Cognitive Operations in Eco-friendly Car Advertising
Abstract
This paper presents a corpus-based analysis of printed eco-friendly car advertisements in English in line with the growing consumer interest in environmental issues and the development of green advertising. The aim of the research is threefold: 1) to unveil the content cognitive operations (for the purpose of this research, metonymy, metonymic chain, metaphoric amalgam and metaphor) underlying the ads and their modes of representation; 2) to examine the relationship between (i) these conceptual operations and the environmental claims made by advertisers, and (ii) the environmental claims made by advertisers and the text-image interaction. In this light, the paper yields two major findings: a) the cognitive operations underlying our corpus are usually rendered in the visual and verbal modes; b) the environmental claims underlying the ads correlate with the conceptual content and the text-image interplay. The conscious use of these mechanisms by advertisers can help the manner in which messages are interpreted.
Downloads
References
Banerjee, S., Gulas, C. S. & Iyer, E. (1995). Shades of green: A multidimensional analysis of environmental advertising. Journal of advertising, 24(2), 21-31.
Barcelona, A. (2005). The multilevel operation of metonymy in grammar and discourse, with particular attention to metonymic chains. In J. F. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez & S. Peña Cervel (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction (pp. 313-352). Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Chang, H., Zhang, L. & Xie, G. X. (2015). Message framing in green advertising: The effect of construal level and consumer environmental concern. International Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 158-176.
Choi, D., & Lee, H. (2020). Beneficiary Foci Types and Performance Appeals in Green Advertising. Sustainability, 12, 3-15.
Cortés de los Ríos, M.ª E. (2010). Cognitive devices to communicate the economic crisis: An analysis through covers in The Economist. Ibérica, 20, 81-106.
Downing, L. H. & Mujic, B. K. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics. Published under the auspices of the Spanish Cognitive Linguistics Association, 9(1), 153-178.
Evans, V. & Green, M. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Felices Lago, A. & Cortés de los Ríos, M.ª E. (2009). A cognitive-axiological approach to print-ecoadvertisements in The Economist: The energy sector under scrutinity”. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas, 4, 59-78.
Forceville, C. (2012). Creativity in pictorial and multimodal advertising metaphors. Discourse and Creativity, 113-132.
Forceville, C. (2009). Nonverbal and multimodal metaphor in a cognitivist framework: agendas for research. In C. Forceville & E. Uriós-Aparisi (Eds.), Multimodal Metaphor (pp.19-42). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Forceville, C. (1996). Pictorial Metaphor in Advertising. London: Routledge.
Forceville, C. & Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Multimodal Metaphor-Applications of Cognitive Linguistics. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Hartmann, P. & Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2009). Green advertising revisited: Conditioning virtual nature experiences. International Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 715-739.
Hassan, R. & Valenzuela, F. (2016). Customer perception of green advertising in the context of eco-friendly FMCGs. Contemporary Management Research, 12(2), 169-182.
Hidalgo, L. & Kraljevic, B. (2011). Multimodal metonymy and metaphor as complex discourse resources for creativity in ICT advertising discourse. Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 9(1), 153-178.
Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2006 [1996]). Reading images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge.
Krzeszowski, T. (1993). The axiological parameter in preconceptual image schemata. In R. A. Geiger & B. Rudzka-Ostyn (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (pp. 307-330). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
Lakoff, G. & Turner, M. (1989). More than cool reason: A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 202–251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Littlemore, J. & Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017). Eyelashes, speedometers or breasts? An experimental cross-cultural approach to multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising. Textus, 30(1), 197-222.
Negro Alousque, I. (2015a). Hugo Chávez and the building of his self-image through metaphor. Ibérica, 29, 83-104.
Negro Alousque, I. (2015b). The role of cognitive operations in the translation of film titles. 33nd International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (AESLA): Language Industries and Social Change. 14-16 April 2015, Madrid. Elsevier. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.339
Negro Alousque, I. (2015c). The role of text in the identification of visual metaphor in advertising. 33nd International Conference of the Spanish Association of Applied Linguistics (AESLA): Language Industries and Social Change. 14-16 April 2015, Madrid. Elsevier. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.379.
Negro Alousque, I. (2014). Pictorial and verbo-pictorial metaphor in Spanish political cartooning. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación, 57, 59-84.
Peña Cervel, S. (2016). Motivating film title translation: a cognitive analysis. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Communicación, 66, 301-339.
Pérez Hernández, L. (2019). XL burgers, shiny pizzas, and ascending drinks: Primary metaphors and conceptual interaction in fast food printed advertising. Cognitive Linguistics, 30(3), 531-570.
Pérez Hernández, L. (2016). The role of mitigation and strengthening cognitive operations in brand names design: a case study of Spanish and American wine brands. Social Semiotics, 26(2), 128-150.
Pérez Hernández, L. (2011). Cognitive tools for successful branding. Applied Linguistics, 32(4), 369-388.
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2017). Multimodal Metaphor and Metonymy in Advertising (Vol. 2). John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2016). Multimodal metaphor and metonymy in advertising: A corpus-based account. Metaphor and Symbol, 31(2), 73-90.
Pérez Sobrino, P. (2013). Metaphor use in advertising: analysis of the interaction between multimodal metaphor and metonymy in a greenwashing advertisement. In E. Gola and F. Ervas (Eds.) Metaphor in Focus: Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor Use (pp. 67-82). Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J. & Galera, A. (2014). Cognitive Modeling: A linguistic Perspective. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F. J., & Mairal, R. (2007). High-level metaphor and metonymy in meaning construction. In G. Radden, K.M.Köpcke, T. Berg and P. Siemund, (Eds.), Aspects of Meaning Construction in Lexicon and Grammar (pp. 33- 49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. & Peña, S. (2005). Cognitive Linguistics. Internal Dynamics and Interdisciplinary Interaction. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Ruiz de Mendoza, F.J. & Otal, J.L. (2002). Metonymy, Grammar, and Communication. Colección Estudios de Lengua Inglesa, Granada, Comares.
Segev, S., Fernandes, J. & Hong, C. (2016). Is your product really green? A content analysis to reassess green advertising. Journal of Advertising, 45(1), 85-93.
Sheehan, K. & Atkinson, L. (2012). Special issue on green advertising: Revisiting green advertising and the reluctant consumer. Journal of Advertising, 41(4), 5-7.
Ungerer, F. (2000). Muted metaphors and the activation of metonymies in advertising. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective, 321-340.
Urios-Aparisi, E. (2009). Interaction of multimodal metaphor and metonymy in TV commercials: Four case studies. Multimodal Metaphor, 11, 95-116.
Villacañas, B., & White, M. (2013). Pictorial metonymy as creativity source in “Purificación García” advertising campaigns. Metaphor and the Social World, 3(2), 220-239.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green
