Community, Exposed Singularity and Death in Mrs Dalloway

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.540361
Keywords: Virginia Woolf, Mrs Dalloway, Community, Singularity, Exposure, Death, Nancy, Blanchot

Abstract

This essay brings Virginia Woolf and Jean-Luc Nancy into dialogue, focusing on their similar critique of essentialized models of community and evocation of forms of being-with that derive from the experiences of singularity and death. It identifies two forms of community in Woolf’s novel Mrs Dalloway (1925). The first one corresponds to Nancy’s conception of the immanent community, built upon essence and fusion, and in which death is provided with an ideological meaning. In Woolf’s novel, this communitarian logic traverses the official, ritualistic way in which England has sublimated the death and loss caused by the First World War, and the repressive conventions and the authoritarian spirit of the governing classes. An alternative kind of community, however, is suggested in Mrs Dalloway, one that can be identified with Nancy’s conception of the inoperative community: a community of singular beings who share their finitude, exposure and death. Blanchot’s ideas on the transient community of lovers and Butler’s theorization of a ‘we’ based upon common vulnerability and loss also shed light on this novel’s concern with antisocial bonds between characters that escape traditional forms of affiliation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Beer, G. (1996). Virginia Woolf: The Common Ground. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Berman, J. (2001). Modernist Fiction, Cosmopolitanism, and the Politics of Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blanchot, M. (1988). The Unavowable Community. (P. Joris, Trans.) New York: Station Hill Press (Original work published 1983).

Bowlby, R. (1999). Meet Me in St. Louis: Virginia Woolf and Community. In J. McVicker & L. Davis (Eds.), Virginia Woolf & Communities: Selected Papers from the Eighth Annual Conference on Virginia Woolf (pp. 147-160). New York: Pace University Press.

Butler, J. (2004). Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. London: Verso.

Cernat, L. (2022). Equal Outsiders: Woolf and Coleridge Thinking Community, Romance, and Education in the Face of War. Partial Answers: Journal of Literature and the History of Ideas, 20.1, 121-149.

Cuddy-Keanne, M. (2019). Virginia Woolf and Cohabiting Communities. In C. Pollentier & S. Wilson (Eds.), Modernist Communities across Cultures and Media (pp. 89-105). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

Esposito, R. (2010). Communitas: The Origin and Destiny of Community. (T. Campbell, Trans.) Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Fairbairn, M. (2021). Toward Multiplicity and (Comm)unity: Conditions of Art, Artist, and Audience in Woolf’s Between the Acts. Virginia Woolf Miscellany, 97, 42-43.

Fynsk, C. (1991). Foreword: Experiences of Finitude. In J. Nancy, The Inoperative Community (pp. vii-xxxv). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Gordon, C. A. (2007). Literary Modernism, Bioscience, and Community in Early 20th Century Britain. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

Hinnov, E. M. (2007). “Each is part of the whole: We act different parts; but are the same”: From Fragment to Choral Community in the Late Work of Virginia Woolf. Woolf Studies Annual, 13, 1-23.

Ho, J. (2015). Nation and Citizenship in the Twentieth-Century British Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hussey, M. (1990). “‘I’ Rejected: ‘We’ Substituted”: Self and Society in Between the Acts. In B. K. Bowers & B. Brothers (Eds.), Reading and Writing Women’s Lives: A Study of the Novel of Manners (pp. 141-152). Ann Arbor: UMI Research Press.

Jiménez Heffernan, J. (2018). “Being Out, Out”: Ontological Exposure in Modernist Fiction. In G. Rodríguez-Salas, P. Martín-Salván & M. J. López (Eds.), New Perspectives on Community and the Modernist Subject: Finite, Singular, Exposed (pp. 21-42). New York: Routledge,

Joyce, J. (1992). Dubliners. London: Penguin Books.

Katz, T. (2016). Woolf’s Urban Rhythms. In J. Berman (Ed.), A Companion to Virginia Woolf (pp. 397-409). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Marcus, L. (2016), The Short Fiction. In J. Berman (Ed.), A Companion to Virginia Woolf (pp. 27-38). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Miller, J. H. (2005). Literature as Conduct: Speech Acts in Henry James. New York: Fordham University Press.

Miller, J. H. (2015). Communities in Fiction. New York: Fordham University Press.

Nancy, J. (1991). The Inoperative Community. (P. Connor, L. Garbus, M. Holland & S. Sawhney, Trans.) Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Pollentier, C. & Wilson, S. (2019). Modernist Communities: Periods and Theories. In C. Pollentier & S. Wilson (Eds.), Modernist Communities across Cultures and Media (pp. 1-22). Gainesville: University Press of Florida.

Rodríguez-Salas, G., Martín-Salván, P. & and López, M. J. (Eds.). (2018). New Perspectives on Community and the Modernist Subject: Finite, Singular, Exposed. New York: Routledge.

Saint-Amour, P. K. (2016). Mrs Dalloway: Of Clocks and Clouds. In J. Berman (Ed.), A Companion to Virginia Woolf (pp. 79-94). Hoboken: Wiley Blackwell.

Utell, J. (2008). Meals and Mourning in Woolf’s The Waves. College Literature, 35.2, 1-19.

Villar-Argáiz, P. (2013). Organic and Unworked Communities in James Joyce’s “The Dead”. In P. Martín-Salván, G. Rodríguez-Salas & J. Jiménez Heffernan (Eds.), Community in Twentieth-Century Fiction (pp. 48-66). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Whitworth, M. H. (2005). Virginia Woolf. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, R. (1973). The Country and the City. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woolf, V. (1992). Mrs Dalloway. London: Penguin Books.

Woolf, V. (1998). Between the Acts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Woolf, V. (2000). The Waves. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth Classics.

Zwerdling, A. (1986). Virginia Woolf and the Real World. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Published
28-06-2024
How to Cite
López Sánchez-Vizcaíno, M. J. (2024). Community, Exposed Singularity and Death in Mrs Dalloway. International Journal of English Studies, 24(1), 171–187. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes.540361
Issue
Section
Articles