Prime Identification in Historical Languages:
The Old English Exponent for the Semantic Prime DIE
Supporting Agencies
- This research has been funded through the grant PID2020-119200GB-I00 (MCIN/AEI/10.13039/501100011033), which is gratefully acknowledged.
Abstract
This research focuses on the identification of the Old English exponent for the semantic prime DIE following the approach of the Natural Semantic Metalanguage theory (Goddard, 2008, 2011; Wierzbicka, 1996). The aim of this paper is to complete the research begun on Old English exponents for the category Life and Death and to review the methodology applied in previous research on this field, which is based on morphological, textual, semantic and syntactic criteria and on the search for examples of the exponent word within the alternative syntactic configurations associated with the prime. The fact that DIE is the only predicate prime which does not allow for optional arguments entails the implementation of a new methodological approach to determine the suitability of the verb selected as prime exponent. All in all, the conclusion is drawn that the OE verb sweltan is selected as the exponent of DIE in Old English.
Downloads
References
Bosworth, J. &, Toller, T.N. (1973). An Anglo-Saxon Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Available online at: http://www.bosworthtoller.com
Croft, W. (1991). Syntactic Categories and Grammatical Relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de la Cruz Cabanillas, I. (2007). Semantic Primes in Old English: A Preliminary Study of Descriptors. SELIM 14, 37–58.
Fox, S. (1864). King Alfred's Anglo-Saxon Version of Boethius De Consolatione Philosophiae. London: The University of Michigan.
Givon, T. (1995). Functionalism and Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard, C. (2002). The Search for the Shared Semantic Core of All Languages. In C. Goddard & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Meaning and Universal Grammar. Theory and Empirical Findings. Volume I (pp. 5–40). Amsterdam: John Benjamins,
Goddard, C. (2004). The ethnopragmatics and semantics of active metaphors. Journal of Pragmatics 36, 1211–1230.
Goddard, C. (2008a). NSM: The State of the Art. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Cross-Linguistics Semantics (pp. 1-34). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goddard, C. (2008b). Towards a systematic table of semantic elements. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Cross-Linguistics Semantics (pp 59–81). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goddard, C. (2011). Semantic Analysis: A Practical Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goddard, C. (2018). Minimal English: The Science Behind It. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Minimal English for a Global World. Improved Communication Using Fewer Words (pp. 29–70). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Goddard, C., & Karlsson, S. (2008). Re-thinking THINK in contrastive perspective: Swedish vs. English. In C. Goddard (Ed.), Cross-Linguistics Semantics (pp. 225–240). Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Goddard, C., & Peeters, B. (2006). The Natural Semantic Metalanguage (NSM) approach: an overview with reference to the most important Romance languages. In B. Peeters (Ed.), Semantic primes and universal grammar: empirical evidence from the Romance languages (pp. 13–38). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Goddard, C., & Wierzbicka, A. (2002). Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar. In C. Goddard & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Meaning and Universal Grammar. Theory and Empirical Findings. Volume I (pp. 41–85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Guarddon Anelo, M. C. (2009). Un Análisis de las Propiedades Combinatorias de los Primitivos Semánticos a través de las Adposiciones Complejas en Inglés Antiguo. Revista Española de Lingüística, 39(2), 93–122.
Healey diPaolo, A., Price Wilkin, J., & Xiang, X. (Eds.). (2009). The Dictionary of Old English Web Corpus. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project. Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
Healey diPaolo, A., Cameron, A., Crandell Amos, A., Liuzza, R. Momma, H., Getz, R., & Pelle, S. (Eds.). (2018). Dictionary of Old English: A to G online. Toronto: Dictionary of Old English Project, Centre for Medieval Studies, University of Toronto.
Kastovsky, D. (1992). Semantics and vocabulary. In R. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language I: The Beginnings to 1066 (pp. 290–408). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kay, C., Roberts, J., Samuels, M., & Wotherspoon, I. (2009). The Historical Thesaurus of the Oxford English Dictionary. University of Glasgow: Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Leonard, H. C. (Ed. & Trans). (1881). A Translation of the Anglo-Saxon Version of St. Mark’s Gospel. London: James Clarke & Co.
Liuzza, R. M. (2011). Anglo-Saxon Prognostics. And Edition and Translation of Texts from London, British Library, MS Cotton Tiberius A.iii. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.
Martín Arista, J. (2012). The Old English Prefix Ge-: A Panchronic Reappraisal. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 32(4), 411–433.
Martín Arista, J. (2018). The semantic poles of Old English: Toward the 3D representation of complex polysemy. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 33(1), 96–111.
Martín Arista, J. (Ed.). (2009). Nerthus: An Online Lexical database of Old English. La Rioja: Nerthus Project, University of La Rioja.
Martín Arista, J., & Martín de la Rosa, M. V. (2006). Old English Semantic Primes: Substantives, Determiners and Quantifiers. ATLANTIS, 28(2), 9–28.
Mateo Mendaza, R. (2013). The Old English exponent for the semantic prime TOUCH. Descriptive and methodological questions. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 33(4), 449–466.
Mateo Mendaza, R. (2016a). The search for Old English semantic primes: the case of HAPPEN. Nordic Journal of English Studies, 15(1), 71–99.
Mateo Mendaza, R. (2016b). The Old English exponent for the semantic prime MOVE. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 36(4), 542–555.
Mateo Mendaza, R. (2020). Semantic primes in historical languages. The identification of the Old English exponent for DO. Journal of English Studies, 18, 125–152.
Mateo Mendaza, R. (2021). Identifying the Old English exponent for the semantic prime LIVE. Journal of the Spanish Society for Medieval English Language and Literature, 26, 85–107.
Miller, T. (1959). Bede’s Ecclesiastical History of the English People. Part I 2. London/New York/Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Ower, C. A. (1996). A Diachronic Investigation of the Semantic Field ‘Death’ [Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
Peeters, B. (2023). NSM webpage. Retrieved October 2, 2023 from https://nsm-approach.net
Peeters, B., Junker, M-O., Farrel, P., Perini-Santos, P., & Maher, B. (2006). NSM exponents and universal grammar in Romance: Speech; actions, events and movement; existence and possession; life and death. In B. Peeters (Ed.), Semantic primes and universal grammar: empirical evidence from the Romance languages (pp. 111–136). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Riyeff, J. (2017). The Old English Rule of Saint Benedict: with Related Old English Texts. Minnesota: Liturgical Press.
Sweet, H. (1897). The Student’s Dictionary of Anglo-Saxon. New York and London: The MacMillan Company.
Thorpe, B. (1844). The Homilies of the Anglo-Saxon Church. London: Printed for the Ælfric Society.
Wierzbicka, A. (1996). Semantics. Primes and Universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wierzbicka. A. (2002a). Semantic Primes and Universal Grammar in Polish. In C. Goddard & A. Wierzbicka (Eds.), Meaning and Universal Grammar. Theory and Empirical Findings. Volume II (pp. 65–144). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wierzbicka, A. (2002b). Philosophy and discourse: The rise of “really” and the fall of “truly”. Cahiers de praxématique, 38, 85–112.
Wierzbicka, A. (2002c). Right and wrong: From philosophy to everyday discourse. Discourse Studies, 4(2), 225–252.
Wierzbicka, A. (2006). English: Meaning and culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green
