Speculative reworkings of the good life at the end times:
Care, resilience, and relational futures in Cherie Dimaline and Rebecca Campbell
Supporting Agencies
- This research was carried out with support from the project Narrating Resilience, Achieving Happiness? Toward a Cultural Narratology (PID2020-113190GB-C22) https://naresh.usal.es/, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities.
Abstract
Taking as a starting point the idea that literature can function as an epistemological medium in its capacity as a testing ground where experiments in the good life can be imagined, aesthetically realized, and critically interrogated, this article turns to speculative fiction as a genre suitable for the exploration of cognitive frameworks that may lead to hopeful futurities amidst the ground-shifting transformations of the Anthropocene, supporting not only the continuity of life, but also the good life. It examines the representation of the ethics of care at the Anthropocene’s tipping point in recent speculative fiction from Turtle Island/Canada, namely, Métis Cherie Dimaline’s young adult novel The marrow thieves (2017) and its sequel, Hunting by stars (2021), and settler Canadian Rebecca Campbell’s short story cycle, Arboreality (2022). It argues that they critique the modernist nature/culture divide underpinning the disasters of the Anthropocene while reworking the notion of the good life from alternative Indigenous and new materialist relational approaches.
Downloads
-
Abstract0
-
PDF0
References
Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more-than-human world. Vintage Books.
Acosta, A. (2017). Living well: Ideas for reinventing the future. Third World Quarterly, 38(12), 2600– 2616.
Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.
Berlant, L. (2011). Cruel optimism. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822394716
Big-Canoe, K., & Richmond, C.A.M. (2014). Anishinaabe Youth Perceptions about Community Health: Toward environmental repossession. Health and Place, 26, 127–135.
Brand, P., & Yancey, P. (1980). Fearfully and wonderfully made. Zonderban.
Campbell, R. (2022). Arboreality. Stelliform Press.
Campbell, R. (2023). Everything Is Awe-ful: A Conversation on Climate Change Fiction with Rebecca Campbell. Interview with Stephanie Oliver. Canada and Beyond, 12, 147–159. https://doi.org/10.14201/candb.v12i145-157
Coulthard, G. (2014). Red skin, white masks: Rejecting the colonial politics of recognition. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816679645.001.0001
Crutzen, P., & Stoermer, E.F. (2000). The anthropocene. IGBP Newsletter, 41, 17–18.
De Cristofaro, D. (2023). ‘How do you sleep at night knowing all this?’: Climate breakdown, sleep, and extractive capitalism in contemporary literature and culture. Textual Practice, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236X.2023.2265887
Deloria, V., Jr. (1979). The metaphysics of modern existence. Harper & Row.
Dillon, G. L. (2012). Walking the clouds: An anthology of indigenous science fiction. University of Arizona Press.
Dimaline, C. (2022). Hunting by stars. Jacaranda.
Dimaline, C. (2017). The marrow thieves. Cormorant Books.
Doyle, B. (2021). Hope out of stock: Critical and melancholic hope in climate fiction. In R. Patulny & J. McKenzie (Eds.), Dystopian emotions: Emotional landscapes and dark futures (pp. 159–175). Bristol University Press. https://doi.org/10.46692/9781529214567.010
Durante, F., Kröger, M., & LaFleur, W. (2021). Extraction and extractivisms: Definitions and concepts. In J. Shapiro & J. McNeish (Eds.), Our extractive age: Expressions of violence and resistance (pp. 19–30). Routledge.
Fischer, E. (2014). The good life aspiration, dignity and the anthropology of well-being. Stanford University Press.
Fraile-Marcos, A.M. (2020). Introduction: Glocal narratives of resilience and healing. In A.M. Fraile-Marcos (Ed.), Glocal narratives of resilience (pp. 1–20). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291647.
Fraile-Marcos, A.M. (2025). Narrating the anthropocene: Scale, latency, and entanglement in Rebecca Campbell’s Arboreality. ISLE: Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment, 077, 1– 22. https://doi.org/10.1093/isle/isaf077.
Hanson, A. J. (2019). Holding home together: Katherena Vermette’s The break. Canadian Literature, 237, 27–46.
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Justice, D. H. (2018). Why indigenous literatures matter. Wilfrid Laurier University Press.
Kenny, C. (2006). Music & life in the field of play. Barcelona Publishers.
Kerber, J., & Lousley, C. (2022). Literary responses to indigenous climate justice and the Canadian settler-state. In A. Johns-Putra & K. Sultzbach (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and climate (pp. 269–279). Cambridge University Press.
Kimmerer, R. (2013). Braiding sweetgrass: Indigenous wisdom, scientific knowledge and the teachings of plants. Milkweed Editions.
Klein, N. (2014). This changes everything: Capitalism vs. the climate. Penguin Random House.
LaDuke, W. (1994). All our relations: Struggles for land and life. South End Press.
Llarena-Ascanio, M.J., & Caporale, S. (Eds.). (2023). Writing the “good life” in narratives of Canada. Canada and Beyond, 13.
Machado de Oliveira, V. (2021). Hospicing modernity: Facing humanity’s wrongs and the implications for social activism. North Atlantic Books.
Magnat, V. (2022). (K)new materialisms: Honouring indigenous perspectives. Theatre Research in Canada, 43(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.3138/tric.43.1.a0
Murphy, P. D. (1992). Rethinking the relations of nature, culture, and agency. Environmental Values, 1(4), 311–320.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
O’Brien, S. (2024). What the world might look like: Decolonial stories of resilience and refusal. McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2017). Matters of care: Speculative ethics in more than human worlds. University of Minnesota Press.
Ravenscroft, A. (2018). Strange weather: Indigenous materialisms, new materialism, and colonialism. Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry, 5(3), 353–370. https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2018.9.
Rosiek, J. L., Snyder, J., & Pratt, S.L. (2020). The new materialisms and indigenous theories of non-human agency: Making the case for respectful anti-colonial engagement. Qualitative Inquiry, 26(3-4), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800419830135.
Ruthven, A. (2024). Narrative agency and storied becomings in Cherie Dimaline’s The marrow thieves. Lagoonscapes, 4(2), 481–496. http://doi.org/10.30687/LGSP/2785-2709/2024/02/012.
Simpson, L. B. (2011). Dancing on our turtle’s back: Stories of nishnaabeg recreation, resurgence, and a new emergence. Arbeiter Ring Publishing.
Tronto, J. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. Routledge.
Whyte, K. P. (2018). Indigenous science (fiction) for the anthropocene: Ancestral dystopias and fantasies of climate change crises. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1-2), 224– 242.
Wilson, S. (2008). Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green
