A thematic study of creativity research in Spain within the social sciences and psychology

Authors

  • Giorgio De-Marchis Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España)
  • Sergei Shchebetenko National Research University Higher School of Economics (Moscow, Russia) and Perm State University (Perm, Russia) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5790-9731
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.461411
Keywords: Creativity, Bibliometric analysis, Thematic analysis, Keywords analysis, SciMAT

Abstract

Creativity is becoming one necessary human skill in a world where robots increasingly outperform people in daily routines. In order to efficiently develop creativity as a research field, scholars need to know where they are. We employed a bibliometric approach to study themes and characteristics of creativity research in Spain. The results indicated that publication production in the field has been growing during the last decades. Compared to psychology, creativity in the social sciences seemed to be an undercited, local, and endogamic area. For social sciences, motor themes in the last decade were a) creativity in children and students in the educational environment, b) innovation and knowledge creation in a working environment, and c) cities and creativity. The motor themes in psychology were a) individual characteristics for generating insights (e.g., skills, improvisation, executive functions) and b) emotional intelligence. We suggest some themes for future research, such as creative collaboration in virtual environments, value co-creation, and how machines can help humans boost their creativity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995

Artola, T., Ancillo, I. Barraca, J., Mosteiro, P., & Barraca, J. (2010), PIC-N. Prueba de Imaginación Creativa para Niños [Creative Imagination Test for Kids]. TEA Ediciones.

Artola, T., Barraca, J., Martín, C., Mosteiro, P., Ancillo, I., & Poveda, B. (2008), PIC-J. Prueba de Imaginación Creativa para Jóvenes [Creative Imagination Test for Young People]. TEA Ediciones.

Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(179–255). https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106

Castillo-Vergara, M., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Placencio-Hidalgo, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics. Journal of Business Research, 85, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.011

Chen, H., & Xiao, L. (2016). Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 212–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.006

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002

Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688

Corbalán-Berná, F.J., Martínez Zaragoza, F., Donolo, D. S., Alonso-Monreal, C., Tejerina-Arreal, M., & Limiñana-Gras, M. (2003). CREA. Inteligencia Creativa. Una medida cognitiva de la creatividad [CREA. Creative Intelligence. A cognitive measure of creativity]. TEA Ediciones.

Fanchini, A., Jongbloed, J., Dirani, A. (2019). Examining the well-being and creativity of school children in France. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1536197

Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625

Long, H., Plucker, J. A., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Research productivity and performance of journals in the creativity sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929425

Noll, H. (2019). ¡Es taylorismo, estúpido! Sobre la nueva organización científica de la investigación y la docencia en la Universidad Española [It's Taylorism, stupid! About the new scientific organization of research and teaching at the Spanish university]. Sociología del Trabajo, 95, 1-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/stra.66436

Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G

Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14(4), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020601027773

van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Measuring science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (pp. 19–50). Springer Netherlands.

Published
27-08-2023
How to Cite
De-Marchis, G., & Shchebetenko, S. (2023). A thematic study of creativity research in Spain within the social sciences and psychology. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 39(3), 505–516. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.461411
Issue
Section
Psychology and creativity