Compromiso conductual y desafección con las actividades escolares: explorando un modelo de facilitadores motivacionales y resultados de rendimiento.
Resumen
Investigaciones previas han mostrado que el control percibido, el valor de la tarea, el compromiso conductual y la desafección son determinantes personales del rendimiento académico. Sin embargo, pocas investigaciones han examinado simultáneamente estos constructos en educación secundaria. El presente estudio analizó las relaciones estructurales entre estas variables y el papel del compromiso y la desafección como mediadores de los efectos del control y el valor sobre el rendimiento. Los participantes fueron 446 estudiantes (51.3% chicas) con edades comprendidas entre 12 y 16 años que asistían a seis colegios de educación secundaria obligatoria (de 7º a 10º cursos; de 1º a 4º de ESO). Las variables se evaluaron a lo largo de nueve meses. Los resultados de los modelos de ecuaciones estructurales confirmaron las hipótesis: el control y el valor predijeron significativamente el compromiso, la desafección y el rendimiento; el compromiso y la desafección predijeron el rendimiento y mediaron parcialmente los efectos del control y el valor sobre el rendimiento. Se concluye discutiendo las implicaciones para la teoría y la práctica psicoeducativa.Descargas
Citas
Arbuckle, J. (2013). AMOS 22. User’s Guide. Chicago, IL: SmallWaters Corporation.
Archambault, I., Eccles, J., & Vida, M. (2010). Ability self-concepts and subjective value in literacy: Joint trajectories from grades 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 804-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/.a00221075.
Bempechat, J., & Shernoff, D. (2012). Parental influences on achievement motivation and student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 315-342). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_15.
Bong, M., Arum, H., Arum, K, & Sung-il, K. (2014). Perfectionism and motivation of adolescents in academic contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(3), 711-721. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0035836.
Brislin, R. (1986). The wording and translation of research instruments. In W. Lonner & J. Berry (Eds.), Field methods in cross-cultural research (pp. 137-164). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Byrne, B. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS. Basic concepts, applications, and programming (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
Chouinard, R., Karsenti, T., & Roy, N. (2007). Relations among compe-tence beliefs, utility value, achievement goals, and effort in mathematics. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 501-517. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000709906X133589.
Cleary, T., & Zimmerman, B. (2012). A cyclical self-regulatory account of student engagement: Theoretical foundations and applications. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 237-257). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_11.
Cole, J., Bergin, D., & Whittaker, T. (2008). Predicting student achievement for low stakes tests with effort and task value. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 609-624. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/jedpsych.2007.10.002
Durik, A., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. (2006). Task value and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382-393. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.382.
Eccles, J. S., O’Neill, S. A., & Wigfield, A. (2005). Ability self-perceptions and subjective task values in adolescents and children. In K. A. Moore & L. H. Lippman (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 237-249). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23823-9_15.
Eccles, J., & Wang, M. (2012). So what is student engagement anyway? In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133-145). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_6.
Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: The structure of adolescents’ achievement task values and expectancy-related beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167295213003.
Eccles, J., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153.
Elmore, G., & Huebner, S. (2010). Adolescents’ satisfaction with school experiences: Relationships with demographics, attachment relationships, and school engagement behavior. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 525-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.20488.
Extremera, N., Durán, A. & Rey, L. (2007). Inteligencia emocional y su relación con los niveles de burnout, engagement y estrés en estudiantes universitarios. Revista de Educación, 342, 239-256.
Fletcher, K., & Neumeister, K. (2012). Research on perfectionism and achievement motivation: Implications for gifted students. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 668-677. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pits.21623
Furrer, C., & Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in chil-dren’s academic engagement and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 148-162. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028089
García, M., Casal, J., Merino, R., & Sánchez, A. (2013). Itinerarios de abandono escolar y transiciones tras la enseñanza secundaria obligatoria. Revista de Educación, 361, 65-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2011-361-135.
Gniewosz, B., & Noack, P. (2012). What you see is what you get: The role of early adolescents’ perceptions in the intergenerational transmission of academic values. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 70-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.10.002.
González González, M. (2010). El alumno ante la escuela y su propio aprendizaje: algunas líneas de investigación en torno al concepto de implicación. Revista Iberoamericana sobre Calidad, Eficacia y Cambio en Educación. 8, 11-31.
Greene, B., Miller, R., Crowson, M., Duke, B., & Akey, K. (2004). Predicting high school students’ cognitive engagement and achievement: Contributions of classroom perceptions and motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 462-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.01.006.
Hall, N., Perry, R., Chipperfield, J., Clifton, R., & Haynes, T. (2006). En-hancing primary and secondary control in achievement settings through writing-based attributional retraining. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4, 361-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2006.25.4.361.
Hong, E., Peng, Y., & Rowell, L. (2012). Homework self-regulation: Grade, gender, and achievement-level differences. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19, 269-275. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.009
Hughes, J., & Kwok, O. (2006). Classroom engagement mediates the effect of teacher-student support on elementary students’ peer acceptance: A prospective analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 465-480. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.10.001
Hughes, J., Wu, W., & West, S. (2011). Teacher performance goal practices and elementary students’ behavioral engagement: A developmental perspective. Journal of School Psychology, 49, 1-23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2010.09.003.
Hulleman, Ch., Godes, O., Hendricks, B., & Harackiewicz, J. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 880-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019506
Husman, J., Derryberry, W., Crowson, H., & Lomax, R. (2004). Instrumentality, task-value, and intrinsic motivation: Making sense of their independent interdependence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 29, 63-76. http://dx. doi.org/10.1016/S0361-476X(03)00019-5.
INEE (2010). PISA 2009. Programa para la evaluación internacional de los alumnos OCDE. Informe español. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.
INEE (2011). Panorama de la educación. Indicadores de la OCDE. Informe español. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación.
Jang, H. (2008). Supporting students’ motivation, engagement, and learning during an uninteresting activity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 798-811. . http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028089.
Johnson, M. L., & Sinatra, G. M. (2013). Use of task-value instructional inductions for facilitating engagement and conceptual change. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 51-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.09.003
Lawson, M., & Lawson, H. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83 (3), 432-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891.
Liem, A., Lau, S., & Nie, Y. (2008). The role of self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals in predicting learning strategies, task disengagement, peer relationship, and achievement outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 486-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2007.08.001.
Liem, A., & Martin, A. (2011). Peer relationships and adolescents’ academic and non academic outcomes: Same-sex and opposite-sex peer effects and the mediating role of school engagement. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 183-206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.2010.02013.x.
Linnenbrink-García, L., Rogat, T., & Kosley, K. (2011). Affect and en-gagement during group instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 13-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.09.001.
Martin, A. (2008). Enhancing student motivation and engagement: The effects of a multidimensional intervention. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 239-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.11.003.
Martin, A. (2009). Motivation and engagement across the academic life span: A developmental construct validity study of elementary school, high school, and university/college students. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 794-824. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164409332214.
Martin, A. Anderson, J., Bobis, Way, J., & Vellar, R. (2012). Switching on and switching off in mathematics: An ecological study of future intent and disengagement among middle school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1-18. . http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025988.
Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2008). Academic buoyancy: Towards an understanding of students’ everyday academic resilience. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 53-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2007.01.002.
Miñano, P., Gilar, R. & Castejón, J. L. (2012). A structural model of cognitive-motivational variables as explanatory factors of academic achievement in Spanish language and mathematics. Anales de Psicología, 28, 45-54. http://hdl.handle.net/10045/22527.
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do. Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Volume I). Paris: OECD.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L., Stupnisky, R., & Perry, R. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 531-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019243.
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-García, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_12.
Perry, R., Hladkyj, S., Pekrun, R., & Pelletier, S. (2001). Academic control and action control in the achievement of college students: A longitudinal field study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 776-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.4.776.
Pianta, R., Hamre, B., & Allen, J (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: Conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 365-386). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_17.
Pyryt, M. (2007). The giftedness/perfectionism connection: recent research and implications. Gifted Education International, 23, 273-279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/026142940702300308.
Raftery, J., Grolnick, W., & Flamm, E. (2012). Families as facilitators of student engagement: Toward a home-school partnership model. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 343-364). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_16.
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149-172). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7.
Reeve, J. & Tseng, C. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ en-gagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 257-267. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028089
Roebers, C., Cimeli, P., Röthlisberber, M., & Neuenschwander, R. (2012). Executive functioning, metacognition, and self-perceived competence in elementary school children: an explorative study on their interrelations and their role for school achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 151-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11409-012-9089-9.
Salanova, M., Martínez, I., Bresó, E., Llorens, S. & Grau, R. (2005). Bienestar psicológico en estudiantes universitarios: facilitadores y obstaculizadores del desempeño académico. Anales de Psicología, 21, 170-180.
Salanova, M., Schaufeli, W., Martínez, I., & Bresó, E. (2010). How obstacles and facilitators predict academic performance: The mediating role of study burnout and engagement. Anxiety, Stress & Coping, 22, 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615800802609965.
Sastre-Riva, S. (2013). High intellectual ability: Extracurricular enrichment and cognitive management. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 36 (1), 119-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0162353212472407.
Skinner, E. (1996). A guide to constructs of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 549-570. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.549.
Skinner, E., Furrer, C., Marchand, G., & Kinderman, T. (2008). Engage-ment and disaffection in the classroom: Part of a larger motivational dynamic? Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 765-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0028089.
Skinner, E., Kinderman, T., Connell, J., & Wellborn, J. (2009a). Engage-ment and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamic of motivational development. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223-245). London: Routledge.
Skinner, E., Kinderman, T., & Furrer, C. (2009b). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection. Conceptualization and assessment of children’s behavioral and emotional participation in the academic activities in the classroom. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 69, 493-525. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013164408323233.
Skinner, E. & Pitzer, J. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student en-gagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In S. Christenson, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 21-44). New York, NY: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2.
Stoeber, J., Feast, A., & Hayward, J. (2009). Self-oriented and socially oriented perfectionism: Differential relationships with intrinsic and extrinsic motivation and text anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 423-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2009.04.014.
Stoeber, J., Hutchfield, J., &Wood, K. (2008). Perfectionism, self-efficacy, and aspiration level: differential effects of perfectionistic striving and self-criticism after success and failure. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 323-327. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.04.021.
Stupnisky, R., Perry, R., Hall, N., & Guay, F. (2012). Examining perceived control level and instability as predictors of first-year college students’ academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 37, 81-90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2012.01.001.
Thompson, S., & Schlehofer, M. (2008). The many sides of control motivation: Motives for high, low, and illusory control. In J. Shah & W. Gardner (Eds.), Handbook of motivation science (pp. 41-56). New York, NY: Guilford Press
Tomarken, A., & Waller, N. (2005). Structural equation modeling: Strengths, limitations, and misconceptions. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 31-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144239.
Wigfield, A., Tonks, S., & Klauda, S. (2009). Expectancy-value theory. In K. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 171-195). London: Routledge.
Wu, A., & Zumbo, B. (2008). Understanding and using mediators and moderators. Social Indicators Research, 87, 367-392. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9143-1.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2024
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada y enviada a la revista) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica. Color RoMEO: verde.
