Psychometric properties of the modified conflict tactics scale. Application in the Ecuadorian adolescent context

Authors

  • Judith Inmaculada Francisco-Pérez Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuador. Facultad de Enfermería. Grupo de Investigación prevención de la violencia de género (E-previo). Quito-Pichincha, Ecuador. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5602-5942
  • Yadira Alejandra Morejón-Terán Universidad Federal de Bahía. Programa de Investigación Social Change, Asthma and Allergy in Latin America - SCAALA, Salvador-Bahia, Brasil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2830-3081
  • María del Mar Pastor Bravo Escuela Universitaria de Enfermería de Cartagena. Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Murcia. http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9831-470X
DOI: https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.482821
Keywords: Violence, intimate partner violence, cross-cultural adaptation, Nursing

Abstract

The study of adolescent dating violence is relevant for Public Health, given its predictive nature and the social impact of this variable on the coexistence of the adult population. Dating violence rating scales need to be validated to ensure the reliability and certainty of their results.
Objective: To analyze the psychometric properties of the modified M-CTS conflict tactics scale in the context of dating violence among Ecuadorian adolescents.
Materials and methods: This is a validation study through confirmatory factor analysis and analysis of linguistic and cultural variables, with probabilistic sampling (n = 1249) with ages between 12-20 years, who met the requirements of having or having had a dating relationship.
Results: 6 questions were culturally modified, and the 4-factor structure of the questionnaire was verified (argumentation, psychological violence, mild physical and severe physical). Low reliability was found for the perpetrator argument (0.26) and victimization (026) items and good reliability for severe physical violence for both profiles (0.80 and 0.76).
Main conclusions:The cultural adaptation of the M-CTS offered adequate validity for the diverse types of violence in the Ecuadorian adolescent population, allowing to compare the prevalence found in other countries that used this instrument based on the same theoretical and methodological perspectives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Krug EG, Weltgesundheitsorganisation, editores. World report on violence and health. Geneva; 2002. 346 p.

Rey-Anacona CA. Maltrato de tipo físico, psicológico, emocional, sexual y económico en el noviazgo: un estudio exploratorio. Acta Colombiana de Psicología. 2009;12(2):27-36. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.co/pdf/acp/v12n2/v12n2a03.pdf

De la Villa Moral M, García A, Cuetos G, et al. Violencia en el noviazgo, dependencia emocional y autoestima en adolescentes y jóvenes españoles. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud. 2017;8(2):41. Disponible en: http://www.rips.cop.es/pii?pii=9

Cala VC, Soriano-Ayala E. Cultural dimensions of immigrant teen dating violence: A qualitative metasynthesis. Aggression and Violent Behavior. 2021; 58:101555. doi: 10.1016/j.avb.2021.101555

López-Cepero JL-C, Rodríguez Franco L, Rodríguez Díaz FJR, Bringas Molleda C. Violencia en el noviazgo: Revisión bibliográfica y bibliométricai. Psicothema. 2007;19(4):693-8. Disponible en: http://www.psicothema.es/pdf/3418.pdf

Muluneh MD, Alemu YW, Meazaw MW. Geographic variation and determinants of help seeking behaviour among married women subjected to intimate partner violence: evidence from national population survey. International Journal for Equity in Health. 2021;20 (1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01355-5

Leuenberger L, Lehman E, McCall-Hosenfeld J. Perceptions of firearms in a cohort of women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) in Central Pennsylvania. BMC Women’s Health. 2021;21(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s12905-020-01134-y

Žukauskienė R, Kaniušonytė G, Bakaitytė A, Truskauskaitė - Kunevičienė I. Prevalence and Patterns of Intimate Partner Violence in a Nationally Representative Sample in Lithuania. J Fam Viol. 2021;36(2):117-30. doi: 10.1007/s10896-019-00126-3

Pastor Bravo, M. del M., Ballesteros Meseguer, C., Seva Llor, A. M., & Pina-Roche, F. (2018). Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas de adolescentes españoles sobre la violencia de pareja. iQual. Revista de Género e Igualdad, (1), 145-158. doi: 10.6018/iQual.301161

Del Moral G, Franco C, Cenizo M, Canestrari C, Suárez-Relinque C, Muzi M, et al. Myth Acceptance Regarding Male-To-Female Intimate Partner Violence amongst Spanish Adolescents and Emerging Adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(21):8145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218145.

Sanabria Vals, M. Diseño y validación de la escala: violencia en parejas adolescentes-victimización y perpetración (VPA-VP) para hispanohablantes. 2020. Universidad de Almería. Disponible en: http://repositorio.ual.es/handle/10835/10189

Ronzón-Tirado RC, Muñoz-Rivas MJ, Zamarrón Cassinello MD, Redondo Rodríguez N. Cultural Adaptation of the Modified Version of the Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) in Mexican Adolescents. Front Psychol. 2019;10. Disponible en: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00619/full

Rubio-Garay F, López-González MA, Saúl LÁ, Sánchez-Elvira-Paniagua Á. Direccionalidad y expresión de la violencia en las relaciones de noviazgo de los jóvenes (Directionality and violence expression in dating relationships of young people. Acción Psicológica. 2012;9(1). Disponible en: http://revistas.uned.es/index.php/accionpsicologica/article/view/437

Cascardi M, Avery-Leaf S, O’Leary KD, Slep AMS. Factor structure and convergent validity of the Conflict Tactics Scale in high school students. Psychological Assessment. 1999;11(4):546-55. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.11.4.546

Rodríguez JA. Violencia en el noviazgo de estudiantes universitarios venezolanos. Archivos de Criminología, Seguridad Privada y Criminalística. 2014;(12):4-20. Disponible en: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4714103

O’Leary KD, Smith-Slep AM, Avery-Leaf S, Cascardi M. Gender differences in dating aggression among multiethnic high school students. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2008;42:473-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.09.012

Muñoz-Rivas MJ, Andreu JM, Graña JL, O’Leary DK. Validación de la versión modificada de la Conflicts Tactics Scale (M-CTS) en población juvenil española. Psicothema. 2007;19(4):693-8. Disponible en: http://www.psicothema.es/pdf/3418.pdf

Nocentini, A., Menesini, E., Pastorelli, C., Connolly, J., Pepler, D., y Craig, W. Physical Dating Aggression in Adolescence. Cultural and gender invariance. European Psychologist. 2011. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000045

Boira S, Chilet-Rosell E, Jaramillo-Quiroz S, Reinoso J. Sexismo, pensamientos distorsionados y violencia en las relaciones de pareja en estudiantes universitarios de Ecuador de áreas relacionadas con el bienestar y la salud. Universitas Psychologica. 2017;16(4):1. Disponible en: http://revistas.javeriana.edu.co/index.php/revPsycho/article/view/14732

Rojas-Solís, J. L., Fuertes-Martin, J. A., and Orgaz-Baz, M. B. Dating

violence in young Mexican couples: a dyadic analysis. Int. J. Soc. Psychol.2017. 32, 566–596. doi: 10.1080/02134748.2017.1352165

Manuel Batista-Foguet J, Coenders G, Alonso J. Análisis factorial confirmatorio. Su utilidad en la validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Medicina Clínica. 2004;122(Supl.1):21-7. Disponible en: http://db.doyma.es/cgi-bin/wdbcgi.exe/doyma/mrevista.fulltext?pident=13057542

MIE. AMIE (Estadísticas educativas a partir de 2009-2010) – Ministerio de Educación [Internet]. 2008 [citado 4 de junio de 2021]. Disponible en: https://educacion.gob.ec/amie/

Straus MA. Measuring intrafamily conflict and aggression: The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS). Journal of Marriage and The Family. 41(1):75-88. doi: 10.2307/351733

Fiorin BH, Oliveira ERA de, Moreira RSL, Luna Filho B, Fiorin BH, Oliveira ERA de, et al. Adaptação transcultural do Myocardial Infarction Dimensional Assessment Scale (MIDAS) para a língua portuguesa brasileira. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva. 2018;23(3):785-93. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_abstract&pid=S1413-81232018000300785&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=pt

Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46(12):1417-32. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n

Kim H, Millsap R. Using the Bollen-Stine Bootstrapping Method for Evaluating Approximate Fit Idices. 2014. Multivariate Behav Res. 49(6):581-96. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280787/

Blunch NJ. Introduction to Structural Equation Modeling using IBM SPSS Statistics and AMOS. 1 Oliver’s Yard, 55 City Road London EC1Y 1SP: SAGE Publications, Ltd; 2013. Disponible en: http://methods.sagepub.com/book/introduction-to-structural-equation-modeling-using-ibm-spss-statistics-and-amos

Hu L, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6(1):1-55. Disponible en: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10705519909540118

Straus MA. Cross-Cultural Reliability and Validity of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales: A Study of University Student Dating Couples in 17 Nations. Cross-Cultural Research. 2004;38(4):407-32. Disponible en: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1069397104269543

Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2a ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988.

Graña JL, Andreu JM, de la Peña ME, Rodríguez MJ. Validez factorial y fiabilidad de la «Escala de tácticas para el conflicto revisada» (Revised Conflict Tactics Scales, CTS2) en población adulta española. Revista internacional de psicología clínica y de la salud. 2013;21(3):525-44.

Gjersing L, Caplehorn JR, Clausen T. Cross-cultural adaptation of research instruments: language, setting, time and statistical considerations. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010, 10:13. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-10-13.

Delgado JB. Violencia en el Noviazgo: Diferencias de Género. Informes Psicológicos. 2016;16(2):27-36. Disponible en: https://revistas.upb.edu.co/index.php/informespsicologicos/article/view/6845

Peña-Cárdenas F, Zamorano-González B, Hernández-Rodríguez G, Hernández-González M de la L, Vargas-Martínez JI, Parra-Sierra V. Violencia en el noviazgo en una muestra de jóvenes mexicanos. Revista Costarricense de Psicología. 2013;32(1):27-40. Disponible en: http://www.rcps-cr.org/openjournal/index.php/RCPs/article/view/17

Medina-Maldonado V, Pastor-Bravo M, Vargas E, Francisco J, Ruiz IJ. Adolescent Dating Violence: Results of a Mixed Study in Quito, Ecuador. J Interpers Violence. 2021; 25. doi:10.1177/08862605211001471

Straus MA. Dominance and symmetry in partner violence by male and female university students in 32 nations. Children and Youth Services Review. 20;30(3):252-75. Disponible en: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0190740907001855

Published
01-04-2022
How to Cite
[1]
Francisco-Pérez, J.I. et al. 2022. Psychometric properties of the modified conflict tactics scale. Application in the Ecuadorian adolescent context . Global Nursing. 21, 2 (Apr. 2022), 302–329. DOI:https://doi.org/10.6018/eglobal.482821.
Issue
Section
ORIGINAL RESEARCH