Transparently Hierarchical
Punctuation in the Townshend Family Recipe Book
Abstract
The three scribes of a mid-seventeenth-century collection of medical recipes resemble each other in how they have punctuated the recipes, although they did not work simultaneously. They draw on similar repertoires of marks and they mark similar functions, but they do not use the same marks for the same functions. The principal function is the global one of indicating where the constitutive elements of the recipes begin and end. This function of indicating a text’s structural hierarchy goes back centuries and can seem old-fashioned for an Early Modern English manuscript produced when grammarians had started to discuss whether punctuation should mark syntactic units. A key observation is that recipes stand out among text-types by having a fixed, transparently hierarchical structure. This feature of them facilitates the researcher’s appreciation of how the punctuation functions and dismisses any impression of the scribes having deployed the marks haphazardly.
Downloads
References
Primary source
London, Wellcome Library, MS 744. Digital images are freely available from: https://wellcomelibrary.org/
Secondary sources
Arn, M.-J. (1994). On punctuating medieval literary texts. Text, 7, 161–174.
Blount, T. (1656). Glossographia: Or A Dictionary, Interpreting All Such Hard Vvords […]. London: Thomas Newcomb.
Bullokar, J. (1616). An English Expositor: Teaching the Interpretation of the Hardest Words Vsed in our Language […]. London: Iohn Legatt.
Calle-Martín, J. (2004). Punctuation practice in a 15th-century arithmetical treatise (MS Bodley 790). Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 105(4), 407–422.
Calle-Martín, J. & Miranda-García, A. (2005). Editing Middle English punctuation: The case of MS Egerton 2622 (ff. 136–152). International Journal of English Studies, 5(2), 27–44.
Cawdrey, R. (1604). A Table Alphabeticall, Contayning and Teaching the True Writing and Vnderstanding of Hard Vsuall English Words […]. London: Edmund Weaver.
de la Cruz Cabanillas, I. (2016). Is punctuation comparable? The case of London, Westminster School MS 3 and Paris, Bibliothèque Sainte Geneviève MS 3390. ES: Revista de filología inglesa, 37, 11–30.
Hanks, D. T. & Fish, J. (1997). Beside the point: Medieval meanings vs. modern impositions in editing Malory’s Morte Darthur. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 98(3), 273–289.
Jenkinson, H. (1926). Notes on the study of English punctuation of the sixteenth century. The Review of English Studies, 2, 152–158.
Lancashire, I. (Ed.). (2018). Lexicons of Early Modern English. Toronto: University of Toronto Press. Retrieved 11 May, 2020 from http://leme.library.utoronto.ca
Mackay, F. (2012). The Development of Reading Practices as Represented in the Textual Afterlife of Nicholas Love’s Mirror of the Blessed Life of Jesus Christ. Unpublished MPhil Dissertation, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Mäkinen, M. (2006). Between Herbals et alia: Intertextuality in Medieval English Herbals. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Medina Sánchez, B. (2015). Punctuation in Eighteenth-century English Grammars. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
Mulcaster, R. (1582). The First Part of the Elementarie which Entreateth Chefelie of the Right Writing of our English Tung. London: Thomas Vautroullier.
Parkes, M. B. (1992). Pause and Effect: A History of Punctuation in the West. Aldershot: Scolar Press.
Parkes, M. B. (1994a). Latin autograph manuscripts: Orthography and punctuation. In P. Robinson & R. Zim (Eds.), Pages from the Past: Medieval Writing Skills and Manuscript Books (pp. 23–36). London: Routledge.
Parkes, M. B. (1994b). Punctuation and the medieval history of texts. In P. Robinson & R. Zim (Eds.), Pages from the Past: Medieval Writing Skills and Manuscript Books (pp. 265–277). London: Routledge.
Parkes, M. B. (1997). Punctuation in copies in Nicholas Love’s Mirror of the Blessed Life of Jesus Christ. In P. Robinson & R. Zim (Eds.), Pages from the Past: Medieval Writing Skills and Manuscript Books (pp. 47–59). London: Routledge.
Parkes, M. B. (1999). Medieval punctuation and the modern editor. In P. Robinson & R. Zim (Eds.), Pages from the Past: Medieval Writing Skills and Manuscript Books (pp. 337–349). London: Routledge.
Puttenham, G. (1589). The Arte of English Poesie. London: Richard Field.
Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. (1998). The role of punctuation in 15th-century vernacular deeds. Folia Linguistica Historica, 32(19), 27–52.
Rodríguez-Álvarez, A. (2010). Teaching punctuation in Early Modern England. Studia Anglica Posnaniensia, 46, 35–49.
Rutkowska, H. & Rössler, P. (2012). Orthographic variables. In J. M. Hernández-Campoy & J. C. Conde-Silvestre (Eds.), The Handbook of Historical Sociolinguistics (pp. 213–236). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Salmon, V. (1999). Orthography and punctuation. In R. Lass (Ed.), The Cambridge History of the English Language. Volume III: 1476–1776 (pp. 13–55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Salter, E. (1956). Punctuation in an early manuscript of Nicholas Love’s Mirror. The Review of English Studies, new series, 7, 11–18.
Samuels, M. L. (1963). Some applications of Middle English dialectology. English Studies, 44, 1–6.
Smith, J. (2013). Punctuating Mirk’s Festial: A Scottish text and its implications. In M. Driver & V. O’Mara (Eds.), Preaching the Word in Manuscript and Print (pp. 161–192). Turnhout: Brepols.
Smith, J. (2017). The afterlives of Nicholas Love. Studia Neophilologica, 89(S1), 59–74.
Wright, L. (Ed.). (2020). The Multilingual Origins of Standard English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Zeeman, E. (1956). Punctuation in an early manuscript of Love’s Mirror. The Review of English Studies, 7, 11–18.
The works published in this journal are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Services at the University of Murcia (the publisher) retains the property rights (copyright) of published works, and encourages and enables the reuse of the same under the license specified in item 2.
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the magazine under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial Share Alike 4.0.
3.Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are encouraged to disseminate pre-print (draft papers prior to being assessed) and/or post-print versions (those reviewed and accepted for publication) of their papers before publication, because it encourages distribution earlier and thus leads to a possible increase in citations and circulation among the academic community.
RoMEO color: green
