Analysis of the self-efficacy of ice hockey referees
Resumen
The objective of this study was to analyse the self-efficacy of ice hockey referees and the factors that contribute to their self-efficacy. We used the quantitative study design (survey model). The study group included 97 ice hockey referees (26 females, 71 males) actively working in Erzurum, Ankara, İzmir and İstanbul Provinces. The "Referee Self-Efficacy Scale (REFS)" was used to measure the self-efficacy of the referees participating in the study. We used the Statistical Program for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for data analysis. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The results of our study showed that there was no statistically significant difference in the referee self-efficacy scale scores according to the gender and education level variables (p > 0.05), but there was a statistically significant difference in the communication sub-dimension of the referees in the age variable (in favour of athletes aged 22-24 years) (p = .025). A statistically significant difference was also found in the game knowledge (p =.013) and decision making sub-dimensions (p = .017) in the refereeing status variable, and also in the decision making (p = .025) and communication sub-dimensions (p = .033) in the referee region variable. There was a remarkable difference between the referees living in Kocaeli in terms of the region, while there was a significant difference between the referees living in Erzurum in the communication sub-dimension (p < 0.05). In conclusion, demographic variables are a determining factor in the self-efficacy of the referees, as well as the factors such as the referees' area of training, match experience, and referee experience.
Descargas
Citas
Adıgüzel, N. S. (2018). Examining the relationship between basketball referees’ physical self-esteem and self-efficacy. Journal of National Sport Sciences, 2(2), 129-137.
Aygün, M. (2019). Buz hokeyi sporcularda duygusal zekâ ve liderlik [Emotional intelligence and leadership in ice hockey players]. Ankara: Nobel Bilimsel Eserler.
Aygün, M., & Öztaşyonar, Y. (2019). Analysing sports trait self-confidence features of ice hockey players. Spormetre: The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 17(3), 202-212. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.508266
Aygün, M., & Murathan, T. (2020). Ice Hockey in the historical process. Journal of History School, 44, 600-612. https://doi.org/10.29228/Joh39678
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. Academic Press.
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman, Barbuto.
Bıkmaz, F. (2004). Öz yeterlik inançları. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
Burns, R. (1982). Self-Concept development and education. London: Holt Rinehanger Winston.
Chen, S., Boucher, H. C., & Tapias, M. P. (2006). The relational self-revealed: Integrative conceptualization and implications for interpersonal life. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 151-179.
Çüm, S., Aygün, M., & Demir, E. K. (2020). Özler takımı: öz yeterlilik, öz saygı, öz güven ve öz düzenleme [Essences team: Self-efficacy, self-esteem, self-confidence and self-regulation]. İzmir: Duvar Yayınları.
Dereceli̇, Ç., Ünlü, H., & Erbaş, M. (2019). Investigation of self-efficacy levels of football referees. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 9(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.455536
Diotaiuti, P., Falese, L., Mancone, S., & Purromuto, F. (2017). A structural model of Self-efficacy in handball referees. Frontiers in Psycholgy, 8(811), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00811
Diotaiuti, P., Falese, L., Mancone, S., Corrado, S., Mallia, L., Zelli, A., & Lucidi, F. (2020). Psychometric properties and reliability of the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale (REFS) in volleyball referees. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(22), 8423. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228423
Eskiyecek, C. G., Satici, O., Ozaltas, H. N., Savucu, Y., & Gul, M. (2019). An analysis on general self-efficacy beliefs of swimming referees in terms of demographic variables. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(5), 259-266. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n5p259
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Gander, M. J., & Gardiner, H. W. (2001). Çocuk ve ergen gelişimi. İmge Kitabevi.
Guillen, F., & Feltz, D. L. (2011). A conceptual model of referee efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(25), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00025
Guillen, F., Feltz, D., Gilson, T., & Dithurbide, L. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale (REFS). Journal of Sport Psychology, 28(1), 15-24.
Harter, S. (1978). Effectance motivation reconsidered: toward a developmental model. Human Development, 21(1), 34-64. https://doi.org/10.1159/000271574
Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2017a). The study of adaptation of Referee Self-Efficacy Scale (REFS) into Turkish. Journal of Physical Education and Sports Sciences, 11(1), 118-128.
Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2017b). Examining the relationship between referee self-efficacy and general self-efficacy levels of basketball referees in terms of certain variables. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 5(8), 37-45. https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v5i8.2450
Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2017c). Examining the relationship between referee self-efficacy and general self-efficacy levels of football, basketball and handball referees. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(9), 1571-1579.
Karaçam, A., & Pulur, A. (2019). Examining the relationship between referees’ problem solving skills and their self-efficacy. Gaziantep University Journal of Sports Sciences, 4(1), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.31680/gaunjss.519158
Karageorghis, C. I., & Terry, P. C. (2017). Spor psikolojisi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
Koçak, Ç. (2019). Investigation of the referee self-efficacy levels of the volleyball referees. The Journal of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, 17(2), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.33689/spormetre.552892
Marshall, H. H. (1989). The development of self-concept. Young Children, 44(5), 44-51.
Martin, J. J., & Gill, D. L. (1991). The relationships among competitive orientation, sport-confidence, self-efficacy, anxiety, and performance. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 13(2), 149-159.
McAuley, E., & Gill, D.L. (1983). Reliability and validity of the Physical Self-Efficacy Scale in a competitive sport setting. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 5, 410-418.
Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self and society. Chicago: Phoenix.
Mowlaie, M., Besharat, M. A., Pourbohlool, S., & Azizi, L. (2011). The mediation effects of self-confidence and sport self-efficacy on the relationship between dimensions of anger and anger control with sport performance. In Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 138-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.027
Myers, N. D., & Feltz, D. L. (2012). From Self-Efficacy to collective efficacy in sport: transitional methodological issues. Handbook of Sport Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118270011
Myers, N. D., Feltz, D. L., Guillén, F., & Dithurbide, L. (2012). Development of, and initial validity evidence for, the Referee Self-Efficacy Scale: A multistudy report. Journal of sport and Exercise Psychology, 34(6), 737-765. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.34.6.737
Rosenberg, M. (1975). Self-Concept and Self-Esteem. Boston: Ally and Bacon, Inc.
Samuel, R. D., Tenenbaum, G., & Galily, Y. (2020): An integrated conceptual framework of decision-making in soccer refereeing, International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(5), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/1612197X.2020.1766539
Tuero, C., Tabernero, B., Marquez, S., & Guillen, F. (2002). Análisis de los factores que influyen en la práctica del arbitraje [Analysis of the factors affecting the practice of refereeing]. Sociedade Capixaba de Psicologia do Esporte, 1(1), 7-16.
Wall, C. (1986). Self-concept: An element of success in the female library manager. Journal of Library Administration, 6(4), 53-65.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.
