Clinical-epidemiological elements of family interviews for donation of organs and tissues
Supporting Agencies
- Não há.
Abstract
Objectives: To identify the clinical and epidemiological features of interviews with families of potential donors of organs and tissues.Methods: Quantitative research, descriptive, exploratory and documental. The sample was composed of medical records of 93 patients, whose families have been addressed in the years 2012/2013. It conducted data analysis using the statical package “R”.
Results: It was observed that 62.4% of approaches have ben performed with families of patients who have become potential cardiorespiratory arrest donor. Parents were the most interviewed family members coming to meet 40% of approaches. The family consent to donation percentage was 51.6%. Eye/corneas globe was the most spolied, coming to represent 87.5%. Knowing tha the potential donor was contrary (in life) donation (46.7%) and ignored his desire in life (33.4%) werw the main family groups for refusal.
Conclusion: Identify the clinical and epidemiological elements of family interviews for donation is very important to evaluate the effectiveness of the activities performed in the donation process of the institutions
Downloads
References
International Registry in Organ Doantion and Transplantation – IRODaT [online]. 2014 [acesso 2015 Fev 26]. Brasil dispara em transplantes de órgãos e cresce também em número de doadores. Desafios do Desenvolvimento. [online]. 2010 [citado em 2014 Jul. 29]. Disponível em: http://www.irodat.org/img/database/grafics/newsletter/IRODaT%20Newsletter%202013%20.pdf.
Associação Brasileira de Transplantes de Órgãos – ABTO. Registro Brasileiro de Transplantes. [online]. 2014 [acess 2014 Jul. 29]; 20(4): 1-81. Disponível em: http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03/Upload/file/RBT/2014/rbt2014-lib.pdf.
Brasil. Lei nº 9.434, de 04 de fevereiro de 1997. Dispõe sobre a remoção de órgãos, tecidos e partes do corpo humano para fins de transplante e tratamento e dá outras providências. [online]. [acesso 2014 Ago. 02]. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/l9434.htm.
Brasil. Lei nº 10.211, de 23 de março de 2001. Altera dispositivos da Lei nº 9.434, de 04 de fevereiro de 1997, que “dispõe sobre a remoção de órgãos, tecidos e partes do corpo humano para fins de transplante e tratamento”. [online]. [acesso 2014 Ago.02]. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/LEIS_2001/L10211.htm.
Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos – ABTO. Diretrizes básicas para captação e retirada de múltiplos órgãos da Associação Brasileira de Transplante de Órgãos [online] [acesso 2014 Ago. 05]. ABTO: São Paulo, 2009. Disponível em: http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03/Upload/pdf/livro.pdf.
Conselho Federal de Medicina – CFM. Resolução CFM nº 1.480, de 08 de agosto de 1997. Dispoe sobre a morte encefálica. [online]. [acesso 2014 Ago. 02]. Disponível em: http://www.portalmedico.org.br/resolucoes/CFM/1997/1480_1997.htm.
Mendes KDS, Roza BA, Barbosa SFF, Schirmer J, Galvão CM. Organ and tissue transplantation: responsabilities of nurses; Text Context Nursing [Internet]. 2012 [acesso 2015 Mar 08]; 21 (4): 945-53. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v21n4/en_27.pdf.
Freire ILS, Vasconcelos QLDAQ, Melo GSM, Torres GV, Araújo EC, Miranda FAN. Facilitating and barriers in the effectiveness of donation of organs and tissues. Text Context Nursing [online]. 2014 [acesso 2015 Fev 20]; 23(4): 925-34. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/tce/v23n4/0104-0707-tce-23-04-00925.pdf.
Santos MJ, Massarollo MCKB, Moraes EL. Family interview in the processo f donation organs and tissues for transplantation. Acta Paul Enfem [online]. 2012 [acesso 2015 Fev 20]; 25(5): 788-94. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ape/v25n5/en_22.pdf.
Cinque VM, Bianchi ERF. Stressor experienced by family members in the process of organ and tissue donation for transplantat. Rev Esc Enferm USP. [online]. 2010 [acesso 2015 Fev. 10]; 44 (4): 996-1002. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/reeusp/v44n4/en_20.pdf.
Freire ILS, Vasconcelos QLDAQ, Araújo RO, Melo GSM, Costa IKF, Torres GV. Perfil de potenciais doadores segundo a efetividade da doação. Rev Enferm UFSM. [online]. 2013 [acesso 2015 Fev. 15];3(Esp.):709-718. Disponível em: http://cascavel.ufsm.br/revistas/ojs-2.2.2/index.php/reufsm/article/viewFile/10998/pdf.
Conselho Nacional de Saúde (Brasil). Resolução nª 466, de 12 de Dezembro de 2012. Aprova as diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos [online]. 2012 [acesso 2015 Fev 25]. Disponível em: http://conselho.saude.gov.br/resolucoes/2012/Reso466.pdf.
Brasil. Ministério do Planejamento, Orçamento e Gestão. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatístico (IBGE). Estudos e Pesquisas Informação Demográfica e Socioeconômica número 27. Síntese de Indicadores Sociais Uma análise das condições de vida da população brasileira 2010. Rio de Janeiro: MPOG; 2010.
Moraes BN, Bacal F, Teixeira MCTV, Fiorelli AI, Leite PL, Fiorelli RL, et. al. Behavior profile of family members of donors and nondonors of organs. Transplantation proceedings [online]. 2009 [acesso 2015 Fev. 15]; 41: 799-801. Disponível em: http://ac.els-cdn.com/S004113450900181X/1-s2.0-S004113450900181X-main.pdf?_tid=3518fe64-bdbf-11e4-9c8c-00000aab0f02&acdnat=1424959145_fd9a032486e6f166d16a50f1339f8bd3.
Noronha MGO, Seter GB, Perini LD, Salles FMO, Nogara MAS. Estudo do perfil dos doadores elegíveis de órgãos e tecidos e motivos da não doação no Hospital Santa Isabel em Blumenau, SC. Revista da AMRIGS, Porto Alegre. [online]. 2012 [acesso 2015 Fev. 15];56(3):199-203. Disponível em: http://www.amrigs.org.br/revista/56-03/estudo_do_perfil.pdf.
Ferraz AS, Santos LGM, Roza BA, Schirmer J, Knihs NS, Erbs JL. Integrative review: indicators of result process of organ donation and transplants. J Bras Nefrol [online] 2013 [acesso 2015 Fev 27]; 35(3): 220-228. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/jbn/v35n3/en_v35n3a09.pdf.
Le Nobin J, Pruvot FR, Villers A, Flamand V, Bouye S. Family refusal of organ donation: a retrospective study in a French organ procurement center. Prog Urol [online]. 2014 [acesso 2015 Fev 27]; 24(5):282-7. Disponível em: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24674333.
Teixeira RKC, Gonçalves TB, Silva JAC. Is the intention to donate organs influenced by the public’s understanding of brain death? Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. [online] 2012 [acesso 2015 Fev. 15];24(3):258-262. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rbti/v24n3/en_v24n3a09.pdf.
Aguiar MIF, Araújo TOM, Cavalcante MMS, Chaves ES, Rolim ILTP. Perfil de doadores efetivos de órgãos e tecidos no Estado do Ceará. Rev Min Enferm. [online] 2010 [acesso 2015 Fev. 16];14(3):353-360. Disponível em: http://www.reme.org.br/artigo/detalhes/126.
Brito LD, Prieb RG. Fatores de interferências no processo de doação de órgãos e tecidos: revisão da literatura. J Bras Transpl. [online] 2012 [acesso 2015 Fev. 15];15:1676-161681. Disponível em: http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03/Upload/file/JBT/2012/2.pdf#page=26.
Pessoa JLE, Schirmer J, Roza BA. Evaluation of the causes for Family refusal to donate organs and tissues. Acta Paul Enferm. [online]. 2013 [acesso 2015 Fev 15];26(4):323-30. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/ape/v26n4/en_v26n4a05.pdf.
Moreira Cinque, v. Ferraz Bianchi, ER. La receptividad de la noticia de muerte encefálica en los familiares de donantes de órganos y tejidos para transplante. Enfermería Global. [online] 2009 [acesso 2015 jul 15]; 16: 1-8. Disponível em: http://revistas.um.es/eglobal/article/view/66381/64001.
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the copyright of the published works, and encourages and allows the reuse of the works under the license for use stated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011 (© Publications Service, University of Murcia, 2011)
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España(texto legal) “ a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Spain license (legal text)”. They can be copied, used, broadcasted, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and original source of their publication (journal, publisher and URL) are cited; (ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license is mentioned.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (pre-reviewed ) and / or post-print (reviewed and accepted for publication) versions of their works prior to publication, as it ensures a wider circulation and dissemination which may lead to a possible increase in its mention and a higher scope among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.
