Differential Difficulty in the Acquisition of Second Language Phonology
Abstract
This paper reports on Mandarin speakers' acquisition of English final voiced and voiceless obstruents and final labial nasals, none of which occur in Mandarin codas. The leamers' production patterns are compared with a simulation using the Gradual Leaming Algorithm (Boersma & Hayes 2001). We dernonstrate that when the Mandarin Chinese rankings are assumed as the initial state and this system is provided with representative English input, the GLA correctly models the order of acquisition of obstruent codas (voiceless before voiced). However, the GLA also predicts that voiced obstruent codas should be acquired before coda labials, which are less frequent than voiced obstruents in English. This prediction is not bome out; speakers made fewer errors with final labial nasals than with final voiced obstruents. We argue that Mandarin speakers' native language perception grammar makes perception of final obstruents more difficult than perception of final nasals, and conclude that the Mandarin learners' pattern can be understood with reference to perceived rather than absolute frequency of input structure types.Downloads
-
Abstract642
-
PDF457
References
Boersma, Paul(1997). How we learn variation, optionality, and probability. Proceedings of the Institute of Phonetic Scienccs of the University of Amsterdam, 2 1,43-58.
Boersma, Paul (1998). Functional Phonology: Formalizing the interactions between articulatory and perceptual drives. Doctoral dissertation, University of Amsterdam. The Hague: Holland Acadeimic Graphics.
Boersma, Paul & Bruce Hayes (2001). Empirical tests of the Gradual Learnnig Algorithm. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 45-86.
Boersma, Paul & Levelt, Clara (1999). Gradual Constraint-ranking Learning Algorithin predicts acquisition order. Proceedings of Child Language Research Forum, 30,229-237.
Broselow, Ellen (2004). Unmarked structures and emergent rankings in second language phonology. International Journal of Bilingualism, 8, 51-65.
Broselow, Ellen (to appear). Language contact phonology: richness of the stimulus, poverty of the base. In Proceedings of NELS 34. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Broselow, Ellen, Chen, Su-I & Wang, Chilin (1998). The emergence of the unmarked in second language phonology. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 26 1-280.
Broselow, Ellen & Finer, Daniel (1991). Parameter setting in second language phonology and syntax. Second Language Research, 7, 35-59.
Browman, Catherine & Goldstem, Louis (1989). Articulatory gestures as phonological units. Phonology, 6, 201-251.
Bybee, Joan & Pardo, Elly (1981). On lexical and morphological conditioning of alternations: a nonceprobe experiment with Spanish verbs. Linguistics, 19,937-968.
Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Pupers in Laboratory Phonololy 1: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 283-333.
Dupoux, Emmanuel, Kazehi, Kauhiko, Hirose, Yuki, Pallier, Christophe & Mehler, Jacques (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: a perceptual illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1568- 1578.
Eckman, Fred (1977). Markedness and the contrastive analysis hypothesis. Language Learning, 27,3 15-330.
Eckman, Fred (198 1). On the naturalness of interlanguage phonological rules. Language Learning, 31, 195-216.
Escudero, Paola & Boersma, Paul (2002). The subset problem in L2 perceptual development: multiplecategory assimilation by Dutch learners of Spanish. 111 B. Skarabela, S. Fish, and H-J. Do (Eds.), Proceedings qf'fhe 251h Annual Boston Conjirence on Language Developmenf. Somerville, Mass.: Cascadilla Press, 250-261.
Escudero, Paola & Boersma, Paul(2004). Bridging the gap between L2 speech perception research and phonological theory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
Flege, James (1988a). The development of skill in producing English word-final stops: kinematic parameters. JASA, 84, 1639-1652.
Flege, James (1988b). Chinese subjects' perception of the word-final English /t/-/d/ contrast: performance before and after training. JASA, 86, 1684-1697.
Flege, J. & Davidian, R. (1 984). Transfer and developmental processes in adult foreign language speech production. Applied Psycholinguistics, 5, 323-347.
Flege, J., McCutcheon, J. & Smith, S. (1987). The development of skill in producing word final Englis stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 82, 433-447.
Flege, Jaines & Wang, Chipin (1989). Native-language phonotactic constraints affect how well Chinese subjects perceive the word-final English /t/-Id/ contrast. Journal of Phonefics, 17,299-3 15.
Flexner, S. B. (Ed.)(1987). The Randorn House Dictionary of the English Language, 2nd edition. New York: Random House.
Grijzenhout, J. & van Rooij, B. (2000). Second language phonology: acquisition through gradual constraint demotion. Ms, Hemrich-Heme-Universitat, Düsseldorf and Potchefstrooinse Universiteit vir CHO. South Africa.
Halhe Seidl-Friedman, Amanda, Kobayashi, Masato & Cieri, Christopher. The American English Spoken Lexicon. http//www.ldc.upenn.edu.
Hayes, Bruce (1999). Phonological acquisition in Optimality Theory: the early stages. Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Kang, Yoonjung (2003). Perceptual similarity in loanword adaptation: English postvocalic word-final stops in Korean. Phonology, 20,2 19-274.
Kenstowicz, Michael (to appear). The role of perception in loanword phonology. Review of Flavien Gbéto (2000). Les emprunts linguistiques d'origine europeenne en Fon (Nouveau Kwa, Gbe: Bénin). Cologne: Rüdiger Koppe. Linguistique African.
Kessler, Brett & Treiman, Rebecca (1997). Syllable structure and the distribution of phonemes in English syllables. Journal ofMemory and Language, 37,295-311.
Levelt, Clara & van de Vijver, Ruben (1998). Syllable types in cross-linguistic and developmental grammars. Rutgers Optimality Archive 265.
McCarthy, John & Prince, Alan (1993). Prosodic morphology 1: Constraint interaction and satisfaction. Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Paradis, Carole (1996). The inadequacy of filters and faithfulness in loanword adaptation. 111 J. Durand & B. Laks (Eds.), Current Trends in Phonology: Models and Methods. Salford: University of Salford Publications, 509-534.
Peperkamp, Sharon (to appear). A psycholinguistic theory of loanword adaptations. Proceedings of the 3@h Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Sociew.
Pierrehumbert, Janet (2003). Probabilistic phonology: discrimination and robustness. In Rens Bod, Jennifer Hay & Stefanie Jannedy (Eds.), Probabilistic Linguistics. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press, 177-228.
Prince. Alan & Smolensky, Paul (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Rutgers Optimality Archive.
Prince, Alan & Tesar, Bruce (1999). Learning phonotactic distributions. Rutgers Optimality Archive. Shih, Chihn & Mobius, Bernd (1998). Contextual effects on voicing profiles of German and Mandarin consonants. ICSLP Proceedings, http://wwwhome.cs.utwente.nl.
Silverman, Daniel (1992). Multiple scansions n loanword phonology: evidence from Cantonese. Phonology 9,289-328.
Strange, Winifred (1 995). Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-Language Research. Baltimore, MD: York Press.
Ussishkin, Adam & Wedel, Aildrew (2003a). Gestural motor programs aild the nature of phonotactic restrictions: evidence from loanword phoilology. 111 M. Tsujimura & G. Garding (Eds.), WCCFL 22 Proceedings. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press, 505-5 18.
Ussishkin, Adam & Wedel, A. (2003b). Loanword adaptation asymmetries in Aushonesian and articulatory gestural programs. Talk pressented at AFLA X, University of Hawaii.
Wang, Chihn. (1995). The acquisirion of English word-final obsrruents by Chinese speakers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. State University of New York at Stoily Brook.
Wissing, D. & Zoihleveld, W. (1996). Filial devoicnlg as a robust phenomenon in second language acquisition: Tswana, English and Afrikaans. South AJi-icun Journal of linpistics. Szrpplement, 34, 3-24.
Yavas, M. (1994). Final stop devoicnlg in interlanguage. In Yavas, M. (Ed.), FirstandSecond Language Phonology. San Diego, CA: Singular, 267-282.
Yip, M. (1993). Cantonese loan word phonology and Optimality Theory. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 2, 26 1-29 1.
Xu, Zheng (2003). The interlanguage phonology of Mandarin learners of English and the Gradual Learning Algorithm. Unpublished Ms., Stony Brook University.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green
