Characterization of physical and chemical composition, and economic evaluation of commercial petfood for small breed adult dogs

Authors

  • Paula Ivars Jansen Universidad de Murcia
  • Fuensanta Hernández Ruipérez Universidad de Murcia
  • Juan Orengo Femenía Universidad de Murcia
  • Silvia Martínez Miró Universidad de Murcia
Keywords: feed, price, dogs, composition

Abstract

Nowadays, the petfood industry is having a great breakthrough due to the facility of feeding our pets and obtaining a correct nutrient composition for the daily diet, with its corresponding increase in demand. For this study, four brands and two batch per brand of dry feed for small breed (< 10 kg BW) adult dogs where used. They belong to three different categories: one Super premium, one Premium and two White brands (1 and 2). The physical parameters measured were the length, thickness, hardness, durability and density, and the chemical parameters were the moisture, ash, crude protein, crude fiber, crude fat, calcium, phosphorus and 16 amino acids. As well as, the metabolizable energy (ME) was calculated with prediction equations and the intake and cost of daily ration were estimated for each feed. The results of the physical parameters showed that the kibbles of feeds had a length < 14 mm and a low density (≤ 0.50 g/cm3). The durability was very high and without significant differences between feeds (P > 0.05). The comparison of the nutritional composition declared on the dog feed label and the chemical analysis done in this study showed that generally the feeds were in the admitted tolerance limits from the legislation, excluding ash and phosphorus contents in White brand 1. The nutrient composition in dry matter showed that the White brand 1 had the lowest percentage of crude protein, methionine and lysine and had significantly the highest level of ash, calcium and phosphorus compared with the other feeds (P < 0.05). In addition, this brand had the lowest concentration in metabolizable energy (P < 0.01). Finally, all the dog foods covered the minimum requirements for the nutrients per 1000 kcal ME. On the estimated daily ration cost, is found that between the most expensive feed (Super premium) and the cheapest (White brands) exists a difference of 66.91%. In conclusion, with these results we can consider that the price of the feed does not determine the quality of itself in relation with the nutrients evaluated, but it would be necessary to consider other trial supplements.
Key words: feed, price, dogs, composition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AAFCO. 2014. AAFCO methods for substantiating nutritional adequacy of dog and cat foods. Association of American Feed Control Officials. Champain.

ANTELO A.B. 2015. Petfood: Las marquistas aprovechan la subida en valor. Alimarket 291: 122-133.

AOAC. 2006. Official Methods of Analysis, 18th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington.

BACIERO G. 2012. La alimentación después de la esterilización. Recuperado el 1 julio 2015, desde http://axonveterinaria.net/web_axoncomunicacion/auxiliarveterinario/40/ AV_40_Alimentacion_esterilizacion.pdf

CASTRILLO C., HERVERA M., BAUCELLS, M.D. 2009. Methods for predicting the energy value of pet foods. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 38: 1-14.

COHEN S.A., DE ANTONIS K.M. 1994. Applications of amino acid derivatization with 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate: Analysis of feed grains, intravenous solutions and glycoproteins. Journal of Chromatography A 661: 25 - 34.

FEDIAF. 2014. Nutritional guidelines for complete and complementary pet food for cats and dogs. The European Pet Food Industry Federation. Bruxelles.

FEDNA. 2010. Tablas FEDNA de composición y valor nutritivo de alimentos para la fabricación de piensos compuestos. Fundación español para el desarrollo de la nutrición animal. Madrid.

GOOGLE PATENTS. 2015. Patentes registradas de Royal Canin y Hill’s Pet Nutrition. United States Patent [Resultados de búsqueda]. Recuperado el 22 de julio de 2015, desde https://goo.gl/fm8oXc

LANKHORST C., TRAN Q.D., HAVENAAR R., HENDRIKS W.H., VAN DER POEL A.F.B. 2007. The effect of extrusion on the nutritional value of canine diets as assessed by in vitro indicators. Animal Feed Science and Technology 138(3): 285-297.

LE CHEVILLER J.P., RICOUR P., SERGHERAERT R. 2006. Patente ES 2 258 087 T3. Alimento ralentizador de la velocidad de ingestión de los perros. Oficina Española de Patentes y Marcas. Madrid.

LIU H.J., CHANG B.Y., YAN H.W., YU F.H., LU X.X. 1995. Determination of amino acids in food and feed by derivatization with 6-aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidyl carbamate and reversed-phase liquid chromatographic separations. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 78: 736-744.

MAPA. 1998. Métodos oficiales de análisis en la Unión Europea. Diario Oficial de las ComunidadesEuropeas. Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación. Madrid.

NRC. 2006. Nutrient requirements of Dogs and Cats. National Research Council. National Academy Press. Washington DC.

REGLAMENTO (CE) 767/2009. 2009. Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo de 13 de julio de 2009 sobre la comercialización y la utilización de los piensos. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L229: 1-28.

REGLAMENTO (CE) 882/2004. 2004. Reglamento del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 29 de abril de 2004 sobre los controles oficiales efectuados para garantizar la verificación del cumplimiento de la legislación en materia de piensos y alimentos y la normativa sobre salud animal y bienestar de los animales. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L165: 1-141.

REGLAMENTO (UE) 939/2010. 2010. Reglamento de la Comisión de 20 de octubre de 2010 por el que se modifica el anexo IV del Reglamento (CE) 767/2009 sobre las tolerancias admitidas relativas a las indicaciones del etiquetado sobre la composición de las materias primas para piensos o los piensos compuestos contemplados en el artículo 11, apartado 5. Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea L227: 4-7.

THOMAS M., VAN DER POEL A.F.B. 1996. Physical quality of pelleted animal feeds. 1. Criteria for pellet quality. Animal Feed Science and Technology 61: 89-112.

TRAN Q.D., HENDRIKS W.H., VAN DER POEL A.F.B. 2008. Effects of extrusion processing on nutrients in dry pet food. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 88(9): 1487-1493.

VAN ROOIJEN C., BOSCH G., VAN DER POEL A.F.B., WIERENGA P.A. 2014. Reactive lysine content in commercially available pet foods. Journal of Nutritional Science 3: 1-6.

Published
20-03-2019
How to Cite
Ivars Jansen, P., Hernández Ruipérez, F., Orengo Femenía, J., & Martínez Miró, S. (2019). Characterization of physical and chemical composition, and economic evaluation of commercial petfood for small breed adult dogs. Anales de Veterinaria de Murcia, 32, 19–30. Retrieved from https://revistas.um.es/analesvet/article/view/369141
Issue
Section
Artículos originales