Velocity of nerve conduction of the tibial and peroneal nerves of Jordan's national badminton team
Resumen
This study aimed to identify velocity of nerve conduction of the tibial and peroneal nerves of the lower end. This was an experimental study and the sample consisted of two groups: the experimental group (A) which consisted of 10 badminton players and their average age was 20-+70 years, regulated in training and every one of them plays with his right hand from the Jordan national badminton team players, and the second, the control group (B), who didn’t practice any physical activity, and their number was (10) who are healthy with average age (20+-60). The results revealed statistically significant differences at ( ≥α 0.05) between the variables velocity of nerve conduction of the tibial nerves and peroneal nerves for the experimental group, there were no statistically significant differences at (≥α 0.05) in the velocity of nerve conduction of the tibial nerves and peroneal nerves according to the variable of age, whereas there were statistically significant differences at ( ≥α 0.05) between the variables velocity of nerve conduction of right peroneal nerves according to the variable of years of experience, where these differences were for people who have experience of more than 5 years.
Descargas
Citas
Al-Khazali, L (2012). A comparative study in certain kinetic abilities between two different speeds from nerve conduction among gymnastics players. Journal of Physical Education Studies and Research, 32, 1503-1818.
Bravo-Sánchez, A., Abián, P., Jiménez, F., & Abián-Vicén, J. (2019). Myotendinous asymmetries derived from the prolonged practice of badminton in professional players. PloS One, 14(9), e0222190. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222190
Jørgensen, U., & Winge, S. (1987). Epidemiology of badminton injuries. International Journal of Sports Medicine, 8(6), 379–382. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2008-1025689
Knipe, H., & Bickle, I. (2021). Common peroneal nerve. Radiopaedia. https://doi.org/10.53347/rID-24725
Lees, A. (2003). Science and the major racket sports: a review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 21(9), 707–732. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264041031000140275
Manish, D., Twinkle, D., & Sujata, Y. (2014). Nerve conduction studies of upper Extremity in badminton players. Indian Journal of Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, 8(4), 72.
Masu, Y., & Otsuka, A. (2021). Comparison of electromyogram reaction time at the onset of motion in badminton players at different competitive levels. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise, 17(4), 849-859.
Matsunaga, S., Sadoyama, T., Onomitu, S., Masuda, T., & Katsuta, S. (1993). The Annals of Physiological Anthropology, 12(4), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.2114/ahs1983.12.251
Michael, P. H., & Laffaye, G. (2015). The Science of Badminton: Game Characteristics, Anthropometry, Physiology, Visual Fitness and Biomechanics. Sports Medicine, 45, 473–495. doi.org/10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2
Parry, G. J. (2007). Guillain–Barré Syndrome. Demos Medical Publishing.
Sedano, M. J., Canga, A., de Pablos, C., Polo, J. M., & Berciano, J. (2013). Muscle MRI in severe Guillain-Barré syndrome with motor nerve inexcitability. Journal of Neurology, 260(6), 1624–1630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-013-6845-y
Yi-Ming, H., Ya-Ju, C., & Chung, H. (2005). Nerve conduction velocity investigation in athletes with trained lower extremity for well controlling movement. Institute of Coaching science, National College of Physical Education and Sports.
Yuasa, J., Kishi, R., Harabuchi, I., Eguchi, T., Arata, Y., Fujita, S., & Miyake, H. (1996). Effects of age and skin temperature on peripheral nerve conduction velocity--a basic study for nerve conduction velocity measurement in worksite. Journal of Occupational Health, 38(4), 158–164.
Ziemowit, B., Henryk, N., & Marcin, O. (2013). Assessment of simple reaction time in badminton players. Trends in Sport Sciences, 1(20), 54-61.
Las obras que se publican en esta revista están sujetas a los siguientes términos:
1. El Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Murcia (la editorial) conserva los derechos patrimoniales (copyright) de las obras publicadas, y favorece y permite la reutilización de las mismas bajo la licencia de uso indicada en el punto 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2013
2. Las obras se publican en la edición electrónica de la revista bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España (texto legal). Se pueden copiar, usar, difundir, transmitir y exponer públicamente, siempre que: i) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); ii) no se usen para fines comerciales; iii) se mencione la existencia y especificaciones de esta licencia de uso.
3. Condiciones de auto-archivo. Se permite y se anima a los autores a difundir electrónicamente las versiones pre-print (versión antes de ser evaluada) y/o post-print (versión evaluada y aceptada para su publicación) de sus obras antes de su publicación, ya que favorece su circulación y difusión más temprana y con ello un posible aumento en su citación y alcance entre la comunidad académica.