STANISLAVSKY'S SECOND OTHELLO: THE GREAT DIRECTOR'S LAST REVELATIONS
Keywords:
Stanislavsky, Othello, Stalinism, ideology, social cleansingAbstract
In March 1927, Konstantin Stanislavsky started to direct Othello at the Moscow Art Theatre. In 1929, Stanislavsky went abroad for treatment. While in Germany. He kept writing a detailed directorial plan, which he sent to Moscow through 1929 and 1930. In the thirties, though Joseph Stalin personally recognized Stanislavsky as “a Jiving legend”, the latter lived and under constant fear. Around 1930, he secretly informed his son, who live abroad, that his cousin died of scurvy and heart failure in prision, and his cousin’s mother had been sent to Siberia. I believe that Stanislavsky’s interpretation of Othello absorbed the turmoil of the socialist era. Thus, Othello’s central leitmotif, the slander and accusation of innocents, was the topic of the day. Othello, a loner outside the battlefield was a noble “outcast” like Stanilavsky himself. The discovery of Desdemona’s unfaithfulness made Othello take upon himself a great duty: to return justice to the word and restore its harmony by killing her. According to Stanislavsky in Othello’s eyes she became the Devil, and her angelic face was one of the Devil’s deceptions. The idea of cleansing was the “toast” in the Soviet ideology of the time. The open political processes cleansed the society from the “ enemies of the people”. Stanislavsky himself, though his relatives were the victims of such “cleansing”, dreamt about cleansing the Moscow Arte Theatre. The total confusion of “bad and good” cleansing overwhelmed the public minds. Stanislavsky’s interpretation of Othello does not have an end: his work was suspended after he learned (two weeks after the fact) of the premiere of Othello at the Moscow Art Theatre on March 14, 1930. But there is a certain metaphorical significance to it. In 1930, with most of the evil of Stalinism still ahead, there was not even a hope to restore the harmonious word.Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.