D, Rossi S. The postoperative pain experience: a description based on the McGill Pain Questionnaire. Clin Nurs Res. 1992;1(3):292-304.

McDonald DD, Weiskopf CS. Adult patients' postoperative pain descriptions and responses to the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire. Clin Nurs Res. 2001;10(4):442-52.

Pimenta CAM, Teixeira MJ. Questionário de dor de McGill: Proposta de adaptação para a língua portuguesa. Rev Esc Enf USP. 1996;30(3):473-83.

Wu CL, Raja SN. Treatment of acute postoperative pain. Lancet. 2011;377(9784):2215-25.

Published
01-10-2017
How to Cite
[1]
Carvalho Borges, N. et al. 2017. Postoperative pain in women undergoing caesarean section. Global Nursing. 16, 4 (Oct. 2017), 354–383. DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.16.4.267721.
Issue
Section
Originales