A thematic study of creativity research in Spain within the social sciences and psychology
Abstract
Creativity is becoming one necessary human skill in a world where robots increasingly outperform people in daily routines. In order to efficiently develop creativity as a research field, scholars need to know where they are. We employed a bibliometric approach to study themes and characteristics of creativity research in Spain. The results indicated that publication production in the field has been growing during the last decades. Compared to psychology, creativity in the social sciences seemed to be an undercited, local, and endogamic area. For social sciences, motor themes in the last decade were a) creativity in children and students in the educational environment, b) innovation and knowledge creation in a working environment, and c) cities and creativity. The motor themes in psychology were a) individual characteristics for generating insights (e.g., skills, improvisation, executive functions) and b) emotional intelligence. We suggest some themes for future research, such as creative collaboration in virtual environments, value co-creation, and how machines can help humans boost their creativity.
Downloads
-
Abstract805
-
pdf515
References
Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.2307/256995
Artola, T., Ancillo, I. Barraca, J., Mosteiro, P., & Barraca, J. (2010), PIC-N. Prueba de Imaginación Creativa para Niños [Creative Imagination Test for Kids]. TEA Ediciones.
Artola, T., Barraca, J., Martín, C., Mosteiro, P., Ancillo, I., & Poveda, B. (2008), PIC-J. Prueba de Imaginación Creativa para Jóvenes [Creative Imagination Test for Young People]. TEA Ediciones.
Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37(179–255). https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106
Castillo-Vergara, M., Alvarez-Marin, A., & Placencio-Hidalgo, D. (2018). A bibliometric analysis of creativity in the field of business economics. Journal of Business Research, 85, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.011
Chen, H., & Xiao, L. (2016). Selecting publication keywords for domain analysis in bibliometrics: A comparison of three methods. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 212–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.01.006
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2011). An approach for detecting, quantifying, and visualizing the evolution of a research field: A practical application to the Fuzzy Sets Theory field. Journal of Informetrics, 5(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.10.002
Cobo, M. J., López-Herrera, A. G., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2012). SciMAT: A new science mapping analysis software tool. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(8), 1609–1630. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22688
Corbalán-Berná, F.J., Martínez Zaragoza, F., Donolo, D. S., Alonso-Monreal, C., Tejerina-Arreal, M., & Limiñana-Gras, M. (2003). CREA. Inteligencia Creativa. Una medida cognitiva de la creatividad [CREA. Creative Intelligence. A cognitive measure of creativity]. TEA Ediciones.
Fanchini, A., Jongbloed, J., Dirani, A. (2019). Examining the well-being and creativity of school children in France. Cambridge Journal of Education, 49(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2018.1536197
Hernández-Torrano, D., & Ibrayeva, L. (2020). Creativity and education: A bibliometric mapping of the research literature (1975–2019). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35, 100625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100625
Long, H., Plucker, J. A., Yu, Q., Ding, Y., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Research productivity and performance of journals in the creativity sciences: A bibliometric analysis. Creativity Research Journal, 26(3), 353–360. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.929425
Noll, H. (2019). ¡Es taylorismo, estúpido! Sobre la nueva organización científica de la investigación y la docencia en la Universidad Española [It's Taylorism, stupid! About the new scientific organization of research and teaching at the Spanish university]. Sociología del Trabajo, 95, 1-18. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/stra.66436
Small, H. (1999). Visualizing science by citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(9), 799–813. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:9<799::AID-ASI9>3.0.CO;2-G
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Raising the achievement of all students: Teaching for successful intelligence. Educational Psychology Review, 14(4), 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020601027773
van Raan, A. F. J. (2005). Measuring science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (pp. 19–50). Springer Netherlands.
Copyright (c) 2023 Servicio de Publicaciones, University of Murcia (Spain)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
About Copyright and Licensing, more details here.
