Spanish pre-university students' use of English: CEA results from the University Entrance Examination

Authors

  • María Belén Díez Bedmar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149681
Keywords: English exam, University Entrance Examination, Computer-aided Error Analysis

Abstract

In this paper an updated overview of the main errors that Spanish students make when writing the English exam in the University Entrance Examination is provided. To do so, a Computer-aided Error Analysis (CEA) (Dagneaux, Denness & Granger, 1998) was conducted on a representative sample of the students who took the exam in June 2008 in Jaén, and wrote a composition on the same topic. The use of the most widely-used error taxonomy, the Error Tagging Manual version 1.1. (Dagneaux, Denness, Granger & Meunier, 1996), and the analysis of the results by means of descriptive statistics foster the possibility to replicate this study and move forward in the description of the students’ written command in the foreign language at this stage. The comparison of the findings obtained in this study and those from previous (C)EAs on the English exam reveals that some common tendencies may be shown.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

María Belén Díez Bedmar

holds a PhD in Applied Linguistics from the University of Jaén, where she is an Assistant Professor. Her research interests include the exploitation of learner corpora, language testing, the acquisition of English as a foreign language, computer mediated communication, clinical linguistics and intercultural pragmatics. She has enjoyed research stays in various international institutions, and she co-edited the book 'Linking up Contrastive and Learner Corpus Research' (Rodopi, 2008). She is currently involved in corpus-based international projects such as ICCI (TUFS), or the CLAN corpus.
Published
01-12-2011
How to Cite
Díez Bedmar, M. B. (2011). Spanish pre-university students’ use of English: CEA results from the University Entrance Examination. International Journal of English Studies, 11(2), 141–158. https://doi.org/10.6018/ijes/2011/2/149681