Comparative study of invasive blood pressure versus non-invasive blood pressure

Authors

  • JA Simarro Blasco Enfermero UCI Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca – SESCAM
  • MC Noheda Blasco Enfermero UCI Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca – SESCAM
  • M Bascuñana Blasco Enfermero UCI Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca – SESCAM
  • M Noheda Recuenco Enfermero UCI Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca – SESCAM
  • I Tolmo Aranda Enfermero UCI Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca – SESCAM
  • MI Romero Carralero Enfermero UCI Hospital Virgen de la Luz de Cuenca – SESCAM
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.10.4.137411
Keywords: Intensive care, determination of blood pressure, effect of drugs, nursing, blood pressure, artificial respiration, systolic pressure and diastolic pressure

Abstract

In clinical practice, blood pressure is an important parameter in patient critic hemodynamic valuation. There are two ways of measuring: Invasive Pressure (IP) and Non Invasive Pressure (NIP). As objectives, we set ourselves the task of comparing the difference between both forms of measurement, assessing the possible differences by arterial location, age and sex, assessing the influence of mechanical ventilation, inotropic drugs and casework in invasive blood pressure difference (IP) and non invasive arterial pressure (NIP). We sought to identify its clinical significance and estimate the reliability of the NIP. We conducted a descriptive, longitudinal and comparative study between March and December 2008. Sex, age and arterial location (hemi-body and artery) were analyzed. We have included patients with artery with optimal curve and calibration at the time of measurement in decubitus. NIP was taken in both arms at an interval of five minutes, and IP was recorded at the same time. Analysis was with SPSS 15.0. The difference was analyzed in 109 patients with statistically significant differences in any scanned parameters. Under discussion and conclusions we propose that the differences found are not clinically significant and therefore the IP and the NIP are reliable in optimal calibration state.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Published
05-10-2011
How to Cite
[1]
Simarro Blasco, J. et al. 2011. Comparative study of invasive blood pressure versus non-invasive blood pressure. Global Nursing. 10, 4 (Oct. 2011). DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.10.4.137411.
Issue
Vol. 10 No. 4 (2011): #24 - Octubre
Section
Clínica

The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:

1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the copyright of the published works, and encourages and allows the reuse of the works under the license for use stated in point 2.

© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011  (© Publications Service, University of Murcia, 2011)

2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España(texto legal) “ a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Spain license (legal text)”. They can be copied, used, broadcasted, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and original source of their publication (journal, publisher and URL) are cited; (ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license is mentioned.

Licencia Creative Commons

3. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (pre-reviewed ) and / or post-print (reviewed and accepted for publication) versions of their works prior to publication, as it ensures a wider circulation and dissemination which may lead to a possible increase in its mention and a higher scope among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.