Dialect in the Making
A Third-wave Sociolinguistic Approach to the Enregisterment of Late Modern Derbyshire Spelling
Abstract
Within the framework of third-wave sociolinguistic research, Asif Agha’s (2003) theory of enregisterment has proved a successful approach to explore the mechanisms that lead to the indexical connection between language and identity. Beal (2009, 2020), Cooper (2013, 2020), and Ruano-García (2012, 2020, 2021), among others, have investigated this phenomenon from a diachronic perspective. They have highlighted the value of dialect writing as a window into the main features associated with particular dialects, as it draws upon authenticating practices such as the use of dialect respellings, which not only signal salient phonological features, but also link them to wider schemes of sociocultural values and identities. This paper seeks to add to this field of research by looking at literary representations of Derbyshire speech (1850–1900) through the lens of enregisterment. My aims are twofold: I attempt to (1) shed light on the main phonological features of the Derbyshire dialect, while (2) determining how this variety was enregistered in the Late Modern English period, and whether meaningful text type-dependent indexical shifts might have affected the way in which this dialect was understood and thus represented by native and non-native speakers.
Downloads
References
Corpus Texts
Brushfield, T. (1870-71). A Village Sketch, at Ashford-in-the-water, in illustration of the Derbyshire Dialect. The Reliquary, XI, 163-165.
Le Fanu, J. S. (1864). Uncle Silas. Richard Bentley.
Murray Gichrist, R. (1897). A Peakland Faggot. Tales of Milton Folk. Grant Richards.
Robinson, J. B. (1870a). Owd Sammy Twitcher’s Visit tu ‘t Gret Exibishun e Derby. Derby.
---. (1870b). Owd Sammy Twitcher’s Crismas Bowk for the Year 1870. Derby.
Verney, F. P. (1868). Stone Edge. Smith Elder and Cy.
Ward, M. H. (1892). The History of David Grieve, vol. I. Smith, Elder & Co.
Secondary sources
Agha, A. (2003). The Social life of cultural value. Language & Communication, 23, 231-273.
---. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge UP.
Amador-Moreno, C. and McCafferty, K. (2015). “[B]ut sure its only a penny after all”: Irish English Discourse Marker sure. In M. Dossena (Ed.) Transatlantic Perspectives on Late Modern English (pp. 179-197). John Benjamins.
Asprey, E. (2020). Black Country Dialect Literature and What it Can Tell Us about Black Country. In P. Honeybone and W. Maguire (Eds.) Dialect writing and the North of England (pp. 29-50). Edinburgh UP.
Beal, J. C. (2009). Enregisterment, Commodification, and Historical Context: “Geordie” versus “Sheffieldish”. American Speech, 84(2), 138- 156.
---. (2012). “By Those Provincials Mispronounced”: The Strut Vowel in Eighteenth-Century Pronouncing Dictionaries. Language and History, 55(1), 5-17.
---. (2016). Enregistering the North: The Dialect of Mendicus in William Bullein’s Dialogue Against the Fever Pestilence. In A. Auer et al. (Eds.) Linguistics and Literary History: In Honour of Sylvia Adamson (pp. 13-30). Benjamins.
---. (2020). Dialect and the Construction of Identity in the Ego-documents of Thomas Bewick. In P. Honeybone and W. Maguire (Eds.) Dialect writing and the North of England (pp. 51-74). Edinburgh UP.
Beal, J. C., and Cooper, P. (2015). The Enregisterment of Northern English. In R. Hickey (Ed.) Researching Northern English (pp. 27-50). John Benjamins.
Blake, N. F. (1981). Non-Standard Language in English Literature. Andre Deutsch.
Clark, U. (2004). The English West Midlands: Phonology. In B. Kortmann et al. (Eds.) A Handbook of Varieties of English. Vol. 1: Phonology, (pp. 134-162). Mouton de Gruyter.
---. (2013). ’Er’s from off: The Indexicalization and Enregisterment of Black Country Dialect. American Speech, 88(4) , 441-466.
---. (2020). Enregistering Dialect Representation in Staffordshire Potteries’ Cartoons. In P. Honeybone and W. Maguire (Eds.) Dialect writing and the North of England (pp. 103-125). Edinburgh UP.
Cooper, P. (2013). Enregisterment in Historical Contexts: A Framework [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Sheffield.
---. (2016). ‘Deregisterment’ and ‘fossil forms’: The Cases of Gan and Mun in ‘Yorkshire’ Dialect. English Today, 1-10.
---. (2020). Russian Dolls and Dialect Literature: The Enregisterment of Nineteenth-Century ‘Yorkshire’ Dialects. In P. Honeybone and W. Maguire (Eds.) Dialect writing and the North of England (pp. 126-146). Edinburgh UP.
Coupland, N. (2014). Language, Society and Authenticity: Themes and Perspectives. In V. Lacoste, J. Leimgruber, and T. Breyer (Eds.) Indexing Authenticity (pp. 14–39). De Gruyter.
Eckert, P. (2008). Variation and the Indexical Field. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 12(4), 452-476.
---. (2012). Three Waves of Variation Study: The Emergence of Meaning in the Study of Sociolinguistic Variation. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41, 87-100.
Ellis, A. J. (1869-1889). On Early English Pronunciation. Vols. 1-5. Trübner & Co.
García-Bermejo Giner, M. (1994). Sources for the Linguistic Analysis of some Nineteenth-Century Midland Dialects. In W. Viereck (Ed.) Proceedings of the International Congress of Dialectologists (pp. 232-245). Franz Steiner.
García-Bermejo Giner, M. F., Pilar Sánchez-García, P., and Ruano-García, J. (Eds.). 2011-. Salamanca Corpus: A Digital Archive of English Dialect Texts. http:// www.thesalamancacorpus.com
Hallam, T. (1885). Four Dialect Words: Clem, Lake, Nesh, and Oss. Printed for Private Circulation.
---. (1896). Introduction: Part II. In S. Pegge Two Collections of Derbicisms (pp. xxiii-xcix). Henry Frowde, Oxford UP.
Hernández-Campoy, J. M. (2016). Sociolinguistic Styles. Wiley Blackwell.
Hodson, J. (Ed.) (2017). Dialect and Literature in the Long Nineteenth Century. Routledge.
Honeybone, P. (2020). Which Phonological Features Get Represented in Dialect Writing? Answers and Questions from Three Types of Liverpool English Texts. In P. Honeybone and W. Maguire (Eds.) Dialect writing and the North of England (pp. 211-242). Edinburgh UP.
Ihalainen, O. (1994). The Dialects of England since 1776. In R. Burchfield (Ed.) The Cambridge History of the English Language (pp. 197-273). Cambridge UP.
Jaffe, A. (2000). Introduction: Non-standard Orthography and Non-standard Speech. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 4(4), 497–513.
Johnstone, B. (2006). How to Speak like a Pittsburgher: Exploring the Role of a Folk Dictionary in the Production of a Dialect. Carnegie Mellon University Papers, 1-11.
---. (2009). Pittsburghese Shirts: Commodification and the Enregisterment of an Urban Dialect. American Speech, 84(2), 157-175.
---. (2011). Making Pittsburghese: Communication Technology, Expertise, and the Discursive Construction of a Regional Dialect. Language & Communication, 31, 3-15.
---. (2013). Speaking Pittsburghese: The Story of a Dialect. Oxford Studies in Sociolinguistics.
Johnstone, B., Andrus, J. and Danielson A. E. (2006). Mobility, Indexicality, and the Enregisterment of “Pittsburghese”. Journal of English Linguistics, 34(2), 77-104.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press.
Paulsen, I. (2022). The Emergence of American English as a Discursive Variety. Language Science Press.
Pegge, S. (1896). Two Collections of Derbicisms. Henry Frowde, Oxford UP.
Ruano-García, J. (2012). On the Enregisterment of the Northern Dialect in Early Modern English: An Evaluation across Literary Text Types. In S. Martín et al. (Eds.) At a Time of Crisis: English and American Studies in Spain (pp. 376-383). Universidad Autònoma de Barcelona.
---. (2020). On the Enregisterment of the Lancashire Dialect in Late Modern English: Spelling in Focus. Journal of Historical Sociolinguistics, 6(1), 1-38.
---. (2021). Aw’m Lancashire, owd cock, and gradely hearty: Enregistered Lancashire voices in the nineteenth-century theatre. In D. Montini and I. Ranzato (Eds.) The Dialects of British English in Fictional Texts (pp. 108-129). Routledge.
---. (forthcoming). The Language of Dialect Writing. In M. Kÿto, and E. Smitterberg (Eds.) The New Cambridge History of the English Language. Vol. II Documentation, Data Sources and Modelling. Cambridge UP.
Sebba, M. (2007). Spelling and Society. Cambridge UP.
Schintu, P. (2020). Theers gud stuff amung uz Darbysher foaks: Dialect Enregisterment in 19th-century Derbyshire. Token, 10, 109–128.
Silverstein, M. (1976). Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description. In B. G. Blount (Ed.) Language, Culture, and Society. A Book of Readings (pp. 187-221). Waveland.
Shorrocks, G. (1996). Non-Standard Dialect Literature and Popular Culture. In J. Klemola et al. (Eds.) Speech Past and Present. Studies in English Dialectology in Memory of Ossi Ihalainen (385-411). Peter Lang.
---. (1999). Working-Class Literature in Working-Class Language: The North of England. In T. Hoenselaars and M. Buning (Eds.) English Literature and the Other Languages (pp.87-96). Rodopi B. V.
Tapping, T. (1851). The Rhymed Chronicle of Edward Manlove Concerning The Liberties and Customs of the Lead Mines within the Wapentake of Wirksworth, Derbyshire. Shaw and Sons.
Trudgill, P. (1990) The Dialects of England. Basil Blackwell.
Vicinus, M. (1974). The Industrial Muse: A Study of Nineteenth Century British Working-class Literature. Croom Helm.
Wells, J. C. (1982). Accents of English. Cambridge UP.
Wright, J. (1905). English Dialect Grammar. Henry Frowde.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green
