Academic entrepreneurship assessment model in Iranian sport science faculties
Resumen
Sports science faculties need to incorporate various activities that have not previously existed in their traditional functions to become innovative and entrepreneurial. For this reason, an effective model should be designed and developed to evaluate the facilitation of entrepreneurial research, the independence of faculties, the development of their relationships, and the application of sports science. Therefore, due to the importance of this issue, the purpose of this research was to design a model for evaluating academic entrepreneurship in sport science faculties of Iran. Using snowball sampling and based on the theoretical adequacy of the research, 13 participants were interviewed. The grounded theory was used to analyze the categories and indicators affecting the academic entrepreneurship assessment process. Charmaz's Grounded Theory approach was used to analyze data. The findings include four categories of requirements, enablers, activities, and consequences, for which 19 sub-categories were identified. The results can be used to evaluate, rank, and compare the entrepreneurial activities of academic actors, managers, and majors in sports science, as well as allocated grants and credits to units associated with academic entrepreneurship and commercialization.
Descargas
Citas
Abdzadeh, F., Kashef, S. M., Boroumand, M., & Fattahpourmarandi, M. (2022). Entrepreneurship profile of sport sciences faculties of Iran and offering an Employment and Entrepreneurship model. Sport Management Journal, 13(4), 1127-1155.
Alizadeh, Z., Ehsani, M., Kozechian, H., & Honari, H. (2015). The environmental factor affecting on sport entrepreneurship. Sport Management Review, 7(29), 99-116. https://doi.org/10.22059/jsm.2021.297727.2413
Andrew, D., Pedersen, P. M., & McEvoy, C. D. (2011). Research methods and design in sport management. Human Kinetics.
Ashouri, T., Dosti, M., Razavi, S. M. H., & Hoseini, A. (2018). Content Analysis of Sport Entrepreneurial Researches in Iran. Applied Research in Sport Management, 6(3), 75-86.
Audretsch, D. B. (2012). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1
Bengtsson, L. (2017). A comparison of university technology transfer offices’s commercialization strategies in the Scandinavian countries. Science and Public Policy, 44(4), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw086
Calvo, N., Rodeiro-Pazos, D., Rodríguez-Gulías, M. J., & Fernández-López, S. (2019). What knowledge management approach do entrepreneurial universities need? Information Systems, 85, 21-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.06.002
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. SAGE.
Charmaz, K. (2016). The Power of Constructivist Grounded Theory for Critical Inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800416657105
Chrisman, J. J., Hynes, T., & Fraser, S. (1995). Faculty entrepreneurship and economic development: The case of the University of Calgary. Journal Business Venturing, 10(4), 267-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(95)00015-Z
Chun Tie, Y., Birks, M., & Francis, K. (2019). Grounded theory research: A design framework for novice researchers. SAGE Open Medicine, 7, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2050312118822927
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage Publications.
Dastoom, S., Ramezaninezhad, R., Benar, N., & Rasouli, R. (2013). Survey of interactions administrative departments and industry sport in Iran Based on the Analysis Documents and structural. Applied Research of Sport Management, 2(2), 91-108. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.23455551.1392.2.2.8.4
Delarestaghi, A., Razavi, S. M. H., & Boroumand, M. R. (2016). Identifying the effective context conditions of strategic entrepreneurship deployment in sports business. Quarterly Journal of Sport Development and Management, 7(4), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.22124/JSMD.2019.3253
Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalization, 1(1), 64-77. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTG.2004.004551
González-Serrano, M. H., Alonso Dos Santos, M., Sendra-Garcia, J., & Calabuig, F. (2023). Sports entrepreneurship during COVID-19: Technology as an ally to maintain the competitiveness of small businesses. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 187, 1-12.
Goudarzi, M., Jalali farahani, M., Rajabi, H., & Hamidi, M. (2016). Analyzing behavioral factors affecting the development of entrepreneurship of management sport students. Organizational Behavior Management in Sport Studies, 3(11), 45-53. https://doi.org/20.1001.1.25384023.1395.3.3.5.8
Halperin, I., Vigotsky, A. D., Foster, C., & Pyne, D. B. (2018). Strengthening the Practice of exercise and sport-science research. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 13(2), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0322
Kaur, M. & Singh, L. (2016). Knowledge in the economic growth of developing economies. African Journal of Science, 8(2), 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2016.1147207
Keshavarz, L., Farahani, A., & Alizadehgolrizi, A. (2018). The pattern design of research commercialization in sport management. Quarterly Journal of Sport Development and Management, 7(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.22124/JSMD.2018.3226
Khodadadi, M., Motefakeri, H., Soleimani, B. (2020). The Effect of Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation (IEO) and entrepreneurial intention and self- fulfillment with the mediating role of entrepreneurial skills. Applied Research in Sport Management, 8(3), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.1970.6433
Klofsten, M., & Jones-Evans, D. (2000). Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe: The case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Business Economics, 14(4), 299-309. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008184601282
Kos, A., Wei, Y., Tomažič, S., & Umek, A. (2018). The role of science and technology in sport. Procedia Computer Science, 129, 489-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.03.029
Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: an Introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(99)80208-2
Muscio, A., & Ramaciotti, L. (2019). How does academia influence Ph.D. entrepreneurship? New insights on the entrepreneurial university. Technovation, 82-83, 16-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2019.02.003
Nasirzadeh, A. A., Farahani. A., & Vatan Doust. M. (2018). Investigating and Analyzing Effective Factors on Entrepreneurship of Iranian Physical Education Graduates. Sport Management Studies, 10(47), 131-52. https://doi.org/10.22089/smrj.2018.1099
Oloyede, R. O., & Tosin, S. A. (2017). Entrepreneurship in Sports: Tools for Sustainable Development. Discovery, 53(257), 286-297. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9091667
Pane, S. G., Kumar M, D., & Yusoff, R. (2015). Role of entrepreneurial leadership and commercialization of university research: A review. Journal Teknologi, 77(22), 55-59. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v77.6662
Pazhouhesh, A. (2017). Modeling the Factors Influencing Commercialization of Academic Research Achievements: Mixed Method (Case study: Engineering Faculties of State Universities in Tehran). Industrial Management Journal, 9(2), 265-286.
Peris-Ortiz, M., Gomez, J. A., Merigo-Lindahl, J., & Rueda-Armengot, C. (2017). Entrepreneurial universities: exploring the academic and innovative dimensions of entrepreneurship in higher education. Springer.
Rahimi, A., Ehsani, M., Saffari, M., & Hossini, N. S. R. (2020). The role of knowledge-based culture with the knowledge management approach in advancing the third-generation university functions (Case study: Sports science faculties). Applied Research in Sport Management, 9(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.30473/arsm.2020.7099
Ramzaninejad, R., Boroumand, M. R., Nataj, S., & Loghmani, M. (2019). The study of job attitudes and skills of physical education and sport sciences graduates at University of Guilan. Sport Management and Development, 8(2), 160-174.
Rasmussen, E. A., & Sørheim, R. (2006). Action-based entrepreneurship education. Technovation, 26(2), 185–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.06.012
Ratten, V. (2010). Sport-based entrepreneurship: towards a new theory of entrepreneurship and sport management. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0138-z
Ratten, V. (2020). Sport technology: A commentary. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31(1), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2020.100383
Seymour, S., & Topazly, Y. (2017). The Impact of Modern UK University Entrepreneurship & Enterprise Education on Entrepreneurial Actions: A Case Study of Russian Students. Contemporary Issues in Entrepreneurship Research, 7, 107–141. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2040-724620170000007010
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research – Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Sage Publications.
Zaharia, N. (2017). University-Industry Knowledge Transfer: Channels of Sport Research Interaction. International Journal of Business and Management, 12(9), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v12n9p1
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
