Underlying processes behind false perspective production

Authors

  • Antonio L Manzanero Universidad Complutense de Madrid
  • Beatriz López University of Portsmouth
  • Javier Aróztegui Universidad Complutense de Madrid
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.194461
Keywords: autobiographical memory, deception detection, eyewitness testimony, credibility, criteria content analysis, high dimensional visualization, multidimensional scaling, holistic.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the extent to which content analysis can provide useful information when discriminating between actual versus false statements. Participants were instructed to either describe a traffic accident as eyewitness actual role or to describe the accident as a simulated victim. Data were analysed in terms of accuracy and quality, and were represented using high dimensional visualization (HDV). In Experiment 1 (between-participant design), participants made significantly more references to cognitive operations, more self-references and less changes in order when describing the event as simulated victim. In Experiment 2 (within-participants design) participants also made significantly more references to cognitive operations and more self references when describing the event from the simulated victim as well as being less accurate, providing less irrelevant information and more evaluative comments. HDV graphics indicated that false statements differ holistically from actual ones.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Antonio L Manzanero, Universidad Complutense de Madrid

Profesor titular de universidad. Facultad de Psicología. Universidad Complutense de Madrid.

Psicólogo Forense.

References

Anderson, R. C. & Pichert, J. W. (1978). Recall of previously unrecallable information following a shift in perspective. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16, 1-12. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90485-1

Barton, A. & Valdés, J. J. (2008). Hybrid unsupervised/supervised virtual reality spaces for visualizing gastric and liver cancer databases: An evolutionary computation approach. In A. An, S. Matwin, Z. W. Raś & D. Ślęzak (Eds.), Foundations of Intelligent Systems (pp. 256-261). Berlin: Springer.

Bensi, L., Gambetti, E., Nori, R. & Giusberti, F. (2009). Discerning truth from deception: the sincere witness profile. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 1(1), 101-121. Retrieved from http://www.usc.es/sepjf/images/documentos/volume_1/Bensi.pdf

Buja A., Swayne D. F., Littman M., Dean N., Hofmann H. & Chen L. (2008). Data Visualization with Multidimensional Scaling. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 17(2), 444-472. doi:10.1198/106186008X318440

Campos, L. & Alonso-Quecuty, M. L. (1998). Knowledge of crime context: Improving the understanding of why the cognitive interview works. Memory, 6, 103-112. doi: 10.1080/741941602

Clark-Carter, D. (2004) Quantitative psychological research. New York : Psychology Press.

Colwell, K., Hiscock-Anisman, C., Memon, A., Colwell, L. H., Taylor, L., & Woods, D. (2009). Training in Assessment Criteria Indicative of Deception to improve credibility judgments. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 9(3), 199-207. doi:10.1080/15228930902810078

Comblain, C., D'Argembeau, A. & Van der Linden, M. (2005). Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults. Experimental Aging Research, 31(2), 173-89. doi: 10.1080/03610730590915010

Diges, M. (1995). Previous knowledge and delay in the recall of a filmed event. In G. Davies, S.M.A. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice. International developments in research and practice (pp. 46-55). Berlin: W. de Gruyter.

Diges, M., Rubio, M. E. & Rodríguez, M. C. (1992). Eyewitness testimony and time of day. In F. Lösel, D. Bender & T. Bliesener (Eds.), Psychology and Law. International Perspectives (pp. 317-320). Berlin: W de Gruyter.

Feldman, R. S. (2006). Development across the life span. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Flavell, J. H., Green, F. L. & Flavell, E. R. (1995). The development of children’s knowledge about attentional focus. Developmental psychology, 31, 706-712. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.31.4.706

Granhag, P. A., Strömwall, L. A., & Landström, S. (2006). Children recalling an event repeatedly: Effects on RM and CBCA scores. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11(1), 81-98. doi: 10.1348/135532505X49620

Hartwig, M., & Bond Jr., Ch. F. (2011). Why do lie-catchers fail? A lens model meta-analysis of human lie judgments. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 643-659. doi: 10.1037/a0023589

Hekkanen, S. T. & McEvoy, C. (2005). Source monitoring in eyewitness memory: Implicit associations, suggestions, and episodic traces. Memory and Cognition, 33(5), 759-769. doi: 10.3758/BF03193072

Henkel, L. A., Franklin, N. & Johnson, M. K. (2000). Cross-modal source monitoring confusions between perceived and imagined events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(2), 321-335. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.26.2.321

Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S. & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.3

Johnson, M. K., Kahan, T. L. & Raye, C. L. (1984). Dreams and reality monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 329-344. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.329

Johnson, M. K. & Raye, C. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.88.1.67

Jones, D. P. H. & McGraw, J. M. (1987). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse in children. Journal of interpersonal Violence, 2, 27-45. doi: 10.1177/088626087002001002

Köhnken, G., Manzanero, A. L., & Scott, M. T. (2015). Análisis de la Validez de las Declaraciones (SVA): mitos y limitaciones (Statement Validity Assessment: Myths and limitations). Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25, 13-19. doi:10.1016/j.apj. 2015.01.004

Lee, K. & Homer, B. (1999) Children as folk psychologists: The developing understanding of the mind. In A. Slater & D. Muir (Eds.), The Blackwell reader in developmental psychology. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Manzanero, A. L. (2006): Do perceptual and suggested accounts actually differ? Psychology in Spain, 10(1), 52-65. Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/11380/1/psychology_in_spain.pdf

Manzanero, A. L. (2009). Análisis de contenido de memorias autobiográficas falsas (Criteria content analysis of false autobiographical memories). Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 19, 61-72.

Manzanero, A. L., Alemany, A., Recio, M., Vallet, R., & Aróztegui, J. (2015). Credibility assessment of statements given by people with learning disability. Anales de Psicología, 31 (1), 1-25. doi:10.6018/analesps.31.1.166571

Manzanero, A. L. & Diges, M. (1994). Análisis de la credibilidad de recuerdos percibidos e imaginados (Credibility assessement of perceived and imagined memories). Apuntes de Psicología, 41-42, 81-92. Retrieved from: http://eprints.ucm.es/11043/

Manzanero, A. L. & Diges, M. (1995). Effects of preparation on internal and external memories. In G. Davies, S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock, M. McMurran & C. Wilson (Eds.), Psychology, law and criminal justice. International developments in research and practice (pp. 56-63). Berlin: W. De Gruyter & Co. Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/6174/1/oxford_95.pdf

Manzanero, A. L., El-Astal, S. & Aróztegui, J. (2009). Implication degree and delay on recall of events: An experimental and HDV study. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 1(2), 101-116. Retrieved from http://eprints.ucm.es/11383/1/Manzanero_et_al_2009.pdf

Manzanero, A. L., López, B., Aróztegui, J., & El-Astal, S. (2015). Autobiographical memories for negative and positive events in war contexts. Anuario de Psicología Jurídica, 25, 57-64. doi:10.1016/j.apj. 2015.02.001

Manzanero, A. L., Quintana, J. M., & Contreras, M. J. (2015). (The null) Importance of police experience on intuitive credibility of people with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 36, 191-197. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.009

Memon, A., Fraser, J., Colwell, K., Odinot, G., & Mastroberardino, S. (2010). Distinguishing truthful from invented accounts using reality monitoring criteria. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15(2), 177–194. doi: 10.1348/135532508X401382

Pérez-Mata, N. & Diges, M. (2007). False recollections and the congruence of suggested information. Memory, 15(7), 701–717. doi:10.1080/09658210701647258

Porter, S. & Yuille, J. C. (1996). The language of deceit: an investigation of the verbal cues to deception in the interrogation context. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 443-458. doi: 10.1007/BF01498980

Roberts, K. P., & Lamb, M. E. (2010). Reality-monitoring characteristics in confirmed and doubtful allegations of child sexual abuse. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(8), 1049-1079. doi: 10.1002/acp.1600

Rochat, P. (Ed.) (1999) Early social cognition: Understanding others in the first months of life. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Romero, E., Valdés, J. J. & Barton, A. J. (2007). Neural network based virtual reality spaces for visual data mining of cancer data: An unsupervised perspective. In F. Sandoval, A. Prieto, J. Cabestany & M. Graña (Eds.), Computational and ambient intelligence. (pp. 1020-1027). Berlin: Springer.

Roskam, E. E. (1989) Formal models and axiomatic measurement. In E. E. Roskam (Ed.), Mathematical psychology in progress. Berlin: Springer-Berlag.

Santtila, P., Roppola, H. & Niemi, P. (1998). Assessing the truthfulness of witness statements made by children (aged 7-8, 10-11, and 13-14) employing scales derived from Johnson and Raye‘s model of reality monitoring. Expert Evidence, 6(4), 273-289. doi: 10.1023/A:1008930821076

Schooler, J., Gerhard, D. & Loftus, E. (1986). Qualities of unreal. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 171-181. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.12.2.171

Sporer, S. L. & Sharman, S. J. (2006). Should I believe this? Reality monitoring of accounts of self-experienced and invented recent and distant autobiographical events. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 837-854. doi: 10.1002/acp.1234

Steller, M. & Köhnken, G. (1989). Criteria-Based Content Analysis. En D. C. Raskin (Ed.), Psychological methods in criminal investigation and evidence (pp. 217-245). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Steyvers, M. (2002). Multidimensional scaling. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. (pp. 1-7). London: MacMillan.

Strömwall, L. A., Bengtsson, L., Leander, L. & Granhag, P. A. (2004). As-sessing children’s statements: The impact of a repeated Experience on CBCA and RM ratings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 18, 653–668. doi: 10.1002/acp.1021

Trankell, A. (1972). Reliability of evidence. Stockholm: Rotobeckman

Tversky, A. (1977). Features of similarity. Psychological Review, 84, 327-352. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.4.327

Tversky, A. & Krantz, D. H. (1970). The dimensional representation and the metric structure of similarity data. Journal of mathematical psychology, 7, 572-596. doi: 10.1016/0022-2496(70)90041-6

Undeutsch, U. (1989). The development of statement reality analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.), Credibility assessment (pp. 101-121). Netherland: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Vrij, A. (2005). Criteria-Based Content Analysis: A Qualitative Review of the First 37 Studies. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 11(1), 3-41. doi: 10.1037/1076-8971.11.1.3

Vrij, A., Akehurst, L., Soukara, S. & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting deceit via analysis of verbal and nonverbal behaviour in children and adults. Human Communication Research, 30(1), 8-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2004.tb00723.x

Wicker, A. W. (1975). An application of the multitrait-multimethod logic to the reliability of observational records. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4, 575-579. doi: 10.1177/014616727500100405

Zahn-Waxler, C., Robinson, J. L. & Emde, R. N. (1992). The development of empathy in twins. Developmental Psychology, 28, 1038-1047. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.28.6.1038

Published
25-12-2015
How to Cite
Manzanero, A. L., López, B., & Aróztegui, J. (2015). Underlying processes behind false perspective production. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 32(1), 256–265. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.32.1.194461
Issue
Section
Basic Psychology

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
2
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
653
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)