Facial validation of Nursing Activities Score in three intensive care units in Bogota, Colombia
Supporting Agencies
- Fundacion Universitaria de Ciencias de La salud
- Hospital San Jose
- Hospital Infantil Universitario San Jose
- Clinica La Colina
Abstract
Introduction: The measurement of workloads in nursing is essential to objectify the nurse-patient relationship. It is assumed that the greater complexity of patients, the greater the time commitment of a nurse providing direct care.Method: Cross-cultural adaptation of the scale Nursing Activities Score (NAS) to Spanish, includes 23 items that measure clinical and administrative tasks of nurses in ICU use. The instrument to an expert opinion be submitted using the Delphi method two rounds to corroborate the content validity of the instrument. The ratio of content validity (RVC) and content validity index (CVI) to establish the usefulness of each item will apply. The ratio of content validity (RVC) and content validity index (CVI) to establish the usefulness of each item will apply. Subsequently, the device should be applied to a sample of nursing professionals three polyvalent intensive care units, applying the same statistical test.
Results: significant RVC data were obtained for most items, in the round of experts and professionals sampling. Although there are some items that did not obtain the minimum score to be considered valid, the global index IVC in the sample of experts and professionals is considered satisfactory, so the scale is considered to be valid with amendments
Downloads
References
Dennis R, Metcalfe A, Pérez A, Londoño D, Gómez C, McPherson K, Rowan K. Cuidado Intensivo en Colombia Recurso humano y tecnológico. Acta Médica Colombiana 2000; 25(5): 211-217.
Fernández Chaves, N. Félix Azcúnaga, M. Rocha, F. Pastrana, M. «Valorización del rol profesional de enfermería en terapia intensiva. Revista Uruguaya de Enfermería, noviembre de 2007, 2 (2): 5-13
Aiken, L . Implications of the California Nurse Staffing Mandate for Other States. HSR: Health Serv Res. 2010; 45(4). p 904- 921.
Cullen DJ, Civetta JM, Briggs BA, Ferrara LC. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: A method for quantitative comparison of patient care. Crit Care Med 1974;2:57- 60
Miranda, D. Reis MD. De Rijk, A. Schaufeli, W. Nursing activities score. Critical Care Medicine: 2003; 31(2): 374-382
Needleman, Jack; Buerhaus, Peter; Mattke, Soeren; Stewart, Maureen; Zelevinsky, Katya. Nurse-Staffing Levels and the Quality of Care in Hospitals. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2002; 346 (22) p 1715-1722.
Subirana-Casacuberta M, Solà-Arnau I. Instrumentos basados en medidas directas para UCI: TISS y NEMS. Metas de Enferm 2007; 10(1):15-20.
Donabedian A. The definition of quality and aproaches to its assessment. Explorations in quality assessment and monitoring. Health Serv Res. 1981 Summer; 16(2): 236–237
Tallier P. How Many Nurses are Enough? A Pilot Study Measuring Nursing Care Hours per Patient Day and Patient Outcomes. Aquichan Año 7 Vol 7 No 1.2007; págs. 37-53
Kane RL, Shamliyan T, Mueller C, Duval S, Wilt T. Nurse Staffing and Quality of Patient Care. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 15. Minnesota: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. 2007
Barroso A, Fuente AI, Loper JJ, Millán FJ, Rosado N, Simón M.a J, et al. Análisis del uso de los recursos humanos enfermeros en una unidad de cuidados intensivos polivalente. Situación con el resto de UCIs europeas. Enferm Intensiva. 2001;12:127-34.
Keene AR, Cullen DJ. Therapeutic intervention scoring system: Update 1983. Crit Care Med 1983;11:1-3.
Miranda DR, de Rijk A, Shaufeli W. Simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system: The TISS-28 items. Crit Care Med 1996;24:64-73.
Bernat Adell A, et al. Nursing Activity Score (NAS). Nuestra experiencia con un sistema de cómputo de cargas de enfermería basado en tiempos. Enferm Intensiva 2005;16(4):164-73
Arias-Rivera S, et al. Adaptación transcultural al castellano del Nursing Activities Score. Enferm Intensiva. 2013; 24(1) :12-22
Burns N, Grove SK. Investigación en Enfermería. 3 ed. España: Elsevier; 2004.
Herrans LL. Psicología y medición: el desarrollo de las pruebas psicológicas en Puerto Rico. 2 ed. México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana; 2000.
Escobar J, Cuervo A. Validez de contenido y juicio de expertos: una aproximación a su utilización. Avances en medición. 2008;6:27-36.
Pedroza, I. Suarez Alvarez, J. Garcia Cueto, E. Evidencias sobre la validez de contenido: avances Teóricos y métodos para su estimación. Acción psicológica. Junio 2014; 10(2): 3-20
Tristán-López, A. Modificación al modelo de Lawshe para el dictamen cuantitativo de la validez de contenido de un instrumento objetivo. Avances en Medición., 2008; 6: 37–48
Gonçalves LA, Padilha KG, Cardoso Sousa RM. Nursing Activities Score (NAS): A proposal for practical application in intensive care units. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2007;23: 355---61.
Carmona MFJ, Uria UI, García GS, Quirós HC, Bergaretxe BM, Etxabe UG, et al. Análisis de la utilización de la escala Nursing Activities Score en dos UCIs españolas. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2013;47:1108---16
Brito AP, Guirardello EB. Carga de trabajo de la enfermería en una unidad de hospitalización. Rev. Latino-Am. Enfermagem Sep.-oct. 2011;19(5)
Congreso de Colombia. LEY 911 DE 2004 “ Por la cual se dictan disposiciones en materia de responsabilidad deontológica para el ejercicio de la profesión de Enfermería en Colombia; se establece el régimen disciplinario correspondiente y se dictan otras disposiciones” Diario Oficial No. 45.693 de 6 de octubre de 2004.
Lopera de Peña A. Presidenta TNEE. Conmemoración de los 10 años de la Ley 911 de 2004. Tribunal Nacional Ético de Enfermería. VIII Encuentro Nacional de Tribunales de Ética de Enfermería. 2014.
Miranda DR, de Rijk A, Shaufeli W. Simplified therapeutic intervention scoring system: The TISS-28 items. Crit Care Med 1996;24:64-73.
Carvajal, A. Centeno, C. Watson, R. Martinez, M. Sanzx, A. Como validar un instrumento de medida de la slaud? An. Sist. Sanit. Navar. 2011; 34 (1): 63-72
The works published in this magazine are subject to the following terms:
1. The Publications Service of the University of Murcia (the publisher) preserves the copyright of the published works, and encourages and allows the reuse of the works under the license for use stated in point 2.
© Servicio de Publicaciones, Universidad de Murcia, 2011 (© Publications Service, University of Murcia, 2011)
2. The works are published in the electronic edition of the journal under Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObraDerivada 3.0 España(texto legal) “ a Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 Spain license (legal text)”. They can be copied, used, broadcasted, transmitted and publicly displayed, provided that: i) the authorship and original source of their publication (journal, publisher and URL) are cited; (ii) are not used for commercial purposes; iii) the existence and specifications of this license is mentioned.
3. Conditions of self-archiving. Authors are allowed and encouraged to electronically disseminate the pre-print (pre-reviewed ) and / or post-print (reviewed and accepted for publication) versions of their works prior to publication, as it ensures a wider circulation and dissemination which may lead to a possible increase in its mention and a higher scope among the academic community. RoMEO color: green.
