Comparative study of therapist’s verbal behavior according its experience during clinical assessment

Authors

  • María Xesús Froján Parga Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Elena María Ruiz Sancho Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Montserrat Montaño Fidalgo Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Ana Calero Elvira Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • Manuel Alpañés Freitag Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Keywords: verbal behaviour, clinical setting, therapist experience, process research

Abstract

The present study is an initial approach to the study of differ-ences between therapists with regard to their experience level. This type of study is based on the assumption that it is the expert therapist who does things well, and that the analysis of his/her behaviour will enable us to learn how to do therapy more efficiently. We used an observational meth-odology for the analysis of video-taped sessions. Verbal behaviour was coded with a coding system created for that purpose. Results show that the Discriminative, Reinforcement and “Others” functions were the most used by inexpert therapists, while Punishment, Elicitation, Motivating, Instructional, and Informative were the functions most used by expert therapists. Inter-mediate values were observed for most therapists with a middle degree of experience. Despite certain limitations, results indicate that there may be quantitative, as well as qualitative, differences with respect to what thera-pists do in session as a function of their experience level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Xesús Froján Parga, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid

Departamento de Psicología Biológica y de la Salud
How to Cite
Froján Parga, M. X., Ruiz Sancho, E. M., Montaño Fidalgo, M., Calero Elvira, A., & Alpañés Freitag, M. (2011). Comparative study of therapist’s verbal behavior according its experience during clinical assessment. Anales de Psicología / Annals of Psychology, 27(2), 311–318. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/analesps/article/view/122911
Issue
Section
Clinical and Health Psychology

Publication Facts

Metric
This article
Other articles
Peer reviewers 
0
2.4

Reviewer profiles  N/A

Author statements

Author statements
This article
Other articles
Data availability 
N/A
16%
External funding 
N/A
32%
Competing interests 
N/A
11%
Metric
This journal
Other journals
Articles accepted 
52%
33%
Days to publication 
5004
145

Indexed in

Editor & editorial board
profiles
Academic society 
N/A
Publisher 
Editum - Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (España)