Detecting facial expressions within a context of surprise and uncertainty
Abstract
Threatening expressions are detected quickly and accurately, warning the observer of the presence of a potential danger. During the detection process, a facial expression of surprise could play an important role as a cue for orientation in conditions of uncertainty that call for a swift and precise response. With a view to analysing this contingency, an experiment was conducted in which 70 subjects undertook a spatial cueing task that involved facial expressions of surprise (vs. neutral ones) as orientation cues, and facial expressions of fear, anger and happiness as target stimuli. The results revealed a priming effect of the expression of surprise solely in the detection of the expression of anger, reducing response times and the percentage of errors. The data indicate that the expression of surprise, when processed as an independent stimulus, could prime the detection of those stimuli that constitute a direct threat, such as the expression of anger, with this being a crucial distinction for understanding the circumstances in which the expression of anger is detected more effectively than other kinds of expressions.
Downloads
References
Calvo, M. G., Avero, P., & Lundqvist, D. (2006). Facilitated detection of angry faces: Initial orienting and processing efficiency. Cognition and Emotion, 20(6), 785-811. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930500465224
Davidson, R. J., Sherer, K. R., & Goldsmith, H. H. (2000). The handbook of affective sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
De Valk, J. M., Wijnen, J. G., & Kret, M. E. (2015). Anger fosters action. Fast responses in a motor task involving approach movements toward angry faces and bodies. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1240. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01240
Denefrio, S., Simmons, A., Amishi, Jha., & Dennis-Tiwary T. A. (2017). Emotional cue validity effects: The role of neurocognitive responses to emotion. PLoS ONE 12(7): e0179714. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179714
Ewbank, M. P., Jennings, C., & Calder, A. J. (2009). Why are you angry with me? Facial expressions of threat influence perception of gaze direction. Journal of Vision 9(16). https://doi.org/10.1167/9.12.16
Fox, E. & Damjanovic, L. (2006). The eyes are sufficient to produce a threat superiority effect. Emotion, 6(3), 534-539. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 1528-3542.6.3.534
Fox, E., Lester, V., Russo, R., Bowles, R. J., Pichler, A., & Dutton, K. (2000). Facial expressions of emotion: Are angry faces detected more efficiently? Cognition & Emotion, 14(1), 61-92. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300378996
Frith, C. (2009). Role of facial expressions in social interactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364(1535), 3453-3458. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0142
Gordillo, F., Mestas, L., Castillo, G., Pérez, M. A., Arana, J. M., & López, R. M. (2017). Las redes neuronales de la expresión facial [The neural networks of facial expression]. Revista de Neurología, 64(3), 125-132.
Gordillo, F., Mestas, L., Pérez, M. A., & Arana, J. M. (2018). Role of surprise in the discrimination of the facial expression of fear: Part of a continuum? Spanish Journal of Psychology, 21, E3. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2018.5
Gordillo, F., Mestas, L., Pérez, M. A., & Arana, J. M. (2019). The priming effect of a facial expression of surprise on the discrimination of a facial expression of fear. Current Psychology 38(6), 1613-1621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9719-0
Hansen, C. H. & Hansen, R. D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 917-924. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.54.6.917
Horstmann, G. & Bauland, A. (2006). Search asymmetries with real faces: Testing the anger-superiority effect. Emotion, 6(2), 193-207. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.2.193
Jack, R. E., Garrod O. G. B., & Schyns P. G. (2014). Dynamic facial expressions of emotion transmit an evolving hierarchy of signals over time. Current Biology, 24(2), 187-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.064
Jack, R. E., Sun W., Delis I., Garrod O. G. B., & Schyns P. G. (2016). Four not six: Revealing culturally common facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 708-730. https://doi.org/10.1037/ xge0000162
Juncai, S., Jing, Z., & Rongb, S. (2017). Differentiating recognition for anger and fear facial expressions via inhibition of return. Journal of Psychology and Cognition, 2(1), 10-16. https://doi.org/10.35841/psychology-cognition.2.1.10-16
Krysko, K. M. & Rutherford, M. D. (2009). The face in the crowd effect: Threat-detection advantage with perceptually intermediate distractors. Visual Cognition, 17(8), 1205-1217. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506280902767789
Lee, T. H., Sakaki, M., Cheng, R., Velasco, R., & Mather, M. (2014). Emotional arousal amplifies the effects of biased competition in the brain. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(12), 2067-2077. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsu015
Lindquist, K. A., Wager, T. D., Kober, H., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). The brain basis of emotion: a meta-analytic review. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(3), 121-143. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X11000446
Mather, M. & Sutherland, M. R. (2011). Arousal-biased competition in perception and memory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(2), 114-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691611400234
Mogg, K. & Bradley, B. P. (1999). Orienting of attention to threatening facial expressions presented under conditions of restricted awareness. Cognition and Emotion, 13(6), 713-740. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999399379050
Nakagawa, A. & Sukigara, M. (2019). Attentional bias assessed by a facial expression cuing paradigm in infants. Scientifics Reports, 9, 68. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-36806-1
Noordewier, M. K. & van Dijk, E. (2018). Surprise: unfolding of facial expressions. Cognition & Emotion, 33(5), 915-930. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1517730
O'Haire, H. E. (2011). The influence of gaze direction on approach- vs. avoidance-oriented emotions. Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, 3(03).
Öhman, A. & Soares, J. F. (1993). On the automatic nature of phobic fear: Conditioned electrodermal responses to masked fear-relevant stimuli. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, 121-132. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-843x.102.1.121
Öhman, A. & Wiens, S. (2003). On the automaticity of autonomic responses in emotion: An evolutionary perspective. In R. J. Davidson, K. Scherer, & H. H. Hill (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 256-275). Oxford University Press.
Öhman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 381-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/ 0022-3514.80.3.381
Pinkham, A. E., Griffin, M., Baron, R., Sasson, N. J., & Gur, R. C. (2010). The face in the crowd effect: anger superiority when using real faces and multiple identities. Emotion, 10(1), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017387
Posner, M. I. & Peterson, S. E. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ne.13.030190.000325
Sawada, R. & Sato, W. (2015). Emotional attention capture by facial expressions. Scientific Reports, 5, 14042. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep14042
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime Reference Guide [Computer software manual]. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
Stoyanova, R. S., Pratt, J., & Anderson, A. K. (2007). Inhibition of return to social signals of fear. Emotion, 7, 49-56. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.1.49
Tottenham, N., Tanaka, J. W., Leon, A. C., McCarry, T., Nurse, M., Hare, T. A., Marcus, D. J., Westerlund, A., Casey, B. J., & Nelson, C. (2009). The NimStim set of facial expressions: Judgments from untrained research participants. Psychiatry Research, 168(3), 242-249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2008.05.006
Wilson, E. & MacLeod, C. (2003). Contrasting two accounts of anxiety-linked attentional bias: selective attention to varying levels of stimulus threat intensity. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112(2), 212-218. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.112.2.212
Wirth, B. E. & Wentura, D. (2019). Attentional bias towards angry faces is moderated by the activation of a social processing mode in the general population. Cognition & Emotion, 33(7), 1317-1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1561423
Copyright (c) 2022 Servicio de Publicaciones, University of Murcia (Spain)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in paragraph 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2022
2. The works are published in the online edition of the journal under a Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 (legal text). You can copy, use, distribute, transmit and publicly display, provided that: i) you cite the author and the original source of publication (journal, editorial and URL of the work), ii) are not used for commercial purposes, iii ) mentions the existence and specifications of this license.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Is allowed and encouraged the authors to disseminate electronically pre-print versions (version before being evaluated and sent to the journal) and / or post-print (version reviewed and accepted for publication) of their works before publication, as it encourages its earliest circulation and diffusion and thus a possible increase in its citation and scope between the academic community. RoMEO Color: Green.
