THE PRINCIPLE OF INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY AS A NEW PARADIGM IN CLIMATE LITIGATION

Authors

  • David Parra Gómez Universidad de Murcia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/bioderecho.671311
Keywords: climate change, climate litigation, intergenerational link, constitutional court, climate plan, amparo proceedings, fundamental rights

Supporting Agencies

  • intergenerational link

Abstract

There is no doubt that it will be future generations who will suffer most severely from the effects of warming caused by the accumulation of greenhouse gas emissions in the atmosphere. This gradual nature of climate change makes the ‘intergenerational link’ an integral part of environmental law, which is based, as is well known, on two principles: the principle of sustainable development (which advocates development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs) and the principle of intergenerational equity (which seeks to link intergenerational justice to decision-making). However, this intergenerational link had been uncertainly applied until the groundbreaking Neubauer v. Germany judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court (2021), which declared the Climate Protection Act of 2019 partially unconstitutional on the grounds that it affected human dignity interpreted from an intergenerational perspective. Well, this new interpretative paradigm of freedom may have important effects in our country if the Constitutional Court takes it into account when resolving the amparo appeal, admitted for processing in 2024, against the Supreme Court's decision to endorse the Energy and Climate Plan.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Metrics
Views/Downloads
  • Abstract
    23
  • PDF (Español (España))
    19

References

ANTONIO DE LA CÁMARA, M., "Urgenda Foundation v. State of the Netherlands: desafíos del constitucionalismo global", Revista Española de Derecho Constitucional, núm. 126, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/redc.126.09.

CANEY, S., “Climate Change and the Future: Discounting for Time, Wealth and Risk”, Journal of Social Philosophy, vol. 40, núm. 2, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467- 9833.2009.01445.x

DE ARMENTERAS CABOT, M., "El litigio climático ante la responsabilidad intergeneracional", Cuadernos Electrónicos de Filosofía del Derecho, núm. 44, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7203/CEFD.44.19409

DE ARMENTERAS CABOT, M., "¿Es posible la protección «intertemporal» de la libertad? La expansión del concepto de libertad en la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional alemán en el caso Neubauer", Revista de Estudios Políticos, núm. 200, 2023.

HERNÁNDEZ PERIBÁÑEZ, M.E., "La Sentencia del TEDH en el caso KlimaSeniorinnen y su potencial recepción por el Tribunal Constitucional español en el primer litigio por el clima", Revista de Derecho Político, núm. 122, 2025. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5944/rdp.122.2025.44752

HUGLO, C., Le contentieux climatique: une révoluton judiciaire mondiale, Bruxelles, Bruylant, 2018.

MAK, C., "Giving voice: a public sphere theory of European private law adjudication", European Law Open, vol. 2, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2023.52

MARKELL, D., and RUHL, J.B., “An Empirical Survey of Climate Change Litigation in the United States”, Environmental Law Reporter, núm. 40, 2010.

PAGE, E. A., Climate Chang e, Justice and Future Generations, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, 2006.

PEÑA CHACÓN, M., “Los principios de objetivación de la tutela a ambiental e irreductibilidad de espacios sometidos a régimen especial de protección y su relación con la prohibición de retroceso”, Medio Ambiente y Derecho. Revista electrónica de derecho ambiental, núm. 25, 2013.

PEEL, J., y OSOFSKY, H.M., Climate Change Litigation: Regulatory Pathways to Cleaner Energy, Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2015.

RUIZ PRIETO, M., "Los derechos fundamentales diacrónicos en la jurisprudencia europea de cambio climático", Revista de Administración Pública, núm. 225, 2024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18042/cepc/rap.225.08

VAN ZEBEN, J., “Establishing a governmental duty of care for climate change mitigation: Will Urgenda turn the tide?”, Transnational Environmental Law, vol. 4, núm. 4, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102515000199

Published
09-03-2026
How to Cite
Parra Gómez, D. (2026). THE PRINCIPLE OF INTERGENERATIONAL EQUITY AS A NEW PARADIGM IN CLIMATE LITIGATION. Bioderecho, (22, agosto-diciembre). https://doi.org/10.6018/bioderecho.671311