Self-efficacy, self-esteem and engagement among Peruvian nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic

Authors

DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.528511
Keywords: Self Efficacy, Self Esteem, Engagement, covid-19

Abstract

Introduction: Nursing professionals have faced the COVID-19 pandemic and health crisis on the front lines. Caught without technical and material readiness, as well as without previous experience, they resorted to using their own resources such as self-esteem and self-efficacy to raise their performance and uphold their commitment to public health. It has been reported that one third of the 37,000 nurses working in Peru contracted COVID-19, and approximately 180 died from the virus.
Objectives: Measure the influence of personal resources on engagement among professional nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: Cross-sectional explanatory correlational research from a sample of 387 Peruvian nursing professionals. A descriptive and inferential statistical analysis was performed. IBM SPSS Statistics V/26 software was used.
Results: The results showed highly significant and positive correlations between the variables self-efficacy, self-esteem and engagement. Likewise, predictive values of more than 50% of personal resources on engagement were identified.
Conclusions: Professional nurses during the pandemic perceived themselves with an average level of self-efficacy, high levels of self-esteem, and a medium level of engagement. Personal resources, self-efficacy and self-esteem, were able to predict the engagement of professional nurses in the dimensions of vigor, dedication and absorption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Jose Ventura Egoávil

Universidad ESAN, Facultad de Economía y Administración. Lima. Peru

References

Pang Y, Fang H, Li L, Chen M, Chen Y, Chen M. Predictive factors of anxiety and depression among nurses fighting coronavirus disease 2019 in China. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021; 30(2): p. 524-532.

Yörük S, Güler D. The relationship between psychological resilience, burnout, stress, and sociodemographic factors with depression in nurses and midwives during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study in Turkey. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2021; 57(1): p. 390-398.

Melchor A, Jiménez M, Solano J, Simón L, Gaya B, Bordonaba D. Análisis del impacto psicoemocional de la pandemia del COVID-19 entre los profesionales de enfermería. Enf Global. 2022; 21(2): p. 184-223.

Gamboa L, Becerra K, López Y, Goicochea E. Nivel de resiliencia del personal de salud frente a la pandemia por Covid-19. Rev. Cuerpo Med. HNAAA. 2021; 14(1): p. 49-54.

Jackson D, Usher K. COVID-19: Resiliencia y la Fuerza Laboral de los Profesionales de Enfermería. Investigación en Enfermería: Imagen y Desarrollo. 2020; 22: 1-. 2020; 22(1).

Arias W, Del Carpio A. Síndrome de burnout en personal de enfermería de Arequipa. Rev Cub Salud Pública. 2016; 42(4): p. 559–575.

Días C, Teixeira A, Oroski G, Conceição M. Gestión del equipo de enfermería: factores asociados a la satisfacción en el trabajo. Enferm. Glob. 2017; 47: p. 193-207.

Maslach C, Leiter M. Understanding burnout: New models. The handbook of stress and health: A guide to research and practice. 2017;: p. 36-56.

Kahn W. Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work. Acad. Manage. J. 1990; 33(4): p. 692-724.

Contreras F, Espinosa J, Esguerra G. Could Personal Resources Influence Work Engagement and Burnout? A Study in a Group of Nursing Staff. SAGE Open. 2020.

Orgambídez A, Borrego Y. Apoyo social y engagement como antecedentes de la satisfacción laboral en personal de enfermería. Enfermería Global. 2017; 16(4): p. 208-225.

Schaufeli W, Bakker A. Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research. Psychology Press. 2010.

Cernas D, Mercado P, Davis A. Perspectiva Futura de Tiempo, Satisfacción Laboral y Compromiso Organizacional: el Efecto Mediador de la Autoeficacia, la Esperanza y la Vitalidad. Rev. psicol. trab. organ. 2018; 34(1): p. 1-9.

Hofboll S. Social and psychological resources and adaptation. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2002; 6: p. 307-324.

Xanthopoulou D, Bakker A, Demerouti E, Schaufeli W. Reciprocal relationship between job resources, personal resources, and work engagement. J. Vocat. Behav. 2009; 74(3): p. 235-244.

Tadić M. Recursos Personales y Compromiso laboral: un estudio en dos fases sobre el papel de los recursos laborales entre los enfermeros. Investigación Social. 2017; 28(1): p. 5-24.

Mäkikangas A, Feldt T, Kinnunen U, Mauno S. Does personality matter? A review of individual differences in occupational well-being. Adv. Posit. Organ. Psychol. 2013; 1: p. 107-143.

Mauno S, Kinnunen U, Ruokolainen M. Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A longitudinal study. J. Vocat. Behav. 2007; 70(1): p. 149-171.

Moreira E, García M, Conde A, Gonzales A. Autoeficacia, recursos laborales y emociones positivas relacionadas con las TIC de los docentes: sus relaciones estructurales con la motivación autónoma y el compromiso laboral. Inform. Educ. 2019; 134: p. 63-77.

Bakker A. Job crafting among health care professionals: The role of work engagement. J Nurs Manag. 2018; 26(3): p. 321-331.

Huaman Z. Autoestima y su relación con el desempeño laboral de las enfermeras del Hospital Daniel Alcides Carrión, Callao. Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. 2017.

Irigoín J. Nivel de autoeficacia laboral en profesionales de los establecimientos de salud de la ciudad de Cajamarca. Universidad Privada Antonio Guillermo Urrelo. 2018.

Baessler J, Schwazer R. Evaluación de la autoeficacia: adaptación española de la Escala de Autoeficacia general. Ansiedad Estrés. 1996; 2(1): p. 1-8.

Rosenberg M. Self Esteem and the Adolescent: Society and the Adolescent Self-Image. Princeton University Press. 1965.

Salanova M, Schaufeli W, Llorens S, Peiró J, Grau R. Desde el ‘burnout’ al ‘engagement’: ¿una nueva perspectiva? Rev. Psicol. Trab. Organ. 2000; 16: p. 117-134.

Leongómez J. Análisis de poder estadístico y cálculo de tamaño de muestra en R: Guía práctica (Versión 3). Zenodo. 2020.

Veliz A, Dörner A, Soto A, Arriagada A. Bienestar psicológico y burnout en profesionales de atención primaria de salud en la región de Los Lagos, Chile. Acta univ. 2018; 28(3): p. 56-64.

Quiroz E, Muñoz J, Salazar A, Ocampo F, Vanegas N. Engagement y burnout en profesionales de la salud colombianos. Salud y Ciencia. 2020; 24(4): p. 201-207.

Bhatti M, Alshagawi M, Syah A. Mediating the role of work engagement between personal resources (self-efficacy, the big five model) and nurses’ job performance. International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare. 2018; 11(3): p. 176-191.

Bakker A, Demerouti E. Towards a model of work engagement. Career. Dev. Int. 2008; 13(3): p. 209-223.

Hernández L, Oramas A. Factores psicosociales laborales relacionados con el work engagement desde el modelo de demanda-recursos laborales en trabajadores cubanos. Revista Cubana de Salud y Trabajo. 2018; 19(2): p. 19-23.

Published
01-04-2023
How to Cite
[1]
Ventura Egoávil, J. and Sosa Huichi, A. 2023. Self-efficacy, self-esteem and engagement among Peruvian nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic. Global Nursing. 22, 2 (Apr. 2023), 1–22. DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.528511.
Issue
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH