The ethics of neoaustenism:
from Jane Austen to Taylor Swift in the age of metamodernism
Supporting Agencies
- This publication has been supported by funding from the University of Salamanca and Banco Santander. It is carried out within the research lines of Intersecciones: Literatura, Arte y Cultura en el Limen (iLAC) and the research project M+PoeMAS, “Mucho más que poemas. Poesía para más gente y poética de la canción” (PID2024-158927NB-100).
Abstract
This article introduces neoaustenism as a metamodern-feminist sensibility rooted in Jane Austen’s fiction and paradigmatically articulated today through Taylor Swift’s songwriting. While other metamodern-rooted discourses such as neoromanticism revive a largely male genealogy of longing and melancholy, neoaustenism retrieves a specifically feminine grammar of irony, self-reflexivity, and relational ethics. Grounded in affect theory and the ethics of care, the concept reframes vulnerability as a shared resource that turns personal wounds into collective agency. The article first situates neoaustenism within metamodern oscillation and the affective turn. It then traces a gendered genealogy of sentiment from Austen’s heroines to Swift’s layered lyrical voices, showing through close reading how Swift’s songwriting translates Austenian irony and care into pop rituals that foster horizontal communities through reflective nostalgia, audience co-authorship, and embodied practices. Finally, this article argues that neoaustenism holds potential beyond Swift and offers a critical horizon for (re)imagining feminine identity and resilience in neoliberal culture, thus inviting further interdisciplinary inquiry.
Downloads
-
Abstract0
-
PDF0
References
Ahmed, S. (2004). Affective economies. Social Text, 22(2), 117–139. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/55780
Ahmed, S. (2014). The cultural politics of emotion (2nd ed.). Edinburgh University Press.
Austen, J. (2009). Persuasion. Barnes & Noble Classics. (Original work published 1818)
Austen, J. (2018). Emma. Standard Ebooks. (Original work published 1815)
Bergson, H. (1950). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness (F.L. Pogson, Trans.). George Allen & Unwin. (Original work published 1889)
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press.
Booth, W. C. (1983). The rhetoric of fiction (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Boym, S. (2001). The future of nostalgia. Basic Books.
Burns, C. (2025). Make it old: (Taylor’s version) and the art and experience of re-creation. In C. A. Bentley, K. Galloway & P.C. Harper (Eds.), Taylor Swift: The star, the songs, the fans (pp. 161–176). Routledge.
Butler, J. (2004). Precarious life: The powers of mourning and violence. Verso.
Charlton, L. (2022). Jane Austen and reflective selfhood: Rereading the self. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12160-9
Clough, P. T., & Halley, J. O. (Eds.). (2007). The affective turn: Theorizing the social. Duke University Press.
Cvetkovich, A. (2012). Depression: A public feeling. Duke University Press.
Deleuze, G. (1992). Ethology: Spinoza and us. In J. Crary & S. Kwinter (Eds.), Incorporations (pp. 625–633). Zone Books.
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980).
Fogarty, M., & Arnold, G. (2021). Are you ready for it? Re-evaluating Taylor Swift. Contemporary Music Review, 40(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2021.1976586
Fraile-Marcos, A. M. (Ed.). (2020). Glocal narratives of resilience. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291647
Fraser, N. (2013). Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Verso.
Galloway, K. (2023). Podcasting Taylor: Listening strategies, fandom, and the sonic environments of Taylor Swift podcasting. Journal of Popular Music Studies, 35(4), 91–110. https://doi.org/10.1525/jpms.2023.35.4.91
Gibbons, A. (2015). “Take that you intellectuals!” and “kaPOW!”: Adam Thirlwell and the metamodernist future of style. Study Neophilologica, 87(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2014.981959
Gill, R. (2016). Post-postfeminism? New feminist visibilities in postfeminist times. Feminist Media Studies, 16(4), 610–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2016.1193293
Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1982)
Gündüz, E. İ. (2024). “Lost in Austen,” found in Regency. Cankaya University Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 18(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.47777/cankujhss.1429495
Harding, D. W. (1998). Regulated hatred and other essays on Jane Austen (M. Lawlor, Ed.). Athlone Press.
Harrison, C., & Ringrow, H. (2022). Disnarration and the performance of storytelling in Taylor Swift’s folklore and evermore. International Journal of Literary Linguistics, 11(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.15462/ijll.v11i1.140
Held, V. (2006). The ethics of care: Personal, political, and global. Oxford University Press.
Hooper, L. A. (2025). Lyrical world building: An exploration of Taylor Swift’s use of intratextuality and intertextuality. In C. A. Bentley, K. Galloway & C. Harper (Eds.), Taylor Swift: The star, the songs, the fans. Routledge.
Hutcheon, L. (1994). Irony’s edge: The theory and politics of irony. Routledge.
Illouz, E. (2007). Cold intimacies: The making of emotional capitalism. Polity Press.
Johnson, C. L. (1988). Jane Austen: Women, politics, and the novel. University of Chicago Press.
Li, J. (2024). Feminist expression in American country music: A case study of Taylor Swift. Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies, 2(9). https://doi.org/10.61173/0gtege84
Lord, B. (2010). Spinoza’s ethics. Edinburgh University Press.
Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83–109.
Mudrick, M. (1952). Jane Austen: Irony as defense and discovery. Princeton University Press.
Müller, W. G. (2018). Irony in Jane Austen: A cognitive-narratological approach. In J. Alber & G. Olson (Eds.), How to do things with narrative: Cognitive and diachronic perspectives (pp. 43–62). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110569957-004
O’Brien, S. (2017). Resilience stories: Narratives of adaptation, refusal, and compromise. Resilience: A Journal of the Environmental Humanities, 4(2-3), 43–65.
Pons, M. (2016). Poetes emprenyats: Possibilitats i reptes del gir afectiu en la interpretació de textos literaris. Els Marges, 110, 10–33.
Poovey, M. (1984). The proper lady and the woman writer: Ideology as style in the works of Mary Wollstonecraft, Mary Shelley, and Jane Austen. University of Chicago Press.
Sloan, N. (2021). Taylor Swift and the work of songwriting. Contemporary Music Review, 40(1), 11–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/07494467.2021.1945226
Spinoza, B. (1959). Spinoza’s ethics: And on the correction of understanding (A. Boyle, Trans.). Everyman’s Library. (Original work published 1677).
Swift, T. (2010). Better than revenge [Song]. Speak Now. Big Machine Records.
Swift, T. (2014). Blank space [Song]. 1989. Big Machine Records.
Swift, T. (2017). Look what you made me do [Song]. reputation. Big Machine Records.
Swift, T. (2021). All too well (10-minute version) [Taylor’s Version] [From The Vault] [Song]. Red (Taylor’s Version). Republic Records.
Swift, T. (2022). Mastermind [Song]. Midnights. Republic Records.
Swift, T. (2023). Better than revenge (Taylor’s Version) [Song]. Speak Now (Taylor’s Version). Republic Records.
Swift, T. (2024a). But daddy I love him [Song]. THE TORTURED POETS DEPARTMENT: THE ANTHOLOGY. Republic Records.
Swift, T. (2024b). THE TORTURED POETS DEPARTMENT: THE ANTHOLOGY [Album]. Republic Records.
Swift, T. (2024c). The manuscript [Song]. THE TORTURED POETS DEPARTMENT: THE ANTHOLOGY. Republic Records.
Tong, O. X. (2024). Unpacking affect in Taylor Swift’s feminism. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 26(7), 1–17. Retrieved March 18, 2025, from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/unpacking-affect-taylor-swifts-feminism/docview/3161975903/se-2
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Turner, L. (2015, January 12). Metamodernism: A brief introduction. Notes on Metamodernism. Retrieved January 26, 2025, from https://bit.ly/41qczJH
van den Akker, R., & Vermeulen, T. (2017). Periodising the 2000s, or, the emergence of metamodernism. In R. van den Akker, A. Gibbons & T. Vermeulen (Eds.), Metamodernism: Historicity, affect, and depth after postmodernism (pp. 1–20). Rowman & Littlefield International.
Vermeulen, T., & van den Akker, R. (2010). Notes on metamodernism. Journal of Aesthetics and Culture, 2, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3402/jac.v2i0.5677
Waterman, S. (2022). Sally Rooney’s sapiosexuals. Contemporary Literature, 63(2), 230–268. https://doi.org/10.3368/cl.63.2.230
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. SAGE.
Wiltshire, J. (1992). Jane Austen and the body: “The picture of health”. Cambridge University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green
