Reflections on the Protection Potential of International of Human Rights in the Age of Neurotechnology
Abstract
Advances in neurotechnology that enable the inference of mental states from brain data and the influence on human behavior through the modulation of neural processes raise ethical and legal concerns within the international community. Some sectors argue that existing protections are insufficient and advocate for the adoption of new human rights, referred to as "neurorights," to safeguard the mind. However, after analyzing some of the existing international human rights with the greatest potential to address the risks posed by neurotechnology, it is not evident that protection at the universal or regional level is insufficient.
Downloads
-
Abstract593
-
.pdf (Español (España))220
References
ALFIHED, S.; et al., “Non-Invasive Brain Sensing Technologies for Modulation of Neurological Disorders”, Biosensors, Vol. 14, No. 7, 2024, pp. 1-23; https://doi.org/10.3390/bios14070335
ALOUI, K.; et al., “Using brain prints as new biometric feature for human recognition”, Pattern Recognition Letters, No. 113, 2018, pp. 38-45; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2017.10.001
ARIELY, D.; BERNS, G. S.; “Neuromarketing: the hope and hype of neuroimaging in business”, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, Vol. 11, April 2010, pp. 284-292; https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2795
AVANI SINGH, M. P., “The privacy awakening: the urgent need to harmonize the right to privacy in Africa”, African Human Rights Yearbook, Vol. 3, 2019, pp. 202-220; http://doi.org/10.29053/2523-1367/2019/v3a10
BANCA, A. L.; et al., “Promoción de salud mental mediante el desarrollo de agencia humana y empoderamiento: enfoque intrapersonal”, Revista Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, vol. 32, núm. 1, 2014, pp. 161-169; https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=12058124017
BANDURA, A., “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective”, Annual review of psychology, Vol. 52, 2001, pp.1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
BASELGA-GARRIGA, C.; RODRIGUEZ, P.; YUSTE, R.; “Neuro Rights: A Human Rights Solution to Ethical Issues of Neurotechnologies”, Protecting the Mind. Ethics of Science and Technology Assessment, vol 49, Springer, 2022, pp. 157-161, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94032-4_13
BAYNES, CH., “Chinese schools scanning children’s brains to see if they are concentrating”, Independent, 15 January 2019; https://www.independent.co.uk/tech/china-schools-scan-brains-concentration-headbands-children-brainco-focus-a8728951.html
BELTRAN DE HEREDIA RUIZ, I., “Hacia el estatuto del yo inconsciente de la persona trabajadora”, Trabajo y derecho: nueva revista de actualidad y relaciones laborales, No. Extra 19, 2024
BELTRAN DE HEREDIA RUIZ, I., Inteligencia artificial y neuroderechos: la protección del yo inconsciente de la persona, Aranzadi: Navarra, 2023.
BHIDAYASIRI, R., “The grand challenge at the frontiers of neurotechnology and its emerging clinical applications”, Frontiers in Neurology, Vol 15, 2024, pp. 1-5; https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10827995/pdf/fneur-15-1314477.pdf
BIJLSMA, J., et al., Kansen en Risico’s van de Toepassing van Neurotechnologie in het Strafrecht, Utrecht University, March 22, 2022; http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12832/3174
BORBÓN, D.; BORBÓN, L., “NeuroDerechos Humanos y Neuroabolicionismo Penal: Comentarios críticos frente a la neuropredicción y la detección de mentiras”, Revista Mexicana de Derecho Constitucional, No. 46, Enero-Junio 2022, pp. 29-64, https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24484881e.2022.46.17047
BUBLITZ, J. CH., “Neurotechnologies and human rights: restating and reaffirming the multi-layered protection of the person”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 28, No. 5, 2024, pp. 782-807; https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2024.2310830
BUBLITZ, J. CH.; et al., “Implications of the novel EU AI Act for Neurotechnologies”, Neuron Vol. 112, 2024, pp. 3013-3016; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2024.08.011
BUBLITZ, J. CH.; “What an International Declaration on Neurotechnologies and Human Rights Could Look like: Ideas, Suggestions, Desiderata”, AJOB Neuroscience, Vol. 15, No. 2, 2024, pp. 96-112; doi:10.1080/21507740.2023.2270512
BUBLITZ, J. CH.; MERKEL, R., “Crimes Against Minds: On Mental Manipulations, Harms and a Human Right to Mental Self-Determination”, Crim Law and Philos, Vol. 8, 2014, pp. 51-77; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-012-9172-y
BUBLITZ, J. CH., “My mind is Mine? Cognitive Liberty as a Legal Concept”, Cognitive Enhancement. Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance, vol 1. Springer, 2013, pp. 233-264, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6253-4_19
CASSINADRI, G.; IENCA, M., “Non-voluntary BCI explanation: Assessing possible neurorights violations in light of contrasting mental ontologies”, Journal of Medical Ethics, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/jme-2023-109830
CERRILLO I MARTÍNEZ, A., et al. (Dir.), Inteligencia artificial y administraciones públicas: Una triple visión en clave comparada, Iustel, Madrid, 2024.
FARAHANY, N. A., “Neurotech at Work”, Harvad Business Review, March- April 2023. https://hbr.org/2023/03/neurotech-at-work
FARANHANY, N. A.; “Incriminating Thoughts”, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 64, February 2012, pp. 351-408; https://www.jstor.org/stable/41511094
FARINA, M.; LAVAZZA, A.; “Memory Modulation Via Non-invasive Brain Stimulation: Status, Perspectives, and Ethical Issues”, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. Vol. 16, March 2002, pp. 1-6; https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.826862
GAMERO CASADO, E., “El enfoque europeo de Inteligencia Artificial”, Revista de Derecho Administrativo, No. 20, 2021, p. 268-289.
GENSER, J.; DAMIANOS, S.; YUSTE, R., Safeguarding Brain Data: Assessing the Privacy Practices of Consumer Neurotechnology Companies, NeuroRights Foundation, 2024; https://neurorightsfoundation.org/reports
GENSER, J.; HERRMAN, S.; YUSTE, R.; International Human Rights Protection Gaps in the Age of Neurotechnology, May 6, 2022; https://neurorightsfoundation.org/reports
GOERING, S.; et al., “Recommendations for Responsible Development and Application of Neurotechnologies”, Neuroethics, Vol. 14, 2021, pp. 365-386; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-021-09468-6
GROSSMAN, C., “La libertad de expresión en el sistema interamericano de protección de los derechos humanos”, Revista IIDH, Vol. 46, 2007, pp. 159-193; https://www.corteidh.or.cr/tablas/R22022.pdf
HASLACHER, D.; et al., “AI for brain-computer interfaces”, en IENCA, M.; STARKE, G.; Brains and Machines: Towards a Unified Ethics of AI and Neuroscience, Academic Press, pp. 3-28 https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.dnb.2024.02.003
HENNEBEL, L., “Les Références Croisées Entre Les Juridictions Internationales Des Droits De L'Homme”, Le dialogue des juges, Emilie Bruylant, 2007, pp. 1-32; https://ssrn.com/abstract=1819764
HUERGO LORA, A. J., “Inteligencia artificial: una aproximación jurídica no catastrofista”, Revista española de control externo, Vol. 25, No. 74-75, 2023, p. 110-129.
IENCA, M.; MALGIERI, G., “Mental data protection and the GDPR”, Journal of Law and Biosciences, Vol. 9, Issue 1, January-June 2022, lsac006, pp. 1-19; https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac006
IENCA, M.; ANDORNO, R., “Towards new human rights in the age of neuroscience and neurotechnology”, Life Sciences, Society and Policy, Vol. 13, No. 5, 2017, pp. 1-27; https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-017-0050-1
JWA, A. S.; POLDRACK, R. A., “Addressing privacy risk in neuroscience data: from data protection to harm prevention”, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Vol. 9, Issue 2, July-December 2022, pp. 1-25; https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsac025
LIGTHART, S.; et. al., “Forensic Brain-Reading and Metal Privacy in European Human Rights Law: Foundations and Challenges”, Neuroethics Vol. 14, 2021, pp. 191-203; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-020-09438-4
LUCCHIARI, C.; et al., “Editorial: Brain Stimulation and Behavioral Change”, Neuroscience, Vol 13, Article 20, February 2019, pp. 1-3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00020
MCCAY, A., Horizont Report for The Law Society: Neurotechnology, law and the legal profession, 2022, https://www.lawsociety.org.uk/topics/research/how-will-brain-monitoring-technology-influence-the-practice-of-law
MEYNEN, G.; et al., “Neurotechnology to reduce recidivism: Ethical and legal challenges”. Handbook of clinical neurology, Vol. 197, 2023, pp. 265–276; https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-821375-9.00006-2
MINIELLY, N.; HRINCU, V.; ILLES, J., “Privacy Challenges to the Democratization of Brain Data”, iScience, Vol. 23, 2020, pp. 1-6; doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101134
MIYAWAKI, Y.; et al., “Visual Image Reconstruction from Human Brain Activity suing a Combination of Multiscale Local Image Decoders”, Neuron, Vol. 60, Issue 5, 10 December 2008, pp. 915-929. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.004
MOECKLI, D.; et al., International Human Rights Law (3rd Edition), Oxford University Press: New York, 2018.
MUÑOZ, J. M.; MARINARO, J. A., “Algorithmic biases: caring about teens’ neurorights”, AI & Society, Vol. 39, 2024, PP. 809-810; https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01516-w
NOWAK, M., “Can Private Actors Torture?”, Journal of International Criminal Justice, Volume 19, Issue 2, May 2021, pp. 415-423; https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab031
O’CALLAGHAN, P.; et al., “The right to freedom of thought: an interdisciplinary analysis of the UN special rapporteur’s report on freedom of thought”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 28, No. 1, 2024, pp. 1-23; https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2023.2227100
OECD, Recommendation of the Council on Responsible Innovation in Neurotechnology, OECD/LEGAL/0457; https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/en/instruments/oecd-legal-0457
PANEL FOR THE FUTURE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, The protection of mental privacy in the area of neuroscience: Societal, legal and ethical challenges, European Parliamentary Research Service, PE 757.807 – July 2024, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/stoa/en/document/EPRS_STU(2024)757807
PATRÃO NEVES, M.; “On (scientific) integrity: conceptual clarification”, Med Health Care and Philos, Vol. 21, 2018, pp. 181-187; doi:10.1007/s11019-017-9796-8
PEÑA-CUELLAR, D. M.; et al., “Neurotecnología y derechos humanos: Evaluando la necesidad de los neuroderechos”, Academia & Derecho, Vol. 17, No. 29, 2024, pp. 1-26.
PYCROFT, L.; et al., “Brainjacking: Implant Security Issues in Invasive Neuromodulation”, World Neurosurgy, Vol. 92, 2016, pp. 454-462; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2016.05.010
RAINEY, S.; et al.; “Brain Recording, Mind‑Reading, and Neurotechnology: Ethical Issues from Consumer Devices to Brain‑Based Speech Decoding”, Science and Engineering Ethics, Vol. 26, 2020, pp. 2295-2311; https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-020-00218-0
RAINEY, S.; et al., “Is the European Data Protection Regulation sufficient to deal with emerging data concerns relating to neurotechnology?”, Journal of Law and the Biosciences, Vol. 7, Issue 1, January-June 2020, pp. 1-19; https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsaa051
RASQUIN LIZARRAGA, M. M., “Sistemas de IA prohibidos, de alto riesgo, o de bajo o nulo riesgo”, Revista de privacidad y derecho digital, Vol. 9, No. 34, 2024, pp. 172-235.
REIDY, A.; The prohibition of torture: A guide to the implementation of Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Human Rights Handbooks, No. 6, Council of Europe, 2002; https://rm.coe.int/168007ff4c
ROAGNA, I., Protecting the right to respect for private and family life under the European Convention on Human Rights, Council of Europe Human Rights Handbooks, Strasburg, 2012; https://www.echr.coe.int/Library/DIGDOC/Roagna2012_EN.pdf
RODRIEGUES, A., Senadores proponen ley para proteger los datos y privacidad mentales. Agencia Brasil. https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/es/geral/noticia/2024-03/senadores-proponen-ley-para-proteger-los-datos-y-privacidad-mentales
RODRIGUEZ ASTUDILLO, N., “Tratamiento de los Neurodatos en Chile: análisis de jurisprudencia de la Corte Suprema de Chile”, Bioderecho.es, Núm. 19, enero-julio 2024, pp.1-9. https://doi.org/10.6018/bioderecho.621281
ROELFSEMA, P. R.; DENYS, D.; KLINK, P. CH.; “Mind Reading and Writing: The Future of Neurotechnology”, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, July 2018, Vol. 22, No. 7, pp. 598-610; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.001
ROLLNERT LIERN, G., Los neuroderechos y la libertad de pensamiento, Madrid: Dykinson, S.L., 2024; FARINA, M.; LAVAZZA, A.; “The ‘NeuroGate’: neuromorphic intelligence, extended mind, and neurorights”, Synthese, Vol. 204, No. 5, Article 148, 2024, pp. 1-23 https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-024-04795-6
SENTENTIA, W., “Cognitive Liberty and Converging Technologies for Improving Human Condition, Annals of the New York Academy of Science, Vol. 1013, 2004, pp. 221-228, doi:10.1196/annals.1305.014
SHAHEED, A., Interim report of the Special Rapporteur on freedom of religion or belief: Freedom of thought, A/76/380, 5 October 2021.
SHIH, J. J.; KRUSIENSKY, J.; WOLPAW, J. R.; “Brain-Computer Interfaces in Medicine”, Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Vol 87, No. 3, 2012, pp. 268-279; doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2011.12.008
SILVEIRA, A.; et alt (eds.), The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union: A Commentary, Braga: Portugal, UMinho Law School, 2024; https://repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt/bitstream/1822/93188/1/The%20Charter%20of%20Fundamental%20Rights%20of%20the%20EU%20-%20A%20Commentary.pdf
SWAINE, L., “Freedom of Thought as a Basic Liberty”, Political Theory, Vol. 46, No. 3, June 2018, pp. 405-425; https://www.jstor.org/stable/26504287
THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH, BRAIN 2025: A Scientific Vision; June 5, 2014, https://braininitiative.nih.gov/sites/default/files/documents/brain2025_508c_2.pdf
THE INTER-AMERICAN JURIDICAL COMMITTEE, Inter-American Declaration of principles regarding neuroscience, neurotechnologies, and human rights, CJI/RES. 281 (CII-O/23) corr.1, 9, March 2023.
THEJLS ZIEGLER, M., “Moral Integrity”, Business & Professional Ethics Journal, Vol. 39, No. 3, Fall 2020, pp. 347-364; https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej2020920101
WEISER, I., “Analysis: Torture Committed by Private Individuals and State Responsibility”, PKI Global Justice Journal, Vol. 2, 2018; https://globaljustice.queenslaw.ca/news/analysis-torture-committed-by-private-individuals-and-state-responsibility
YANG, S.; DERAVI, F., “On the Usability of Electroencephalographic Signals for Biometric Recognition: A Survey”, IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems, Vol. 47, No. 6, December 2017, pp. 958-969; 10.1109/THMS.2017.2682115
YUSTE, R., “Neurorights and New Charts of Digital Rights: A Dialogue Beyond the Limits of Law”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, Vol. 30, No. 1, 2023, pp. 15-37, https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ijgls/vol30/iss1/3
YUSTE, R.; GENSER, J.; HERMANN, S., “It’s Time for Neuro-Rights: New Human Rights for the Age of Neurotechnology”, Horizons, No. 18, 2017, pp. 154-164.
YUSTE, R.; et al., “Four priorities for neurotechnologies and AI”, Nature, Vol. 551, 2017, pp.159-163; https://doi.org/10.1038/551159a
ZELADA, C. J.; BERTONI, E., “Apuntes sobre la vida privada desde la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos”, Forseti, No. 1, 2013, pp. 123-146; https://doi.org/10.21678/forseti.v1i1.1195
ZIBLY, Z.; et al., “Modulation of mind: therapeutic neuromodulation for cognitive disability”, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, Volume 21, Issue 9, 2014, pp. 1473-1477, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2013.11.040
ZOHNY, H.; et al., “The Mystery of Mental Integrity: Clarifying Its Relevance to Neurotechnologies”, Neuroethics, Vol. 16, article number 20, 2023, pp. 1-20; https://doi.org/10.1007/s12152-023-09525-2

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The journal is object of publication in electronic and printed form. With the object of the first one, the author is supposed aware, being presumed that he lends his consent to such form of publication by the circumstance of presenting his manuscript. At the time of the printed edition the author will receive, of free form, 25 offprints of his contribution.