The aesthetic utopia. From Barthes to Baudrillard

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/cartaphilus.718701
Keywords: unknown, end of criticism, symbolic operation, end of metaphysics, innocence of art

Abstract

This article discusses a working hypothesis that defines the work of art as the theoretical and practical possibility of producing the unknown, in contrast to scientific-technical operations whose mission is precisely to replace it with the known. It is based on a text by Roland Barthes —A Lover’s Discourse: fragments— and then addresses some works by Jean Baudrillard that generously support this hypothesis. The themes evoked are the end of criticism, the symbolic operation and the evaporation of metaphysics, leading to a reflection on the innocence of art.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    0
  • pdf (Español (España))
    0

References

Barthes, Roland (1982): Fragmentos de un discurso amoroso. México: Siglo XXI.

Bataille, Georges. (1974): Teoría de la Religión. Madrid: Taurus.

Baudrillard, Jean. (1980): El intercambio simbólico y la muerte. Caracas: Monte Ávila.

Baudrillard, Jean. (2006): El complot del arte. Ilusión y desilusión estéticas, Buenos Aires: Amorrortu.

Feuerbach, Ludwig. (2012): La esencia del cristianismo. Madrid: Trotta.

Kant, Immanuel. (2015): Crítica de la Razón Pura. Madrid: Gredos.

Marx, Karl. (1966): El Capital. México: FCE.

Nietzsche, Friedrich. (1970): Más allá del Bien y del Mal. Madrid: Alianza.

Published
29-06-2026
How to Cite
Espinosa Proa, S. (2026). The aesthetic utopia. From Barthes to Baudrillard. Cartaphilus. Journal of Aesthetic Research and Criticism, 23, 56–72. https://doi.org/10.6018/cartaphilus.718701
Issue
Section
Articles